[CALL MEETING TO ORDER]
[00:00:02]
WHEN YOU GAVE ME A HAND SIGNAL. GOOD EVENING. IT IS TUESDAY, APRIL 7TH AT 6:30 P.M. I'D LIKE TO CALL THIS MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO ORDER. COULD WE HAVE A ROLL CALL, PLEASE? BRETT ENGLE HERE. MATTHEW FISHER HERE. VIKTOR MUCHIRI HERE. CODY HATTON HERE.
MICHAEL NICKERSON HERE. ROB STILLING HERE. CHAD WOLLOWITZ HERE. ALL RIGHT. NEXT IS THE
[APPROVAL OF MINUTES]
APPROVAL OF LAST MONTH'S MINUTES. THE MARCH 3RD, 2020 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES AS EVERYONE HAD A CHANCE TO REVIEW. AND ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? COMMENTS CHANGES. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. THANK YOU SIR. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED THE SAME. THANK YOU.[SWEARING OF CITIZENS & APPLICANTS]
ALL RIGHT. AT THIS POINT, WE'RE SWEARING IN OF CITIZENS AND APPLICANTS. SO IF YOU FEEL THAT THERE IS A CHANCE YOU MAY BE SPEAKING THIS EVENING, WE ASK THAT YOU STAND UP. RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. I WILL READ AN OATH. AND AT THE END OF IT, YOU SIGNAL BY SAYING, I WILL WRITE.SO WE'RE WAITING FOR THE. ALL RIGHT. DO YOU DECLARE THE TESTIMONY THAT YOU'RE ABOUT TO GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH AND THE WHOLE TRUTH. UNDER THE PAINS AND PENALTIES OF PERJURY AND FALSIFICATION. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. SO THAT TAKES US TO CITIZEN COMMENTS. SO IF THERE ARE ANY CITIZENS HERE WISHING TO SPEAK ON A NON AGENDA ITEM, WE ASK THAT YOU COME TO THE PODIUM. YOU HAVE UP TO FIVE MINUTES TO TO SPEAK. ANYONE FOR NON AGENDA ITEM. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL MOVE INTO OLD BUSINESS MIKE. YEAH LIKE I SAID WE'D LIKE TO REQUEST THAT YOU MOVE THE NEW BUSINESS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER ONE TO THE. I CONSIDER THAT, BUT I WASN'T SURE AT START OF THE AGENDA. I DON'T KNOW IF MANY OF THESE ARE GOING TO BE TOO LONG, BUT THAT'S FINE. ALL RIGHT. SO DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO MOVE THE FIRST ITEM OF NEW BUSINESS UP IN FRONT OF OLD BUSINESS. MOTION TO MOVE. ALL RIGHT. BUSINESS AHEAD. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ALL OPPOSED? THE SAME. ALL RIGHT, SO THEN WE WILL BE GOING TO TO HEAR AN
[1. To hear an application for a Conditional Use application to permit senior housing located at 409 N Main Street in the Water and Light Planned Unit Development district. ]
APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION TO PERMIT SENIOR HOUSING. LOCATED AT 409 NORTH MAIN STREET AND THE WATER AND LIGHT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IS THERE.SPEAKER TWO HERE TO PRESENT. SO NAME ADDRESS. BOB LAMB 577 NORTHWEST BOULEVARD, SORRY, NATIONWIDE BOULEVARD, COLUMBUS 432154. I WAS READING THROUGH ONE OF OUR NORTHWEST BOULEVARD PROPERTIES WHEN WE CAME UP. SO BEFORE YOU IS A REQUEST TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE FOR SENIOR HOUSING AT THE SILO AND LIGHT FACILITY. SO WE HAVE LOOKED AT VARIOUS DIFFERENT USES ON THIS SITE. AS YOU KNOW, WE'VE GONE THROUGH THE PUD PROCESS THROUGH THAT PROCESS.
WE DID HAVE FIVE DIFFERENT APARTMENT BUILDINGS APPROVED ON THAT SITE. WE ARE LOOKING TO PROCEED WITH FOUR OF THEM AS PART OF WHAT WE HAVE DEEMED OUR PHASE ONE. AS PART OF THAT, PHASE ONE IS ALSO THE. SO IF YOU SEE THE ONES ON THE SOUTH SIDE, JUST SOUTH OF THE CREEK AREA, AND THEN THE TWO IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF THE CREEK CLOSEST TO THE OLD HISTORIC WATER TREATMENT PLANT ARE THE ONES INCLUDED IN THE FIRST PHASE, ALONG WITH THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE HISTORIC WATER TREATMENT PLANT AND THE SILO. MOVING FORWARD, WHAT WE WOULD BE LOOKING AT IN WHAT WE ARE CONSIDERING A FULL PHASE TWO WOULD BE THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE APARTMENT BUILDING THAT YOU SEE CIRCLED IN GREEN ON THAT MAP. THAT IS THE BUILDING THAT WE ARE REQUESTING TO BE ABLE TO RECEIVE A CONDITIONAL USE FOR SENIOR HOUSING. THIS WOULD BE 55 AND UP HOUSING, NOT 62 AND UP. SO NOT LOOKING AT THE HUD QUALIFICATION ON THAT. THE 55 AND UP IS THE STATE QUALIFICATION FOR THAT SENIOR HOUSING COMPONENT. AND THE REASON FOR THAT IS THERE'S APPROXIMATELY JUST OVER 200 APARTMENT UNITS IN THE PHASE ONE. SO THOSE FOUR BUILDINGS THAT YOU SEE CLOSEST TO MILL CREEK, WE ARE SEEING THE BUILDING OF 54 UNITS UP CIRCLED IN GREEN AS A GOOD LOCATION IN ORDER TO DIVERSIFY THE HOUSING ON THE SITE. THESE INDIVIDUALS WILL BE 55 AND OLDER. THE MAJORITY OF THEM, IF NOT ALL, WILL STILL BE WORKING. SO THEY WILL BE ENGAGED WITHIN THE COMMUNITY FROM A JOB PERSPECTIVE. BUT THEY ARE ALSO THEN ABLE TO DIVERSIFY THE COMMUNITY. THEY'LL HAVE ACCESS
[00:05:06]
TO THE WALKING TRAILS, THE AMENITIES LOCATED AT THE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY, WHICH WILL BE FITNESS FACILITY, SPA MOST LIKELY RESTAURANTS, AS WELL AS A CO-WORKING LOCATION, AND THEN ALSO THE OTHER RESTAURANT, BAR AND EVENT SPACE THAT WE'LL BE DOING OVER IN THE SILO AREA AS WELL. WE FEEL THAT THIS IS A NICE WAY TO ROUND OUT THE PROJECT. IT ALSO MEETS SEVERAL OF THE GOALS ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY IN THEIR DIFFERENT VARIOUS PLANNING AND STRATEGIC DOCUMENTS. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE ON THIS ITEM. ALL RIGHT. I GUESS ONE QUESTION. JUST BECAUSE YOU BROUGHT UP PHASE ONE VERSUS PHASE TWO, THIS SEEMS LIKE DIFFERENT NOMENCLATURE THAN WE'VE SEEN BEFORE, BECAUSE FROM A DRB STANDPOINT, WE REVIEWED THE TWO BUILDINGS ON THE SOUTH SIDE AND THAT WAS PHASE ONE. WE'RE REVIEWING THAT AS PHASE ONE A, AND THEN PHASE ONE B WOULD BE THE TWO BUILDINGS ON THE NORTH SIDE AND THE WATER HISTORIC TREATMENT PLANT AND THE SILO FACILITY ACROSS THE STREET WOULD BE ONE B. YES. ALL RIGHT. SO AND THOSE ARE SCHEDULED TO GO TO DRB NEXT WEEK. OKAY. I WAS OUT OF THE COUNTRY. I DIDN'T REVIEW THE DRB PACKAGE YET. SO YEAH, BUT I WILL. ALL RIGHT. I THINK THAT'S REALLY JUST A CLARIFICATION THAT YEAH, I MEAN, AT FIRST I WAS THINKING, YOU KNOW, YOU PUT THE SENIORS ALL THE WAY IN THE BACK, THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO WALK FURTHER, BUT THEY ALSO PROBABLY WOULD LIKE, YOU KNOW, LESS TRAFFIC. SO, YOU KNOW, A LITTLE MORE SECLUDED PERHAPS BACK THERE, IT'S A LITTLE MORE SECLUDED. YOU HAVE A LITTLE MORE GREEN SPACE RIGHT UP AGAINST IT THAN YOU DO ON SOME OF THE OTHERS. BUT ALSO, WE VIEWED IT AS A NICE COMPLEMENT TO THE EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOMES THAT ARE LOCATED TO THE NORTH OF IT, SO THAT IT WOULD BE MOST LIKELY LESS NOISE GENERATED, LESS LATE NIGHT TRAVEL. NORMALLY WHEN YOU LOOK AT THAT POPULATION, ALSO, STATISTICALLY THEY JUST HAVE LESS DEMAND ON REGIONAL SERVICES. ALL RIGHT. AND THE PLAN IS A STILL A THREE FLOOR BUILDING OR IS IT IT MOST LIKELY THREE FLOOR. IT MAY WE MAY COME FORWARD WITH A REQUEST FOR FOUR. I DON'T EXPECT THAT.WHAT WE WOULD LIKELY DO IS THREE FLOORS WITH AN ELEVATOR. YOU UNDERSTAND THIS DOESN'T AFFECT OUR DECISION RIGHT HERE. JUST ASKING. YEAH. AND WE'VE LOOKED AT TWO DIFFERENT LAYOUTS OF THAT. THE BENEFITS OF THE FOUR FLOORS, WE'RE ACTUALLY FOUR FLOORS IS WE'RE ABLE TO PUSH THAT A LITTLE FURTHER SOUTH, EXPANDING THE DISTANCE BETWEEBETWEEN THE SINGLE FAMILY, RESIDENTIAL AND THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THAT DOES COME WITH SOME SET OFFS THOUGH. SO WE'RE TRYING TO DO THAT RIGHT NOW. OKAY. ANYONE ELSE FROM THE BOARD HAVE QUESTIONS? I GUESS MY QUESTION IS, YOU STATED THAT THE 55 OR OLDER AND YOU SAID SOMETHING ABOUT THE STATE. DOES THAT MEAN THAT THEY'RE GOING TO BE SUBSIDIZED? THIS IS LOOKING AT A LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT FOR THE PROJECT. WHAT THAT IS THOUGH, IS IT'S TO OFFSET THE AGE AND DO THAT AGE LIMITATION SIDE OF IT, BECAUSE WE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO AGE RESTRICT UNLESS WE WERE TO DO THAT WITHIN THE DEED STRUCTURE SEPARATELY. SO JUST TO REITERATE, THIS WOULD BE SET ASIDE FOR LOWER INCOME. IT WOULD BE IN THE 60 TO 80% RANGE. AND THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT WE DID RECEIVE A LETTER OF SUPPORT FROM THE CITY ON REGARDING THAT. I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. AND TODAY WE'RE JUST GOING FOR THE P D TEXT CHANGE, RIGHT. WE'RE NOT LOOKING AT APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE, RIGHT? YEAH. THERE'S NO CHANGE TO THE P D TEXT. IT'S ALREADY IN. YEAH.
IT'S ALREADY IN THERE AS A CONDITIONAL USE. HE JUST HAS TO COME BACK FOR THAT APPLICATION.
NOW FOR THE CONDITIONAL USE. BUT THERE'S NOTHING TIED TO THAT PARCEL RIGHT. THE APPROVAL.
YEAH. OKAY. GOT IT. YOU'RE THINKING I THINK. NO I THINK I'M GOOD. I JUST HAVE ONE. SO I THINK THE 55 AND OVER IS KIND OF CRITICAL TO HOW IT'LL FIT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT. I MEAN ARE WE ABLE BECAUSE SENIOR HOUSING IS KIND OF A BROADER DEFINITION. ARE WE ABLE TO KIND OF NOT RESTRICT BUT KIND OF PIGEONHOLE THEM INTO THE 55 AND OVER BEING SO IT'S NOT IT DOESN'T BECOME, YOU KNOW, WE APPROVE SENIOR HOUSING, THEN IT BECOMES A, YOU KNOW, A NURSING HOME. YEAH. THE INTENT IS NOT THAT IT'S AN ASSISTED LIVING BECAUSE THERE'S NO AMENITIES FOR THAT ON SITE. AND THE BUILDING IS GOING TO BE SET UP LIKE THE OTHER BUILDINGS ON SITE BESIDES AN ELEVATOR. IS THAT CORRECT? CORRECT. THE BUILDING, THE ROOMS REMAIN ALL EXACTLY THE SAME. THERE IS NO WE ARE NOT A CARE PROVIDER. SO WE ARE NOT SEEKING THAT TYPE OF A FACILITY. I BELIEVE IN OUR REQUEST AND I KNOW IN THE LETTER FROM THE CITY WE DID
[00:10:05]
HIGHLIGHT 55 AND UP AND THAT THERE WOULD NOT BE MEDICAL CARE TYPE FACILITIES ON SITE. HAPPY TO AGREE TO THAT HERE AS WELL. GOT IT. YEAH. THANK YOU BOB. JUST JUST OUT OF CURIOSITY, BUT IT WOULD PROBABLY BE EASIER TO GO BACK TO OPENING UP TO ANY AGE GIVEN THAT VERSUS RESTRICT GOING TO THE ASSISTED LIVING TYPE, BECAUSE THAT BUILDING IS SET THE SAME AS YOUR OTHER MODELS THAT ARE OPEN TO 18 AND OLDER OR WHATEVER THAT MIGHT BE. YEAH. WE ARE NOT LOOKING NOR PROPOSING TO DEVELOP THE BUILDING IN A WAY THAT IT WOULD BE A CARE FACILITY. THOSE HAVE THEIR OWN RULES, GUIDELINES, THEIR OWN DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS, AND WE ARE NOT INTERESTED IN THAT PATH. THESE WILL LOOK THE SAME FUNCTION, THE SAME AS THE OTHER APARTMENT UNITS ON THE SITE. GOT IT. NO. THAT'S HELPFUL. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? ALL RIGHT. WE WILL OPEN UP CITIZEN COMMENTS. ANY CITIZENS WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? I'LL HAVE TO SWEAR YOU IN. I MEAN, YOU CAN COME UP TO ME IF YOU'RE GOING TO TALK ANYWAYS.SO YES, IF YOU WILL RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. DO YOU DECLARE THE TESTIMONY THAT YOU'RE ABOUT TO GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH AND THE WHOLE TRUTH UNDER THE PAINS AND PENALTIES OF PERJURY AND FALSIFICATION SIGNAL BY SAYING, I WILL, I WILL. ALL RIGHT. SO STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND YOU HAVE UP TO FIVE MINUTES. YEAH. MY NAME IS JEFF HARRIMAN. I LIVE AT 221 ELWOOD AVENUE, MARYSVILLE, OHIO. I'M LOOKING AT THE MAP. IT'S THE FIRST TIME I'VE SEEN THIS ACTUAL MAP. MY PARCEL IS RIGHT THERE. SO I'M JUST KIND OF CURIOUS. I CAME UP HERE BECAUSE I KIND OF SEEN A QUICK PRINT OF THIS AND I'M I'M MYSELF. I MEAN THE 55 AND OVER. I'M I'M FINE WITH. BUT THERE IS A THERE IS NOISE ON THAT SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. WE GOT KIDS AND EVERYTHING ELSE. I GUESS MY QUESTION IS I'M SEEING THIS MAP TOO. THIS WALKWAY, THE WALKING PATH. LAST MEETING I WAS AT WAS WITH THAT GENTLEMAN ALSO AND SOME OTHER PEOPLE, EMERY AND THEM. AND WE HAD IT AT THE WATER TREATMENT PLANT. AND I WAS TOLD THAT THE WALKING PATH WAS GOING TO BE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE WATERWAY. SO I'M CURIOUS TO THIS PRINT, IS IT ON WHICH SIDE IS THE WHAT'S ON BOTH SIDES NOT SUPPOSED TO BE BACK AND FORTH, BUT TRYING TO BE HELPFUL. ALSO, THERE WAS A BRIDGE IN THE MIDDLE OF IT. OKAY, SO THE PATH COMES FROM THE SOUTHEAST, GOES UP ALONG THE RIVER, CROSSES THE BRIDGE, AND THEN FOLLOWS ALONG THE THE NORTH SIDE OF THE. OKAY, SO IT'S NOT GOING BEHIND THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. CORRECT. OR I'M NOT SURE WHERE IT GOES.
THE PROPERTIES ON ELWOOD. YES, MA'AM. IT FOLLOWS THE CREEK. IT FOLLOWS CREEK ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE. NO, NO. ALONG ELWOOD. BUT BUT BEHIND THE PROPERTIES. NO, NO, NO. I'M SORRY. WITH THAT PATHWAY IS THERE ON YOUR SCREEN. YEAH. SO IT'S THIS IS THE PATH WHERE IT COMES OVER HERE TO THEIR PROPERTY LINE. THAT'S MY PROPERTY LINE. THAT'S WHY I'M WANTING TO KNOW HERE. THAT'S WHY I'M HERE. DOES IT STOP THERE FOR NOW. AT THIS POINT IT WILL. YEAH. YEAH. OKAY. THAT'S WHAT I WAS WONDERING. I MEAN, OTHER THAN THAT, I MEAN, WHAT THE GENTLEMAN IS DOING, I, I BELIEVE IS GOING ANYTHING'S GOING TO BE BETTER THAN WHAT WAS THERE. SO BUT I ALSO KNOW WITH THE 55 AND OVER THERE IS LIKE 14 KIDS THAT RUN AROUND THAT BACKYARD RIGHT NEXT DOOR TO IT. SO THAT'S, YOU KNOW, I JUST WANT THAT TO BE AWARE. BUT YEAH, THE WALKING PATH WAS A BIG CONCERN. THAT WAS WE'VE BEEN KIND OF FOLLOWING THIS. LIKE I SAID, WE WERE UP AT THE WATER COMPANY WHEN THIS WAS ALL BEING PROJECTED AND MARIE AND ALL THEM GUYS WERE UP THERE.
AND, YOU KNOW, I WAS TOLD THAT THEY HAD A BRIDGE COMING FROM OVER BY FAIRBANKS. IT WAS GOING TO BE PUT IN, AND THE PEOPLE WITH THE DOG PARK ALREADY GAVE AGREEMENT, BECAUSE THAT WAS THE ONLY ONE THAT REALLY AFFECTED WAS OVER THERE. AND WITH ALL THE HOUSES DOWN THROUGH THERE AND KIDS AND THIS AND THAT, BECAUSE AS OF RIGHT NOW, WE DO HAVE THE RETAINING WALL THAT'S IN MY BACKYARD WITH THE CITY PUT IN BECAUSE OF THE WATER THING. AND I'M ALREADY HAVING PROBLEMS WITH, I'LL JUST SAY IT, A FEW VENEZUELANS AND STUFF LIKE THAT ARE NOT FROM THIS AREA COME IN THE BACKYARD WANTING TO LIGHT A FIRE DOWN BY THE CREEK AND BRING IN THEIR BEER AND THEIR RADIOS AND WANTING TO FISH. AND WE GOTTA GO DOWN ALL THE TIME, SAY PRIVATE PROPERTY. THEY FOLLOW THE CREEK LINE AND SEE AN OPEN AREA AND THEY'RE LIKE, HEY, YOU KNOW, SO I'M REAL WORRIED ABOUT THAT BIKEE PATH. THAT'S, LIKE I SAID, THE ONE REASON I CAME UP HERE, OTHER THAN THAT, THAT'S BASICALLY IT. THANK YOU SIR. SIR, I'M HAPPY TO ADDRESS JUST THAT. WE WILL BE PROVIDING LIGHTING ALL ALONG THAT PATHWAY AS WELL AS EXTERIOR CAMERAS. SO IF ANYTHING, SECURITY SHOULD BE ENHANCED WITHIN THAT AREA AS WELL AS THE ADDITIONAL
[00:15:01]
RESIDENTS ABLE TO HEAR NOISES AND BE ABLE TO REPORT THAT. YOU MIGHT. WELL, I DON'T KNOW IF WE HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS. ALL RIGHT. SO WHAT IS THE WILL OF THE COMMISSION? DO WE HAVE A MOTION? SO WILL BOB. WELL, BOB, IF YOU'D LIKE APPROVAL, CORRECT? YES. I DON'T ALWAYS ASK THAT.THAT'S WHAT HE'S HERE FOR. MOTION TO APPROVE, SIR. ALL RIGHT. CAN I GET A ROLL CALL, PLEASE, MR. FISHER? YES, MR. ENGEL. YES, MR. WOLOWITZ. YES. MR. NICKERSON. YES. MR. YES.
MR. HATTON. YES. MR. MUCHIRI. YES. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, SIR. APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU.
THAT'S A QUICK AS YOU GET OUT OF HERE. ALL RIGHT. SO WITH THAT, WE WILL GO BACK TO AGENDA
[1. To hear an application for Zoning Code Amendments to Part Eleven – Appendix – Glossary of Terms. ]
ITEM NUMBER ONE UNDER OLD BUSINESS TO HEAR AN APPLICATION FOR ZONING CODE. AMENDMENTS TO PART 11. APPENDIX. GLOSSARY OF TERMS. FROM LAST MONTH'S MEETING. WHAT SOME OF THE ITEMS. SO WE'LL START WITH SOME OF THE ONES THAT WERE TABLED AND THEN ROLL INTO THE NEW AMENDMENTS AS WELL. OKAY. SO AS YOU GUYS PROBABLY REMEMBER FROM THE LAST MEETING, THERE WAS A LOT OF BACK AND FORTH ON THIS DEFINITION CHANGE OR UPDATE. AND AFTER WE HAD A CHANCE TO REVIEW OR GO OVER SOME OF THOSE COMMENTS AND EVALUATE IT WITH OUR LAW DIRECTOR, COME TO THE DETERMINATION THAT WE DON'T REALLY NEED TO MAKE ANY CHANGES AT THIS TIME. WE'VE COME TO A MORE CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF HOW THIS WILL BE INTERPRETED AND IT WILL FOLLOW, YOU KNOW, THE BACK LINE OF THE HOUSE, THE DARK GREEN SHADE TO THE TOP WILL BE THE REAR YARD, SO IT'LL FOLLOW THAT L SHAPE. SO THIS TIME WE DON'T NEED TO PROCEED WITH THE CHANGE. WE'RE JUST GOING TO KEEP IT AS IS. AND THEN THIS IS HOW IT WILL BE INTERPRETED. SO SO YOU SINCE YOU JUST GOT A LEGAL CLARIFICATION. YEAH. AND IT'S IN LINE WITH WHAT YOU'D LIKE TO SEE. YEAH. SO OUR INTERPRETATION IS NOW ALL, YOU KNOW, ON THE SAME PAGE. OKAY. SO THIS ONE I THINK WE TABLED EVEN BEFORE WE CAME TO THE MEETING LAST MONTH, AND WE HAD A LOT OF DISCUSSION INTERNALLY WITH OUR LAW DIRECTOR. AND ULTIMATELY WE WANTED TO GET BACK TO THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF THIS DATA PROCESSING CALL CENTER DEFINITION, WHICH WAS MORE OF A CALL CENTER WHEN WE DID THE 2020 ZONING CODE UPDATE. SO WE'RE ASKING THAT WE REMOVE THOSE ITEMS THAT ARE HIGHLIGHTED UNDER THAT CURRENT DEFINITION, AND IT WILL JUST BE FOCUSED ON CALL CENTER. AND THEN WE CAN CONTINUE TO EVALUATE WHAT'S THE BEST ROUTE MOVING FORWARD ON THAT DEFINITION, ESPECIALLY AS WE GET THROUGH OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE AND ZONING CODE UPDATES AS WELL HERE OVER THE NEXT YEAR. SO IS IT DO WE NOT CURRENTLY HAVE JUST A DEFINITION FOR DATA CENTER? IS THAT THE ISSUE? THIS IS IT. AND THIS DEFINITION I THINK PREDATES THE KIND OF WHAT DATA CENTERS ARE. YEAH. YEAH. WELL, I MEAN, BUT CHANGING IT TO A CALL CENTER IS NOT A DATA CENTER. RIGHT. OR ARE YOU SAYING THAT OR ARE WE SAYING IT IS? SO IT'S JUST CLARIFYING LIKE THIS DEFINITION, WE THINK THE INTENT OF IT WAS MORE FOR A BUNCH OF PEOPLE ANSWERING CALLS. RIGHT? RIGHT. OKAY. NOT WHAT WE HAVE TODAY WITH THAT DATA CENTERS WITH LIKE THE HYPERSCALE. MY QUESTION WAS, DO WE HAVE A DEFINITION? NO, IT WAS THIS, THIS WAS IT. OKAY. SO WE DIDN'T HAVE A DEFINITION. WE PROBABLY SHOULD COME UP WITH ONE, EVEN IF IT'S NOT AN APPROVED USE CURRENTLY. YEAH. SO THE, THE WAY THAT WOULD GO FORWARD NOW IS IF THERE WAS A DATA CENTER TO COME THROUGH, IT WOULD BE PART OF A P D UNTIL, UNTIL THAT DEFINITION GETS WORKED OUT AND WE LAND ON SOMETHING THAT EVERYONE'S COMFORTABLE WITH. YEAH. I MEAN, I WAS JUST THINKING, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE TYPICALLY PUDS USE OUR ZONING IN OUR DEFINITIONS, BUT WE DON'T HAVE A DEFINITION. YEAH. AND MARYSVILLE, WE SHOULD WORK ON ONE. I'M NOT SAYING TONIGHT WE'RE DOING IT, BUT YEAH. AND THAT THAT IS ON THE TOP OF OUR LIST HERE AS WE GO THROUGH THAT COMP PLAN AND ZONING CODE. AND SO MARYSVILLE EAST AND THEN MARYSVILLE SOUTH HAD A SEPARATE DEFINITION WITHIN THOSE PEDS ASSOCIATED WITH DATA CENTERS THAT THE DEVELOPER WROTE. NOT TO SAY THAT WAS, YOU KNOW, RIGHT OR WRONG. DON'T GET ME WRONG, I WASN'T TRYING TO ALLUDE TO THAT, BUT OKAY, SO SO THEY DEFINED IT[00:20:02]
THEMSELVES. YEP. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. AND THEN WE WOULD JUST REFLECT THE CHANGE IN THE TERMINOLOGY WITHIN THOSE DISTRICTS TO JUST STATE CALL CENTER AND IT WOULD STAY AS PERMITTED, WHICH IT CURRENTLY IS IN THOSE THREE DISTRICTS, LMU, RMU, OR EXCUSE ME, LMD, RMU AND MANUFACTURING INNOVATION. OKAY. FOR ANY OTHER CHANGES UNDER THIS, I THINK THAT IS IT FOR LAST MONTH'S. RIGHT. YEAH. FOR THE FOR THE FIRST AGENDA. YEAH. SO THIS IS ACTUALLY IS THE SECOND AGENDA ITEM OF BUSINESS IS THE DISTRICT USES. SORRY ABOUT THAT SUSAN TO SPEAK ON THE FIRST AGENDA ITEM. SO THE FIRST AGENDA ITEM IS THE DEFINITIONS.SO ANY CITIZENS WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM ASK THAT YOU COME TO THE PODIUM, STATE YOUR NAME ADDRESS. YOU HAVE UP TO FIVE MINUTES. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS MICHAEL FUSSELMAN. ADDRESS IS 19792 PARROT BOULEVARD IN MARYSVILLE. AND THIS IS RELATED TO WHAT WE JUST TALKED ABOUT, ABOUT THE DEFINITION OF A DATA CENTER, WHICH IT SOUNDS LIKE WORKING ON THAT IN THE FUTURE. BUT I STILL WANT TO MAKE THIS STATEMENT. SO LIKE JUST THIS AFTERNOON, I RECEIVED AND REVIEWED THE COPY OF THE PRESENTATION THAT LAST MONTH MR. BARRICK SHARED WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION LAST MONTH ABOUT DATA CENTERS. AND FIRST, I WANT TO SAY I'M NOT ARGUING THAT ALL DATA CENTERS SHOULD BE TREATED THE SAME. I'M AWARE THAT BUSINESSES USE ON SITE, ON SITE DATA CENTERS TO SUPPORT THEIR OPERATIONS, AND ZONING RULES AND DEFINITIONS.
NEED TO TAKE THAT INTO ACCOUNT. I DO HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT THE PRESENTATION THAT IT WILL BE USED AS A GUIDE TO MAKE DECISIONS ON DATA CENTERS, WHEN IT DOESN'T FULLY EXPLAIN OR ADDRESS THE IMPACTS OF LARGE SCALE DATA CENTERS, SUCH AS THE AWS PROJECT IN MARYSVILLE, THESE HAVE AN IMPACT ON. I WANT I'M CONCERNED ABOUT THE IMPACT THEY HAVE ON WATER AND ELECTRICITY USAGE, THE STRAIN ON THE GRID, HOW WATER IS USED FOR COOLING WILL BE DISPOSED OF.
SOMETHING I HAVEN'T REALLY SEEN ANYTHING TALKED ABOUT WITH THAT AND THE OVERALL IMPACT ON OUR COMMUNITY. SO JUST A QUICK EXAMPLE FROM THE PRESENTATION. SLIDE THREE LISTS NUMEROUS REASONS FOR NEEDING DATA CENTERS, ALL OF WHICH HAVE BEEN AROUND FOR NEARLY 30 YEARS WITHOUT THE NEED FOR MASS QUANTITIES OF LARGE SCALE DATA CENTERS WE'RE SEEING NOW THAT WILL BE USED TO SUPPORT AI. SO THEY'RE VERY DIFFERENT FROM WHAT ARE SHOWN IN THE PRESENTATION. THERE ARE OTHER PIECES OF INFORMATION IN THE PRESENTATION I DISAGREE WITH, BUT THE POINT OF MY ATTENDANCE HERE TONIGHT IS TO ASK THAT YOU PAUSE ANY FURTHER RULINGS, SPECIFICALLY ON DATA CENTERS, TO ALLOW MYSELF AND OTHER CITIZENS THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL RESOURCES TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM ORGANIZATIONS THAT HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN SIMILAR PROJECTS AND RESEARCH THE IMPACTS OF LARGE SCALE DATA CENTERS.
THAT'S MY REQUEST TONIGHT. SO THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU SIR. YEAH. SO JUST TO CLARIFY, I THINK YOU GUYS I DON'T KNOW IF YOU REMEMBER WHEN MR. BARRETT, WE WERE GOING THROUGH THIS, MR. BARRETT SAID, HEY, WE HAVE THIS INFORMATION THAT THE COUNTY, THEY'VE BEEN WORKING WITH THE COUNTY ON PUTTING TOGETHER. SO THAT WAS JUST A PACKET THAT MR. BARRETT SHARED.
IT'S NO REFERENCE TO WHAT STAFF HAS BEEN PREPARING. SO THAT WAS JUST A HEY, HERE'S A COUPLE DEFINITIONS. SO I HEAR HIM ASK TWO QUESTIONS. ONE WAS ABOUT ENERGY USAGE AND WATER THAT IS USED FOR COOLING, AND WE COULD ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS ON THE ONE THAT'S BEING BUILT IN MARYSVILLE. YEAH. SO ALL OF THE WATER SPECIFICALLY GETS LOOKED AT BY OUR PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR AND DETERMINED WHAT THAT USAGE IS. AND THEY'RE GIVEN STRICT AMOUNTS ON WHAT THEY'RE PERMITTED TO DO RELATED TO THAT WATER USAGE. AND THEN THEY EITHER WORK WITH URI OR ON THEIR ELECTRIC AS WELL. SO THE WATER IS EVAPORATED OFF FOR COOLING PURPOSES. THERE IS MY UNDERSTANDING NO WASTEWATER, NO WASTEWATER. OKAY. IS THAT CORRECT? I BELIEVE, I BELIEVE AWS HAS TOWERS THAT THEY WILL USE FOR STORAGE OF WATER TOO. YEAH, YEAH. IS THAT GOING TO BE AS FAR AS COOLING? IT GETS EVAPORATED THROUGH COOLING TOWERS. SO IS THAT GOING TO BE LIKE A CLOSED LOOP SYSTEM? I KNOW A LOT OF THE TALKING LIKE DATA CENTERS IN OHIO. TALK ABOUT THAT AS A WAY TO MITIGATE A LOT OF THE WATER ISSUES. I'M NOT SURE SPECIFICALLY ON AWS.
BUT CERTAINLY EVERYONE'S MIND. SO YES. SO APPRECIATE YOU. ABSOLUTELY. THANK YOU, I APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. SO AS FAR AS THE OLD BUSINESS AGENDA ITEM WITH DEFINITIONS, DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO OR I GUESS WE HAVE THE PRESENTATION. ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? I PUT CITIZEN COMMENTS FIRST. I DIDN'T EVEN THINK ABOUT US COMMENTING. SO.
ALL RIGHT. SO WITH THAT THEN DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE MOTION SIR CAN WE HAVE A ROLL
[00:25:08]
CALL PLEASE? MR. WOLLOWITZ? YES. MR. NICKERSON. YES. MR. STILLMAN. YES. MR. HATTON. YES.MR. CHERRY. YES. MR. FISHER. YES. MR. ENGEL. YES. MR. NICKERSON, JUST A POINT OF CLARIFICATION. SINCE WE REMOVED THE PROPOSED REAR YARD DEFINITION, IF YOU WANT TO MAKE THAT CLEAR IN THE APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM, IT'S JUST FOR THE THE DEFINITION, THE DATA CENTER, DATA CENTER. AND WE'RE NOT MOVING FORWARD WITH THE REAR YARD DEFINITION. OKAY. I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT'S CLEAR FOR THE. YES. I MEAN, DO WE DO I NEED TO DO ANYTHING ELSE, I GUESS, OR ARE YOU JUST CLARIFYING FOR FOR, FOR CLARIFYING FOR THE DEFINITION.
[2. To hear an application for Zoning Code Amendments to Part Eleven – Chapter 1121 Districts and Overlays, addressing permitted and conditional uses.]
THANK YOU, I APPRECIATE IT. ALL RIGHT. SO OLD BUSINESS AGENDA ITEM TWO. I DIDN'T TURN OFF MY ALARM. AND THIS WOULD JUST BE THE DISTRICT USES. SO WE'RE JUST CHANGING THE THE WORDING FROM DATA PROCESSING SLASH CALL CENTER. SINCE WE CHANGED THAT DEFINITION TO JUST CALL CENTER.SO WE'VE UPDATED IT AND THE THREE DISTRICTS THAT CURRENTLY IS PERMITTED. OKAY, SO WE'RE JUST UPDATING THAT AND THEN WE'VE PUT IT IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER. SO THE CALL CENTER MOVED UP, BUT SO, SO, AND THIS WILL GET LUMPED INTO THE ONES THAT WERE APPROVED LAST MONTH TO BE ONE ITEM AT COUNCIL. SO BUT WE'LL HAVE TWO ORDINANCES FOR THAT OR TWO RESOLUTIONS FOR THAT. BUT IT'LL BE ONE ORDINANCE JUST TO UPDATE THEM ALL ONCE. OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS? COMMENTS, CITIZEN COMMENTS. ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO TO APPROVE MOTION? CHAD. ROLL CALL PLEASE. MR. FISHER. YES. MR. MUCHIRI. YES. MR. HATTON YES. MR. STILLMAN. YES. MR. NICKERSON. YES. MR. WOLNIEWICZ. YES. MR. ENGEL. YES. SO NOW WE MOVE ON TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER
[2. To hear an application for Zoning Code Amendments to Part Eleven – Chapter 1139 Alternative Energy addressing electric vehicle charging and Appendix – Glossary of Terms. ]
TWO OF NEW BUSINESS. IT'S TO HEAR AN APPLICATION FOR ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS TO PART 11, CHAPTER 1139. ALTERNATE ENERGY ADDRESSING ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING AND APPENDIX. GLOSSARY OF TERMS. I'LL LET BRANDON DO MOST OF THE HEAVY LIFTING ON THIS, BUT THIS IS SOMETHING WE'VE WORKED WITH. THE DIVISION OF FIRE ON GIVES US A WAY TO EVALUATE AND. SET CERTAIN STANDARDS FOR WHERE THE DISCONNECTS ARE FOR EV CHARGING STATIONS WHEN NEW DEVELOPMENTS COME IN. SO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WILL BE ABLE TO LOOK AT THOSE PLANS, DETERMINE IF WHERE THOSE DISCONNECTS ARE, MEET, WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED. THANKS FOR THANKS FOR HAVING ME TONIGHT.BUT YEAH, THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT WE'RE GOING FOR IS A PROACTIVE APPROACH TO THE EV CHARGING SYSTEMS, AS WELL AS THE CARS AND THE FIRE INDUSTRY ITSELF. WE'RE WE'RE PRETTY FAR BEHIND ON CODE LANGUAGE. IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE DEVELOPED EVERY THREE YEARS. THE LAST ONE TOOK EIGHT.
SO A LOT A LOT OF STUFF HAPPENS AT THAT TIME. SO WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO WITH THE PROACTIVE APPROACH ON THIS IS SIMPLY FIND THE POWER SOURCE, RIGHT? SO IF WE GO TO A STRUCTURE FIRE, WE'RE SHUTTING OFF THE GAS, WE'RE SHUTTING OFF THE ELECTRIC TO MAKE IT SAFER ENVIRONMENT.
THESE EV CARS AND CHARGING STATIONS WOULD BE NO DIFFERENT. SO WE SHOW UP ON SCENE, WE WOULD HAVE A REMOTE DISCONNECT THAT WE COULD KNOCK THE POWER OUT, AND WE CAN PROVIDE A SAFER ENVIRONMENT FOR THE FIREFIGHTERS AS WELL AS EVERYBODY AROUND THE VEHICLES SAW THE OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS AND CARS BESIDE IT, BUILDINGS BESIDE IT. WE CAN MAKE A SAFER ENVIRONMENT FOR A FIRE ATTACK. THIS IS SOMETHING A LOT OF TOWNSHIPS AND STUFF ARE STARTING TO DO. THESE TYPE OF REGULATIONS, BECAUSE THE CODE IS SO FAR BEHIND ON THESE. SO I TAKEN A FEW OF THEIR IDEAS AND WE KIND OF MADE OUR OWN UP JUST SO WE CAN HAVE A GOOD ATTACK AND KEEP EVERYBODY SAFE ON THESE. RIGHT NOW, THERE'S, THERE'S AREAS WHERE THE SHUT OFF, THE DISCONNECTS ARE RIGHT ON THE POLE, RIGHT BY THE CHARGING STATION. NOT A GOOD IDEA, RIGHT? BECAUSE THE CAR'S ON FIRE. WE CAN'T GET TO IT. SOMETIMES THEY'RE SHOVING THEM IN THE SIDEWALKS ONCE AGAIN, WE CAN'T GET TO IT. AND THEN OTHER TIMES WE'VE SEEN THEY ARE PUTTING IN LIKE INSIDE THE BUILDING IN A FUZE PANEL. WE HAVE NO IDEA WHAT FUZE THAT IS, RIGHT. SO WE GOT TO KILL THE ENTIRE BUILDING. WE CAN'T JUST ISOLATE IT. SO THIS IS A WAY TOO THAT CHARGING STATION, KNOCK THE FIRE OUT AND HAVE A GOOD, SAFE ENVIRONMENT. SOME OF THE STUFF WE WERE JUST LOOKING AT IS HAVING SIGNAGE, SEPARATION DISTANCES. WE SEE A LOT OF
[00:30:02]
THESE AT GAS STATIONS, AND WE'RE STARTING TO SEE AT LEAST 1 OR 2 OF THESE ON A LOT OF BUILDING PLANS. WE'RE GETTING. SO LIKE GAS STATIONS SHOULD BE 40FT AWAY FROM THE THE GAS DISPENSER, 30FT FROM THE FILL CONNECTIONS, 25FT FROM THE VENT PIPING, WHICH IS PRETTY STANDARD. EVEN MOST GAS STATIONS YOU WILL SEE IF YOU EVER PAID ATTENTION. THEY HAVE EMERGENCY GAS SHUTOFFS TOO, WHERE YOU HIT AND THEY'RE WITHIN 75FT OF THAT BUILDING.SOME OF OUR OTHER CONCERNS IS WHEN THEY DO HIT THAT MANUAL DISCONNECT SWITCH, NO ONE CAN JUST GO BACK UP TO IT AND TURN IT BACK ON WHILE WE'RE IN OPERATION. SO IT'S GOT TO BE MANUALLY RESET, WHICH IS PART OF LIKE THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE, STUFF LIKE THAT. SO THAT STUFF'S ALREADY KIND OF PRE-BUILT IN THERE. THEN WE WOULD REQUIRE SIGNAGE. BELIEVE IT OR NOT, MOST FIREMEN ARE PRETTY GOOD READERS. NOT TOO BAD. BUT WE PROVIDE A SIGN JUST SAYS, HEY, THIS IS THE EV CHARGING DISCONNECT, RIGHT? SO IT'S CLEARLY LABELED ONCE AGAIN, JUST LIKE GAS PUMPS, YOU'LL GO TO SAY EMERGENCY GAS SHUT OFF. THESE WILL SAY EMERGENCY EV SHUT OFFS. SO THEY PULL A LEVER. NOW WE KNOW WE GOT A SAFER ENVIRONMENT TO DO OUR JOB. YEAH, A LOT OF THESE STEPS WE'LL BE WORKING HAND IN HAND. I WOULD BE PERSONALLY OR ONE OF MY INSPECTORS JUST ENSURING DISTANCES, SIGNAGE, THE TYPE OF DISCONNECT SWITCH AND THEN DOING LIKE AN ACCEPTANCE TEST, SEEING THAT IT TRULY DID WORK, IT HIT THE DISCONNECT POWER SHUT OFF TO ALL THE BANKS. AND THEN THERE ARE SOME OF THESE ITEMS IN RED, SOME OF THESE LETTERS AND STRIKETHROUGHS IN RED. THOSE ARE JUST CHANGES THAT WE'VE PROPOSED. SINCE YOU GUYS HAVE RECEIVED THAT PACKET. SO WE'LL JUST WANT TO WHEN, IF THIS GETS APPROVED, INCORPORATE THOSE CONDITIONS WITH THE, THE THE RED LINES IN THERE. SO ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD? I WAS JUST LOOKING. DOES ANY OF YOUR LANGUAGE CONTRADICT OR HAVE YOU LOOKED AT THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THEIR GUIDANCE ON CHARGING STATIONS? HAVE YOU GUYS REVIEWED THAT WHILE YOU WERE PUTTING THIS TOGETHER? I GOT TO REVIEW A LITTLE BIT OF IT.
WE'RE ACTUALLY PROBABLY A LITTLE BIT STRICTER. SOME OF THEM SAY LIKE THE DISTANCES CAN GO UP TO 100FT. I BELIEVE THAT'S A HUGE LINE OF SIGHT. YOU KNOW, WHETHER A VEHICLE PARKS THEIR BIG TRUCK, WHATEVER, LOT OF STUFF THAT CAN GO WRONG WITH THAT LINE OF SIGHT DISTANCE. SO WE RESTRICTED IT A LITTLE BIT MORE THAN THAT. NOT SAYING IF WE GET A PROJECT AND THE BEST SPOT IS 60FT AWAY, YOU KNOW, WE CAN WORK WITH THAT, BUT TRY TO KEEP IT AS CLOSE AS WE CAN. OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? MY ONLY COMMENT IS, I CAN'T BELIEVE THAT, YOU KNOW, THESE RULES ARE IN PLACE. THAT'S GREAT. AND AS YOU GUYS DO YOUR JOB BETTER AND IF YOU GUYS ARE GOOD WITH IT, THEN I, I THINK I AM TOO. SO YEAH, I THINK IT MAKES SENSE. WE'RE DEFINITELY SEEING MORE, NOT LESS OF THESE, RIGHT? SO WE'RE GETTING A LOT OF EVS. NOTHING WRONG WITH THEM. LOTS OF CHARGERS. BUT THINKING CITY OF MARYSVILLE CAN HAVE A GOOD PROACTIVE APPROACH TO THIS AND GET AHEAD OF THE GAME. ABSOLUTELY. DO WE YOUR THOUGHTS AND I'M JUST THINKING OUT LOUD HERE, YOUR ELECTRICAL DISCONNECT SWITCH MAKES SENSE.
DO WE HAVE AN IDEAL SITUATION. IS THIS GOING TO BE WHERE IT WOULD BE MOUNTED AND HOW IS IT PROTECTED. SO THE PUBLIC CANNOT JUST GO UP AND HIT IT. SOME WE'VE SEEN HAVE BEEN MOUNTED ON BUILDINGS ON THE EXTERIOR WALL OF A BUILDING. WE HAVE SEEN SOME VERSIONS THAT ARE LIKE IN THE MIDDLE OF A PARKING LOT TO WHERE IT WOULD REQUIRE IMPACT PROTECTION AROUND THAT DISCONNECT SWITCH. SO FOUR INCH CONCRETE PILLARS THREE FEET APART ALL THE WAY AROUND IT. SO IF A CAR DOES HIT IT, THEY'RE GOING TO HIT THEM THEN BOLLARDS AND HELP PROTECT IT. YEAH. BUT DO YOU NEED LIKE YOU HAVE A KEY TO THE BUILDING FOR EXAMPLE, DO WE NEED. I CAN'T THINK OF THE NAME KNOX. KNOX BOX. YEAH. IS THAT SOMETHING. YEAH. THAT SO THAT'S LOCKED FROM THE PUBLIC THAT ONLY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT HAVE ACCESS TO. YEP, YEP. SO THEY DO. WE DO OR CAN SELL KNOX LOCKS, WHICH WE WOULD HAVE THE KEY TO THAT. SO WE COULD GO ON SCENE, TAKE OUR KEY OUT OF THE TRUCK, UNLOCK IT, HIT THE DISCONNECT. SO DO WE WANT TO ADD THAT REQUIREMENT. I WOULD THINK THAT THEY WOULD WANT TO EXPLORE THAT REQUIREMENT JUST SO THAT IT'S SECURE AWAY FROM THE PUBLIC. AND THE PUBLIC CAN INTERFERE WITH THE DISCONNECT. YEAH, SO I GUESS I SHOULD IT BE CODE OR SHOULD IT BE UP TO THE OWNER TO HAVE NUISANCE TRIPPING? WELL, I THINK IT OUGHT TO BE
[00:35:05]
STANDARDIZED ACROSS THE CITY. I DON'T THINK IT IT OUGHT TO BE HONORED OWNER. I THINK IF THERE'S A CALL IT OUGHT TO BE THE SAME IN EVERY LOCATION. YEAH. WE CAN DISCUSS THAT WITH THE LAW DIRECTOR. JUST SEE IF THERE'D BE IF THAT WOULD BE POSSIBLE. IT COULD ALSO BE SOMETHING THAT WE JUST HAVE IN POLICY. I'M NOT SURE THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE CODIFIED. OR IF IT'S FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES ONLY OR WHATEVER THE CASE MAY BE. I'M ALSO NOT SURE HOW, LIKE SOME OF THESE COMPANIES THAT INSTALL THE CHARGING, THEY MIGHT HAVEIFFEREIFFERENT REQUIREMENTS PER THEIR COMPANY. SO IT MIGHT NOT BE CONSISTENT ACROSS THE BOARD. BUT I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING WE COULD TALK ABOUT THOUGH. I'M GOOD WITH IT. I'M JUST THINKING THROUGH LIKE WHEN YOU ALSO. YEAH, I LIKE THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, THE CITY OF COLUMBUS. SOME OF THE PROBLEMS YOU'RE WORKING OUT ARE BIG RED MUSHROOM. PEOPLE WILL WANT TO WALK BY AND HIT IT. SO YEAH, WE NORMALLY SEE TWO TYPES OF THEM LOCKS, EITHER THE CHEAPEST OF THE CHEAP, SO WE'RE GOING TO CUT IT OR WE GET THE BIG HEAVY DUTY KNOX LOCKS TO WHERE YOU'RE NOT GOING TO GET THROUGH IT. SO WE SEE BOTH SIDES. THEY EVEN DO THAT ON LIKE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS AS WELL. SO A LOT OF TIMES WE'LL JUST USE A NICE $10 WALMART LOCK KNOWING THAT IT'S GOING TO GET DESTROYED AND THEY'RE OKAY WITH IT. BUT YEAH, HAVING SOMETHING IN PLACE, I DEFINITELY AGREE WITH WHETHER IT'S A CHEAP LOCK OR A $200 LOCK. SO DO WE KNOW WHAT OTHER MUNICIPALITIES ARE DOING AROUND HERE? SO LIKE PLAIN TOWNSHIP, WHICH IS LIKE BY CINCINNATI, THEY'RE, THEY'RE KIND OF ON BOARD WITH WHAT THIS PRESENTATION IS. AND THERE'S A LOT OF PLACES AROUND THE DAYTON AREA THAT'S DOING THE SAME THING. SO IT'S STARTING TO CATCH ON SINCE WE JUST HAD A NEW CODE UPDATE AND IT REALLY DIDN'T ADDRESS ANY OF THIS CONCERN OF OURS. SO WE WON'T BE THE FIRST IN OHIO, BUT WE'RE DEFINITELY GOING TO BE THE LAST TO DO THIS TYPE OF PROPOSAL.THANK YOU. YEP. OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? OPEN UP COMMENTS. ANY CITIZENS WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? SEEING NONE. DO WE HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL WITH THE THOUGHT THAT CONTINUE TO SPEAK ABOUT OTHER. USING A KNOX BOX BLOCK OR SOME OTHER ITEM TO LIMIT ACCESS TO THE SHUT OFF? YEAH, IF YOU WANT TO HAVE THAT AS A CONDITION, WE CAN LOOK INTO THAT AND THEN ADJUST IT IF IF NEEDED AS WE GO ON TO CITY COUNCIL. I DO AGREE WITH CHAD THAT IT WOULD BE NICE TO HAVE CONSISTENCY. SO YOU KNOW, WHAT YOU'RE, YOU KNOW, DRIVING UP TO I GUESS, RIGHT? YEAH. SO ALL RIGHT, MOTION FOR APPROVAL. MOTION FOR APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS OF LAW.
DIRECTOR TO WEIGH IN ON REQUIREMENTS OF RESTRICTED ACCESS. AND THEN WITH THE AMENDMENTS THAT ARE ON THE PRESENTATION AND WITH THE AMENDMENTS. OKAY. JUST JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, THESE TWO GLOSSARY TERMS WILL ACTUALLY GO IN THE GLOSSARY OF TERMS. AND IT'S SUBSECTION E, WHICH IS APPLICABLE TO THE ALTERNATIVE ENERGY CHAPTER. AND OUR CODE.
CAN WE HAVE A ROLL CALL PLEASE. MR. HATTON? YES. MR. YES. MR. NICKERSON YES. MR. WOLNIEWICZ.
YES. MR. ENGEL. YES. MR. FISHER. YES. MR. MUCHIRI. YES. HERE'S. WITH THAT, THAT TAKES US TO
[DISCUSSION ITEMS]
DISCUSSION ITEMS. ANYTHING TO DISCUSS THIS EVENING? YEAH, WE DO HAVE A COUPLE ITEMS. ONE OF THE THINGS WE WOULD LIKE TO DO TONIGHT IS DO A VERY BRIEF OVERVIEW OF SOME OF THOSE CODE AMENDMENTS THAT WERE APPROVED AT THE END OF 2025, BECAUSE WE'RE GOING TO START TO SEE SOME OF THOSE. SO JUST AS A QUICK REFRESHER, WE HAVE A COUPLE NEW MEMBERS. SO I WANT TO GIVE THEM KIND OF AN OVERVIEW OF THIS AS WELL. SO WE HAD PLANNING AND ZONING WORKING GROUP THAT MIKE AND MATT AND ROB SAT DOWN, WHICH STARTED IN 2024. WE DID 23 CODE AMENDMENTS.SO WE'VE BROKEN DOWN THE ONES THAT WILL BE MORE FOCUSED ON PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THIS PRESENTATION. AND THOSE WERE APPROVED AT CITY COUNCIL AT THE END OF LAST YEAR. SO WE'LL TOUCH ON ARCHITECTURE LANDSCAPE AND THEN SOME OF THOSE DEFINITIONS. SO IN THE ARCHITECTURE SECTION WE STARTED EVALUATING DESIGN STANDARDS FOR SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES, WHICH WOULD BE AN S R D V R D A R D, HMD UPTOWN TRANSITIONAL AND THEN UPTOWN SINGLE FAMILY FOCUSING ON THE GARAGES. WE WOULD WANT THE GARAGES LOCATED TWO FEET BEHIND THE FRONT PORCH.
[00:40:02]
AND IF THERE'S NO PORCH, IT CANNOT BE IN FRONT OF THAT. IT IT HAS TO BE IN LINE WITH THAT.THE HOUSE THERE. SO ALSO THE QUANTITY. NO MORE THAN THREE BAYS MAY FACE ANY STREET EXCEPT REAR LOADED HOUSES, AND THEN THAT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO R D SO THAT IS EXCLUDED. FOR LOT WIDTHS. WE WANTED TO INCLUDE SOME LOT VARIABILITY. SO 20% OF THE LOTS EXCLUDING THE CORNER LOT SHALL HAVE REAR OR SIDE LOADED GARAGES. SO WHEN YOU SEE A WHOLE SUBDIVISION COME THROUGH 20, 20% OF THOSE HAVE TO HAVE REAR OR SIDE LOADED GARAGES. SO WHEN WE GET LIKE A SKETCH PLAN, WE WOULD START TO EVALUATE THAT AND WE WOULD HAVE THEM MAYBE DESIGNATE OUT WHICH OF THOSE PARCELS AND THOSE LOTS WILL HAVE THAT SIDE OR REAR, OR DETERMINE IT BASED ON MAYBE THE LOT WIDTH. AND THEN FOR LOT WIDTH IN S R D V, R D, H D, USF AND U T ANYTHING 60 FOOT OR LESS HAS TO HAVE REAR LOADED GARAGES. SO ALI FOCUS DEVELOPMENT FOR 60 FOOT OR LESS LOT SIZES. THE OTHER ITEM WE UPDATED LAST YEAR, PRIOR TO ALL THE ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS WAS OUR DENSITY BONUS. SO WE ADDED IN SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES FOR THE INTENT. WE WOULD LIKE TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL DENSITY WITHIN THE COMMUNITY, BUT WE WANTED TO ENSURE THAT IN ADDITION TO ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS, WE WERE STILL GETTING GOOD SITE DESIGN AND OPEN SPACE WALKABILITY, GOOD VEHICULAR CIRCULATION THROUGHOUT THE SITE. SO WE HAVE FIVE DIFFERENT ITEMS THAT ARE SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES THAT AN APPLICANT WILL HAVE TO REVIEW AND ENSURE THAT THEY ARE MEETING THOSE. WHEN THEY SUBMIT THAT APPLICATION. AS WELL, WE ADDED DESIGN CRITERIA, CREATING A ADDITIONAL DESIGN ELEMENTS AND REQUIREMENTS. IF THAT APPLICANT IS ASKING FOR THAT ADDITIONAL DENSITY ON SITE. AND THERE'S SEVEN OF THOSE ITEMS THAT WE WILL REVIEW WITH THE BOARD. AND THEN WE HAVE THIS CHART WAS ALSO IN OUR PREVIOUS DENSITY BONUS. WE JUST UPDATED WHAT THOSE ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS LOOKED LIKE. SO REQUIRING ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES ON THE BUILDING. AND AS WELL AS ADDING OPEN ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS FOR THOSE DEVELOPMENTS. AND THEN TOUCHING ON SOME LANDSCAPE HERE, WE WILL NOW HAVE 20% OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT ON COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS. AND THEN WE ALSO EXPANDED ON THE RETENTION AND DETENTION PONDS. SO UP TO 30% OF THE BASIN AREA CAN BE INCLUDED IN OPEN SPACE. IF THE FOLLOWING ARE MET. WALKING PATHS, SEATING AREA, WILDLIFE HABITAT, FOUNTAIN AND ENHANCED LANDSCAPE AREAS. WE WANT TO ENCOURAGE IT TO KIND OF BE FREEFORM VARIABLE CONTOURING. AND THEN 30% OF THE BASIN NEEDS TO HAVE LANDSCAPE AROUND IT.
I'M REALLY PROUD OF THAT LAST SLIDE. WE WORKED HARD ON THAT ONE. WE DID. YES. WE WORKED HARD ON ALL OF THESE. RIGHT. IT WAS A VERY DEDICATED FALL LAST YEAR, FALL TIME. SO FOUNDATION PLANTING IS SOMETHING NEW ON THE RESIDENTIAL. HAVING THAT ON THE FRONT AND A PORTION OF THE SIDES OF THOSE HOUSES, MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL CAP, TRYING TO CAP THAT AT 125% OVER THE LIKE THE BASE STANDARD OF THE CODE, WE ARE HAVING A LITTLE BIT OF A STRUGGLE WITH THAT. I WOULD I WOULD SAY SO FAR WITH THIS BEING REQUIRED. PREVIOUSLY, THE APPLICANT HAD TO DO ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING IF THEY WERE GOING OVER A PERCENTAGE. THEY DON'T HAVE THAT REQUIREMENT NOW, BUT THEY'RE STILL ASKING FOR THE ADDITIONAL PARKING AND THEY'RE ASKING TO DO VARIANCES. SO WE'RE KIND OF TALKING THROUGH THAT INTERNALLY OF I THINK THE ORIGINAL INTENT WAS LIKE, W CAPPING IT AND THAT'S WHAT IT IS. SO WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT THAT. AND HOW DO WE, HOW DO WE CHANGE IT OR KIND OF RESOLVE THAT ISSUE THAT WE'RE SEEING ON THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION SIDE? SO YOU MIGHT SEE SOMETHING COME BACK IN THE FUTURE REGARDING THAT TO ALLOW MORE PARKING. THEY WANT. YEAH, THEY WANT OVER THAT 125%. WAS IT THE CHICKEN WAS ONE OF THOSE AND WE HAD ANOTHER ONE. I THINK THEY HAD LIKE 15 SPOTS OR 20
[00:45:06]
SPOTS. OR WAS IT WAS REAL SMALL. YEAH, THEY'RE GOOD, BUT THEY DIDN'T. THAT LOT WAS NOT APPLICABLE BECAUSE IT WAS SUCH A WEIRD LOT. SURE. OKAY. MORE PART. I THOUGHT WE BATTERED PEOPLE AGAINST. I MEAN, I, I THINK OUR THOUGHT WAS, YOU KNOW, BIG BOX, YOU KNOW, JUST RIGHT.YOU WERE ON. YEAH, I KNOW YOU KNOW. YES. YOU KNOW, JUST A, A SEA OF ASPHALT WANTED TO LIMIT THAT. BUT. RIGHT. THE LIMITS THAT WE SET MAY NOT HAVE BEEN CORRECT FOR SMALLER COMME COMMEL BUILDINGS. YEAH. AND IT MAY NEED A MORE DETAILED PARKING CODE, YOU KNOW, ASSOCIATED MORE WITH CERTAIN SIZES. AND TO HELP AVOID THAT IN THE LARGE SCALE BIG BOX STORES. YEAH. THE OTHER ITEM WAS TREE PLANTING. SO WE'VE ADDED A REQUIREMENT FOR THE RESIDENTIAL. IF IT'S LESS THAN 60 FOOT LOT WIDTH, ONE ONE LARGE OR MEDIUM TREE, 60 TO 80 GETS A LARGE TREE AND THEN ONE OTHER TREE OF ANY SIZE 80 FOOT OR GREATER, ONE LARGE TREE AND TWO TWO OTHER TREES IN ADDITION TO THAT. AND THEN JUST ADDED A HANDFUL OF DEFINITIONS TO THE GLOSSARY OF TERMS AS WELL. SOME OF THOSE ARE RELATED TO ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES THAT COME THROUGH THAT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD, OR AS PART OF SOME OF THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL REVIEW WILL BE DOING SO. JUST CLARIFYING THOSE ITEMS. AND THAT'S ALL FOR THAT OVERVIEW. WE WILL HAVE THIS AS A PDF WE CAN SEND OUT TO EVERYONE. SO YOU GUYS CAN KIND OF HAVE THAT. AND THEN AS YOU START TO SEE OUR STAFF REPORTS COMING THROUGH, YOU'RE GOING TO WE'LL INCLUDE THIS INFORMATION IN THERE AS WELL. AND THAT'S SOMETHING THAT THE BOARD WILL WANT TO TALK TO THE APPLICANTS ABOUT TOO. SO. ALL RIGHT. SO THAT'S O. AND THEN SO I'M SORRY, ONE OTHER THING. I'M ON MY END.
THE VISION PLAN WAS ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL THAT WE HAVE BEEN WORKING ON. THAT ADOPTION HAPPENED AT THE END OF FEBRUARY. SO I'M GOING TO SEND OUT THE VISION PLAN BOOKLETS TO YOU GUYS. AND I ASK THAT YOU LOOK THROUGH THOSE, READ THROUGH THOSE, SO YOU BECOME FAMILIAR WITH IT, AND WE WILL HAVE OUR CONSULTANT IN HERE EITHER MAY OR JUNE, DEPENDING ON THEIR SCHEDULE. AND WE CAN DO KIND OF LIKE A Q AND A SESSION WITH THEM. JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE'S COMFORTABLE MOVING FORWARD BECAUSE WE'LL START TO SEE PLANS COMING THROUGH THAT ARE KIND OFIND OF REFLECTIVE OFF THE INTENT OF THE VISION PLAN TOO. SO, AND I'LL ALSO SHARE IN THE EMAIL I SEND YOU, I'LL SHARE THE CLIP OF REALM'S PRESENTATION AT CITY COUNCIL THAT YOU CAN WATCH AS WELL. SO OKAY. AND THEN AS FAR AS THE EMAIL THAT YOU SENT ABOUT THE TRAINING. YEAH, IF YOU WANT TO TOUCH ON THAT, BUT ALSO DID YOU SAY WHEN YOU NEED TO KNOW BY THE SOONER THE BETTER, BECAUSE I WOULD LIKE TO GET THOSE IN, BUT THAT IS, I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE MORE OF A DRB TRAINING FOR THOSE MEMBERS. I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE MORE FOCUSED ON WHAT DRB TYPICALLY LOOKS THROUGH THAN PLANNING COMMISSION. BUT I DID NOT SAY IN MY EMAIL WHEN WE NEED TO KNOW BY. BUT IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF DAYS WOULD BE GREAT, SO WE CAN GET EVERYONE REGISTERED IN THE CALENDAR. SO. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO WITH THAT, I DO JUST WANT TO WELCOME CODY TO THE BOARD. THIS IS HIS FIRST MEETING. I WAS ONBOARDING YESTERDAY, SO I KIND OF THREW HIM TO THE WOLVES. SO GOT HIM TRYING TO GET THEM PREPARED QUICKLY YESTERDAY. AND BUT WE WELCOME YOU. AND NOW WE HAVE A FULL BOARD WHICH WILL HELP APPLICANTS THROUGH THE PROCESS. YEAH. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. MOVE ON TO DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
[DESIGN REVIEW BOARD LIAISON REPORT]
LIAISON REPORT. OH, SHOOT MAN. THAT SLIPPED MY MIND. I DIDN'T EVEN READ ANYTHING FROM LAST MONTH. LANE'S CHICKEN TABLED. NO, WE DIDN'T TABLE THE WHOLE THING. WE APPROVED THE LANDSCAPE, BUT NOT THE ARCHITECTURE. NEW RESTAURANT, COMING LANES, CHICKEN MILL, VALLEY ARCHITECTURE, GOOD SIGNAGE. THEY'RE GOING FOR SOME SIGNAGE, VARIANCES AT BZA AND I THEY'LL BE BACK ON THE DRB AGENDA NEXT WEEK. SO THEY'LL HAVE SOME UPDATES AT THAT MEETING. YEAH, I REALLY FOR I TOTALLY FORGOT I HAD A QUICK MEETING. I MEAN, THE GAS STATION WAS TABLED. YEAH. OH THERE YOU GO. ALL RIGHT. SORRY GUYS. THANK YOU SIR. I'LL LET YOU GUYS DOWN. I APOLOGIZE. HAPPENS EVERY MONTH. NO. ALL RIGHT. SO THAT TAKES US TO[COMMENTS OF INDIVIDUAL BOARD MEMBERS]
COMMENTS OF INDIVIDUAL BOARD MEMBERS. I'M GOING TO START OPPOSITE OF CODY. SO MR. CHERRY ANY COMMENTS. NOTHING WITH ME TODAY. THANK YOU, MR. ANGEL. NOPE. JUST WELCOME. WELCOME[00:50:02]
CODY. THANK YOU. WELCOME CODY. THANK YOU. I ALSO WELCOME YOU. THANK YOU. YEAH, WE WE'RE ON IT.WE ENJOY IT. IT'S LABOR OF LOVE. IT'S. YES. YEAH. LABOR OF LOVE. VERY GOOD DESCRIPTION. WELCOME, MR. HAYDEN, AND THANK YOU FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS TODAY. ROB. WELCOME. AND AS FOR YOU, WE HAVE REQUESTED MORE TRAINING ON DATA CENTERS. WHAT THEY DO, HOW THEY IMPACT US. WE WE WANT TO KNOW, RIGHT? ANY INFORMATION WE'LL BE HAPPY TO CONSUME THAT. YEAH. ABSOLUTELY. CODY, IF YOU DON'T MIND JUST INTRODUCING YOURSELF. YEAH, BRIEFLY. OH MAN. I NEWLY MINTED POKER PLAYER IN THE MARYSVILLE COMMUNITY. SO NO, MY NAME'S CODY. JUST JOINED YESTERDAY. THANK YOU FOR THE AMAZING ONBOARDING. HONESTLY, IT WAS A REALLY GOOD FIRST MEETING TO KIND OF SEE HOW THE DIALOG WORKS HERE AND JUST KIND OF GET TO MEET ALL OF YOU ALL. AND I'M REALLY LOOKING FORWARD TO IT. MY BACKGROUND'S IN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND WORKED IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT GOING ON YEAR FIVE NOW. SO REALLY JUST HAVE A PASSION FOR SERVING IN THE COMMUNITY. SO HAPPY TO BE HERE AND APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY GUYS APPRECIATE YOUR VOLUNTEERING. ALL RIGHT.
SO WITH THAT, DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN? AWESOME. THANK YOU. A
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.