[1. To hear an application for a Final Plat for Skybrook Section 1 (Suburban Residential District) located along State Route 4 - U.S. Route 36 & Philip Herre Road.]

ALRIGHT SO THAT MOVES US TO NEW BUSINESS. THE FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS TO HEAR AN APPLICATION FOR A FINAL PLANT OF SKY BROOKE SECTION ONE SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOCATED ALONG STATE, RALPH FOUR U. S ROUTE, 36 AND PHILIP HERE ROAD. IS THERE AN APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE HERE THIS EVENING? IF YOU COULD GO TO THE PODIUM, STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, AND, UH GIVE US AN UPDATE ON WHAT YOU'RE PRESENTING. JOHN BUCHANAN WAS CSO INCORPORATED 2800 CORPORATE EXCHANGE DRIVE SUITE 400, COLUMBUS 43231. WE ARE THE APPLICANT FOR THE FINAL PLAN, AS WELL AS THE ENGINEER FOR THE DEVELOPER FOR THIS PROJECT. UM WE APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE THIS HERD TONIGHT FOR APPROVAL. UM LOOK FORWARD TO ANOTHER SUCCESSFUL DEVELOPMENT HERE. ASKING FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL OF SECTION ONE OF SKY BROOKE, WHICH HAS 82 LOTS TOTAL , UM WITH THAT WITH THAT CONSTRUCTION OF THE STREETS, PUBLIC UTILITIES WILL BE ONE STORMWATER POND THAT'S ADJACENT TO STATE ROUTE FOUR AT THE SOUTHERN PIECE OF THIS PROJECT AND AGAIN, JUST JUST SEEKING APPROVAL OF THE FINAL. PLATT GOT THE STAFF REPORT. UM YOU KNOW, ADDRESS SOME OF THE COMMENTS THAT WERE ON THIS FINAL PLAN AND PROVIDED SOME CLARIFICATION BACK TO STAFF YESTERDAY. OKAY AND SETH OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW IT. AND IS THERE ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS WILL WORK WITH THE ENGINEER TO MAKE SURE THAT THEIR COMMENTS WERE ADDRESSED? THEY HAVEN'T REVIEWED IT YET, OKAY? BUT AS OUR FOR OUR COMMENTS, UM THEY ADDRESSED THOSE CLARIFICATIONS IS UP TO YOU GUYS TO MAKE SURE THOSE CLARIFICATIONS MAKES SENSE. AND THEY DO STILL MEET THE CODE. SO OKAY, LET ME UH, JUST RECEIVED CLARIFICATIONS THIS EVENING. I READ THROUGH THEM VERY QUICKLY, BUT, UM, SO IF THERE'S ANYTHING YOU WANT TO POINT OUT, I GUESS I'D BE OPEN TO IT. BUT UM SO I WILL WELCOME US UP TO THE BOARD. ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS. I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS. SO, UM IT WAS. I DON'T KNOW WHEN IT WAS LAST SUMMER. I THINK IT WAS THAT WE HAD REVIEWED THE PRELIMINARY PLAN. AND AT THAT POINT IN TIME IT WAS I WANT TO SAY IT WAS A 4 TO 3 OR A 4 TO 2 VOTE. I WAS ONE OF THE ONES THAT VOTED AGAINST THAT PLAN BASED ON LACK OF WALK ABILITY AND THE EXCESSIVE COLLEGE SEX. THE VOTE TONIGHT IS IT IS THE SCOPE OF THAT VOTE. ALSO THE OVERALL PLAN OR IS IT STRICTLY THE DEVIATION FROM THAT PLAN TO THIS PLAN? IT WOULD JUST BE. WE'RE LOOKING AT THIS ONE SECTION SECTION ONE AND HOW IT COMPARES TO THE PRELIMINARY PLAN THAT WAS APPROVED. OKAY SO IT'S JUST THE DEVIATION FROM WHAT? WE HAD ALREADY VOTED ON IT INTO THIS ONE. IF IT'S THAT CASE, I FEEL DIFFERENTLY THAN IF I'M STILL CONSIDERING THIS FROM AN OVERALL , UM LIKE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SCOPE. I STILL THINK

[00:05:05]

IT'S INCONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FROM WATERVILLE. WELCOME BILITY VIEWPOINTS. SO THAT'S THE ONLY QUESTION I HAD. THANKS. MHM TAYLOR COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD.

FOR THOSE OF US WHO WERE NOT HERE LAST YEAR. DO WE HAVE THE ORIGINAL PLAN AVAILABLE TO REVIEW QUICKLY? I'LL SEE IF I CAN PULL THAT UP HERE. WE SHOULD HAVE THE PLANETARY PLATT.

AND WHILE YOU'RE DOING I DO HAVE A QUESTION. UH IN THIS DOCUMENT HERE AND YOUR RESPONSE YOU MENTIONED DIVERSITY OF PRODUCT A FEW TIMES IS THAT JUST THE MODEL UNITS? THAT'S NO RIGHT. RIGHT RIGHT THE LOT SIZE ADJUSTMENTS ON THE STAFF HAD INDICATED IN THEIR IN THEIR RESPONSE OR IN THEIR COMMENTS BACK TO US. SOME OF THOSE LOTS WERE ADJUSTED SO THAT THE BUILDER HAS MORE VARIETY OF MODELS THAT THEY CAN OFFER TO THE END USER. AS WELL AS SOME WITH A THIRD OPTION, RIGHT THIRD CAR GARAGE, SO MADE SOME OF THOSE LOTS A LITTLE BIT BIGGER. UM, BUT THE OVERALL LOT VARIABILITY AS YOU SEE IN THE RESPONSES. IT'S STILL FALLS WITHIN THE A CERTAIN PERCENTAGE REQUIRED BY SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. UM IT IS TOO LOTS. I THINK LESS THAN WHAT THE PRELIMINARY PLATT WAS FOR THE LARGER LOTS FOR THAT, BUT IT'S STILL FALLS WITHIN WHAT DOES ONLY COVER A LOT.

DO YOU BY CHANCE? HAVE YOUR RESPONSE THAT YOU SENT YOU DO YOU MIND JUST TO GO AND OVER HIGH LEVEL THEN SINCE YEAH. YEAH. SO AS FAR AS CITY ENGINEERING COMMENTS, UM THERE WERE MINIMAL COMMENTS ON THE ACTUAL PLATT. SOME OF IT WAS LABELING RIGHT AWAY. WHAT? SOME OF THE DEDICATIONS WERE SO WE UPDATED THAT SEND IT BACK TO STAFF YESTERDAY AND THEN ALSO AT THE COMMENTS AGAIN FOR THE LOT SIZES AND SOME OF THE LOT LINE SHIFTS. IT WAS FOR THE BUILDER TO HAVE THE ABILITY TO OFFER SOME DIFFERENT MODELS. SO INSTEAD OF ON A SINGLE LOT BEING THREE MODELS, MAYBE THEY'RE ABLE TO OFFER FIVE BY SHIPS AND SOME OF THOSE LOT LINES AROUND AS WELL AS THE OPTION FOR A THIRD CAR GARAGE. AND THEN, ADDITIONALLY, THROUGH FINAL ENGINEERING. UM SOME OF THE RIGHT AWAY WITH WERE INCREASED FROM THE PRELIMINARY. PLATT UM, BASED ON ENGINEERING COMMENTS. TO PROVIDE ALL OF IT MORE AESTHETICALLY PLEASING ROADWAYS THROUGH THERE FOR THE NORTH SOUTH STREETS SO THAT CUT INTO SOME OF THE LOTS AS WELL. AND SO THOSE HAD TO BE SHIFTED AROUND ACCORDINGLY, WITH THE RIGHT AWAY. UM THE. AS FAR AS A LOT VARIABILITY. UM WE'RE AT 40.6% OF LARGER LOTS OF THE OVERALL OF THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT. NOT SPECIFIC JUST TO THIS SECTION, UM, WITH THIS SECTION'S UPDATES IN THE REMAINING OF THE OVERALL . UM WE DROPPED BY TWO LOTS DOWN TO 39.9% ON THE SRD ALLOWS FOR 30% FOR THE LOT VARIABILITY THERE. UM AND THEN THE. THE LOT NUMBERS. THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IN THE LOT NUMBERS. UM AS WE WERE GOING THROUGH FINAL ENGINEERING AND FINAL, PLATT, UM, YOU CAN ACTUALLY SEE BACK ON ON THE ONE YOU HAD UP THEIR FIRST, JEFF, BUT WE MISSED LOT 88. RIGHT UP. RIGHT HERE. SO WHEN ALL THE LOT WE UPDATED NUMBERS SO THAT WE ARE CONSECUTIVE ONE THROUGH 320 , SO ALL OF THE LOTS ABOVE 88 DROPPED OR ABOVE 87. MY APOLOGY DROPPED ONE LOT NUMBER, SO THAT'S THAT'S WHY THERE WAS A DISCREPANCY IN THE LOT NUMBERS BETWEEN PLATINUM FINAL PLOT. NO JEFF, I BELIEVE HE IS CORRECT AND THAT AS FAR AS THE LOT FOR ABILITY, UM WE DON'T JUDGE IT BY PHASE. CORRECT IT IS OVERALL. SO THEY ARE OKAY, JUST ASKING. DOES THIS FACE HAVE ANY OF THE LARGER LOSS OR ARE THEY ALL TOWARDS THE BACK? IT DOES, UM, ON THE PRELIMINARY PLATT. I THINK IT'S PAGE EIGHT. MAYBE. SO SOME OF THE LOTS. I THINK IT'S ON THE NEXT PAGE, JEFF THANKS. SO SOME OF THE LOTS ALONG THE MAIN

[00:10:12]

BOULEVARD AS YOU'RE COMING OFF STATE ROUTE FOUR. BRING LOTS OF A LOT. MOST OF THE LOTS IN THE FIRST QUARTER SACK TO THE WEST OF THE LARGER LOTS. AND THEN ASTRAL UNLESS TO 77 TO 85, OR SOME OF THE LOST OR THE LARGER LOTS, AND SOME OF THOSE WE SWITCHED AROUND TO ALLOW FOR THE THIRD PARTNER OCCUPATION, SO SECTION ONE ACTUALLY HAS A MUCH HIGHER PERCENTAGE. CORRECT, OKAY? NOT THAT WE COULD JUDGE YOU ON THAT EITHER WAY, BUT JUST FOR REFERENCE. ALRIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? DO YOU MEAN TO LOOK THIS WAY? ALSO APOLOGIZE. NO, I'M JUST HANGING OUT OVER HERE ALONE. I'M NOT HEARING ANY BECAUSE I MEAN, WE DON'T HAVE ANY BECAUSE YOU'RE STILL LOOKING TO BRUSH, OKAY? OKAY WELL, AT THIS TIME, WE WILL OPEN UP TO SUSAN COMMENTS. UM IF THERE ARE ANY CITIZENS HERE WISHING TO COMMENT ON THIS ITEM. HAPPY YOUNG FOR 25 WEST EIGHT.

I'M NOT SURE WHAT FAITH ONE IS. CAN SOMEBODY TELL ME? SURE. IT'S THOSE FIRST TWO CALLS SEX LOWER LEFT. AND THEN SOME OF THE HOUSES THAT ARE ON THAT NORTH SOUTH STREET. WHAT SPOT. OKAY.

CAN YOU TAKE ME BACK TO THE OTHER ONE? NOW I KNOW THIS ISN'T PHASE ONE. BUT SCROLL DOWN. NO THE OTHER WAY DOWN. I AGREE WITH THAT DOWN MEANS DOWN THE PAGE TO SEE THE TOP OF THE PAGE AMERICA, OKAY? SO THERE'S OPEN SPACE BETWEEN 1 31 31 AND I REALIZED IT'S NOT PHASE ONE. I THINK IT NEEDS TO BE BIG ENOUGH SO YOU CAN GET OUT ON THAT ROAD. WE'VE WOULD OUT WAS A LONG DISCUSSION DURING THE PRELIMINARY PLOT. UM IT WAS JUST A MATTER OF THE, UH, PHILIP HAIR ROAD IS IT'S A TOWNSHIP ROAD THAT I KNOW IT'S NOT NOT YET. IT'S NOT WIDE ENOUGH, BUT I THINK WE NEED TO RESERVE ENOUGH SPACE FOR THAT ROAD TO GO OUT THERE. I MEAN, I HATE TOGETHER, BUT I THINK WE NEED TO LEAVE ACCESS. SO WE CAN EXPAND. I BELIEVE THAT WAS PROBABLY THE BIGGER STICKING POINT ON THE PEOPLE THAT VOTED NO. UM ON THE PRELIMINARY PLOT, IF I'M RECALLING CORRECTLY COMPLAIN ABOUT IT BACK THEN TO YEAH, YEAH. YEAH AND I JUST WANT TO MAKE MY VOICE HEARD THAT I THINK THAT IS STUPID. THE WAY IT'S DONE. YES I UNDERSTAND. UM, WE WENT BACK AND FORTH AND YEAH , BECAUSE IT SOUNDS TO PROVE THAT THAT WE COULD NOT DO ANYTHING WITH WE DIDN'T WANT TO DUMP A LOT OF TRAFFIC ON IT. AND WE HAVE A HOMEOWNER WHICH I'LL BE BACK HERE. NOTHING ARE YOU THE HOMEOWNER FROM PHILIPPA HERE ? OH, OKAY. UM BECAUSE IT ALSO CONCERN WAS IF WE DID LEAVE THAT THERE THAT THE HOUSE WOULD HAVE HEADLIGHTS. FLASHING ON IT EVERY TIME A CAR TURNED OUT OF THERE, YOU KNOW, SO THERE WAS A SORT OF ACCESS ONTO THAT ROAD. I'M JUST SAYING WE'RE AT PHASE ONE NOW JUST SAT THROUGH A CITY MEETING THAT TALKED ABOUT HOW WE DIDN'T PLAN ACCORDINGLY. JUST LAST NIGHT AT WORK CENTER. AND HOW IT'S COSTING THE CITY MORE MONEY. LATER ON, SO WHY DON'T WE THINK AHEAD? SO JUST SAYING I DON'T DISAGREE. I'M SORRY. UNFORTUNATELY WE DON'T HAVE. WE DON'T HAVE ACCESS TO DUMP THE TRAFFIC ON THAT ROAD BECAUSE IT'S ATTENTION RULES. BUT CURRENTLY IT'S A TOWNSHIP BUT WE CAN'T DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT, THEN ENOUGH SPACE FOR STRENGTH. IN THE FUTURE. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY OTHER CITIZENS WISHING TO SPEAK? UH, SEEN NONE. DO WE HAVE A MOTION? I REALLY DON'T WANT DON'T WANT TO MAKE A MOTION, BUT, UH YOU KNOW, JUST BASED ON THE EARLIER COMMENTS, I'D SAID I WAS I HAD A THIS AGREEMENT, THE OVERALL PLAN BUT THE DEVIATIONS FROM THE PREVIOUS PLAN OF THIS PLAN ONLY CONCERN WITH BUT I WOULD PREFER SOMEONE ELSE WOULD MAKE A MOTION. MOTION TO PROOF. THANK YOU. CAN WE GET A ROLL CALL,

[00:15:05]

PLEASE? MR HUNTER. YES, MR ENGEL. YES. MR FISHER? YES MR NIXON PURPOSE? YES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALRIGHT THE SECOND ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS TO HEAR A CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION FOR

[2. To hear a Conditional Use Application for a neighborhood market located at 332 W 5th St. (Parcel Number: 2900070590000).]

A NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET LOCATED 332 WEST FIFTH STREET, PERSONAL NUMBER 29000705. WE HAVE AN AFRICAN REPRESENTATIVE HERE JUST DISCUSS THIS PROJECT STATE YOUR NAME JUST JUST REAL QUICK. I JUST WANT TO LET THE BOARD KNOW WITH THE NEW MEMBERS. WE DID APPROVE, ADDING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR A NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET INTO THIS ZONING DISTRICT IN MARCH, WITH THE 70 VOTE APPROVED THAT TYPE OF USE AS A CONDITIONAL USE, AND THEN I WENT THROUGH COUNCIL AND COUNCIL APPROVED IT AS WELL. SO IT IS. ACTIVE AND THAT'S WHY THIS APPLICANT IS HERE NOW. HE HAD CONTACTED US PREVIOUSLY, BUT AT THAT TIME IT WAS STILL GOING THROUGH A COUNCIL SO WE HAD TO WAIT UNTIL THE 30 DAYS AFTER THE COUNCIL WAS APPROVED, SO WELL, THANK YOU. OKAY GOOD EVENING.

ONE. MY NAME'S ANGELA ALVAREZ. MY ADDRESS IS 9 46 CAMERA CROSSING BOULEVARD APARTMENT 101 MARYSVILLE, OHIO. 43040 SEIKO. I'M HERE ON BEHALF OF MY FRIEND GARCIA'S SO BASICALLY HIS IDEA IS TO OPEN A LATIN MARKET. WITH THE INTENTION TO BRING, UH LATIN PRODUCTS AND SERVICES TO THE LATIN POPULATION TO THE CITY, WHICH HAS BEEN INCREASING IN THE PAST FEW YEARS. I ALSO WANT TO MENTION THAT HE OWNS A FOOD TRUCK. SO I BELIEVE YOU ALREADY APPROVED SOME UM, LICENSES OR NEW BUSINESS. UM FOR THAT, SO. ALL RIGHT, UM THANK YOU, UM ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD? SO? SO THIS IS, UH YEAH. TWO TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE. UM THERE WAS A MEMBER OF MARKER GOOD THERE. THERE WERE SOME SLIDES IN THE PACKET. I'M JUST WONDERING IF WE COULD GO THROUGH THOSE SLIDES JUST FOR THE SAKE OF WHERE THE PUBLIC MEETING GOING THROUGH THOSE SO BASICALLY, THE CONCEPT OF LATIN MARKET COMES TO THE CDF. MANY WILL MUNICIPAL TO OFFER, UM, ITS INHABITANTS, A BATTERY OF ROADS AND SERVICES THERE ARE NOT AVAILABLE IN OTHER MARKETS OR STORES IN THE CITY. AH THIS IS TO THE FACT THAT THE LATINO POPULATION IN THIS AREA WAS VERY LOW FEW YEARS AGO, AIN'T NO OF THESE TWO JOB OPPORTUNITIES IN THE AREA HAVE ALLOWED THESE COMMUNITIES TO GROW. UM AND THIS HAS DEMANDED US TO OFFER THE SERVICE. UM, MY FRAME CURRENTLY HAVE AN ACTIVE OPERATION OF THE CAPTAIN. THE CHARACTERS LATIN FOOD LLC SINCE 2020, A FOOD TRUCK THAT OFFERS LATIN FOOD FROM FRIDAY TO SUNDAY FROM 4:30 P.M. TO 9 30 PM LOCATED, UH 1003 DELAWARE AVENUE, MURRYSVILLE, OHIO FOR 3040. WHICH HAS BEEN VERY WELL RECEIVED BY LOCALS AND HISPANIC LIVING IN THE AREA. SO THEY HIGH INFLUENCE OF CUSTOMERS HAS LED US TO CONSIDER AND THAT AN EXPANSION OF THIS BUSINESS TO CONVENIENCE STORE WILL BRING A GOOD BOOM FOR IT. SINCE THERE IS ALREADY A PRODUCT SERVE A MANY PEOPLE WHO ARE FREQUENT. THE PLACE HAS CONSIDERED BUYING THE PRODUCTS WITH WHICH THESE FOOD IS PREPARED. SO THE MISSION TO SATISFY THE LATINO COMMODITY NEEDS OF THE HISPANIC POPULATION FOUND AND AROUND THE STUDIO OF MARYSVILLE. AS WELL AS TO OFFER THE LOCALS AND YOU'D CONCEPT THAT ALLOWS THE INTRODUCTION OF VARIOUS LATINO PRODUCTS. OUR VISION. TO BE THE PIONEER CONVENIENCE STORE OF LATINO PROS IN THE IN THE AREA. PLANNING SUPPLYING THE POPULATION WITH ARTICLES OF DAILY CONSUMPTION, OFFERING THE OPPORTUNITY TO ACCESS THEM EASILY. EXPANDING THE RADIOS OF RELATION WITH SERVICES THAT ALLOWED TO GENERATE ATTENTION FROM THE COMMUNITY. ESTABLISHING ALLIANCE WITH DISTRIBUTION COMPANIES.

THAT TO INCREASE THE VOLUME OF SALES THAT DOES OFFER AN EXCELLENT ATTENTION WITH A BODY OF BROAD TRANS SERVICES. SO FOR THE OPPORTUNITIES, UH EXCELLENT LOCATION, EASY ACCESS FOR AREA RESIDENTS EASY ACCESS FOR THOSE LIVING AROUND. FREEWAY ACCESS CONVENIENCE STORE WITH SIMILAR

[00:20:02]

COUNCILS WITHIN 25 MILES DISTANCE. NO POTENTIALLY COMPETITIVE STORE NEARBY AND PROXIMITY TO THE AREA RATIONS HOMES. MARKETING STRATEGY. UH IT'S A DIFFICULT WORD TO ME NECESSARY. THIS IN MINI THROUGH ADVERTISING MEDIA, SUCH AS INTERNET SOCIAL NETWORKS, MAGAZINES, MAIL. OR THE OPERATIONAL STRATEGY HAVE TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT AND MACHINERY. SO THAT PERISHABLE PRODUCTS ARE DURABLE AND WHEN AFFECTED AH! CONFIDENT ALLIANCE FOR EFFECTIVE AND BARRIER DISTRIBUTION PRODUCTS ORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGY. GOD SURE QUALIFIED, TRAINED PERSONAL SO THAT THEY CAN HAVE PERFORMED THEIR WORK. I'M BEING CHARGED OF GIVING ADDED VALUE TO THE SERVICE PROVIDED. AND THE LAST ONE ECONOMY. FINANCIAL STRATEGY ATTRACT NEW CLIENTS WHO WILL BE A SPREAD THE QUALITY OF THE SERVICE RECEIVED. AS WELL AS ESTABLISHED PROMOTIONS THAT ALLOW ACCESS TO PRODUCTS WITH MODERATE VALUE AND IN THE SAME WAY ACQUIRE OTHERS PROMOTING THE USE. AND CONCERN SHIN OF THE PRODUCT OFFER. THANK YOU. MM HMM . ALRIGHT OPENING UP TO THE BOARD. I GUESS I'LL JUST GO AND START. UM SOMETHING THINKING OF A SIMILAR STORE. THAT'S IN HILLIARD. DO YOU KNOW WILL THEY BE OFFERING? UM UH FOOD AS WELL . I MEAN, LIKE THE RESTAURANT, BUT LIKE TAKEOUTS, OR OR IS IT ALL JUST TRADITIONAL GROCERY STORE GROCERIES? OKAY MAYONNAISE. BUTTER. UM FLOWER. BOIL THINGS I HAVE. OKAY LATINO SIDE TRUE. I WAS GONNA ASK A VERY SIMILAR QUESTION. I THINK I KNOW THE ANSWERS TO THESE, BUT OBVIOUSLY THE CACTUS FOOD TRUCK IS A DIFFERENT LLC THAN THE CACTUS MARKET. THEY'RE THERE TO INDIVIDUAL COMPANIES, RIGHT? AND I ASK YOU THERE, I GUESS TO FOLLOW UP TO THAT. IT WAS JUST I WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE NOT ALSO GOING TO BE SELLING THE FOOD TRUCK FOOD OUT OF THIS LOCATION BECAUSE JUST COMMUNITY MARKET AND RESTAURANT ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS, OKAY? OKAY? I KIND OF HOPE THAT THEY DID, BUT I UNDERSTAND 11 IS A CONDITION IN ONE NIGHT. ACTUALLY, TECHNICALLY BOTH TRADITIONAL USES, BUT I WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE THE APPLICATION.

CORRECT YES, MR QUESTION. YOU SAID PRODUCTS AND SERVICES OR IS IT PRODUCTS? WHAT ARE THE SERVICES SO THE SERVICES TO MY UNDERSTANDING IN THE FUTURE? THE IDEA IS TO CONSOLIDATE CARGO.

UM, THINGS THAT WE COLLECT LET'S SAY FOR CHRISTMAS, AND WE SENT TO OUR COUNTRIES. YOU KNOW FAMILIES. SO BASICALLY THEY CAN COLLECT THE BOXES WITH FOOD. CLOTHING THINGS WHERE WE'RE FAMILY. AND. DO A TRANSPORTATION TO THE PORTS COULD BE MIAMI AND THEN SEND THEM TO DIFFERENT COUNTRIES, SPECIFICALLY VENEZUELA. MHM. THE PART OF THE SERVICES THAT THEY WANT TO PROVIDE. OKAY SO JUST TO FOLLOW UP WITH THAT, SO IS THE IMAGE THAT THE STOREFRONT IS PRIMARILY GROCERY. AND WOULD IT WOULD THE STOREFRONT HAVE THE CLOTHING KIND OF BOXING? OR THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING DONE? MAYBE IN THE BATHROOM GROCERIES, BUT AT THE SAME TIME I TAKE OUT BUCKS WITH THE ARTICLES, THINGS THAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEND TO MY ORIGINAL COUNTRY, SO THEY'RE GOING TO USE A SEPARATE STORE. TO COLLECT THAT I'M GOING TO GET A RECEIPT AND MAYBE TWO WEEKS, THREE WEEKS, EVERYTHING WILL BE IN THE COUNTRY. OKAY IS THAT LIKE A SO IT WOULD BE LIKE A SHIPPING KIND OF STORE AS WELL. AND WOULD THAT BE LOCATED IN THE STOREFRONT AREA IN THE FRONT? I WILL SAY JUST IN THE BACK SEPARATE CANDIDATES AND SAY, OKAY, THIS IS THE CONSOLIDATION CENTER FOR OKAY? UH DOES THAT MEET THE DEFINITION OF MARKET? I JUST WANT TO CONFIRM OR WOULD THAT BE CONSIDERED AN ASPECT OF THEIR SHIPPING RECEIVING? WITH THE PRIMARY FUNCTION BEING A MARKET OPERATION. PERHAPS I'M PUTTING YOU ON THE SPOT. HMM YEAH, THAT WASN'T REALLY DISCUSSED. WHEN WE MET WITH THEM. IT WAS MORE ABOUT THE MARKET AND THAT WAS THEIR FOCUS WAS TO HAVE THE NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET. UM AT THAT TIME, SO FOLLOW UP QUESTION FOR ME. IS THIS A MORE OF A CHARITABLE SERVICE? OR ARE YOU PROFITING FROM SHIPPING? THESE ITEMS ARE GONNA BE THEY'RE GONNA GET PROFIT FROM THAT. NOW I CAN NOT GUARANTEE YOU THAT THAT IS

[00:25:06]

RIGHT. FOCUS ON JUST THE LATIN MARKET. THAT'S THEIR MAIN GOAL. QUESTION OF CITY. UM DO WE HAVE A CERTAIN PERCENTAGE OF BUSINESS THAT IS ALLOWED TO FALL OUTSIDE OF PRIMARY SCOPE. HMM. I KNOW ABOUT THAT. OKAY? LIKE I MEAN, IF THAT'S IF THAT'S LIKE 5% OF THEIR REVENUE. DOES THAT REALLY MATTER? IT MATTERS. BUT I GUESS IS IT ALLOWED. TRUST ME IF I MAY MAKE A COMMENT, SO I THINK THE APPLICATION IS TO OPEN UP THE GROCERY MARKET, RIGHT? AND THEN WHAT YOU HAD SAID WAS IN THE FUTURE WE MAY CONSIDER SOMETHING IN ADDITION TO THE MARKET ASPECT OF IT IS BECAUSE BASED ON THIS BROCHURE THEY'RE SAYING SERVICES LATINO. THAT'S THE ONLY TYPE OF WILL SAY HEY, I HEARD THE SAME MR HUNTER, SO I WOULD THINK FOR WHAT'S IN FRONT OF US IS FOR THE MARKET IF THE BUSINESS WERE TO EXPAND THAT SHOULD WORK WITH THE CITY AND SEE IF THERE'S SOMETHING ELSE. AND I'M JUST GOING TO REITERATE MY POINT AS WELL. AND YES, IF THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE METHOD OF THE TYPE OF BUSINESS, WE WOULD WANT TO ENSURE THAT THAT'S IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZONING AND WITH THE DEFINITIONS AGAIN GET THE APPROVALS. OR CONSULT? YEAH OR CONSULT WITH THE CITY TO FIND OUT IF HE EVEN HAVE TO, BUT, YEAH, OKAY. TAYLOR QUESTIONS CANCER, SIR. HOW OFTEN ARE YOU HAVING DELIVERIES OF TRUCKS? AND WHERE DO YOU SEE THEM? PARKING DOESN'T LOOK THAT THERE IS A TYPE OF DOCTOR OR SERVICE ENTRANCE TO THE PROPERTY. SO. SORRY. HOW MUCH TRAFFIC? HOW LARGE. ARE THESE TRUCKS COMING IN AND DROPPING OFF PRODUCTS. MACHINE. IT DOESN'T SEEM TO HAVE A DUCK. BUT THE PARKING SPACES DECENTLY. BIG ENOUGH TO RECEIVE THE PRODUCT AND MAYBE THEY'RE GOING TO TRANSPORT THE PRODUCT WITH THEIR OWN BANGOR TRUCK. OKAY SO WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT 50 FT FOOT TRAILER OR SOMETHING LIKE WALMART OR ANY OTHER I AM FAMILIAR WITH THIS PROPERTY.

THERE IS NOT A DOCTOR ON ON THE SIDE AT ALL. UM AND THAT IS TWO PARCELS SO ALL THOSE PARKING SPACES WOULDN'T BE ALLOCATED TO UM BUT THE GROCERY STORE. SO I THINK IT'S JUST THOSE. 12345.

FIX OR SEVEN ALONG THE SIDE, AND THEN THE THREE PARALLEL ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE BUILDING. YEAH I MEAN, I SEE THE MAN DOOR ON THE BACK CORNER THERE. I SHOULD HAVE JUST MANNED OR MAYBE A BOX TRUCK PULLED UP TO THE SPACES WHERE THE TWENTIES THIRTIES PARKING SPACE AREA AS WELL.

YEAH. I HAVE A RANDOM QUESTION AS WELL. UM WILL THERE BE CARTS? I COULD LIKE A GROCERY CART.

BECAUSE THE PARKING LOT IS NOT VERY BIG AND YOU CAN SEE KIND OF RUN AWAY. CARDS GOING OUT OF THAT INTERSECTION CART CORRAL GROCERY. YOU PUT THE GROCERIES IN OR IS IT THOUGHT MORE SO LIKE A THAT'S A REALLY GOOD QUESTION. AH. I CAN'T ANSWER THAT RIGHT NOW. WE HAVE TO HAVE, UH, MINIMUM BASKETS. YEAH AROUND MHM FROM THE SHELF AND COLLECT ALL THE ITEMS UP. GIVES THEM IS NOT GOING TO BUY. HMM. BEFORE I'M NOT SURE IF THEY ARE GOING TO BE HARD. ON THOSE STORIES. YOU DON'T HAVE CARDS. YOU HAVE THAT LEVEL. YEAH YOU SUPER? YEAH, SURE. MOST OF THE FAMILY NOT SCARED. AND THAT'S KIND OF WHAT I WHAT I ASSUMED, BUT I THOUGHT I WOULD ASK ALSO WITH PARKING LOT NOT BEING LARGE. THEY DON'T HAVE TO CARRY GROCERIES TOO FAR. THAT'S RIGHT. SOME GREAT 0.2. MR CHAIR. IS THERE AN ALLEY BEHIND THIS BUILDING? YOU KNOW MARCOS PIZZA, RIGHT? ON THE BOTTOM. ARE ANY OF YOU FAMILIAR WITH HOW MARCO'S PIZZA RECEIVES DELIVERIES NOW IS IT IN THE FRONT WORKING LOT? I'M JUST ASSUMING IT IS, BUT I DON'T KNOW. NEVER BEEN AROUND WHEN THEY'VE DROPPED ANYTHING. I HAVEN'T EITHER. SO OKAY. WELL LET'S SEE THAT THEY JUST DELIVERED IN THE PARKING LOT. YEAH, I WANT TO FAR. YEAH THERE THERE IS NO BEHIND THAT

[00:30:07]

BUILDING. THERE'S ANOTHER BUILDING BEHIND THAT BUILDING. YEAH LOOKS LIKE THE DUMPSTERS ALSO ON THAT SIDE AS WELL. YEAH THEY HAVE THE DARK SQUARE THERE , WHICH IS NOT WELL. IS THAT GOING TO BE A SHARED DUMPSTER? YOU KNOW WITH THAT THE DUMPSTER THAT'S BELOW MARCOS IN THIS PICTURE. IS THAT SHARED WITH MARCO SANTA MARKET, YOU KNOW, OR WILL YOU HAVE YOUR OWN DUMPSTER? YEAH. BUT I DIDN'T EXPECT THAT THEY HAVE TOO MUCH. LET'S TAKE OUR MUCH JUST CARDBOARD. YEAH. I MEAN, IT'S AS I'M NOT A GROCER, BUT I WOULD IMAGINE THERE'S A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF FOOD WASTE FROM PERISHABLE FOODS THAT'S GOING TO HAVE TO BE DISPOSED OF, AND I FEEL LIKE HAVING INAPPROPRIATE OUT SIDE CONTAINER . FOR SO DO YOU NECESSARY? YES SO? SO I MEAN, IF THEY COME TO A POINT WHERE A DUMPSTER IS NEEDED, DON'T YOU COME BACK SO WE CAN REVIEW A DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, BUT THAT FOR THE WHAT'S THIS AVAILABLE NOW? I WE? WE DON'T KNOW. WE DON'T KNOW.

YEAH. SO IF IT IS NEEDED YOUR PRODUCTS COMING BACK IN FRONT OF US TO DISCUSS THE ENCLOSURE. SO UM, MARCOS IS EXPOSED AT LEAST THE STREET VIEW I HAVE, BUT THAT'S BECAUSE IT PREDATES PROBABLY. BUT THAT THAT'S PROBABLY NOT, UM, RELEASING PHOTOS IN FRONT OF US NOW, YOU KNOW, BUT THOSE LEASING PHOTOS ARE PRETTY CURRENT. AND AT THE END AND THERE'S NOT ANYTHING TO THE LEFT OF THE BUILDING. ALRIGHT PRETTY GOOD DISCUSSION. ANYTHING ELSE BEFORE WE OPEN UP TO CITIZEN COMMENTS. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. WE WILL OPEN THIS UP TO. I'M SORRY. THANK YOU.

APPRECIATE IT. WE WILL OPEN THIS UP FOR CITIZEN COMMENTS. IF THERE ARE ANY CITIZENS WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM. HMM. UM SEEING NONE. DO WE HAVE A MOTION? COMMOTION PROOF.

ALRIGHT UH, CAN WE GET A REAL CALL, PLEASE? MR ENGEL. YES. MR FISHER? YES MR NICHOLSON.

BERBICE YES, MR HUNTER? YES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES YES, YES. YOU ARE FREE TO LEAVE MISTRESS. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, SO WITH THAT WE WILL GO BACK TO THE REPORTEDLY ADMINISTRATION.

[REPORT OF ADMINISTRATION]

WHAT IS THE TWO ITEMS THAT WE HAD BROUGHT FORWARD FOR RESENTING COULD AMENDMENTS. WE HAD THE BIG GROUP OF AMENDMENTS PREVIOUSLY IN MARCH, 2 NOW WE'RE TABLE WHERE THE SOLAR AMENDMENTS THAT ALLOW FOR SOLAR PANELS ON THE ROOF MOUNTED TO BE IN THE FRONT. UM AND THEN, ALSO A LOT COVERAGE, SO WE JUST WANTED TO GIVE SOME UPDATES ON SOME OF THE RESEARCH THAT WE'VE DONE. UM ONE OF THE MAIN QUESTIONS FOR THE SOLAR PANELS AT THE BOARD HAD WAS IN THE UPTOWN DISTRICT. UM SONY RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN THE UPTOWN DISTRICT. UM WHAT THE PROCESS WOULD BE IF IT WAS PERMITTED USE. THEY'RE ALLOWED TO HAVE ON THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING IF THERE WERE STILL ANY STEPS TO HAVE REVIEW ON THAT, UM , LOOKING AT OUR CODE, IT WOULD REQUIRE THEM TO THE GATE OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS SO THEY WOULD REVIEW THE DESIGN . IT WOULD BE PERMITTED TO BE ON THE FRONT BUT THEN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD WOULD HAVE THE ULTIMATE SAY ON HOW IT LOOKED AND MAKE SURE IT DOESN'T TAKE AWAY TOO MUCH FROM THE CHARACTER OF THE OF THE HOUSE OR THAT FIT INTO THAT NEIGHBORHOOD. UM, SO IT WOULD HAVE TO REQUIRE THAT, UM THEN EMILY HAD HAD DONE SOME RESEARCH ON SOME OTHER COMMUNITIES HERE TODAY TO LOOK AT IT DOUBLING THEY ALLOW ROOFTOP SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS. SINGLE FAMILY OR TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS ALONG AS THEY'RE NOT ABOVE THE BUILDING HEIGHT. UH THEY DON'T HAVE ANY STANDARDS ON IF IT'S IN THE FRONT SIDE, REAR. UM THEY DON'T HAVE ANY SPECIFICS ON THEIR HISTORIC DISTRICT OR ANYTHING THAT JUST HAPPENED. MOTHER PERMITTED. COLUMBUS LAUSA AND RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS. UM BUT NOT LONG AS THEY GET A PERMIT. SOME OTHER ONES ALLOW. MOST OF THEM ARE ALL PERMITTED.

THERE'S A FEW A COUPLE COMMUNITIES THAT DON'T ALLOW THEM THEIR HISTORIC DISTRICT.

BUT CURRENTLY I BELIEVE WE ALLOW IT. UM AND THEN THE OTHER ONES ALL HAVE TO REVIEW WHAT

[00:35:04]

COMMUNITIES DIDN'T ALLOW IT. YEAH I'M TRYING TO REMEMBER WHICH ONE I'M LOOKING AT. I'M LOOKING AT HIM HERE. UM.

WESTERN GILLES ONE COMMUNITY THAT DOES NOT ALLOW THEM IN THEIR UPTOWN. ON THE ROOF. AND MORE LEAN SANTA HAS TO GO THROUGH THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD, SO IT WOULD BE SIMILAR TO WHAT WHAT WE WOULD REQUIRE. WHAT'S THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS? I'M GONNA CIRCLE BILL DOES NOT ALLOW HIM IN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT. OKAY? SO THAT THAT WOULD BE THE UPDATES FOR. FOR THE SOLAR. UM WE PLAN TO BRING THESE BACK. PROBABLY THE NEXT COUPLE OF MONTHS, UH, HAVE MORE FORMAL DISCUSSIONS WITH THE BOARD. BUT IF YOU GUYS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS NOW ON THE SOLAR, WE CAN DO THAT. SO OH, JUST LIKE WHEN I HAVE THAT. V R D DISTRICT. IS THAT WHAT CHALLENGES BE FOR UPTOWN OR BEARDY. THOSE AREAS. IS WHERE THE MAIN CONCERNS FROM THE BOARD. THE OTHER TOPIC WAS LOT COVERAGE. UM SO. TRYING TO DO SOME RESEARCH ON DIFFERENT PARCELS THROUGHOUT, UM. WITH IT . WE'RE ACTUALLY GONNA DO SOME MORE RESEARCH. SO THIS IS N C D SO YOU CAN SEE THE OUTLINE THE BLACK OUTLINE PARCELS. UM THE BIG AREAS OR THE ALL THE AREAS THAT ARE ZONED IN C. D. M. AND THEN. I I'M SORRY. I'M BLANKING PROVISION COVERAGE. NCB NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. UM. AND WE CAN SPELL THAT OUT OVER HERE. SO WE I WENT THROUGH OFF OF THE G. I S, UH, EXPLORE MARRIAGE, LITTLE G, I S AND CALCULATED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF WHAT'S COVERED BY A BUILDING OR PARKING IN A M PREVIOUS SINCE WE JUST UPDATED THE LOT COVERAGE DEFINITION AND THEN TOOK IT WITH SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THEIR PARCELS AND THEN SO WE GET THE PERCENTAGE. SO WE HAVE A BROKEN DOWN HERE WITH IT AS THIS IS THE N C D ONE. YOU CAN SEE, UM AND THEN WE DID. OUR EMU IS WHERE HAVE SOME DISCUSSIONS WITH COMMERCIAL? UM, ITEMS, SO THIS WAS ONE FOR R R M U UM, WITH A LOT OF DIFFERENT LOT COVERAGE IS SOME OF THEM. WE DID THE SED.

WHICH ISN'T A LOT OF IT IN THE CITY IS A NICE CD. SO FEW THERE AND. UM, THIS AREA SO WE HAVE THIS ONE. YOU KNOW, DONE THE R D, WHICH IS A LITTLE BIGGER AREA. I JUST TOOK SOME RANDOM PARCELS AND TRY TO CALCULATE DIFFERENT SHOW THE RANGE OF THE LOT COVERAGES AS WE PROPOSE THEM. AH PERCENTAGES. AS AS WE STARTED DOING THIS, UM AND I WAS DISCUSSING WITH ASHLEY. WE DETERMINED THAT WE MIGHT HAVE TO ADJUST SOME OF OUR NUMBERS THAT WE WERE PROPOSING. THEY MIGHT NEED TO BE INCREASED ON WHAT OUR MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE WILL BE. UM I'VE BEGUN ON SRD WITH SRD TAKES UP THE MAJORITY OF THE CITY, SO IT'S A LITTLE MORE INCENTIVE. UM MAP TO DO. AND THEN AS WE WERE DISCUSSING S, C D AND R M U LIKE THIS ONE'S SO THIS IS WALMART PARCEL. BUT THEN THIS IS THE MULTI FAMILY THAT GOT APPROVED. WHICH SINCE WE HASN'T GONE THROUGH FINAL ENGINEERING, WE DON'T HAVE THE FINAL PERMIT. SO IT'S NOT ON THE AUDITORS ON THE JS MAP. YOU HAD TO DO IT, SO I HAVE TO GET THE ACTUAL PERMITS AND CALCULATE THAT BUT SINCE WE HAD DIFFERENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE PACES COMPARED TO RESIDENTIAL SPACES IN THAT IN THE RM YOU, UM WE'RE GONNA GIVE THE DO SOME MORE RESEARCH AND LABEL THESE WITH EITHER IF THEIR OFFICE

[00:40:03]

RESIDENTIAL HOW THEY ARE SINS BECAUSE SOME OF THEM WE HAD, AS LIKE 70% LOT COVERAGE FOR COMMERCIAL AND THEN FOR OFFICE WAS 60% FOR CERTAIN ONES. AND THEN RESIDENTIAL WAS LIKE 60. SO WE'RE GONNA WE HAVE TO THERE'S SOME MORE RESEARCH TO DETERMINE WHAT EACH PARCEL IS SO WE CAN KIND OF CHECK OUR NUMBERS THAT WE PROPOSE HOW WE HAVE SUGGEST THEM. QUESTION SO JUST SO I UNDERSTAND WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT . WE PASSED THE DEFINITION TO CHANGE THE WHAT WOULD BE CLASSIFIED AS LOCK COVERAGE, AND THAT INCLUDES PERMEABLE SURFACES LIKE GRAVEL, DRIVEWAYS AND WHATNOT, WHEREAS BEFORE THAT WASN'T INCLUDED, THAT'S CORRECT AND THEN APPLIED THAT NEW DEFINITION TO RANDOM LOTS IN DIFFERENT DISTRICTS OR ZONE DISTRICTS, CORRECT AND THEN WHAT YOU'RE SHOWING IS BASED ON WITH THE NEW DEFINITION APPLIED TO THAT LOT. THIS IS THE COVERAGE WE WOULD SEE. THEREFORE OKAY, I UNDERSTAND. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WAS ALL CLEAR. YEAH BECAUSE INITIALLY IT OFFERS SOME NUMBERS, AND I THINK WE ALL QUESTION LIKE WHAT DO WE ACTUALLY HAVE? RIGHT NOW? YOU KNOW WHAT? WHAT DATA SUPPORTED THE NUMBERS THAT WERE BEING PROPOSED FOR LA COVERAGE. SO AND THAT'S WHERE, LIKE SOME OF THESE ARE SOME OF IT THE NUMBERS THAT WE HAVE PROPOSED LIKE SED. WE HAD 70% FOR ALL THE TYPOLOGY FOR THE COMMERCIAL OFFICE INSTITUTIONAL SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED. UM. V R D WE HAD AT 60 ALL ACROSS THE BOARD. UM N C D.

WE HAD CHANGES. WE HAD 70 60 60 60 60, SO LIKE FOR NCD WILL HAVE TO LABEL IT. SO WE LOOK AT WHICH ONES ARE COMMERCIAL COMPARED TO THE OTHERS. UM SAME WITH WHEN YOU GET DOWN TO THE OTHER DISTRICTS OF LIKE RM YOU WE HAD 80% FOR COMMERCIAL OFFICE WITH 70% MIXED USE A MULTI FAMILY 60 . SO THAT'S WHERE WE HAVE TO GO BACK AND TRY TO LOOK AT EACH PARCEL HERE THAT WE'VE CALCULATED AND LABEL SO WE KNOW IF IT'S OFFICE OR DOES NOT PUT THEM ALL TOGETHER SINCE WE HAVE IT BROKEN DOWN BY THE TYPOLOGY. THANKS DISTRICT. JUST ASK ANOTHER QUESTION. IS THERE SOME OBSERVATION THAT YOU'RE MAKING SO AS YOU APPLY THIS NEW DEFINITION TO THE LOCK COVERAGE? YOU'RE SEEING CERTAIN PERCENTAGES. IS THERE A CONCLUSION THAT THE MAJORITY OF WHAT THE ACTUAL CALCULATION AND OVERLAY IS SHOWING IS EXCEEDING THE PERCENTAGES THAT WERE ORIGINALLY PROPOSED, AND SOME OF THE AREAS IT IS, UM SOME OF IT, THE BIGGER THE PARCELS. THE MORE COVERAGE IT SEEMS TO HAVE, UM, ON SOME OF THEM AND DIFFERENT DISTRICTS. V R D WAS SHOWING SOME HIGHER NUMBERS IN THE 60. THEY'RE CLOSER LIKE 70 SOME OF THE OLDER NEIGHBORHOODS. UM ESPECIALLY WITH THE GRAVEL. UM SOME OF THE OLDER HOUSES HAVE A LOT OF GRAVEL ON THEIR PARCEL.

UM BUT THERE ARE SOME THAT HAVE THAT ARE HIGHER THAN WHAT WE WERE PROPOSING SO LOT COVERS THAT WERE DOING THE EMPEROR VARIOUS AREAS THAT WE MIGHT HAVE TO INCREASE THE LOT COVERAGE.

THERE ARE SOME COMMUNITIES THAT HAVE NO LOCK COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS THAT WE LOOKED AT.

UM WE'RE LIKE COMMERCIAL. THEY HAD SOME COMMERCIAL THAT YOU COULD HAVE 100. OR BASED ON OUR COLOR. THEY HAVE TO HAVE A 10% AT LEAST 10% OPEN SPACE SO THEY CAN'T HAVE 100. BUT THERE ARE SOME COMMUNITIES THAT WE LOOKED AT THAT FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL ANALYSTS KNOW THEIR FAVORITE ALL MAXIMUM, YEAH, NO MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE, BUT THEY STARTED MEET THE OTHER THEIR SETBACKS AND STUFF, BUT SO THEY HAD A LITTLE BIT BUT WE STILL HAVE THAT 10% SO NONE OF THEM WILL GO ABOVE 90 FOR SURE. JUST BECAUSE WE HAVE THAT 10% OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT. BUT THERE ARE SOME SOME OF THE SIXTIES MIGHT GO UP TO 70. THEN SOME OF THE SEVENTIES MIGHT GO UP TO 80.

QUESTION. UM ARE YOU STILL JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, AND HE STILL BREAKING THEM OUT OF OFFICE COULD POTENTIALLY STILL HAVE A DIFFERENT PERCENTAGE THAN COMMERCIAL OR OKAY, THEY COULD ZONING DISTRICT SOME OF THE DISTRICTS. WE PROPOSED. JUST 1% FOR EVERYTHING. SOME OF THEM WE BROKE IT DOWN. UM JUST KIND OF DEPENDS ON THE TYPE OF IT. UM KIND OF LIKE WITH RM YOU WE HAD LIKE THIS. WE HAVE MULTI FAMILY AT 60, WHERE WE HAD COMMERCIAL AT 80. UM COMMERCIAL MORE OF A DESTINATION PLACE, RESIDENT, MULTI FAMILIES. YEAH PEOPLE ARE LIVING THERE, SO WE DON'T WANT THAT TO BE ALL PARKING AND THE HOUSES. SO, UM, ANY EXISTING PARCELS. NOW THAT WOULD POTENTIALLY BE OVER THE NEW PERCENTAGE THERE OBVIOUSLY GRANDFATHERED AND THEY DON'T HAVE TO CHANGE ANYTHING UNLESS SIGNIFICANT CHANGE OF USE OR NEW DOCUMENTED LABOR. OKAY AND THERE ARE SOME THAT ARE HIGHER AND THEN RUN INTO SOME THAT HAVE MULTIPLE PARCELS THAT ARE ONE

[00:45:03]

THAT'S ONE WHOLE BUILDINGS ON TWO OR THREE PARCELS WAS KIND OF LIKE THE ONE. WE JUST LOOKED AT THE FAMILY VIDEO AND MARCOS SO THAT KIND OF MESSES WITH THEIR PARKING BECAUSE THE PARCEL LINES LIKE RIGHT DOWN THE MIDDLE. SO LIKE, YEAH, THERE'S PARKING FOR MARCOS, BUT WE CAN'T COUNT THAT TOWARDS THEIR PARKING COUCH. BECAUSE THEY'RE DIFFERENT PARCELS EVEN THOUGH THE BUILDINGS CONNECTED, UM AND THERE'S BEEN SOME LIKE THAT WE'VE LOOKED AT SO HARD TO DETERMINE WHAT THE PERCENTAGE REALLY IS BECAUSE SOME OF US 100% BECAUSE IT'S TAKING UP THE WHOLE MIDDLE PARCEL, BUT THERE'S TWO OTHER PARCELS SO KIND OF COMBINED ALL OF THEM. NERVOUS, BUT. WE'RE HOPING TO HAVE THIS BACK AND PROBABLY IN AUGUST, UM SO I'LL BE. I'LL BE OUT FOR THE JULY MEETING, BUT SO WELL, WE'RE GONNA DO SOME RESEARCH TO BREAK IT DOWN TO LIKE FOR ARMY WILL BE COMMERCIAL OFFICE MIXED USE THEIR MULTI FAMILY. AND YOU'RE LOOKING AT EXISTING PARCELS. ARE YOU USING THAT AS JUST AS REFERENCE, OR ARE YOU TRYING TO SET A PERCENTAGE ABOVE THAT? SO THAT'S NOT AFFECTING EVERY EXISTING PARCEL OR IS IT JUST TOO, AS A REFERENCE AS A REFERENCE, SINCE THEY'LL BE GRANDFATHERED IN, BUT BUT WE WANT TO TRY TO KEEP IT FAIRLY CLOSE IF IT WAS GONE THROUGH THROWING OUT SUDDEN, LIKE A MUCH HIGHER BAR THAN RIGHT ALREADY HAVE. YEAH. WHICH I THINK IS WHAT OUR CONCERN WAS. WE DIDN'T KNOW WHAT PERCENTAGES THEY WERE ONE OF US ORIGINALLY, ARMY RIGHT HERE ARE OUR CURRENT DEFINITION . OUR CURRENT STANDARD RIGHT NOW IS NO MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE. LONG AS IT MEETS THE SETBACKS. SO YEAH, WE HAVE, LIKE 10% REQUIREMENT, BUT THEY COULD GO TO THAT 90% BUT YOU KNOW, WE'RE PUSHING FOR MORE GREEN SPACE AND MORE OF LOSE AMENITIES. SO THERE'S MULTIPLE ONES THAT ARE KIND OF IT WASN'T REALLY CLEAR ACROSS THE BOARD, SO I CAN R AND R M U OFFICES WAS NO MAX COVERAGE. SO WE HAVE THAT IN A FEW DIFFERENT PLACES WE TRY TO. WE WANTED TO HAVE A PERCENTAGE FOR ALL OF THEM. SO HAVE A QUESTION BACK TO SOLAR PANELS. IF ANYONE ELSE'S ARE YOU GOING TO BE SPECIFIC ON THE TYPES OF SOLAR PANELS? ARE YOU JUST SAYING IN GENERAL SOLAR POWER SOLAR PANELS ARE ALLOWED OR IS THE, UM DESIGN COMMISSION GOING TO HAVE LIKE A LIST OF APPROVED SOLAR PANEL TYPES. I DON'T THINK WE'RE GETTING INTO THE DETAILS ON THE TYPE IS IT'S THE ROOF MOUNTED ONES AS WELL AS THE ONES THAT WE'RE WE'RE LOOKING AT. WE'RE GETTING A LOT OF VARIANTS REQUESTS THAT ARE GOING THROUGH B. C A TO HAVE WON THE FRONT BECAUSE THAT'S THE EAST OR WEST FACING, UM UNDER HOUSE SO THAT WE'VE HAD A LOT GOING THROUGH IS THAT WE'RE TRYING TO THAT AND A LOT OF COMMUNITIES THERE ARE TRYING TO HELP THE SOLAR. THAT'S WHERE DUBLIN THEY USED TO HAVE SOME MORE STRICT STANDARDS ON AND THAT KIND OF PREVENTED IT THROUGH HERE RECENTLY. SAY IN GENERAL THAT THE SIGN REVIEW BOARD HAS A LITTLE BIT MORE LEEWAY OF DOES THIS LOOK RIGHT? DOES IT NOT LOOK RIGHT? UNLESS YOU KNOW LIKE, DOES IT? CHECK THE BOXES? OKAY, THAT'S PROBABLY THE INTENT, OKAY? THANK YOU. MR. CHAIR DR. CLIP POINT OF CLARIFICATION. SO YOU HAD SAID THAT THE DUBLIN, FOR EXAMPLE, HAD ADOPTED MORE OF AN OPEN USE . IT'S A PERMITTED USE IN ALL DISTRICTS OF DUBLIN. WHAT SPECIFICALLY WAS CITED FOR THEIR CITY. FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL. PERMITTING THAT IT HAS TO GET A PERMIT WAS INSPECTED BY THEIR BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IT'S A SINGLE FAMILY OR TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS, BLANKET APPROVAL, BASICALLY, AND DO THEY HAVE TO ALSO MEET SOME DESIGN REVIEW BOARD REQUIREMENT. THEY DID NOT MENTION THAT THEY HAVE TO GO THROUGH DESIGN REVIEW BOARD.

LONG AS IT DOESN'T ACTUALLY THE MAXIMUM LEGAL BUILDING HEIGHT. AND THIS IS IN ALL DISTRICTS WAS FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL, ALL SINGLE AND FAMILY AND TO FAMILY DWELLING UNITS THAT HAVE IT BROKEN DOWN BY DISTRICTS THAT IS JUST THE TYPE OF DWELLING UNITS. OKAY AND THEN, JUST AS A REMINDER, THE INITIAL PROPOSAL WE HAVE LOOKED AT BEFORE. IT. WAS IT SPECIFIC TO RESIDENTIAL OR WAS IT ANYTHING CITYWIDE? I CAN'T RECALL WE WERE APPROVING THEM CITYWIDE, BUT WE WERE JUST REMINDING OURSELVES THAT ANYTHING IN THE HISTORICAL DISTRICT WOULD HAVE TO GO THROUGH. EASY A REGARDLESS OF WHAT THEY WERE DOING TO THEIR HOUSE AND SOLAR PANELS INCLUDED.

HMM NOT BUSY. A RIGHT DESIGN DESIGN OF YOU. YEAH, OKAY. BECAUSE WHEN WE STARTED TALKING

[00:50:13]

ABOUT DO WE REALLY WANT TO MAKE THIS A BLANKET APPROVAL BECAUSE WE WERE UNSURE ABOUT HOW IT WOULD LOOK UPTOWN? IT'S I DON'T SEE THAT'S A MOOT POINT. BUT ANYTHING UPTOWN IS GOING TO GO THROUGH DESIGN REVIEW. SO THEY ALWAYS HAVE THE CHANCE TO SAY DOESN'T REALLY LOOK GOOD ON THAT HOUSE. DOES THE CURRENT ZONING ALLOW FOR PANELS ON REARS OF ROOFS? OKAY SO I THINK THE PRIMARY THING WAS THE HOUSES THAT FACE THE SOUTH, OKAY? OKAY, THANKS. QUESTIONS. COMMENTS WERE IN THE TWO ITEMS. JEFF, YOU GOOD. GOOD ALRIGHT, LET'S JUST LAID INTO OTHER DISCUSSION ITEMS . ARE THERE ANY OTHER ITEMS OF DISCUSSION FROM THE SYDNEY NO. SEEN. NONE WILL MOVE ONTO

[COMMENTS OF INDIVIDUAL BOARD MEMBERS]

INDIVIDUAL COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD. START ON THE LEFT THIS TIME, ITS PURPOSE. I'M EXCITED TO BE ABLE TO GET SOME OF MY MIAMI FOOD AGAIN IN TOWN. SO. AH, SIR, I PROMISE. DOWN HERE AS WELL. I JUST WANT TO REITERATE THE SKYBRIDGE PLAN. A I WAS A NO VOTE ON THAT I WOULD STILL BE A NO VOTE TODAY. JUST THE VOTE TONIGHT WAS JUST THE CHANGE POINT FROM THAT PLAN TO THIS POINT PLAN OR SORRY THAT POINT TO THIS POINT IN TIME FOR THOSE LOTS THAT WAS THE BASIS OF MY VOTE. BUT THE OVERALL PLAN I STILL HAVE, YOU KNOW, CONCERNS WITH SO THAT'S IT. THANKS. AND, UH, I DON'T BELIEVE I HAVE ANY COMMENTS, SO WE HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN. MAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN FOR THE EVENING IN FAVOR. SAY AYE, RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. AND KATHY.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.

Jun 06, 2023 Planning Commission

Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download Selected Item