1. To hear an application for a Final Plat for Adena Pointe Section 10 Phase 3 located between Weaver Road and London Ave. and Zoned as Suburban Residential District

[1. To hear an application for a Final Plat for Adena Pointe Section 10 Phase 3 located between Weaver Road and London Ave. and Zoned as Suburban Residential District]

TO HEAR AN APPLICATION FOR A FINAL PLAT OF ADINA POINT SECTION TEN, PHASE THREE, LOCATED BETWEEN WEAVER ROAD AND LONDON AVENUE AND ZONED AS SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, DO WE HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE TO PRESENT TO US? STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, AND THE FLOOR IS

[00:05:04]

YOURS. ALL RIGHT, ELI COWAN, 2800 CORPORATE EXCHANGE DRIVE, COLUMBUS, OHIO, SUITE 400, I'M I'M WITH CSO, THE ENGINEERING CONSULTANT OF THE PROJECT, ON BEHALF OF THE DEVELOPER, I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME TONIGHT, AND WE APPRECIATE THE CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF THIS FINAL PLAT, SECTION TEN, PART THREE OF ADINA POINT DEVELOPMENT'S LAST PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT, AND IS LOCATED NORTH OF ADINA POINT DRIVE AND EAST OF WOODLAWN DRIVE, BEING AN EXTENSION OF ADINA POINT, SECTION TEN, PART ONE AND TWO. SECTION TEN, PART THREE IS COMPRISED OF 36 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS. AND A COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER AND UPDATED. FINAL PLAT WAS SENT TO CITY STAFF YESTERDAY, JUNE 3RD, AFTER RECEIPT OF THE STAFF REPORT, I WANTED TO ADDRESS SOME COMMENTS. CLARIFICATIONS REQUESTED BY PLANNING AND ZONING AND ENGINEERING STAFF, A 20 FOOT WIDE, SIDEWALK EASEMENT HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE FINAL PLAT, CENTERED, BETWEEN LOTS. 73 AND 74 FOR FUTURE SHARED USE PATH, AN ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER.

INFORMATION HAS BEEN UPDATED TO CORRECT SPELLING ERROR. AND THEN THERE WAS A QUESTION ON DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND THE FINAL PLAT ON LOT NUMBERS, AND IT WAS SIMPLY, ON THE PRELIMINARY PLAT, THE WHOLE SUBDIVISION WAS, NUMBERED CLOCK. YEAH, CLOCKWISE AS A WHOLE. AND THEN WHEN WE GOT TO THE FINAL PLAT OF PART ONE AND TWO, WE DID EACH PART CLOCKWISE. AND SO THAT'S THE DISCREPANCY ON THE, ON THE LOT NUMBERS, AND WITH THAT, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU ALL MIGHT HAVE. OKAY, YEAH, THE STAFF SENT OUT, THE REVISION THIS AFTERNOON IF EVERYONE HAD A CHANCE TO LOOK AT IT. BUT SAW THAT YOU PICKED UP ANY ITEMS THAT THEY HAD, AND, I DON'T THINK I HAD ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS. I'LL OPEN UP TO THE REST OF THE BOARD. QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? ALL RIGHT, WELL, THEN, WE WILL OPEN UP FOR CITIZEN COMMENTS AND THEN GO FROM THERE. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. ARE THERE ANY CITIZENS HERE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM, IF SO, YOU HAVE UP TO FIVE MINUTES. I THINK THIS ONE'S AN EASY ONE TODAY. SO ALL RIGHT, SO SEEING NO ONE, WHAT IS THE WILL OF THE COMMISSION? DO WE? I WOULD, VOTE FOR APPROVAL. I'D LIKE TO PROPOSE APPROVAL. ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND? ALL OVER. ALL RIGHT, CAN WE GET A ROLL CALL, PLEASE? SORRY, MORRIS , WE NEED, MR. FISHER. YES, MISS LAUB. YES MR. STOYAN. HI. MR. NICKERSON. YES, MISS BURGESS. YES, MR. WOLOWITZ. YES, MR. ENGEL. YES CONGRATULATIONS, CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THE CITY STAFF. APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU.

[2. To hear an application for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Sketch Plan application for a development known as Marysville South located at Parcels with ID numbers of 2900300600000, 2900300470000, 2900300480000, 2900300560010, 2900300670000, 2900230740000, 2900230560000, 2900230731000, 2900300521050, 2900300500000.]

ALL RIGHT. THE SECOND ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS TO HEAR AN APPLICATION FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BEAUTY, SKETCH PLAN, APPLICATION FOR A DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS MARYSVILLE SOUTH, LOCATED AT PARCELS WITH ID NUMBERS. OF 2900300600000029003004700002900, 029003006700002900230740000. 29002305600002900230731000290030 .

AND 2900300500000. I'M SORRY THAT JUST DID THAT TO YOU. I MEAN, I THINK YOU MISSED THE ZERO. I KNOW, I KNOW IN THE PAST LIKE I DO HAVE TO READ THE I DO HAVE TO READ THESE RIGHT? YES.

EVERYONE BEFORE ME HAD ALWAYS READ IT, SO I ASSUMED I HAD TO. SO. ALL RIGHT, I SEE, IF YOU COULD INTRODUCE YOURSELF AND, THE FLOOR WOULD BE YOURS. OH, MY. JUST A SECOND. JUST JUST AN UPDATE FOR EVERYBODY HERE. SO WE. I RECEIVED A PHONE CALL THIS MORNING FROM SAINT MARY'S CEMENT COMPANY, THEY ARE BASED OUT OF CHICAGO. THE REPRESENTATIVE, THEY'VE GOTTEN A LEGAL NOTICE,

[00:10:06]

SO THEY PREPARED A LETTER. I PROVIDED IT WITH THE COMMISSION, BASED ON THEIR COMMENTS, THEY TOOK IT AS IT WAS A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR PUD, SO I NOTIFIED THEM THAT IT WAS NOT RESIDENTIAL, SO THEY'RE REPLY WAS THAT THE FIRST AND SECOND POINTS ARE PROBABLY LESS CRITICAL, BASED ON THE CLARIFICATION, THEIR CONCERN WOULD BE THE STORMWATER WATER RETENTION, BUT THAT WOULD BE WORKED OUT WITH ENGINEERING, DURING THE DESIGN REVIEW AND FINAL ENGINEERING PROCESS, THEY JUST WANT TO BE KIND OF INVOLVED WITH IT, WITH IT, IF POSSIBLE, SO THAT JUST WANTED TO GIVE AN UPDATE ON THAT BEFORE MATT SPOKE AND JUST FOR LOW BACKGROUND, FOR THOSE THAT DON'T HAVE IT IN FRONT OF THEM, THE FIRST ITEM WAS JUST NOISE, DUST AND LIGHT FROM THEM. YEP. AND, AND THEN THERE'S A LAKE THAT PEOPLE GO FISHING ON THAT'S TRESPASS ON THEIR PROPERTY. AND THINKING THAT IT WAS RESIDENTIAL THOUGHT THAT THAT WOULD WELCOME MORE.

SO. YEAH. PLEASE. OKAY MATT MCQUADE, 129 NORTH MAIN STREET, MARYSVILLE, OHIO. I'M HERE REPRESENTING THE MARYSVILLE LAND COMPANY, WHICH IS A SUBSIDIARY OF THE NEW ALBANY COMPANY, AND PRESENTING OUR SKETCH PLAN FOR THE MARYSVILLE SOUTH PUD, JEFF, COULD I POSSIBLY GET, THE SCREEN? DO YOU WANT TO PRESENT? YEAH. SO I'VE ACTUALLY I'VE GOT SOME SLIDES, IF THAT'S OKAY THAT I THINK. ARE YOU PLUGGED IN? I AM, YEAH. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. SO, WE'RE GOING TO GO THROUGH THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONDITIONS, BUT BEFORE, I DO THAT, I WANT TO START WITH JUST TALKING ABOUT THE OBJECTIVES OF THE PUD IS AS STATED BY MARYSVILLE ON THE WEBSITE, AND I'M NOT GOING TO READ THROUGH THESE, ONE BY ONE, BUT BUT IN TERMS OF, HOW IT'S FRAMED, OUR PLAN FOR MARYSVILLE SOUTH ONE, AS YOU'LL SEE, AND WE'LL GET INTO THIS IS A SITE WITH UNIQUE CHARACTERISTICS. WE'RE NOT THE FIRST TO IDENTIFY THAT. IT'S SOMETHING THAT'S BEEN IDENTIFIED BY THE CITY NUMEROUS TIMES, MOST RECENTLY IN THE 2023 THOROUGHFARE PLAN, MARYSVILLE SOUTH HAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE, A MAJOR ECONOMIC ASSET FOR THE CITY. BUT BECAUSE OF SOME OF THE CONSTRAINTS THAT GO ALONG WITH IT BEING UNIQUE, IT'S A CHALLENGE TO UNTAP THAT POTENTIAL. AND WE THINK THAT OUR PUD IS PART OF THE SOLUTION TO UNLOCKING THE SITE'S POTENTIAL, BUT ALSO THE FLEXIBILITY ALLOWED IN THE PUD PUT US IN THE BEST POSITION TO MAKE SURE THAT THE DEVELOPMENT ITSELF CONFORMS BEST WITH SURROUNDING USES. MOST NOTABLY, MOST EXCUSE ME, MOST NOTICEABLY, MOST NOTABLY RESIDENTIAL OFF OF WEAVER ROAD. SO THIS IS THE SITE, THE SUBJECT SITE. IT'S, CLOSE TO 600 ACRES, 588 IN TOTAL. AND IT'S A LARGE SITE THAT HAS A LOT OF ATTRIBUTES THAT MAKE IT COMPELLING, ONE, DIMENSIONS ARE GOOD, SIZE IS GOOD, THERE IS LARGE INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE AREA BASED ON THE INDUSTRIAL USES THAT NEIGHBOR IT TO THE EAST ALONG INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY. IT'S VERY CLOSE TO THE US 33 SCOTLAND INTERCHANGE, YOU HAVE LARGE ELECTRIC POWER RUNNING THROUGH THE SITE RIGHT NOW. AND THE DERBY SUBSTATION LOCATED ON INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY RIGHT NEXT DOOR. SO WHEN YOU JUST LOOK AT THOSE THINGS IN ISOLATION, IT'S A GOOD SITE. AND HONESTLY, WHEN I WAS STILL AT ONE, COLUMBUS OR COLUMBUS 2020, THIS IS A SITE THAT WE TOOK A LOOK AT QUITE A BIT, NOT AS CLOSELY AS YOU WOULD AS A DEVELOPER, BUT IT'S SOMETHING THAT WAS ALWAYS IN THE CONVERSATION FOR INDUSTRIAL OPPORTUNITIES THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT THE COLUMBUS REGION, BUT VERY RARELY WE MADE IT TO THE POINT WHERE WE EVEN GOT A SITE VISIT.

I UNDERSTAND THAT ORIGIN MALT WAS LOOKING THERE AT ONE POINT, BUT THAT WAS THE RARE OPPORTUNITY THAT WOULD WORK ON THE PROPERTY AT THAT TIME. ASIDE FROM THOSE ASSETS, THERE ARE SOME MAJOR CONSTRAINTS. WITH ACCESS CHALLENGES BEING AT THE TOP OF THE LIST. YOU'VE GOT THE UNION COUNTY AIRPORT TO THE NORTH, YOU'VE GOT THE RAILROAD LINE THAT SERVES AS THE SITE'S EASTERN BOUNDARY AND, ONLY AN AT GRADE CROSSING CONNECTS THE SITE TO INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY AND THEN TO US 33, AND THEN OBVIOUSLY TO THE WEST YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL ALONG WEAVER ROAD. IT IS ALREADY ZONED FOR MANUFACTURING. SO THAT'S SOMETHING THAT I THINK IS PRETTY IMPORTANT TO WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE, BECAUSE THIS PUD IS NOT, SIGNIFICANT. ALTERING THE PERMITTED USE, THE PERMITTED USES ON THE SITE OR THE CONDITIONAL USES, BUT AT THE SAME TIME, WHEN YOU LOOK AT DEVELOPMENT BARRIERS TO THIS SITE, THIS ITSELF POSES A CHALLENGE JUST BECAUSE THERE IS

[00:15:01]

A REALLY GOOD POSSIBILITY THAT YOU WOULD HAVE A USER THAT, IF THE SITE WORKS FOR THEM, MAY WANT TO LOCATE STRADDLING BOTH OF THOSE ZONING DISTRICTS, WHICH WOULD PROPOSE A CHALLENGE. IT'S A TIMING CHALLENGE, BUT TIME IS MONEY, AND THAT'S JUST SOMETHING THAT GOES AS A RISK IN THE MODEL AND IS NOT OPTIMAL. SO ONE OF THE SOLUTIONS THAT A PUD PROVIDES IS, IS ALLOWING US TO TAKE THE ELEMENTS FROM THE TWO ZONING DISTRICTS THAT WE THINK MAY MAKE THE MOST SENSE FOR THE SITE, GIVEN ITS EXISTING CONDITIONS, AND, AND PUT TOGETHER A DISTRICT, THAT TAKES THOSE INTO ACCOUNT AND LIKE I SAID EARLIER, CONFORMS BEST WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA. BUT THIS IS AN AREA IN AREA THAT IS PLANNED FOR MANUFACTURING. AND OBVIOUSLY, ONE OF THE THINGS, THAT WE LOOK CLOSELY AT WHEN WE STARTED PLANNING FOR THE SITE AND PUTTING THIS SKETCH PLAN TOGETHER, WAS HOW IT CONFORMS WITH THE MARYSVILLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. AND THIS IS AN AREA, THAT WAS IDENTIFIED AND PLANNED FOR INDUSTRY, SPECIFICALLY MANUFACTURING AND WAREHOUSING AND WAREHOUSING IS NOT SOMETHING THAT IS A DEVELOPER, THE MARYSVILLE LAND COMPANY OR THE NEW ALBANY COMPANY PLACES A BIG FOCUS ON. BUT JUST IN GENERAL, WHEN THE CITY HAS LOOKED AT THAT, THIS SITE, THAT IS WHAT IT HAS ENVISIONED THERE, REGARDLESS, OF SOME OF THOSE CONSTRAINTS. SO WHAT WE'RE LOOKING TO DO IS TO LEVERAGE THE PUD OR USE THE PUD TO CAPITALIZE ON THE HEAVY INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE AREA, AND TAKE WHAT WE VIEW AS THE BEST ELEMENTS OF THE LMD AND MANUFACTURING AND INNOVATION ZONING DISTRICTS, AND TURN IT INTO THE MARYSVILLE SOUTH PUD, WHILE ALSO INCLUDING ENHANCED SETBACKS AND BUFFERS ALONG WEAVER ROAD. BECAUSE, LIKE I SAID, THAT'S THE ONE AREA THAT DOES NOT CONFORM WITH EVERYTHING ELSE. THAT IS LARGELY TO THE EAST OF THE SITE. SO I WANTED TO PUT THE OBJECTIVES FOR THE PUD BACK UP THERE AND THEN, PUT THOSE UP NEXT TO WHAT OUR OBJECTIVES ARE FOR THE MARYSVILLE SOUTH PUD. AND LIKE I SAID EARLIER, THAT'S REALLY ALIGNING THE STANDARDS WITH THE SITE'S UNIQUE CHARACTERISTICS BY BLENDING TWO EXISTING ZONING DISTRICTS INTO ONE THAT WILL PUT THE PROPERTY IN A BETTER POSITION TO ATTRACT, MOST LIKELY A LESS INTENSIVE END USER, THAT IS NOT DETERRED BY SOME OF THE CONSTRAINTS THAT HAVE BEEN REFERENCED. BY DOING SO, YOU'RE PUTTING THE PROPERTY IN THE BEST POSITION TO CREATE JOBS FOR RESIDENTS, INCOME FOR AREA BUSINESSES, AND REVENUE FOR THE SCHOOLS AND AT THE SAME TIME, MINIMIZING THE IMPACT ON WEAVER, WHICH I PROMISE I WILL GET TO THAT PLAN SHORTLY, BUT WANTED TO GET THROUGH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FIRST. BUT LET'S GET TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONS, SO YOU ALL KNOW, WE, IMPLEMENTED A PUD FOR THE MARYSVILLE EAST DEVELOPMENT THAT WE'RE A PART OF , AND THAT WAS AN INTERESTING PROCESS THAT THAT AREA DID NOT HAVE SOME OF THE SAME PHYSICAL CONSTRAINTS THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT WITH MARYSVILLE SOUTH, BUT THERE WAS A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD, BUXTON MEADOWS, RIGHT NEXT DOOR, AND THROUGH OUR DIALOG WITH THOSE RESIDENTS, ANOTHER BENEFIT OF THE PUD IS IT GAVE US THE AGILITY TO CONTINUE WITH THE RIGHT ZONING CODE, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT THAT WE WERE LOOKING TO MOVE FORWARD THERE. WELL, AT THE SAME TIME, GIVING US A TON OF FLEXIBILITY TO SCREEN AND BUFFER OUR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FROM BUXTON MEADOWS AND, A LOT OF WHAT YOU SEE HERE, ALL OF WHAT YOU SEE ACTUALLY, IN TERMS OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES, THESE ARE WHAT WE MOVE FORWARD WITH IN MARYSVILLE EAST. AND THEN WHEN WE WALK THROUGH OUR BUFFERING PLAN, OR AT LEAST OUR PRELIMINARY BUFFERING PLAN, YOU'LL SEE THAT THERE ARE A LOT OF SIMILARITIES TO WHAT WE DID THERE AS WELL. SO IN TERMS OF PROPOSED CONDITIONS, AND I HAVE A CHART AT THE END HERE THAT SHOWS WHAT THE EXISTING CODE ALLOWS TODAY. BUT OUR GENERAL SETBACKS AND THESE ARE LARGELY GOING TO APPLY TO THE NORTHERN AND EASTERN BOUNDARIES OF THE SITE, WHICH ARE MORE SIMILAR USES TO WHAT WE MAY BE PLANNING HERE. NOT THE EXACT SAME, BUT THEY'RE MORE INDUSTRIAL IN NATURE. WILL BE 50FT FOR PAVEMENT, 100FT FOR BUILDINGS, WHERE THE SETBACKS WILL BE ENHANCED ARE ALONG WEAVER ROAD AND THE SITE HAS A BIT OF AN ODD SHAPE ON THE WESTERN BOUNDARY. AND THE CORPORATION LINE FOR THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE. ALSO, WHEN YOU'RE ON WEAVER ROAD, KIND OF RUNS EAST WEST THROUGH THERE, AND THE SITE HAS DIFFERENT DEPTHS OFF OF WEAVER ROAD IN DIFFERENT AREAS. SO THE BEST WAY WE PLAN TO DO THIS RIGHT NOW IS, FROM THE WEAVER ROAD CENTER LINE FOR THOSE PROPERTIES THAT ARE IN THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE, WE'RE TAKING A 400 FOOT BUILDING AND PAVEMENT SETBACK FROM WEAVER ROAD. AND THESE THESE RESIDENTIAL LOTS ARE ACTUALLY WITHIN, THE LMD DISTRICT TO BEGIN WITH. SO THEY'RE THEY'RE USED AS RESIDENTIAL LOTS, BUT THEY ARE ZONED FOR LIGHT MANUFACTURING. IF YOU GO FURTHER

[00:20:03]

SOUTH, INTO THE TOWNSHIP WHERE THE LOTS START GETTING A LITTLE BIT DEEPER, 400FT FROM WEAVER ROAD TAKES YOU TO THE MIDDLE OF THOSE LOTS. IT DOESN'T EVEN GET YOU ONTO OUR SITE. SO WE'RE PROPOSING 150 FOOT PAVEMENT AND 200 FOOT BUILDING SETBACK FOR THOSE AREAS THAT BORDER THE UNINCORPORATED RESIDENTIAL LOTS OFF OF WEAVER. ONE OF THE MORE NOTABLE ENHANCEMENTS THAT WE HAVE OF IN THIS PLAN IS CURRENTLY THE HEIGHT LIMITATION IS 50FT. WE'RE GOING TO MOVE THAT UP TO 70FT JUST BECAUSE THAT'S MORE IN LINE WITH MARKET FOR THESE TYPES OF BUILDINGS RIGHT NOW. AND WE DON'T WANT TO PAINT OURSELVES INTO A CORNER FOR A HEIGHT LIMITATION THAT DOESN'T WORK IN THE MARKET. AND FOR THE COMPANIES THAT WE'RE HOPEFULLY GOING TO BE TALKING TO IN THE VERY NEAR FUTURE, I WILL SAY THAT WE MET WITH THE UNION COUNTY AIRPORT LAST WEEK FOR THE FIRST TIME AND GAVE THEM, A LITTLE BIT OF A PRIMER TO WHAT WE'RE PRESENTING TODAY, AND LOOKED AT THE REGULATIONS, BASED ON THE, HORIZONTAL SURFACE AND EVERYTHING TO THE SOUTH, WHICH ENCOMPASSES OUR SITES AND THIS STILL GIVES A LOT OF ROOM, BETWEEN WHAT, WOULD MAKE THE AIRPORT NERVOUS, AND WHAT WE BELIEVE PUTS THIS SITE IN THE MOST COMPETITIVE POSITION. SO YOU HAVE, YOU'RE PROPOSING A WIRELESS TOWER, THOUGH? OUR WIRELESS, OUR WIRELESS TOWERS OVER 70FT. WELL, SO THERE'S ONE THAT'S WITHIN THE SITE RIGHT NOW OFF OF INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY. IT'S ACTUALLY PROBABLY ON THE DRUM PROPERTY ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE RAILROAD TRACKS. BUT, IF A WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER, IS PROHIBITIVE FOR ANY REASON, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE'RE WILLING TO, TO TALK ABOUT AND EITHER CHANGE OR MODIFY. BUT THAT WAS JUST PULLED FROM THE MARYSVILLE EAST TEXT. OKAY. THANK YOU. AND BY THE WAY, WITH MARYSVILLE EAST, YOU'RE ACTUALLY HAVING PLANES TAKE OFF AND APPROACH THERE, AT THE SAME TIME. SO IF IT WASN'T AN ISSUE FOR MARYSVILLE EAST AND SINCE THIS IS SOUTH OF THE AIRPORT WHERE YOU DON'T HAVE THAT SAME TYPE OF ACTIVITY, I'D WONDER WHY IT WOULD BE A CHALLENGE HERE OR NOT THERE. BUT AGAIN, WE'RE OPEN TO IT. WE JUST TOOK IT FROM MARYSVILLE EAST FOR THAT REASON. OKAY, SO THIS IS OUR OUR PROPOSED PLAN THAT SHOWS THE UPDATED SETBACKS, I'M GOING TO TAKE A FEW MINUTES TO TALK ABOUT A FEW OTHER THINGS BEFORE WE, GET INTO THE SETBACKS. BUT OUR OBJECTIVE IS FOR PRIMARY SITE ACCESS TO COME FROM SCOTTS LAWN ROAD. THAT'S NOT BEEN FINALIZED, AT THE SAME TIME, WE WOULD ENVISION THERE'S A 12 INCH WATER LINE THAT RUNS ALONG SCOTTS LAWN THAT WOULD FOLLOW THE ACCESS ROAD WHEREVER IT THE FINAL ALIGNMENT IS INTO THE SITE. WATER AND SEWER WOULD COME FROM FURTHER NORTH OFF OF INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY. AND LIKE I SAID, POWER IS ALREADY ON SITE. AND THEN YOU SEE THE UPDATED SETBACKS ON THIS, ON THIS RENDERING AS WELL. WITH THE 400FT TO THE NORTH, THIS THIS GIVES A BETTER ARTICULATION OF WHAT IT ACTUALLY IS, WHAT ACTUALLY IS PROPOSED COMPARED TO JUST READING IT OFF OF A BULLET, BECAUSE YOU CAN SEE THE 400FT FROM WEAVER FOR THOSE AREAS THAT ARE IN THE INCORPORATED, ON THE INCORPORATED SIDE OF THE LINE.

AND THEN FOR THOSE THAT ARE SOUTH THAT HAVE THOSE MUCH DEEPER LOTS, AND THE SITE IS FURTHER OFF THE ROAD TO BEGIN WITH, YOU'VE GOT THE 150 AND 200FT, FROM THE BOUNDARY. IN TERMS OF, BUFFERING AND SCREENING, AGAIN, THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE, WE TOOK FROM OUR EXPERIENCE WITH BUXTON MEADOWS. WE ARE PROPOSING FOR, ON THE PERIMETER BOUNDARIES ABUTTING RESIDENTIAL. SO AGAIN, OFF OF WEAVER, LARGELY, A MINIMUM SIX FOOT MOUND, THAT WOULD HAVE HAVE, PLANTING MATERIALS ON TOP OF IT. SO A MIX OF, TREES, EVERGREENS, BUSHES WITHIN FOUR YEARS, REACHING 80, 80% OPACITY, AND A TOTAL HEIGHT FROM GROUND LEVEL OF TEN FEET ABOVE GROUND. SO YOU GOT A SIX FOOT MOUND PLANNING ON TOP, IN ADDITION TO THE SETBACKS THAT WE'RE PROPOSING TO BUFFER RESIDENTIAL FROM THE MARYSVILLE SOUTH, PUD, THE ONE THING THAT I WANT TO REALLY CALL OUT ON THIS SLIDE ARE THE SETBACKS. SO TODAY, BECAUSE THIS SITE IS ZONED IN TWO DIFFERENT MANUFACTURING DISTRICTS, YOU COULD HAVE SOMEBODY BUILD 40FT FROM THE ABUTTING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. SO WE ARE PROPOSING TO TAKE THAT BACK SUBSTANTIALLY, AND ALSO PUT IN, SCREENING AT THE SAME TIME. NOW THERE'S QUITE A BIT TO FIGURE OUT WITH THE SITE. I MENTIONED ALL THE PROS THAT GO ALONG WITH IT, ACCESS IS GOING TO BE ONE OF THE KEY THINGS THAT WE NEED TO FIGURE OUT. BUT ONE OF OUR BIGGEST PRIORITIES IS MAKING SURE THAT WE ARE PRESERVING WEAVER ROAD AS A RESIDENTIAL ROAD, AND WE ARE BUFFERING RESIDENTS ON WEAVER ROAD FROM THIS PUD, AND WE THINK GIVEN WHAT'S CURRENTLY ALLOWABLE, THAT THIS IS A GOOD

[00:25:03]

PLAN. I'LL STOP THERE AND SEE IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS. I HAVE A QUESTION, HAVE YOU BEEN IN CONTACT WITH CSX RAILROAD AND HAVE YOU DO YOU ANTICIPATE HAVING A RAIL SPUR OR A POTENTIAL RAIL SPUR INTO THIS DEVELOPMENT? THAT WE COULD, BUT WE'RE TOO EARLY IN, IN OUR PLANNING RIGHT NOW TO KNOW THAT DEFINITIVELY. WE'VE BEEN TALKING TO, RUSTY AUBURN, WHO MANAGES GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS AT CSX AS WELL AS ADAM HESS, WHO'S THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT MANAGER FOR CSX OVERSEEING THE STATE OF OHIO. JUST ABOUT OUR PLANS FOR THE SITE AND THE FACT THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT IT AND WE CONTINUE TO ENVISION IT AS AN INDUSTRIAL SITE, BUT IT'S TOO EARLY TO KNOW WHETHER OR NOT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A RAIL SPUR. BUT THERE IS CAPACITY THERE FOR THEM TO EXTEND ONE IF IT IS NEEDED. THEN MY FOLLOW UP QUESTION WAS WITH THE ELECTRICAL EASEMENT, THE 50 FOOT THAT'S GOING TO BE RELOCATED, WHAT TYPE OF UTILITIES ARE CURRENTLY GOING THROUGH THERE, IF ANY? AND HOW DO YOU ANTICIPATE RELOCATING THAT EASEMENT? SO WE'RE IN PRELIMINARY CONVERSATIONS WITH UTILITIES RIGHT NOW. THE ELECTRICAL THERE'S TWO SEPARATE ELECTRIC LINES THAT ARE GOING THROUGH THERE RIGHT NOW. AND WE'RE HAVING INDIVIDUAL CONVERSATIONS ON BOTH OF THOSE, SIMILAR TO MY ANSWER WITH CSX, WHERE WE'RE STILL PRELIMINARY IN THOSE CONVERSATIONS. BUT ARE, STARTING ENGINEERING TO PROPOSE SOME SOLUTIONS FOR THAT. MR. CHAIR, WHEN WE DECIDED SIX FOOT MOUNDS, FOR BOOTY MOUNDS, DID WE DECIDE TOP OF CURB? TOP OF PAVEMENT. WHAT? WHERE WHERE ARE WE GETTING THE SIX FOOT FROM? IS IT FROM TOP OF PAVEMENT? REMEMBER, JEFF, DO YOU REMEMBER WHERE WE'RE GETTING THE SIX FOOT HEIGHT? I THINK IT'S GREAT. YEAH GREAT. OKAY. AND YES. YEAH. SO AND FOR THE MARYSVILLE EASTERN. YEAH. SO THERE WAS A DETAIL THAT THEY PROVIDED LIKE A TYPICAL SECTION. THAT'S WHAT WE WERE REFERENCING. AND I THINK IT'S FROM THAT TOP GRADE ADJACENT TO THE, THE EDGE OF THE MOUNTAIN AND ON THE, SKETCH PLAN, NOT, THERE'S THE, THE WHERE'S THAT, THE EASEMENT FOR THE FUTURE MARYSVILLE ROAD. WHAT I SAW YOU REFERENCED, I HEARD YOU REFERENCE IT, BUT YOU LOST ME WHEN WE WERE TALKING ABOUT IT.

SO IT'S ON THE SOUTH. SO. AND OUR INTENTION IS FOR PRIMARY SIDE ACCESS TO BE OFF OF SCOTTS LAWN. WE HAVE NOT FINALIZED AN ALIGNMENT YET. SO GIVEN THAT WE'RE IN SKETCH RIGHT NOW, WE FELT LIKE OUR BEST RECOURSE IS JUST TO SHOW ON THE MAP THAT THAT'S WHERE WE INTEND TO ACCESS THE SITE FROM. BUT THE ACTUAL ALIGNMENTS NOT YET BEEN FINALIZED. WHAT IS THAT PROCESS? I GUESS I CAN YOU GIVE US HIGH LEVEL? SURE. LAND NEGOTIATE PLANS, BUT ALSO LOGISTICS DOES MATTER. THE LOCATION DOES MATTER. SO WE'VE GOT A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT ALIGNMENTS THAT WE'RE CONSIDERING RIGHT NOW AND TALKING TO PROPERTY OWNERS ABOUT, AND WE'RE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHAT THE BEST ONE IS. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. I SEE YOU DO HAVE NOTED ON THE LITTLE SPURS THAT GO OUT TO WEAVER. POTENTIAL EMPLOYEE AND EMERGENCY ACCESS, NO TRUCKS. CORRECT THAT'S THAT'S A NICE TOUCH. AND I DON'T KNOW IF THE RESIDENTS ON WEAVER KNOW THAT, BUT THEY ARE CALLING OUT NO TRUCK ENTRANCES ON WEAVER ROAD. IS THAT JUST GOING TO BE LIKE A GATE KIND OF ACCESS KEY CARD? A LOT OF IT'S GOING TO DEPEND ON THE ACTUAL END USER, SOME MAY NOT NEED IT, SOME, BECAUSE OF THEIR OPERATIONS, WILL WANT TO AT LEAST HAVE EMERGENCY ACCESS OR SECONDARY ACCESS POINT IN THE EVENT THAT SOMETHING HAPPENS WITH THE PRIMARY ACCESS POINT, WE DO NOT ENVISION THAT BEING A HIGH TRAFFIC ENTRANCE OR EXIT IS THE MAIN POINT. AND, YOU KNOW, A LOT IS GOING TO BE FIGURED OUT IN IN THE FUTURE WHEN WE'RE ACTUALLY WHEN THERE IS AN END USER THAT'S SUBMITTING THEIR PLANS, AND WORKING ON THOSE ACCESS POINTS OFFICIALLY, WE JUST FELT THAT IT WAS IMPORTANT TO HAVE ON THE RECORD THAT WE DO NOT INTEND TO USE WEAVER ROAD AS A PRIMARY ACCESS POINT. WE WOULD LIKE TO DIVERT AS MUCH TRAFFIC FROM IT AS POSSIBLE, AS FAR AS THE EASEMENTS, LIKE, I APPRECIATE THE, DIFFICULTIES WITH THE SHAPE OF THIS AREA, THOUGH IT SEEMS LIKE THE, I BELIEVE IT'S PROBABLY THE LAST TWO PROPERTIES, IN MARYSVILLE, THAT 400FT IS PROBABLY ONLY. I MEAN, THERE'S NOT A MEASUREMENT, BUT MAYBE LIKE 50FT OR SOMETHING OFF. YOU KNOW, IF YOU COULD BUMP THAT OUT. I MEAN, LIKE, GENEROUS WITH THE EASEMENTS OUT EVERYWHERE ELSE, BUT, YOU KNOW, DON'T WANT TO, YOU KNOW, WHOEVER THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS ARE, THEY MAY BE HERE. THEM SOON, BUT, I, I WOULD THINK THAT, AT LEAST 150FT, WOULD LIKE TO SEE. OKAY. MR. CHAIR, WHERE ARE YOU SEEING THAT AT, YEAH. JUST GRAPHICALLY, IT LOOKS

[00:30:01]

TIGHTER. I THINK IT'S I THINK IT STAYS 150. OH, NO, IT'S 400 FROM WEAVER THERE. BECAUSE IT'S IN THE CORPORATION. GOTCHA, GOTCHA. BUT THAT MAY ONLY BE 50FT OR SO. YEAH, I SEE THAT NOW. NOTED OKAY. THANK YOU. LET'S SEE. YEAH. ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD? THANKS. I HAD WRITTEN DOWN ABOUT , DISCUSS THE PROCESS OF GETTING ACCESS TO SKYLON CONCERNS, A FIGHT NEAR THE AIRPORT. SO. SO YOU HAVE TALKED, WITH THE AIRPORT AND THEN BUFFERING. SO, MR. CHAIRMAN. YES, SIR, WITH THE BUILDING HEIGHT INCREASE FROM 50 TO 70FT, WOULD IT MAKE SENSE TO ALSO INCREASE THE STANDARD SIX FOOT BERM AND VEGETATION GROWTH INCREMENTS TO GROW WITH THAT 50 TO 70, AS WELL AS A RATIO? THOUGHTS FROM THE BOARD MAYBE. I THINK MARYSVILLE EAST, IT WAS 70 WITH THAT SIX FOOT BERM. MARYSVILLE EAST WE ACTUALLY DID A 12 FOOT MOUND, BUT THAT WAS AT THE REQUEST OF THE RESIDENTS, I'M NOT SURE THAT A 12 FOOT MOUND IS EVERYBODY'S JAM. SO I, YOU KNOW, WE'RE WE'RE OPEN TO MAKING MODIFICATIONS TO THE PLAN, BUT WE FELT THAT SIX WAS JUST THE, THE RIGHT STARTING POINT. I FEEL LIKE THIS IS PRETTY CLOSE TO A LOT OF THE RESIDENTS. I MEAN, I GET THE 400FT. THAT'S WHAT YOU SAID ABOUT ONCE WE GET INTO THE CITY LIMITS IS WHERE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO HAVE SOME ISSUES. JUST FROM RESIDENT COMMENTS IN THE PAST.

OKAY, SO I, I GUESS WE'LL SEE WHAT PEOPLE HAVE TO SAY. I MEAN, I. SURE. GO AHEAD. BUT IT DOES MATCH MARYSVILLE EAST, WHETHER IT'S RIGHT, RIGHT OR WRONG. MY CONCERN IS I THINK THE DATA I MEAN, I GET IT, IT'S AN INDUSTRIAL AREA AND WE WANT TO, YOU KNOW, GROW AND EXPAND. BUT I THINK WITH A I KNOW THAT THAT'S A USE THAT'S ON THERE AS A DATA CENTER. YEAH. SO IF YOU LOOK AT THE GIS MAP, THERE'S NOT A TON OF RESIDENTIAL. THERE'S THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACROSS WEAVER, THERE'S INDIVIDUAL PARCELS HERE WHERE THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE THAT 400 FOOT SETBACK.

SOUTH. I APPRECIATE IT SINCE I'M SOUTH UP THERE RIGHT. SHE WAS SHE MENTIONED RESIDENTS IN THE CITY. SO I'M SHOWING WHAT'S IN THE CITY BOUNDARIES WITH THAT BUFFERING COMMENT. SO IT WOULD BE SETBACK. COULD IT BE SETBACK FOR YOUR FEET FROM WEAVER ON IT? IT'LL BE 400FT FROM HERE. SO THIS IS ABOUT THESE ARE ABOUT 300 AND ABOUT 340 FROM THE CENTER LINE TO THE BACK OF THIS.

SO I REQUESTED THAT ADDITIONAL BUFFER. WELL WE'LL WE'LL GO BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD ON THAT AND SEE WHAT WE CAN COME UP WITH. OKAY. WELL SINCE YOU THIS IS A FOLLOW UP ON THE DEVELOPMENT TAX, ONE OF THE ONES THAT I WOULD QUESTION IS THAT PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES, WHICH WOULD BE, ELECTRICAL SUBSTATIONS, YOU'RE INCLUDING THAT IN THE TEXT. AND I'M QUESTIONING WHY WE WOULD WANT TO HAVE THAT ON THIS SITE. SURE AND THEN I'LL FOLLOW UP THE DATA CENTER. I ALSO HAVE A PROBLEM WITH AND THE WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS ANTENNA FACILITY AND TOWER. I THINK WE COULD TAKE I WOULD SUGGEST POTENTIALLY MAKING THE WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS A CONDITIONAL USE, EVEN THE SUBSTATION, IF YOU WOULD NEED IT FOR YOUR FACILITY, THAT SHOULD BE A CONDITIONAL USE. SO THEY COULD AT LEAST COME FROM THE BOARD TO SEE WHAT THEIR WHAT YOU'RE ANTICIPATING. AND THEN ON THE CONDITIONAL USE THE RECYCLING CENTERS. WHAT WHAT'S YOUR VISION OF A RECYCLING CENTER. LET ME LET ME TAKE THOSE IN ORDER. SO I'M I'M ACTUALLY GOING TO START WITH THE SUBSTATION. SO IF YOU LOOK AT INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY THESE DAYS THERE'S A COUPLE OF TRENDS. ONE, CAPITAL INVESTMENTS GOING UP BECAUSE OF I, EMPLOYMENT IS GENERALLY GOING DOWN. WAGES ARE GOING UP ASSOCIATED WITH THOSE JOBS, THE POWER DEMANDS OF THESE FACILITIES HAS ALSO GONE UP QUITE A BIT AS WELL, BASED ON THE AUTOMATED EQUIPMENT THAT THEY'RE USING. AND I HAS SOMETHING TO DO WITH THAT AS WELL. SO IT IS PROBABLE THAT YOU COULD LAND A DIGITAL MANUFACTURING OPERATION ON THE SITE OR A DATA CENTER THAT HAS A POWER DEMAND SUCH THAT THEY REQUIRE THEIR OWN ON SITE SUBSTATION. SO WE'RE JUST FOLLOWING TRENDS THAT ALIGN WITH THE TYPES OF PERMITTED USES THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT, BUT WE CAN

[00:35:06]

DISCUSS THAT INTERNALLY AND EITHER COME BACK WITH ADDITIONAL THOUGHTS ON IT OR IF WE DO FEEL COMFORTABLE MOVING IT TO A CONDITIONAL USE, THEN WE'LL DO THAT, RECYCLING CENTERS, THAT WE ARE NOT THINKING OF TAKING, YOU KNOW, YOUR PLASTICS, YOUR NEWSPAPERS, YOUR, YOUR BOXES AND ALL THOSE KINDS OF THINGS AND, AND HAVING A RECYCLING CENTER ON THE SITE, WE ARE ACTUALLY MORE THINKING OF THINGS LIKE THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY, WHICH IS BECOMING MORE ELECTRIFIED, AND RECYCLING THOSE BATTERIES IS A NEXT BIG EVOLUTION IN THE INDUSTRY, WHICH TEND TO BE GOOD CAPITAL INVESTMENT, HIGH PAYING JOB OPERATIONS. SO GIVEN THAT MARYSVILLE IS AN AUTOMOTIVE TOWN AND THE EXTENT TO WHICH THAT WE ARE FOLLOWING AN INDUSTRY THAT DRIVES THIS COMMUNITY, WE JUST DIDN'T WANT TO EXCLUDE SOMETHING THAT WE THINK MIGHT BE A VIABLE OPPORTUNITY. YEAH. SO I WAS WONDERING, IS THERE A WAY TO DISTINGUISH THE RECYCLING CENTERS THAT WOULD BE AN ENCLOSED FACILITY, NOT AN OUTDOOR STORAGE FACILITY? I THINK THAT THERE IS A WAY TO DO THAT. THAT WOULD BE MY PROPOSAL. OKAY BE IN FAVOR OF THAT. I THINK, CHAD, I WANT TO TALK TO YOU ABOUT THIS TALK THIS SUBSTATION SITUATION OUT. I THINK IT SHOULD BE A CONDITIONAL USE FOR PLACEMENT PURPOSES, WE DON'T WE I WOULD THINK IT SHOULD COME IN FRONT OF US AND WE COULD HAVE A SAY OR SEE WHERE IT'S GOING ON, ON THAT BUILDING. SO THE SUBSTATIONS YOU KNOW, NEAR A RESIDENCE. I DON'T THINK WE SHOULD JUST HAVE CARTE BLANCHE TO JUST BE ABLE TO PUT IT ANYWHERE OR SOMEONE ELSE. I THINK IT SHOULD BE A CONDITIONAL USE. SO IF IT'S RELATED TO SITE WHERE IT IS ON THE SITE, WE WOULD DEAL WITH THAT AT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD THEN. RIGHT, SO IS THAT IS THAT AN OKAY KIND OF STEP FOR YOU THEN. SO IF IT IS JUST UNDER PERMITTED THEN THEY WOULD HAVE THAT YOU WOULD EVALUATE THAT ACTUAL SITE LOCATION AND HOW THAT LOOKS AND IS SCREENED OR WHAT, YOU KNOW, WHAT THAT EXACT SITE PLAN IS AT THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STAGE. I THINK THAT'S FAIR IN A QUESTION, AND THIS MAY BE A MOOT POINT. NOW, BASED ON ASHLEY'S COMMENT, BUT A QUESTION I HAVE IS WHY IS IT A CHALLENGE FOR MARYSVILLE SOUTH? BUT IT WASN'T FOR MARYSVILLE EAST WHEN WE BROUGHT THIS THROUGH. IS THERE SOMETHING ABOUT THE SITE CHARACTERISTICS THAT I'M I'M NOT CONTEMPLATING, I THINK IT'S US BEING MORE EDUCATED AS THESE THESE PROCESSES FLOW THROUGH. OKAY ALL RIGHT. I JUST DIDN'T KNOW IF IT WAS SOMETHING UNIQUE TO THE SITE. THE SURROUNDING AREA. I DON'T THINK WE'RE AGAINST A, SUBSTATION BY ANY MEANS. WE JUST WANT TO KNOW THAT IT'S NOT GOING TO BE ADJACENT TO SOMEBODY'S RESIDENCE. OKAY? OR THE PLACEMENT NEXT TO THE BUFFERING. YEAH, RIGHT. OR WITHIN ONE OF THESE DESIGNATED AREAS WHERE IT'S AN EMERGENCY SEA PATH FOR EGRESS OUT. IF IT'S WITHIN THE CONFINEMENTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT, I DON'T THINK ANYONE WOULD HAVE AN ISSUE WITH THAT. YEAH. AND WAS JUST ASKING THE QUESTION NOT TO PUSH BACK, BUT TO MAKE SURE WE UNDERSTOOD THE NATURE OF IT. AS A RESIDENT, I WOULD NOT WANT TO HEAR THE BUZZING OF A SUBSTATION. JUST MY PERSONAL OPINION. YEAH, I NOR WOULD I.

CHAD HAD ONE MORE QUESTION ABOUT THE TOWER. WHAT WAS YOUR. I WOULD I WOULD PROPOSE TO MOVE THAT TO A CONDITIONAL. I'M WHERE IF YOU WERE GOING TO PUT ANOTHER TOWER IN. YEAH. THAT SHOULDN'T BE AN ISSUE FOR THE SAME REASON. SO THAT WE CAN HAVE SAY ON PLACEMENT. YEAH. OKAY. MR. CHAIR, I DID HAVE. I WANTED TO BRING SOMETHING UP. YES, MA'AM, YOU HAD MENTIONED AND THIS IS, I GUESS, LESS OF A QUESTION AND MORE JUST FOR CONVERSATION ON, THE ACCESS OFF OF SCOTTS LAWN, YOU HAD SAID THAT THERE'S STILL SOME CONVERSATIONS WITH LANDOWNERS BECAUSE THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE AN EASEMENT THERE FOR THAT. BUT CAN YOU TALK US THROUGH WHY SCOTTS LAWN AND NOT INDUSTRIAL, WELL. WELL, THE MOST LIKELY SCENARIO OFF OF INDUSTRIAL, WHICH WE LOOKED AT A LOT, IS BUILDING AN OVERPASS, OVER THE RAILROAD TRACKS. THE ONLY SCENARIO WHERE YOU WOULDN'T HAVE TO BUILD AN OVERPASS IS IF YOU CAME IN THROUGH THAT LITTLE SLIVER RIGHT BEFORE INDUSTRIAL CROSSES THE RAILROAD TRACKS NORTH OF OUR SITE, THROUGH THE AIRPORT FENCE, AND THEN DOWN IN.

AND I'M NOT SAYING THAT THAT'S NOT POSSIBLE OR NOT EVEN LOGICAL, BUT, IT DOESN'T SEEM TO BE THE BETTER SCENARIO THAN HAVING ACCESS DIRECTLY OFF A ROAD THAT HAS A HIGHWAY INTERCHANGE A MILE UP THE STREET. SO I WAS JUST CURIOUS, BECAUSE THERE'S SO MUCH FARTHER TO. YEAH, OTHER PROPERTIES TO TRAVERSE FROM SCOTTS LAWN TO THAT SITE. YEAH, I'LL SAY I'VE HAD EXPERIENCE WORKING WITH RAILROADS AND THEY DON'T LIKE WORKING WITH PEOPLE. SO I MEAN, TO BUILD A ROAD OR. YEAH, I MEAN, ALTHOUGH IF THEY'RE LISTENING, CSX HAS BEEN WONDERFUL TO WORK WITH. I'M SURE THEY HAVE, MY EXPERIENCE HAS BEEN OUT OF STATE, I GUESS SO,

[00:40:04]

BUT YEAH. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. MR. CHAIR. YES, SIR, JUST OUT OF CURIOSITY, WITH YOUR CONVERSATIONS WITH UNION COUNTY AIRPORT, DID THEY HAVE ANY CONCERNS WITH THE DATA CENTER ANTENNAS? ANYTHING JUST FOR FREQUENCIES AND COMMUNICATION TOWER WITH AIRCRAFT, THEY'RE GOING TO BE SENSITIVE TO FREQUENCIES IN GENERAL, THEY DID NOT SAY SPECIFICALLY ANYTHING ABOUT DATA CENTERS. I WOULD ACTUALLY ASSUME THAT TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER AND SOMETHING THAT'S EMITTING, LIKE 5G FREQUENCIES WOULD BE MORE PROBLEMATIC THAN THAN A DATA CENTER. BUT THAT, YOU KNOW, DATA CENTER SPECIFICALLY DID NOT COME UP IN YOUR CONVERSATIONS WITH THEM, DID THEY MENTION, RETENTION PONDS? I KNOW THEY DID. THEY DID. AND WE ARE MEETING WE'RE PRESENTING TO THEIR BOARD IN JULY. SO YOU'RE NOT AT A POINT WHERE YOU. YEAH, JUST JUST MET WITH STEVE FOR THE FIRST TIME TO LET THEM KNOW THAT WE'RE HOPEFULLY MOVING IN NEXT DOOR. AND, WANTED TO START THE RELATIONSHIP, BUT WE'RE PROBABLY GOING TO START GETTING INTO MUCH, DEEPER LEVELS OF DETAIL COME JULY. JUST JUST FOR CLARIFICATION. SO THE OUR CURRENT ZONING CODE DOES HAVE A SECTION THAT, RELATES TO WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS. SO IT DOES HAVE STANDARDS ON THE HEIGHT THAT THEY'RE ALLOWED. AND SETBACKS AND THOSE ITEMS. SO, THAT IS SOMETHING THAT I CAN PROVIDE WITH THEM. WHAT SECTION THAT IS. SO THEY CAN LOOK AT IT, SEE IF IT SHOULD BE ALTERED OR IF THEY WANT IT TO FOLLOW OUR CODE. THEY COULD STATE THAT AS WELL, SO MAYBE THE OPTIONS ARE FOLLOWING MARYSVILLE CODE OR HAVING IT CONDITIONAL. YEAH.

BECAUSE IT IS PERMITTED, IT'S PERMITTED IN RMU GOVT OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MANUFACTURING HOSPITAL, MIXED USE LIGHT MANUFACTURING AND MANUFACTURING INNOVATION ZONE. IT IS CONDITIONAL AND HOSPITAL MIXED USE EXCEPT THAT SAYS IT'S CONDITIONAL AND PERMITTED IN TWO DIFFERENT DISTRICTS. SO BUT IT IS PERMITTED IN LIGHT MANUFACTURING AND MANUFACTURING DISTRICTS. ALL RIGHT. ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD THIS TIME. AND I DON'T KNOW. DID I STOP YOU DURING YOUR PRESENTATION OR WERE YOU DONE. NO. WE JUST STARTED ON THIS QUESTION. SO I WANT TO MAKE SURE. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS AT THIS TIME. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SO AT THIS TIME WE'LL OPEN IT UP FOR CITIZEN COMMENTS, AS WITH OTHER THINGS, PLEASE GO TO THE PODIUM. YOU HAVE FIVE MINUTES AND STATE YOUR NAME, ADDRESS, AND YOU'LL HAVE THE FLOOR. GOOD DAY. GOOD EVENING, AMY POTTER. GRIMM 14 294 WEAVER ROAD FOR EVERYONE IN THE AUDIENCE, PLEASE LEAVE IT IF YOU DON'T MIND. THAT IS MY PROPERTY. THAT IS MY PARENTS PROPERTY. SO EVERYBODY KNOWS WHERE I AM. I DO NOT LIVE IN CITY LIMITS. I'M THE FIRST HOUSE OUTSIDE OF CITY LIMITS. AND THIS SURE DOES FEEL LIKE 400FT. SOUNDS GREAT FOR EVERYBODY THAT'S IN CITY LIMITS, BUT ONCE YOU CROSS THE LINE, JUST BECAUSE MY LOT IS BIGGER THAN THE AVERAGE LOT, WHICH I PAID FOR, NOW SUDDENLY THEY'RE GOING TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THAT MY LOT IS AT LEAST 400FT DEEP WHEN THEY'RE PLANNING THIS. AND THAT SURE DOES FEEL LIKE TAKE ONE FOR THE CITY, BUT EVERYBODY ELSE OUTSIDE OF IT. SORRY ABOUT YOUR LUCK. SO MY PARENTS THAT HAVE FARM LAND AND FARMLAND THAT IS STILL GOING TO BE FARMED AFTER THEY PUT THIS IN, WE SURE WOULD LIKE SOME MORE BUFFER AND RECYCLING CENTER. OKAY LET'S TALK ABOUT THE BATTERIES. I LIVE ON A WELL, I DO NOT HAVE CITY WATER. THEY'RE NOT GOING TO BRING CITY WATER DOWN MY STREET. AND SO NOW WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A RECYCLING PLANT BACK THERE POTENTIALLY. CAN WE JUST LOSE IT BECAUSE GUESS WHAT. EVERYBODY SOUTH OF THERE THAT DOESN'T LIVE WITHIN CITY LIMITS.

AND A LOT OF THE PEOPLE THAT DO LIVE WITHIN CITY LIMITS, WE'RE GOING TO BE REALLY WE'RE GOING TO BE IN A LOT OF TROUBLE. I WAS MAKING NOTES LEFT AND RIGHT. THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS IN THIS PLAN. THE PRIMARY ACCESS POINT. IS NOT FINALIZED YET. WHAT IF THEY CAN'T GET IT? THEN WHAT? ONE, TWO. AND THEN THERE'S A THIRD SPOT. COULD YOU MOVE IT UP A THIRD SPOT? POTENTIALLY, IF WE DON'T ACTUALLY KNOW WHERE WE'RE GOING TO GO IN OFF OF THIS, HOW CAN WE APPROVE THIS AND LET IT MOVE ON? I UNDERSTAND THAT THERE'S A LOT OF LAND BACK THERE. YEARS AGO WHEN THIS WENT TO MANUFACTURING, IT WAS BECAUSE THEY WERE PUTTING IN A BARLEY PLANT. MANY OF YOU DIDN'T EVEN LIVE IN MARYSVILLE AT THAT TIME, BUT THAT'S HOW IT GOT REZONED. AND THEY WERE GOING TO PUT IN A

[00:45:04]

BARLEY MANUFACTURING PLANT. AND TOM HAMPTON SOLD THE LAND FOR $3 MILLION. IT IS NOW CHANGED HANDS, CHANGED HANDS, CHANGED HANDS, CHANGED HANDS, AND NOW THEY'VE BUILT THIS. I AM NOT AGAINST DEVELOPMENT, BUT HOWEVER, I THINK THERE CAN BE SOME MUCH IMPROVED OPTIONS FOR THIS. WE ARE NOT MARYSVILLE EAST GUYS. WE'RE MARYSVILLE SOUTH SO THEY'VE LUMPED US IN WITH MARYSVILLE AND THEY'RE MAKING IT THE REALLY EASY CUT AND PASTE, CUT AND PASTE, CUT AND PASTE.

BUT WE'RE NOT. SO WE DO HAVE THE AIRPORT AS A MAJOR FACTOR IN THIS. WE ALSO HAVE A LOT OF FARMLAND THAT IS STILL GOING TO CONTINUE TO BE FARMED AROUND HERE. AND SO THERE NEEDS TO BE SOME CONSIDERATION AND WE NEED TO MAKE SOME DECISIONS BEFORE WE DECIDE WE'RE GOING TO DO THIS, GET THE ANSWERS TO THESE QUESTIONS BEFORE WE DO IT. BECAUSE GUESS WHAT? WHAT IF THEY DON'T NEGOTIATE AND THEY HAVE TO PULL IT OFF OF WEAVER ROAD? WHERE ARE THEY GOING TO PULL IT IN? THANK YOU GUYS. LADIES AND GENTLEMEN. EXCUSE ME. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER CITIZENS WISHING TO SPEAK? HE DID? YES. DID NOT? YES YOU WERE HERE WHEN WE SWORE PEOPLE IN, CORRECT? YEAH HE'S.

HE'S FIRST. YEAH, BUT HE HE HAD YOU ADDRESSING ME, SIR? YES, SIR. I DIDN'T HEAR YOUR QUESTION. I WAS JUST ASKING, THERE WAS A CONFUSION WHETHER YOU WERE SWORN IN OR NOT. I THOUGHT YOU HAD BEEN. YOU WERE. DID YOU RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND SAY I WILL? I DID NOT, BUT BY GOLLY, I WILL RIGHT NOW, I WILL. THAT WAS RIGHT. AND I THINK THERE WERE A COUPLE OTHER PEOPLE THAT CAME IN. AND, IF YOU PLAN ON SPEAKING, IF YOU COULD STAND UP, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.

I WILL, SAY THE OATH AND JUST SIGNAL WITH I WILL CHANGE. I WILL? ALL RIGHT. DO YOU DECLARE THE TESTIMONY THAT YOU'RE ABOUT TO GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH AND THE WHOLE TRUTH UNDER THE PAINS AND PENALTIES OF PERJURY AND FALSIFICATION, I WILL THANK YOU VERY MUCH. APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. CHAD THIS WAY PLEASE. THANK YOU, I HAVE COMMENTS ABOUT TWO ITEMS THAT ARE. I KNOW YOU SPOKE EARLIER STILL FOR THE RECORD NAME AND ADDRESS AND THEN JC NOTESTEIN 14240 WEAVER ROAD.

430402 COMMENTS ABOUT THIS PROJECT THAT THERE'S ABOUT A 40 ACRE PATCH OF TREES THAT ARE TO BE DEMOLISHED AND THAT SORT OF THING. I WOULD LIKE TO HEAR THAT AN ARBORIST IS GOING TO BE EMPLOYED TO DETERMINE THE VALUE OF THE TIMBER. THAT WILL NEVER, EVER GROW AGAIN ON THAT 40 ACRES. IT'D BE A SHAME TO SEND A GUY WITH A CHAINSAW AND A BULLDOZER IN THERE AND SAY, CLEAR IT OFF. SECOND THING IS, YEARS AGO, WHEN THE SEWER LINE WAS PUT IN THERE, THERE WERE TEST WELLS DRILLED IN WHAT WAS TOM HAMPTON'S FARMLAND TO DETERMINE THE WATER LEVEL. MANY OF THOSE TEST WELLS, THEY COULD NOT PULL THE CASING. AND SO THEY WERE CUT OFF FAR ENOUGH DOWN THAT A FARMER'S PLOW WOULD NOT CATCH THEM. BUT THEY'RE STILL THERE. SO I'M CONCERNED THAT WE'RE GOING TO BUILD BUILDINGS AND RECYCLING CENTERS OVER OPEN CASINGS THAT ARE SIX FEET BELOW THE SURFACE OF THE GROUND. NOW, PARDON ME, BUT I KNOW WELL NOBODY'S GOING TO LOOK AT THAT.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU, SIR. SIR. MY NAME IS JAY ROUSH. I LIVE ON SCOTTS LAWN ROAD. MY ADDRESS IS 15199 SCOTTS LAWN ROAD. SO WHAT YOU'RE PROPOSING? SO I USED TO FARM HERITAGE FOR HERITAGE'S. IF YOU COULD GO UP THAT WAY PLEASE. WELL, I'M SORRY, I'M GOING TO GO DOWN ON THE SCOTS LAWN ROAD. SO LET ME GET MY BEARINGS. THAT'S SCOTS TRACK. THIS IS THE SCOTS PROPERTY. THIS IS OUR FARM. IT'S FARMS. BEEN IN THE FAMILY SINCE 1859. AND MY SON'S JUST STARTING THE FARM. SO WE'RE GOING TO KEEP FARMING. MY DRIVEWAY IS HERE ON THE DARBY TOWNSHIP, DARBY, PARIS TOWNSHIP LINE. I KNOW FOR A FACT THAT THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE IS IN HERITAGE, AND THE PROPOSED OUTLET FOR THE SCOTTS LAWN, UNLESS THEY GO THROUGH HERITAGE, YOU'RE YOU'RE NEGOTIATING THROUGH COUNTY PROPERTY AND IT'S NOT EVEN IN THE CITY LIMITS. SO HOW CAN THIS PROPOSED EASEMENT COME INTO SCOTTS LAWN? YOU YOU APPROVE IT AND IT'S NOT EVEN IN THE CITY LIMITS. YOU DON'T KNOW FOR SURE WHAT THEY'RE

[00:50:06]

NEGOTIATING WITH. BESIDES WHAT IS SCOTTS LAWN ROAD? WHAT IS ITS DESIGN USE? WHAT IS ITS APPROVED DESIGNATION? IS IT A COUNTY ROAD OR IS IT A CITY ROAD? IT'S A CITY ROAD FROM THE SCOTTS PROPERTY. OUR FARM DRIVEWAY THAT WAY IT'S NOT THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE FROM HERE OUT. SO YOU NEED TO DECIDE WHAT YOU'RE APPROVING. THAT'S NOT EVEN IN THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE. THANK YOU. YES SIR. TIM WHITE, 17 200 WALDO ROAD, THIS IS PROBABLY A DUMB QUESTION, BUT THESE THREE PEOPLE SPOKE BEFORE ME. THEY ASK QUESTIONS. NOW, WHAT'S THE PROCESS THAT HAPPENS? DO YOU ANSWER THEIR QUESTIONS NOW SOMEHOW? DOES THIS GO BEFORE YOU GUYS AND YOU GO BACK IN THE CORNER AND TALK ABOUT IT? YOU KNOW, I, I USUALLY EXPLAIN IT BETTER AND I DIDN'T THIS TIME, SO I APOLOGIZE. SO THE CITIZEN COMMENTS, IT'S NOT MEANT TO BE A BACK AND FORTH. SO IF YOU'RE NOTICING LIKE WE'RE ALL WRITING NOTES. AND SO ONCE ALL THE CITIZENS OF, SPOKEN, WE'LL CLOSE THAT AND THEN BRING THE APPLICANT BACK UP. AND BETWEEN US AND THEM, WE TRY TO ANSWER AS MANY QUESTIONS AS WE CAN. SOME OF THESE THINGS. WERE YOU AWARE OF SOME OF THIS STUFF THAT THEY JUST ASK ABOUT? THE, THIS GENTLEMAN HERE, WERE YOU KIDS WORRY ABOUT THAT, WHICH PART ABOUT THE, NOT HAVING ACCESS FROM SCOTT SONG CURRENTLY OR THIS GENTLEMAN BACK HERE? YES. WERE YOU GUYS AWARE THAT THE THING HE BROUGHT UP. THE DESIGN USE FOR SCOTT'S LAWN, I THINK, THEY'RE GOING TO COME BACK AND THEY'RE GOING TO ADDRESS. I THINK THE ROAD ISSUE IS A CONCERN, COUNTY VERSUS CITY. BUT I THINK, THAT'LL GET WORKED OUT.

YEAH. AND AGAIN, THIS IS, SKETCH PLAN. THIS IS THE FIRST OF MANY STEPS, YOU KNOW, SO, SO, SO WE CAN, APPROVE THIS TO, TO MOVE FORWARD IN PRINCIPLE, YOU KNOW, AS THEY WORK OUT, THE DETAILS WITH THE OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS TO GET ACCESS ONTO SCOTT'S LAWN. IF THAT DOES NOT WORK OUT, THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO COME TO FOR THE, DEVELOPMENT PLAN. AND IF THINGS CHANGE AND EVERYTHING'S GOING ON. WEAVER, THAT'S A DIFFERENT CONVERSATION. AND WE DECIDE AT THAT TIME, YOU KNOW, SO THERE'S MULTIPLE STEPS. SO, YEAH, IT'S A PROCESS, I GUESS I UNDERSTAND THAT. I UNDERSTAND THAT. OKAY. WELL, I HOPE I ANSWERED. I THINK YOU DID. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THESE PEOPLE THAT SPOKE HERE THAT, YOU KNOW, HERE'S THREE PEOPLE TRYING TO BEAT THE GUY, THE GENTLEMAN THAT WAS UP HERE, THAT GENTLEMAN AND THE OTHER YOUNG MAN. AND THIS GENTLEMAN OVER HERE THAT A LOT OF THESE PEOPLE HAVE HAD FARMS HERE FOREVER. AND, YOU KNOW, AND I UNDERSTAND THAT, BUT I GUESS I'M SPEAKING FOR THEM AS WELL. BUT I GUESS, YOU KNOW, IT'S TOUGH TO BEAT, THE GOVERNMENT AS WE KNOW NOW. AND YOU, EVERY DAY I PRAY AT NIGHT SOMEBODY TO HELP US GOVERNMENT. BUT THAT'S ANOTHER STORY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, SIR. APPRECIATE IT. ALL RIGHT.

ANY OTHER CITIZENS WISHING TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? AND YOU JUST NOW WALKED IN, RIGHT? JUST ON THAT. THIS IS SURE THIS IS MARYSVILLE SOUTH BETWEEN WEAVER AND INDUSTRIAL, I'M GOING TO HAVE TO SWEAR YOU IN, BUT ONCE I DO. SO I'M GOING TO READ A STATEMENT.

JUST SIGNAL OATH, I WILL. THEN YOU HAVE FIVE MINUTES, STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, BUT, YEAH, I'M TOM HAMPTON. HOLD ON. SO DO YOU SWEAR YOU IN FIRST? IF YOU RAISE YOUR I GOT IT. HE HAS TO SWEAR YOU IN FIRST. YEAH. AND THEN YOU CAN TALK. I HAVE TO SWEAR FIRST. YEP YEAH, SOMETHING LIKE THAT, DO YOU DECLARE THAT THE TESTIMONY YOU'RE ABOUT TO GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH AND THE WHOLE TRUTH? UNDER THE PAINS AND PENALTIES OF PERJURY AND FALSIFICATION SIGNAL BY SAYING, I WILL, I WILL. ALL RIGHT. SO THEN NAME, ADDRESS. AND YOU HAVE FIVE MINUTES. OKAY. MY NAME IS THOMAS HAMPTON. I LIVE AT 13 880 WEAVER ROAD. MY CONCERN ON WHAT I SAW ON THE INTERNET THAT THIS PROPERTY DOES NOT GO OUT TO INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY. IT STOPS AT THE RAILROAD. THAT IS CORRECT.

ARE THEY PLANNING ON BRINGING ALL OF THAT INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY THROUGH THE WEAVER ROAD? THEY'RE NOT, THE PLAN. AND YOU CAN KIND OF SEE MAYBE THE ARROW OFF OF SCOTLAND. THEY ARE WORKING WITH THE CURRENT OWNERS OF PROPERTIES ALONG SCOTS LAWN ON ONE TO BRING THE PRIMARY, ACCESS, BUT THAT'S

[00:55:04]

NOT AN INDUSTRIAL ROAD. THAT'S JUST AN OLD ROAD. WHY DON'T THEY GO ACROSS THE RAILROAD TRACK AND TAKE THE OTHER PART? SURE. VALID QUESTION. YES. OKAY. WE'LL WRITE THAT QUESTION DOWN. OKAY. I HAVE NOTHING ELSE TO SAY. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER CITIZENS WISHING TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME? ALL RIGHT. HERE. NONE, IF THE APPLICANT WILL COME BACK UP AND WE CAN, TALK THROUGH SOME OF THE QUESTIONS. SERVICES CITIZEN COMMENTS. SO THANK YOU FOR THE QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS, AFTER WE'RE THROUGH HERE, I WOULD LOVE TO GET PHONE NUMBERS, OF ANYBODY WHO'S CONCERNED ABOUT WHAT WE PRESENTED TODAY JUST BECAUSE, LIKE WE DID WITH MARYSVILLE EAST, WE DO INTEND TO SIT DOWN WITH CONCERNED RESIDENTS, UNDERSTAND THOSE CONCERNS, AND IF WE CAN MODIFY OUR PLAN ACCORDINGLY, WHICH WE DID WITH MARYSVILLE EAST, WE INTEND TO DO THAT. WE VIEW OURSELVES AS STRONG PUBLIC, PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERS WITH THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE, AND WE ARE IN THIS FOR THE LONG HAUL. SO WHAT WE'RE HEARING DOES MATTER, AND WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE INDIVIDUAL CONVERSATIONS, TO GET A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF YOUR CONCERNS AND THEN REACT ACCORDINGLY. I ALSO WANT TO, REINFORCE WHAT WHAT THE CHAIRMAN SAID, AND ALSO ADD SOMETHING TO IT, LIKE THIS IS THE FIRST STEP IN A MULTI-LEVEL PROCESS. WE INTEND TO INCORPORATE THIS FEEDBACK IN OUR DEVELOPMENT PLAN, WHICH COMES BACK IN FRONT OF PLANNING COMMISSION. AND THEN IT RECEIVES THREE READINGS AT CITY COUNCIL, SO WE ARE LONG FROM ANYTHING BEING FINALIZED, AND AT THE SAME TIME, AS FAR AS OUR PLANS FOR THIS SITE, WE'RE IN THE FIRST INNING. ZONING IS MERELY ONE FACTOR, OF THINGS THAT WE NEED TO WORK OUT TO MAKE THIS A COMPETITIVE SITE. AND I'VE LISTED ALL THE REASONS THAT IT'S NOT RIGHT NOW, BUT WE'VE GOT TO GET ZONING FIGURED OUT FIRST AND FOREMOST ON ON THINGS LIKE RECYCLING CENTERS. WELL, WE'LL GO BACK AND TAKE ANOTHER LOOK AT IT. BUT IT'S A CONDITIONAL USE IN OUR SKETCH PLAN, NOT A PERMITTED USE. WE HAVE NO PLANS TO PUT A RECYCLING CENTER THERE TOMORROW, ALTHOUGH I DO APPRECIATE WHY THAT WOULD MAKE SOMEONE NERVOUS, BUT WE'LL WE'LL WE'LL TAKE ANOTHER LOOK AT THAT. AS FAR AS TREES GO, IT'S A REQUIREMENT IN OUR DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO HAVE A STRATEGY FOR TREE REPLACEMENT. WASN'T IN THE SKETCH PLAN, BUT WE ARE GOING TO INCORPORATE THAT INTO OUR DEVELOPMENT PLAN, SCOTTS LAWN ROAD, YOU KNOW, HERITAGE IS IN THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE RIGHT NOW , AND WE ARE WORKING WITH THE CITY ENGINEER, KYLE HOYING, WHO IS COMMUNICATING WITH THE COUNTY ENGINEER. JUST OUCH ABOUT THIS PROJECT. SO I UNDERSTAND ACCESS IS A CONCERN. I'M NOT SURE HOW MATERIAL IT IS RIGHT NOW TO EVERYTHING ELSE WE'RE PRESENTING, BUT IT IS A MAJOR CONVERSATION THAT WE'RE HAVING RIGHT NOW WITH THE CITY AND COUNTY. WE JUST DON'T HAVE IT SOLVED YET. BUT WE WILL HAVE IT SOLVED, LET ME SEE HERE. WE I TRIED TO MENTION AS MANY TIMES AS I COULD THAT IT'S NOT OUR INTENTION TO, HAVE TRAFFIC ON WEAVER ROAD. UNDERSTAND THOSE CONCERNS. I THINK THAT'S EVERYTHING THE MAIN THING IS APPRECIATE EVERYBODY'S COMMENTS. APPRECIATE YOUR INVOLVEMENT WITH BEING HERE THIS EVENING. APPRECIATE YOU HEARING OUR SKETCH PLAN PRESENTATION. AND LOOK FORWARD TO MEETING WITH, ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WANTS TO, BETWEEN NOW AND THE NEXT MEETING TO GET A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF YOUR CONCERNS. THANK YOU. IF YOU DON'T MIND, COULD YOU TOUCH ON, AGAIN. THE REASON NOT GOING OVER THE RAILROAD TRACKS? WELL, IT WOULD REQUIRE AN OVERPASS, CLASS ONE RAILROADS ARE GENERALLY NOT ADDING, GRADE LEVEL CROSSINGS ANYMORE, IN FACT, THEY ARE TRYING TO REMOVE AS MANY AS POSSIBLE. SO IF WE WERE GOING TO CROSS THE RAILROAD TRACKS FROM INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY, WHICH WE LOOKED AT, YOU KNOW, THAT'S TEN, $20 MILLION DEPENDING ON THE LOCATION AND THE ENGINEERING, SO THAT THAT IS A POSSIBILITY, BUT IT'S NOT THE OPTIMAL POSSIBILITY . COULD YOU ADDRESS, SIR? COULD YOU ADDRESS THE, CITY VERSUS COUNTY ROADS AND WHAT IMPACT OR UPGRADES WOULD BE REQUIRED? AND WOULD YOU, WOULD YOUR COMPANY BE WILLING TO, I KNOW IT'S EARLY, BUT WOULD THAT BE SOMETHING THAT YOU WOULD BE CONTRIBUTING TO? WELL, IT'S TOO EARLY TO KNOW WHETHER WE'D BE CONTRIBUTING TO THAT. YOU KNOW, THINGS LIKE COST ALLOCATIONS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE. WE JUST HAVEN'T GOTTEN THERE RIGHT NOW. BUT, YOU KNOW, ANY ROAD WHERE WE'RE TAKING PRIMARY ACCESS THAT'S GOING TO BE IMPACTED WILL REQUIRE A TRAFFIC STUDY AT SOME POINT THAT WILL DICTATE, WHAT IMPROVEMENTS ARE NECESSARY FOR THAT IMPROVEMENT

[01:00:04]

TO BE SAFE, BUT THAT, THAT IS MANY STEPS DOWN THE ROAD. AGAIN, WE'RE JUST ASSESSING OUR OPTIONS. WE WILL FIND A PRIMARY ACCESS POINT THAT IS NOT OFF OF WEAVER ROAD. WE'RE JUST NOT THERE YET. OKAY THE ISSUE THAT WAS BROUGHT UP ABOUT THE CASINGS OF THE TEST WELLS ON THE CENTER WAS INSTALLED, IN THE PROCESSING OF THAT LAND, I GUESS. I MEAN. ARE YOU CONFIDENT THAT YOU WOULD FIND THEM? I GUESS I I'M NOT SURE WHAT THE SOLUTION TO THAT IS. I DON'T KNOW, DICK. CIVIL ENGINEER. SORRY, I'M DICK ROGGENKAMP, NEW ALBANY COMPANY. MY NAME IS DICK ROGGENKAMP. I'M THE DIRECTOR OF REAL ESTATE FOR NEW ALBANY COMPANY, 8000 WALTON PARKWAY, NEW ALBANY, ACTUALLY, THAT IS THE FIRST I'D HEARD OF THAT. IT SOUNDS LIKE IT WAS SOMETHING DONE BY THE CITY WHEN THEY WERE DOING THE SANITARY. SO I'M HOPING THEY HAVE RECORDS, BUT I'M GRATEFUL TO HAVE LEARNED THAT FACT, BECAUSE IF WE CAN IDENTIFY WHERE THOSE WELLS ARE, WE'LL WANT TO ADDRESS THAT ISSUE. NOW, YOU CAN'T BUILD BUILDINGS ON TOP OF SANITARY LINES, BUT WE DON'T KNOW YET BECAUSE WE'RE SO EARLY IN THE PROCESS. WHAT GRADING IS GOING TO BE NECESSARY AND WHERE, WHERE, WHETHER WE MIGHT HIT ONE OF THOSE. SO THAT'S ACTUALLY ONE OF THE ITEMS I WROTE DOWN TO CHECK ON. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. I THINK THAT MADE IT THROUGH THE LIST OF THINGS THAT I WROTE DOWN. BUT, CHAD THE ARBORIST, HE, HE, HE ADDRESSED THE TREES, THAT THEY WOULD FOLLOW THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE, TREE REPLACEMENT, THEY MIGHT WE MIGHT WE ARE GOING TO ADDRESS OUR PLAN FOR TREE REPLACEMENT IN THE DEVELOPMENT. AND IF YOU HAVE YOUR OWN, IT'LL BE SUBMITTED TO US FOR APPROVAL.

SO THE WORDING OF IT TEXT OF IT. ALL RIGHT. ANYTHING ELSE ON YOUR LIST, CHAD? NOPE. I THINK THE EASEMENT CONNECTING TO, SCOTT'S, WOULD THAT BE INCORPORATED INTO CITY OR WOULD THAT BE REMAINING IN TOWNSHIP? I GUESS IT CAN BE. I MEAN, I THINK IT WOULD STILL BE TOWNSHIP, RIGHT? I MEAN, SORRY, CAN YOU REPEAT YOUR QUESTION? SO CAN YOU TURN YOUR MIC ON TO MATT? OH, SORRY, I WAS JUST TALKING. THERE WAS A QUESTION ABOUT THE PROPERTY THAT WOULD THE CONNECTION TO SCOTT'S LAWN, WOULD THAT GET INCORPORATED INTO CITY OR WOULD THAT REMAIN? RIGHT NOW I MEAN, WE'RE WORKING WITH THE HERITAGE CO-OP, PROPERTY FOR THAT EASEMENT. HERITAGE IS ALREADY IN THE CITY. IT'S BEEN ANNEXED, AND SO IF WE GO THROUGH THE HERITAGE PROPERTY, BY DEFINITION, THEN IT WOULD BE IN THE CITY. I THINK THE OTHER QUESTION IS, YOU KNOW, THAT'S A PUBLIC IT'S A PUBLIC ROAD. IT'LL NEED TO BE DEDICATED, PLATTED AND ALL THAT, AND THAT WILL COME BACK BEFORE YOU AS WELL. YEAH. I WAS THINKING THE LINE WAS IT SCOTT SALON. BUT YOU'RE I SEE IT IS ON HERITAGE. IT'S WEST SIDE SO. OKAY OKAY, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD.

OKAY. AND, SO, DO WE HAVE A MOTION? WE HAVE A MOTION. YEAH MOTION TO APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OR. SORRY, PLAN, AM I SKETCH PLAN? I MEAN, MOTION APPROVED PRELIMINARY SKETCH PLAN. OKAY. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. OKAY CAN WE HAVE A ROLL CALL, PLEASE, MR. STOYAN? YES MR. JACKSON? YES, MISS PURVIS. YES, MR. WONG? YES, MR. ABEL.

YES, MR. FISHER. YES MISS LORE. YES. ALL RIGHT. WELL, THANK YOU AND CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THE CITY AND LOOK FORWARD TO, THE NEXT STEP IN THE PROCESS. THANK. JUST KIND OF TAKE MAYBE, LIKE, A MINUTE BREAK. I MEAN, SO EVERYONE'S WELCOME TO STAY FOR THE NEXT ONE AS WELL, IF YOU'RE INTERESTED. BUT, ALSO DON'T FEEL LIKE YOU HAVE TO. IT'S UP TO YOU . I GUESS. USUALLY THERE'S A LITTLE BIT OF COMMOTION ONCE PEOPLE LEAVE, SO JUST WANTED TO PAUSE FOR A SECOND. SO MUCH. GOT MARRIED YOURSELF? OKAY. WITH THAT, WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER THREE. NEW BUSINESS TO

[3. To hear an application for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Sketch Plan application for a development known as Marysville East Section 3 located at Parcels with ID numbers of 2800170080010, 2800170050000, 2800170060010, 2800170010000, 2800140280010, 2800170030000.]

HEAR AN APPLICATION FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PUD SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION FOR A DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS MARYSVILLE EAST. SECTION THREE, LOCATED AT PARCELS WITH ID NUMBERS. OF

[01:05:14]

2800170080010280017005000028001, 02800170010000280014, 0814, 0280010. AND 2800170030000. I SEE WE HAVE AN APPLICANT REPORT. THE YOU HAVE THE FLOOR. SUMMARY. MR. DON'T FORGET. OKAY WE HAVE ONE MORE SECOND HERE. I WAS REALLY LOOKING FORWARD TO THAT ONE MINUTE BREAK. SORRY TALK AMONGST YOURSELVES. YEAH. OKAY. LOOK AT THAT. THAT'S ABOUT THE FASTEST I'VE EVER BEEN ABLE TO SET UP. THANK YOU FOR HEARING US TONIGHT, I AM BART BARRETT WITH ROCKFORD DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENTS . OUR OFFICE IS AT NINE, NINE, NINE PLAYERS PARKWAY, SUITE 200, IN COLUMBUS, THIS IS A CONTINUATION OF OUR MARYSVILLE EAST PLAN, OBVIOUSLY, THE PREVIOUS APPLICANT HAS SPOKEN ABOUT SOME OF THE OTHER PIECES THAT WE HAD BROUGHT THROUGH, AND I'M GOING TO TAKE YOU THROUGH JUST A LITTLE BIT OF HISTORY. MAYBE IF YOU JUST ARE A LITTLE BIT PATIENT, I'M GOING TO KIND OF TAKE YOU THROUGH A LITTLE BIT OF AN OVERSIGHT OF THE MARYSVILLE EAST PLAN. I WILL FIRST START WITH THE LOCATION OF WHAT WE'RE TALKING TO TONIGHT. THIS IS AN ANNEXATION. THE ANNEXATION PETITION HAS BEEN FOUND OR FILED WITH THE COUNTY. IT HAD 20 DAYS TO GET THE SERVICE AGREEMENT APPROVED THROUGH CITY COUNCIL. THEY DID APPROVE IT A COUPLE WEEKS AGO.

AND IT'S ON THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA FOR TOMORROW MORNING. NOW IT'S SORT OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS. ONCE THE CITY SAYS THAT THEY CAN SERVICE THE ANNEXATION, BUT THEY WILL GO THROUGH AND THEY HAVE THEIR HEARING TOMORROW MORNING ON THAT AT THAT POINT IN TIME, IF THEY APPROVE IT, THAT, ANNEXATION PETITION WILL COME BACK TO THE CITY AND IT NEEDS TO SIT FOR A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF DAYS. WE WILL BE DUAL TRACKING OUR ZONING, JUST LIKE WE DID ON ANNEXATIONS ONE AND TWO THROUGH MARYSVILLE. SO THIS IS THE FIRST STEP OF ANNEXATION THREE OF BRINGING IT THROUGH SKETCH PLAN, THEN DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND THEN WE'LL MEET UP AT CITY COUNCIL.

IF EVERYTHING GOES WELL WITH THE ANNEXATION DOCUMENT. AND THOSE WILL GO THROUGH READINGS ONE, TWO AND THREE WITH CITY COUNCIL AT THE SAME TIME. SO THAT'S THE GOAL. HIGH LEVEL, LOTS OF THINGS CAN DERAIL THAT OR DELAY IT OR OTHER THINGS AND THOSE SORT OF THINGS. BUT THAT'S WHAT WE'RE DOING. JUST SO YOU KNOW, WE ARE DUAL TRACKING THIS JUST LIKE WE DID BEFORE. SO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, ROUGHLY 243, SOME PEOPLE SAY I'M TOO, TOO FOCUSED ON DETAIL. AND I'LL TELL YOU IT'S 243 .89, BUT IT'S 244 ACRES, SITS NORTH OF US 36, AND ESSENTIALLY THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY AND MOST OF THE, THE, WESTERN BOUNDARY IS ACTUALLY MILL CREEK, SO A LOT OF PEOPLE, WHEN THEY'RE TRYING TO FIND THIS ON THE MAP, I TELL THEM IT'S JUST WEST, IT STARTS JUST WEST.

THAT LEG THAT COMES DOWN TO 36 WEST OF OR I'M SORRY, EAST OF TRACTOR SUPPLY. SO EVERYBODY SEEMS TO KNOW WHERE TRACTOR SUPPLY IS IN MARYSVILLE, SO THAT'S THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM AN ANNEXATION STANDPOINT AND THE OVERALL PLAN FOR MARYSVILLE EAST, THIS IS THE THIRD ANNEXATION IN THE FIRST TWO ANNEXATIONS, WHICH WERE ALL SOUTH OF US 36 ALONG 33, THOSE ESSENTIALLY BROUGHT IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK. SO WE ANNEXED OVER 600 ACRES IN THAT. BUT WE ALSO TIED IT TO THE PIECE OF, THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE, WHICH IS AT SCOTTS LAWN, THAT 150, 160 ACRES IS ALREADY ZONED IN IN MARYSVILLE, WHICH IS DOWN AT THE CORNER. SCOTTS OWNS A PIECE OF THAT AND SOME OTHER PRIVATE PEOPLE, BUT ESSENTIALLY THE FIRST TWO ANNEXATIONS CREATED THE 750 ACRE BUSINESS PARK, THAT PARK IS IN THE HANDS WITH THERE GOING, THE NEW ALBANY COMPANY, AND THEY WILL DO WHAT THEY DO, ON THAT AND BRING IN THE HIGHER PAYING JOBS AND THE USES AND THOSE SORT OF THINGS. SO IT WAS OUR INTENT TO BRING THE JOBS TO MARYSVILLE AND SHOW THAT THIS MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT THAT WE HAVE GOING ON IN MARYSVILLE EAST, ON THE EAST SIDE, IS LEADING WITH THE JOBS. AND THESE WILL BE HIGHER PAYING JOBS AS YOU LOOK AT THEIR THEIR PERMITTED USES ON THEIR SOUTH SIDE OR ON THEIR EAST SIDE, THEY'RE NOT LOOKING FOR WAREHOUSES. THEY'RE NOT GOING TO PUSH REFRIGERATORS IN ONE SIDE. AND OUT THE OTHER. THAT'S JUST NOT WHAT THEY DO. SO AND YOU CAN SEE THE RELATIONSHIP FOR ANNEXATION THREE. SO AN ANNEXATION THREE THIS IS THE BEGINNING OF BRINGING THE OTHER COMPONENTS, WHEN WE STARTED THIS WHOLE MARYSVILLE EAST PLAN, WE LOOKED AT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF WHAT MARYSVILLE SAID THEY WANTED ON THE EAST SIDE. THE UTILITIES, THE REGIONAL PUMP STATION, WHICH WE'LL TALK A