[CALL TO ORDER]
          [00:00:07]
          MARYSVILLE CITY COUNCIL. THE DATE IS APRIL 27TH, 2026. THE TIME IS SEVEN, PERHAPS 701 NOW. 
          AND WE ARE GOING TO CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER THIS EVENING. WE'RE GOING TO START BY STANDING AND SAYING THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, AND THEN PLEASE REMAIN STANDING FOR THE INVOCATION. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. ALMIGHTY GOD, WE ASK YOU TO GUIDE US THROUGHOUT THIS MEETING AS WE SEEK TO MAKE DECISIONS FOR THE GOOD OF THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE AND ITS CITIZENS. AMEN. AMEN. 
          ROLL CALL. ZACH BORTNER HERE. STEVEN WOLF HERE. DONALD BURGER HERE. SCOTT HUNTER HERE. KELSEY TAKACS HERE. MARK REAMS, KATHY YOUNG HERE. THANK YOU. NEXT ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA IS APPROVAL OF 
          [ APPROVAL OF MINUTES]
THE MINUTES. WE WILL BEGIN WITH APRIL 6TH, 2026. COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES. IS THERE ANY CORRECTIONS? HAS EVERYONE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW AND IF SO, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THE APRIL 6TH MEETING MINUTES. I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. 
          OKAY. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ALL OPPOSED? OKAY. MEETING MINUTES FROM THE APRIL 6TH WORK SESSION ARE APPROVED. THE APRIL 13TH, 2026 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES. ALL HAVE ANY REVISIONS? CORRECTIONS. I'LL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO APPROVE. AND IF SO, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR APPROVAL. MR. PRESIDENT, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE APRIL 13TH, 2026 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA. OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ALL OPPOSED? MINUTES OF THE APRIL 13TH MEETING ARE APPROVED. NEXT ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA, WE HAVE A 
          [Additional Items]
PROCLAMATION. THIS IS FOR MILITARY APPRECIATION MONTH, AND I'M GOING TO MOVE TO THE FORWARD TO GRAB A MICROPHONE. AND THEN I WILL WELCOME SOME GUESTS HERE TO STAND UP WITH ME. 
          IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO COME UP. THAT'S ALL. HIM. OKAY. THIS EVENING WE HAVE CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER RICHARD KERWOOD WITH US. AND AFTER THE PROCLAMATION, YOU'RE WELCOME TO SAY A FEW WORDS, SIR. SO IN 2000, WHEREAS IN 2004, THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS PASSED A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING MAY AS NATIONAL APPRECIATE MILITARY APPRECIATION MONTH, ENCOURAGING ALL CITIZENS TO HONOR CURRENT AND FORMER MEMBERS OF THE US ARMED FORCES AND THEIR FAMILIES, INCLUDING THOSE WHO MADE THE ULTIMATE SACRIFICE. AND WHEREAS THE MONTH OF MAY WAS SELECTED FOR THIS DISPLAY OF PATRIOTISM BECAUSE DURING THIS MONTH WE CELEBRATE VICTORY IN EUROPE, VE DAY, MILITARY SPOUSE DAY, LOYALTY DAY, ARMED FORCES DAY, NATIONAL DAY OF PRAYER AND MEMORIAL DAY. AND WHEREAS, FOR GENERATIONS, THE FREEDOM AND SECURITY ENJOYED BY CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES ARE DIRECT RESULTS OF THE CONTINUED VIGILANCE AND SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES OVER THE HISTORY OF OUR GREAT NATION AND. WHEREAS, DURING MILITARY APPRECIATION MONTH, WE HONOR ALL SOLDIERS. THEIR COMMITMENT TO OUR COUNTRY AND THEIR LEGACY. 
          LEGACY OF PATRIOTISM AND SACRIFICE, THESE HEROES HAVE PROTECTED AND INSPIRED ALL AMERICANS. AND WHEREAS FOR MORE THAN TWO CENTURIES, AMERICANS HAVE BEEN CALLED TO DEFEND THE FOUNDING IDEALS OF DEMOCRACY. DURING MILITARY APPRECIATION MONTH, A GRATEFUL NATION REMEMBERS THE PROUD PATRIOTS WHO MADE THE ULTIMATE SACRIFICE IN DEFENSE OF LIBERTY'S BLESSINGS. AND WE ACKNOWLEDGE ALL PAST AND PRESENT SERVICE MEMBERS. AND WHEREAS IN 1868, MAJOR GENERAL JOHN A LOGAN STATED, LET NO NEGLECT, NO RAVAGES OF TIME TESTIFY TO THE PRESENT OR TO THE COMING GENERATIONS THAT WE HAVE FORGOTTEN AS A PEOPLE THE COST OF A FREE AND UNDIVIDED REPUBLIC. NOW I THEREFORE, SCOTT HUNTER, MAYOR AND PRESIDENT OF COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE, OHIO, DO HEREBY RECOGNIZE THE MONTH OF MAY 2026 AS MILITARY APPRECIATION MONTH IN THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE AND CALL UPON ALL THE RESIDENTS OF OUR COMMUNITY TO JOIN IN PERSONALLY EXPRESSING OUR GRATITUDE TO ALL U.S. ARMED FORCES ARMED FORCES MEMBERS WHO WORK IN THE DEFENSE OF OUR FREEDOMS THAT WE REALIZE EACH DAY. AND WE THANK THE FAMILY MEMBERS WHO SHARE THE BURDEN OF THEIR SERVICE. THE 
          [00:05:06]
STORY OF AMERICA IS WRITTEN WITH COURAGE, HONOR, AND DEDICATED SERVICE OF OUR VETERANS. SO THANK YOU. AND I'M GOING TO PRESENT THIS PROCLAMATION TO YOU, ROGER, SIR, AND YOU ARE WELCOME TO SAY A FEW WORDS. OKAY. FIRST OF ALL, YOU WANT TO, LIKE, SHAKE HANDS. 
          SURE. ALL RIGHT. OKAY. FIRST OF ALL, THANK YOU, SIR. I'M VERY HUMBLED AND HONORED TO RECEIVE THIS ON BEHALF OF MILITARY MEMBERS. VERY GRATEFUL TO BE A MEMBER OF THE MILITARY. YOU KNOW, LESS THAN 1% OF THE POPULATION ACTUALLY SERVES IN THE MILITARY. AND I HAD NO MORE NO LESS THAN 4 OR 5 PEOPLE. TELL ME, THANK YOU FOR FOR MY SERVICE. YOU KNOW, MY WIFE AND I MOVED HERE IN 1999. WE WERE OUTSIDERS, HAD TO GET CLOSER TO WORK. MY DAUGHTER WAS GETTING READY TO START KINDERGARTEN. MARYSVILLE HAS BEEN A GREAT PLACE TO GROW UP AND RAISE THOSE KIDS. NOW WE GOT GRANDKIDS. I'M A I'M ABOUT A YEAR AND A HALF OUT FROM RETIRING WHERE I LIKE 40 YEAR CAREER, AND I'M JUST VERY GRATEFUL TO HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY T SERVE WITH MY MY MEMBERS IN THE MILITARY, MY FAMILY IN THE MILITARY. AND I'M JUST GRATEFUL TO HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE AND BE A GUARDIAN FOR OUR FREEDOM FOR PEOPLE LIKE YOU. AND IT MAKES IT ALL WORTHWHILE. SIR, WE DON'T DO IT FOR THE RECOGNITION. 
          WE DON'T DO IT FOR APPRECIATION. BUT WHEN WE ARE APPRECIATED, IT REALLY GOES A LONG WAY. AND I DON'T THINK YOU REALLY UNDERSTAND JUST HOW MUCH. THANKS. THANKS FOR YOUR SERVICE. 
          OUR LITTLE KID SALUTING YOU IN THE GROCERY STORE MAKES YOU FEEL GOOD. AND SO I JUST REALLY APPRECIATE IT. AND I'M VERY GRATEFUL TO BE HERE. AND THANKS FOR THE INVITE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, ROGER, SIR. THANK YOU. 
          MR. PRESIDENT. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO ADD ADD MILITARY APPRECIATION MONTH INTO THE MINUTES. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE AYE. ALL OPPOSED? THANK YOU. NEXT ON 
          [APPOINTMENT]
TONIGHT'S AGENDA IS AN APPOINTMENT. SO THIS IS FOR A CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENT OF JESSICA HARMON TO THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION THROUGH DECEMBER 31ST, 2028. AND WITH THAT, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE. MR. PRESIDENT, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE APPOINTMENT OF JESSICA HARMON TO THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION THROUGH. 123128 OKAY. AND WE HAVE A MOTION IN THIS INDIVIDUAL. THEY'RE HERE THIS EVENING. YES. SHE IS. IF YOU WANT TO STAND, YOU ARE WELCOME TO. IF YOU WANT TO SAY A WORD, A FEW WORDS, I WILL NOT PUT YOU ON THE SPOT, I PROMISE. OKAY. I'M GOING TO. JESSICA. I REALLY APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE THE COMMUNITY. AND THEN IF YOU WANT TO SPEAK INTO THE MICROPHONE, IT'LL BE PICKED UP ON OUR RECORDED MEETING. I DON'T KNOW HOW I CAN TOP THE MILITARY SERVICE, BUT MY NAME IS JESSICA AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE. SO I REALLY APPRECIATE THAT. MY FATHER IN LAW WAS IN THE SERVICE, SO I WILL LET HIM KNOW. THANK YOU. SO MY NAME IS JESSICA HARMON. 
          I'VE BEEN A RESIDENT OF MARYSVILLE FOR TEN YEARS AND IN HR SERVICE FOR 15. AND I REALLY APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE THE COMMUNITY I LIVE IN. SO THANK YOU SO MUCH. WE REALLY APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE TONIGHT, JESSICA. AND WE HAVE A MOTION TO MAKE YOUR APPOINTMENT. 
          AND WITH THAT MOTION, I WILL DO A ROLL CALL OR NOT ROLL CALL, BUT ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE AYE. ALL OPPOSED? WELL, CONGRATULATIONS ON YOUR APPOINTMENT. APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE TONIGHT. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. AND FOR THOSE HERE FOR THE PROCLAMATION AND FOR THE APPOINTMENTS, YOU ARE WELCOME TO STAY THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF TONIGHT'S MEETING. 
          WE DO HAVE A NUMBER OF ITEMS TO GET TO, AND WE WILL NOT BE OFFENDED IF YOU CHOOSE TO ALSO LEAVE. OKAY. MOVING ON. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT. THANK YOU, MR. PRESIDENT. MEMBERS OF 
          [ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT]
COUNCIL, A FEW THINGS TONIGHT. A COUPLE REPEATS, BUT I'M GOING TO REMIND EVERYBODY THIS IS THE LAST WEEK TO PURCHASE A MUNICIPAL POOL SEASON PASS AT A 15% DISCOUNT. SO I WOULD ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THAT DISCOUNT. IT'S GOOD THROUGH. YOU CAN DO IT UP THROUGH APRIL 30TH, AND PASSES MAY BE PURCHASED ONLINE VIA REC DESK, AND THE POOL OPENS FOR THE SEASON ON SATURDAY, MAY 23RD. SO JUST WANTED TO ENCOURAGE EVERYONE TO 
          [00:10:02]
TO TAKE A LOOK AT THAT IF ESPECIALLY IF THEY'RE GOING TO PURCHASE A POOL PASS THIS YEAR. 
          OUR FRIDAY NIGHT UPTOWN'S COMING UP QUICKLY. IT'LL BE ON FRIDAY NIGHT, MAY 15TH, 6 TO 10 P.M. ROCK THE BLOCK IS THE EVENT THAT NIGHT MUSIC BY MCGUFFEY LANE, AND IT'S PRESENTED BY MONARCH ROOFING COMPANY. SO WE'RE REALLY EXCITED ABOUT THE FRIDAY NIGHT UPTOWNS KICKING OFF HERE. WITHIN THE NEXT THREE WEEKS OR SO. ANOTHER ITEM THEN THIS IS KIND OF DOVETAILS INTO TWO NATIONAL POLICE WEEK WILL BE OBSERVED FROM MAY 10TH AND MAY 16TH. YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY, WE WANT TO THANK ALL THE BRAVE MEN AND WOMEN WHO ARE PART OF OUR MARYSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, AS WELL AS THE UNION COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE AND ALL OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL. AT THE CONCLUSION OF THAT WEEK IS THE UNION COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT MEMORIAL CEREMONY THAT IS SATURDAY, MAY 16TH AT 11 A.M. AT THE UNION COUNTY COURTHOUSE. THAT'S ALWAYS AN AWESOME EVENT. SATURDAY MORNING, MAY 16TH, 11 A.M. AND OF COURSE, THE POLICE WEEK IS THAT ENTIRE WEEK FROM MAY 10TH TO MAY 16TH. AND THEN STAYING ALONG THE LINES OF POLICE HOSTED THE BATTLE OF THE BADGES. BLOOD DRIVE IS COMING UP. AND SO IT'S HOSTED BY THE MARYSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT ON MAY 12TH, 11 A.M. TO 4 P.M. YOU CAN DO THAT IN THE COMMUNITY ROOM AT OUR POLICE AND MUNICIPAL COURT FACILITY, 1250 WEST FIFTH STREET. AGAIN, IT'S A BATTLE OF THE BADGES BLOOD DRIVE. WE ENCOURAGE ANYONE IF THEY HAVE THE ABILITY TO DO SO, TO UTILIZE THAT FOR VARIOUS REASONS, FOR VARIOUS REASONS. 
          AND WITH THAT, I'LL I'M GOING TO SHIFT OVER TO OUR ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER, JEREMY HOYT. YEAH. 
          THANK YOU. TERRY. CITY STREET CREWS CONTINUE TO PERFORM EARTHWORK OPERATIONS AT THE FORMER WATER TREATMENT PLANT AND REPAIR AND REPLACE CATCH BASINS AHEAD OF THE ANNUAL PAVING PROGRAM. OUR STREET CREWS HAVE REMOVED ALL THE LIME FOR A TEXT I RECEIVED THIS MORNING. SO NOW THEY'RE GOING TO GET DIRT PRIMARILY FROM INNOVATION PARK TO BE ABLE TO FILL IN THOSE LAGOONS. PARKS CREWS CONTINUE TO PERFORM LANDSCAPE CLEANUP, MULCHING AND MOWING. ON THE WATER SIDE, THE CREWS CONTINUE TO REPLACE THE CONLEY STREET WATER LINE NORTH OF LYDIA, AND THEY'RE ON THE TREATMENT SIDE. THEY'RE ADDRESSING A SEASONAL TURBIDITY ISSUE THAT WE RUN INTO EVERY SO OFTEN ON THE WASTEWATER FRONT. CREWS CONTINUE TO ADDRESS ISSUES AT THE NEW PUMP STATION FOUR, AS WELL AS EVALUATING POTENTIAL AIR RELEASE VALVE ALTERNATIVES. FROM AN ENGINEERING PERSPECTIVE, I'LL GO THROUGH ALL THE CAPITAL MIND ANY SCHEDULES OR WHETHER IN CONTRACTOR DEPENDENT. BUT THIS IS THE BEST INFORMATION THAT WE HAVE AT THIS TIME. CARRIAGE ACRES AND CHERRY STREET SANITARY THAT HAS THAT PROJECT HAS FLIPPED INTO STORM SEWER. SO WE'RE REPLACING A STORM SEWER FROM MCCARTHY PARK DOWN TO THE RAILROAD TRACKS, SOMETHING THAT WE ENCOUNTERED DURING DURING OUR, I GUESS, OUR CONTRACTORS EFFORTS ON THE WASTEWATER SIDE AND THEN THE CHERRY STREET ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ARE EXPECTED TO START ONCE THE TESTING IS COMPLETED TOWARDS THE END OF MAY. AND IN JUNE ON THE PUMP STATION FOUR SIDE. THIS ONE'S UP AGAINST THE JUNE 30TH DEADLINE, BUT THE CONTRACTOR CONTINUES WORKING TO CONNECT THE EXISTING LINE TO THE NEW LINE THAT WE JUST PUT IN. THAT PROJECT IS EXPECTED TO BEAT THE DEADLINE AND BE COMPLETED WITHIN THE NEXT 2 TO 3 WEEKS. KIMBERLY DRIVE AND BRIARWOOD DRIVE WATER LINE IMPROVEMENTS. 
          THIS IS A WATER LINE REPLACEMENT PRO PROJECT RIGHT ACROSS FROM JEROME TOWNSHIP HALL, AND WE HAVE THE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING SCHEDULED FOR MAY 7TH. THE COLEMANS CROSSING AND WALMART TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION IS TO BEGIN THIS SUMMER PAVING PROGRAM. WE'RE FINALIZING THE CURBS THAT ARE GOING TO BE  &-PS PROGRAM AND THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETINGS COMING UP SOON. ONE ITEM THAT WILL BE ON OUR LIST FOR THE NEXT TWO YEARS, ALTA FIBER CONSTRUCTION CONTINUES NEAR PROFESSIONAL PARKWAY AND CHESTNUT STREET, AND THEN RESTORATION CREWS WILL FOLLOW ALL NEW INSTALLATIONS. AND THEN FINALLY, AS PART OF THE VISION DEVELOPMENT, THE CONTRACTOR IS GOING TO BE INSTALLING MEDIANS ON WEST FIFTH STREET. EASTBOUND TRAFFIC WILL BE DIVERTED THROUGH GREEN PASTURES. SO WE'RE CLOSING EASTBOUND. THAT DIVERSION WILL TAKE DAMASCUS TO A MAY EMMAUS VIA A DETOUR. THIS 
          [00:15:08]
WILL ALLOW THE CONTRACTOR TO MOVE MUCH QUICKER IN. THIS REROUTING OF TRAFFIC SHOULD ONLY TAKE ABOUT TWO WEEKS. I KNOW WORKING WITH JOE, THAT'LL BE OUT IF IT IS NOT ALREADY OUT ON SOCIAL MEDIA ALERTING THE PUBLIC OF THAT. BUT WE WE'VE GOT MESSAGE BOARDS UP AND GETTING THAT INFORMATION OUT OUT TO THE PUBLIC AS BEST WE CAN. AND THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT. UNLESS THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS. I DID HAVE ONE OTHER THING TO ADD. OKAY. ANY ANY QUESTIONS ON THOSE THOSE ITEMS I THINK I DRIVE 11 A.M. 4 P.M. YEP. I THINK FOR ME, ONE OF THE MORE IMPORTANT THINGS IS THAT THE TRAFFIC REROUTING. IF YOU HAD IF YOU NEED TO HEAR THAT A COUPLE OF TIMES OR LET IT SINK IN, WE'RE GOING TO YEAH, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE IT OUT AND ABOUT A LOT. THE INFORMATION, YOU KNOW, IT'S A QUICK PROJECT. I'M SAYING QUICK. IT'S A TWO WEEK TIME SPAN FOR THE PROJECT. SO WE'LL MOVE IT AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE. OBVIOUSLY WEATHER, YOU KNOW, COULD IMPACT IT A LITTLE BIT. BUT WE'RE HOPING TO STAY RIGHT ON THAT TIME FRAME. 
          BUT PATIENCE IS ALWAYS REQUESTED AND THAT SHOULD START WEDNESDAY. GOOD DEAL, GOOD DEAL. 
          THE ONLY OTHER THING I WANTED TO SAY TONIGHT IS JEREMY IS ON A HIGH TONIGHT. HIS SON'S BASEBALL TEAM JUST BEAT THE NUMBER ONE TEAM IN THE STATE. SO THERE YOU GO. UNDEFEATED NUMBER ONE TEAM IN THE STATE. SO THERE YOU GO. CONGRATS. FANTASTIC. THANK YOU FOR THE 
          [REPORT OF CLERK OF COUNCIL]
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT. WE WILL MOVE ON TO THE REPORT OF THE CLERK OF COUNCIL. THANK YOU. I DO HAVE ONE ITEM. TONIGHT. WE RECEIVED A LIQUOR PERMIT REQUEST FOR A NEW LIQUOR PERMIT FOR MONARCH TACOS, LOCATED AT 211 EAST FIFTH STREET, WHICH IS THE FORMER HALF PINT LOCATION. 
          I FOLLOWED UP WITH THE POLICE DIVISION AND THEY DON'T HAVE ANY CONCERNS. DOES COUNCIL HAVE ANY CONCERNS? ANY CONCERNS? NOTED COUNCIL. NO CONCERNS. THANK YOU. PLANNING COMMISSION 
          [PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT]
REPORT. GOOD EVENING. COUNCIL. SO WE HAD SOME OLD BUSINESS FOR SOME ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS TO PART 11. THE APPENDIX GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND CHAPTER 1121 DISTRICTS AND OVERLAYS. IT'S ACTUALLY THIS IS WHAT WE HEARD AT THE LAST COUNCIL MEETING. WE'RE JUST NOW GETTING THE PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT. BOTH OF THOSE WERE APPROVED BY A VOTE OF SEVEN. YES VERSUS ZERO. NO NEW BUSINESS. WE HAD A CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION FOR SENIOR HOUSING AT THE WATER AND LIGHT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS ALREADY IN THE PD TEXT AS A CONDITIONAL USE. AND THAT WAS APPROVED WITH A VOTE OF SEVEN YES VERSUS ZERO. NO. AND SOME MORE ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS THAT WE'LL HEAR TONIGHT FOR CHAPTER 13 AND 39. ALTERNATIVE ENERGY. THIS HAS TO DO WITH ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS. AND THAT WAS APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS VOTE OF SEVEN VERSUS ZERO. NO. FOR YOU. GO AHEAD AND DO DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OR QUESTIONS. ANY ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS. QUESTIONS COMMENTS. MR. BORDNER JUST HAVE ONE QUESTION. WILL YOU GET INTO THE CONDITIONS FOR THE CHARGING LATER? I CAN SPEAK TO THAT NOW. 
          IT WAS JUST TO ADDRESS SOME SIGNAGE AND SPECIFIC LOCATIONS FOR THE EMERGENCY SHUTOFF APPARATUS, SIMILAR TO LIKE AT A GAS STATION. OKAY, THANKS. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMENTS. 
          MEMBERS OF COUNCIL. THANK YOU. SO MOVE ON TO THE NEXT ITEM THEN. FOR DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 
          [DESIGN REVIEW BOARD REPORT]
HAD THREE HOME IMPROVEMENT GRANT APPLICATIONS AT 242 TODD COURT, 1792 SASSAFRAS COURT AND 1750 CREEKVIEW DRIVE. AND THOSE WERE ALL FOR EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS ON RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, AND EACH OF THOSE WAS APPROVED. SIX YES VERSUS ZERO. NO. SOME OLD BUSINESS, A NEW RESTAURANT ON STATE ROUTE 31 AND NORTHWOODS DRIVE, NEXT TO THE DUNKIN DONUTS FOR LANES KITCHEN. THE ARCHITECTURE, SIGNAGE AND BUILDING LIGHTING WAS APPROVED. SIX YES VERSUS ZERO. NO. AND AN EXTERIOR PLAN LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR A MULTI-TENANT RETAIL CENTER IN THE MARYSVILLE EAST. SECTION THREE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. THE ARCHITECTURE, SIGNAGE AND BUILDING LIGHTING WAS APPROVED. SIX YES VERSUS ZERO. NO. AND A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. THE RIVER TRAILS AT WEAVER RIDGE. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON WEAVER ROAD WAS APPROVED. SIX YES VERSUS ZERO. NO. AND ANOTHER PROJECT AT THE WATER AND LIGHT DEVELOPMENT. 
          [00:20:07]
THE ARCHITECTURE FOR THE SILO WATER TREATMENTATMENT SITE RENOVATIONS, AND A FEW ADDITIONS, A FITNESS CENTER AND ARCHITECTURE FOR THE APARTMENT BUILDINGS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE CREEK. THE SITE PLAN FOR PHASE TWO, WHICH IS THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT SITE. 
          THE LAYOUT, LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING WERE APPROVED FOR YES VERSUS ONE NO. THE WATER TREATMENT PLANT RENOVATION, THE ADDITION AND THE FITNESS CENTER WERE APPROVED. FIVE YES VERSUS ZERO. NO. AND THE APARTMENT BUILDINGS NORTH OF MILL CREEK WERE APPROVED. FIVE YES VERSUS ZERO. NO. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBERS. ANY QUESTIONS? COMMENTS. MR. ANDREWS? HEY, THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR REPORT TONIGHT. APPRECIATE THAT. HEARING OF CITIZENS. THIS IS THE TIME AND THIS EVENING'S MEETING WHERE WE WELCOME CITIZENS UP TO THE PODIUM. AND IF IF YOU HAVE AN ITEM TO SPEAK TO, WE ASK THAT YOU KEEP IT TO ITEMS NOT WITH WITHOUT CURRENT LEGISLATION PENDING AND YOU HAVE UP TO FIVE MINUTES, WE WOULD ASK THAT YOU STATE YOUR ADDRESS AND THEN WE WILL KEEP IT AT FIVE MINUTES. AND THEN AND ALSO, JUST TO REMIND YOU, IT'S NOT A TIME FOR Q&A, IT'S NOT AN ENGAGEMENT. IT'S MORE SO FOR YOU TO COME EXPRESS ANY CONCERNS OR STATEMENTS YOU WOULD LIKE TO MAKE. SO I WILL OPEN IT UP FOR ANY CITIZENS TO COME TO THE PODIUM AT THIS TIME. OKAY. SEEING NONE, WE WILL MOVE ON TO RESOLUTIONS 09-26 FIRST 
          [09-26]
READING INTRODUCTION TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER AND OR APPOINTED DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE TO THE STATE OF OHIO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT. SMALL BUSINESS SMALL CITIES PROGRAM FOR AN AMOUNT OF. NOT TO EXCEED 150 000 OF PROGRAM YEAR 2026 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION GRANT FUNDS. 
          ADMINISTRATION. THANK YOU, MR. PRESIDENT. YEAH, THIS IS FOR THE NEWER COUNCIL MEMBERS. THIS IS AN EVERY TWO YEAR PROCESS THAT YOU GIVE AUTHORIZATION TO US TO, TO APPLY AND TO MYSELF TO APPLY FOR THESE FUNDS. THEY'RE TYPICALLY USED FOR CONNECTIVITY TYPE PROJECTS, SIDEWALK PROJECTS. I KNOW THIS MORNING WE HAD TALKED A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WE'VE STILL YET TO DETERMINE EXACTLY THE LOCATION, ALTHOUGH WE HAVE A PRETTY GOOD IDEA. BUT IT'S, YOU KNOW, IT'S, IT'S A GREAT PROJECT AND A GREAT USE OF FUNDS. WE WILL BE ASKING BECAUSE OF THE TIMING OF THE APPLICATION PROCESS, WE WILL WE WILL BE ASKING FOR A WAIVING OF THE THIRD READING. 
          OKAY. COUNCIL. I HAVE I HAVE A KIND OF NOT A QUESTION, BUT LIKE A STATEMENT. FOR YEARS, YOU KNOW, WE'VE BEEN USING THIS AS A WAY TO HELP FUND THE REPLACEMENT OF A LOT OF OUR SIDEWALKS THROUGH AND THROUGH OUT MARYSVILLE, ESPECIALLY, ESPECIALLY IN THE OLDEST PART OF TOWN. AND THEY HAVE BEEN BENEFICIAL TO REPLACING SIDEWALKS AT NO COST TO RESIDENTS. THE ONLY I THE ONLY ISSUE I HAVE, WHICH I'VE ALWAYS HAD, IS THAT IT CONTINUES TO ELIMINATE THE HISTORIC MATERIAL OF THE SIDEWALKS IN THE UPTOWN. YOU KNOW, NOT TOO LONG AGO, THE WHOLE ENTIRE MAIN DRAG OF TOWN USED TO HAVE BRICK SIDEWALKS, WHICH. IN THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE, THE MAJORITY OF IT IS NOT ONLY IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER DISTRICT, BUT ALSO IN THE CITY'S PRESERVATION DISTRICT. THE RECENTLY, CITY STAFF'S BEEN ABLE TO WORK WITH MYSELF AND COUNCIL TO PRESERVE SOME OF THE SIDEWALKS THAT WERE BRICK TO PUT THEM BACK AS BRICK. 
          THE ONLY CONCERN I HAVE FOR US AS A COUNCIL IS THAT IF WE ARE REALLY OR IF WE ARE REALLY SUPPORT PRESERVATION INITIATIVES, IT HAS TO START WITH THE PUBLIC SECTOR FIRST. 
          AND HOW ARE WE GOING TO PROTECT EXISTING HISTORIC SIDEWALKS WITHIN OUR DISTRICT? THAT IS LEFT. AND BECAUSE WITHIN THIS GRANT, IT'S ONLY FOR CONCRETE. AND, YOU KNOW, RESIDENTS AND CITY WILL OFTEN SAY THAT BRICK SIDEWALKS ARE UNLEVELED. THEY'RE, YOU KNOW, UNLEVELED. 
          AND THEY'RE AND BECAUSE OF THE TREE ROOTS OR WHATEVER. BUT THOSE SIDEWALKS, A LOT OF THOSE SIDEWALKS ARE EASILY 150 YEARS OLD. CONCRETE SIDEWALKS WILL ONLY LAST YOU 20 YEARS MAX, PROBABLY DEPENDING ON THE LOCATION AND THE FREEZING AND THAWING. SO IT'S JUST I ALWAYS BRING IT UP. IT'S, IT'S, IT'S ALWAYS AN ITEM OF CONCERN BECAUSE CURRENTLY IN THE CITY 
          [00:25:06]
OF MARYSVILLE, WE DON'T HAVE A DESIGNATED DISTRICT WHERERICKCK SIDEWALKS SHOULD ALWAYS BE PROTECTED. SO RESIDENTS UNDERSTAND THAT 150 YEARS AGO, BRICK BRICKS WERE THE ONLY ROUTE OF PROTECTION FOR FOOT TRAFFIC. THE LAST BRICK STREET IN MARYSVILLE IS STILL COTTAGE STREET, WHICH, AS WE NOT ONLY HAVE MARYSVILLE, YOU KNOW, WE WENT THROUGH. MARYSVILLE FOUNDING OF 1819 AND SUPPORTING OUR HISTORY, BUT NOW WE'RE IN AMERICA'S 250, SUPPORTING SOME INITIATIVES THAT SUPPORT PRESERVATION IN A WAY THAT EDUCATES FUTURE GENERATIONS ON THE IMPORTANCE OF WHY OLD MATERIALS SHOULD BE PROTECTED, IS SOMETHING THAT SHOULD BE IMPORTANT TO ALL OF US, NOT JUST SOME OF US. SO THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY. THANK YOU. JUST A NOTE, AND I CONCUR WITH DONALD. AND IN THOSE APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS THIS YEAR, WE'RE GOING TO BE IT'S ANTICIPATED WE ARE GOING TO BE BE EXTENDING THE SIDEWALK IN THE AREA OF WEST THIRD STREET WHERE THERE ARE NO SIDEWALKS. AND SO IT'LL BE AN EXTENSION FROM WHERE SIDEWALK EXISTS. AND THEY'RE ALSO TO KEEP IN MIND, THESE FUNDS ARE ALWAYS TO BE USED IN LM, LMI AREAS, LOW TO MODERATE INCOME AREAS. SO THAT'S ALWAYS A STIPULATION WITH THE USE OF THESE FUNDS AS WELL. AND WE WOULD YOU KNOW I THINK WE DID. WHAT WAS IT, WALNUT STREET THE TWO YEARS AGO THAT WE DID THAT WE PUT BRICK BACK. AND SO WE, WE TRY TO DO THAT WHEN WE CAN. SO. JUST ONE QUESTION I HAD HAD JUST IN REGARD TO THE YOUR COMMENT, IF A RESIDENT DOES HAVE A BRICK SIDEWALK, ARE THEY ABLE TO OPT IN TO KEEP THAT. IT'S MORE ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS. WE DO OUR BEST JOB TO BE ABLE TO PRESERVE THAT, YOU KNOW, USING MAYBE ALTERNATE FUNDS OR SIDEWALK PROGRAM FUNDS. SO, YOU KNOW, OUR BIGGEST CONCERN, AT LEAST WITH BRICK IN MOST CASES IS JUST THE ADA ACCESSIBILITY. YOU KNOW, CONCRETE'S GOING TO STAY FLAT AND YOU CAN, YOU KNOW, YOU CAN PUSH A WHEELCHAIR OR WHEEL OVER CONCRETE SOMETIMES MUCH EASIER THAN BRICK, OBVIOUSLY, BRICK DAY ONE, IT'S NO DIFFERENT THAN THE CONCRETE. BUT WITH THE SETTLEMENT THAT COUNCILMAN BERGER MENTIONED, THAT'S WHERE THAT'S WHERE BECOMES A CONCERN. BRICK COST FIVE TIMES MORE. IN SOME CASES. 
          AND IN LMI AREAS. KEEP IN MIND IT'S THEIR RESPONSIBILITY TO MAINTAIN IT OVER TIME. SO OFTENTIMES IT'S NOT EASY FOR AREAS LIKE THAT TO CONTINUE TO MAINTAIN. BUT I TEND TO AGREE IF WE CAN KEEP THEM, I THINK IT'S DEFINITELY AND IT MAKES SENSE. IT'S DEFINITELY SOMETHING WE WANT TO DO. OKAY. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION FOR THIS? THERE WAS A. MR. BORDNER, YOU HAVE SOMETHING. OKAY. THERE WAS A REQUEST AND MR. EMERY'S COMMENTS TO WAIVE THIRD READING. 
          I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO WAIVE THIRD READING IF COUNCIL SO WISHES TO DO SO. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION TO WAIVE THIRD READING. ROLL CALL, MR. BORDNER. YES. MR. WOLFE. YES. MR. BERGER. 
          YES. MR. HUNTER. YES. MRS. TAKACS. YES. MR. REAMS YES. MRS. YOUNG YES. SEVEN. YES. 
          [05-26]
MOTION PASSES. OKAY. ORDINANCES 05-26. THIRD READING VOTE TO APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION TO AMEND THE COOKS POINT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION. 
          YEAH, I'M GOING TO DEFER TO TO THE DEVELOPMENT AND LET THEM SPEAK TO IT A LITTLE BIT. I HAVE MAYBE A COUPLE SUGGESTIONS TO MAKE DEPENDING ON THE DISCUSSION RIGHT HERE. SO. GOOD EVENING EVERYONE. CHRIS WINKEL WITH WINKLE CONSULTING SOLUTIONS. THANKS FOR HEARING US AGAIN TONIGHT. IN ADDITION TO SEVERAL PAGES, AND I THINK SOME OF THE GUESTS EMAIL THERE. 
          WHAT I DID IS I PRINTED OUT THE MAP FOR YOU JUST BECAUSE WE KEEP TALKING SESSIONS. AND SO I DON'T HAVE TO FLIP BACK AND FORTH. YOU GUYS HAVE SOMETHING THAT ACTUALLY WHAT THEY HAVE AND THE ACTUAL TEXT THAT WAS RECEIVED TO THE, IT'S ACTUALLY THE SAME POINT, BUT I JUST FIGURE THAT'S A LOT EASIER. SO YOU CAN LOOK DOWN IN HERE AND ACTUALLY SEE WHAT'S GOING ON AND WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. SO IT'S EASIER TO REFERENCE. THANK YOU. YES. THANK YOU. 
          THAT'S THAT'S GOOD, THAT'S GOOD. A LITTLE BIT OF THAT. SO WHAT YOU GUYS END UP HAVING IS, IS 
          [00:30:06]
YOU HAVE AN SAW. SOME OF IT IS WE HAVE THREE DIFFERENT DOCUMENTS HERE THAT WE SUBMITTED BACK IN IS OBVIOUSLY WE HAVE THE MAP FIRST AND TO HELP YOU. AND THEN THE SECOND ONE IS JUST A DOTTED A BULLET POINT LIST OF EVERY SECTION THAT WE CHANGED FROM PLANNING COMMISSION TO HEARING YOUR GUYS'S. I MEAN, WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON THIS FOR A WHILE, SO WE'VE TAKEN YOUR COMMENTS IN AND, AND EVERYTHING ALONG THAT LINE TRIED TO ADD IN YOUR COMMENTS, REMOVE THINGS, ADJUST THINGS AROUND AND EVERYTHING ALONG THAT LINE. SO THAT IS A, I CREATED THE BULLET FOR SECTIONS THAT SAYS, HEY, OKAY, YOU KNOW, WHEN YOU, YOU GO FOR YOUR MOTION, IF YOU APPROVE US AND WANT TO GO FOR THAT MOTION THAT, HEY, IT ACTUALLY SAYS, WE ADDED THIS, WE MOVED THIS, WE DID THIS. SO PRETTY DETAILED, HOPEFULLY DETAILED ENOUGH FOR YOU. SO, YOU KNOW, AND THEN SOME OF YOU HAD THE, THE PRINTOUT OF THE, THE BIG SHEET HERE. SO I WANTED TO GIVE US A LITTLE BETTER OF A VISUAL OF IT. SO WHAT YOU'LL END UP SEEING HERE IS YOU'LL HAVE THE LEFT COLUMN IS WHAT WAS APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION ON DECEMBER 2ND. THE MIDDLE ONE IS WHAT IS ACTUALLY. WE'RE LOOKING FOR BEING PERMITTED NOW. SO THIS HAS THE SAME ITEMS THAT WERE INCLUDED AS THE PLANNING COMMISSION. AND THEN THE RED IS WHAT WE'VE CHANGED. SO I HIGHLIGHTED IN RED EVERYTHING THAT ENDS UP CHANGING. AND THEN THOSE ARE ALL IN YOUR BULLET POINTED ITEMS. AND THEN SOMETHING WE DIDN'T HAVE BEFORE AND THOSE PREVIOUS ONES IS I GAVE YOU ONES THOUGH, THAT, YOU KNOW, PER THE, FOR THE PUD, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE DID IN IT IS, HEY, WE'RE ADOPTING THE SD DISTRICT AND THIS ONE HERE FOR A, WE'RE DOING RMU AND AN SD AND THERE'S ONE OTHER ONE WHERE WE HAVE THE NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT IN IT, BUT I GAVE YOU SO THAT YOU COULD ACTUALLY SEE THAT, HEY, THIS IS ALL THE PERMITTED USES IN THERE. SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE DID WHEN WE ENDED UP DOING THINGS IN IT, AS YOU CAN SEE, IS LIKE IN THE ORIGINAL PROHIBIT, THERE WERE NO PROHIBITED USES. SO THAT WAS FINE. AND WE TYPICALLY DON'T DO THEM IF THEY'RE NOT LISTED, THEY'RE NOT ON THERE. BUT HOWEVER, WHEN YOU START LOOKING AT THE LIST THAT'S IN YOUR CODE, YOU START REALIZING DATA CENTERS ARE BIGGEST ONE. SO YOU GOT DATA CENTER OVER THERE THAT WE'VE ALL AGREED TO PROHIBIT IT. 
          WELL, WE NEED TO LIST IT AS PROHIBITED BECAUSE IT'S ALREADY LISTED IN EARLIER AS BEING THERE. SO WE ADDED THE PROHIBITED ONES TO ONES THAT ADD IN AND SAY, HEY, THIS IS IT. 
          SO THERE'S A LIST OF PERMITTED ONES THAT ARE THERE. AND THEN IF WE HAD ONES IN HERE, LIKE I'LL PICK SMALL BOX RETAIL THAT EVERYBODY IN THIS DISTRICT DIDN'T IN THAT AREA DIDN'T WANT. 
          SO WE'VE MOVED IT FROM A PERMITTED USE DOWN TO PROHIBITED USES. SO IT WAS ACTUALLY LISTED THERE. SO AND SO IT'S KIND OF EXPLAIN THE THE PROCEDURE OF IT. SO THEN SO FIRST ONE UP IS WE'RE GOING TO GO THROUGH SECTION BY SECTION. SO YOU CAN LOOK AT THEM. AND THEN THAT WAY I WOULD ASSUME AT THE END. I MEAN OUR VISION AT THE END IS THAT YOU WOULD END UP, YOU KNOW, APPROVING ALL OF THEM INDIVIDUALLY SO THAT IF THERE'S A PROBLEM WITH B TWO, THEN YOU JUST SAY, HEY, WELL, WE'RE GOING TO APPROVE BB1B, YOU KNOW, A WHATEVER, AND THEN WE CAN COME BACK AND REITERATE THAT ONE. AND THAT WAY WE AT LEAST MAKING STEPS FORWARD IN ORDER TO GETTING THIS DONE, BECAUSE WE'RE RUNNING OUT OF TIME ON OUR 90 DAY SCENARIO ON THIS ONE. SO WE'RE TRYING TO GET THAT ALL DONE. SO I WILL START WITH SECTION A. SO SECTION A, IF YOU LOOK AT YOUR MAP AND EVERYTHING IS. SO THAT IS THE AREA THAT IS CLOSEST. 
          THAT'S AT THE INTERSECTION OF 33 STATE ROUTE 31 AND AND ROUTE FOUR. SO ORIGINALLY THIS WAS FOR HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT IS WHAT THAT WAS. SO AS WE SAID BEFORE, DON'T WANT TO KEEP DOING IT, BUT WE WANTED TO SOFTEN IT UP WITH SOME RESIDENTIAL AND SOME OTHER THINGS THAT ENDED UP HAPPENING IN THERE. SO FROM THE, FROM THE ORIGINAL, WE ENDED UP ADDED THE FOLLOWING USE OF SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES, BUT PUT A CONDITION ON THEM THAT THEY HAVE TO BE A COTTAGE STYLE, 13 OR 1200 SQUARE FOOT MAXIMUM. SO BASED ON YOUR GUYS'S COMMUNICATION WITH US AND EVERYTHING ABOUT THAT, WE WANTED TO TRY TO MAKE IT A LITTLE BIT MORE OF A SMALL TOWN FEEL WITH COTTAGE HOMES, WHICH JUST LIKE A SMALL LITTLE INDIVIDUAL HOMES THAT ARE IN THERE. AND IT WOULD GIVE THE FLEXIBILITY TO HAVE THERE'S SOME WETLANDS IN THERE AND THERE'S SOME LITTLE THINGS IN THERE THAT BREAK IT UP. IT ALLOWS US, IN ORDER TO BREAK THEM UP. ALLOWS US TO BREAK THEM UP AND MOVE THEM AROUND. 
          SO IT'S JUST NOT MULTIFAMILY OR SOMETHING STRAIGHT WHERE YOU GOT EIGHT HOUSES AND, YOU KNOW, GOT THEM ATTACHED AND WE GOT A BUNCH OF THEM IN A ROW. THIS GIVES US A LITTLE BIT MORE FLEXIBILITY TO WORK AROUND IN THAT AREA. SO, AND IT ALLOWS US TO, YOU KNOW, SOME OF OUR VISION OF THIS A AND THE B ONE ARE SENIOR LIVING AND THINGS ALONG THAT LINE. THAT ALSO GIVES US AN OPTION TO HAVE THAT AVAILABILITY FOR THEM, THAT THEY CAN HAVE THEIR OWN LITTLE SMALLER HOUSES, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE WITH, YOU KNOW, MAYBE A ONE CAR GARAGE INSTEAD OF THE BIG TWO CAR GARAGES AND, YOU KNOW, A LITTLE MORE CLOSER WHITE PICKET FENCE KIND OF FACILITY THERE. AND THEN AFTER THAT. SO THEN WE WENT THROUGH. SO WE WENT THROUGH IN THIS ONE AND I'M JUST GOING TO GO DOWN THROUGH HERE. SO IT'S JUST EASIER TO LOOK AT IT THAT WAY. 
          [00:35:02]
SO THE NURSERY AND GARDEN CENTER AND SMALL BOX, PER OUR CONVERSATIONS, WE HAD THOSE AS A PERMITTED USE BEFORE. WE'VE NOW REMOVED THOSE AND PUT THEM DOWN IN THE PROHIBITED USES. 
          NOW WE HAD VEHICLE CAR WASH AGAIN, MOVED IT DOWN TO PROHIBITED BECAUSE IN THAT AREA WHERE WE'RE AT, IT JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE. SO WE'VE MOVED THOSE ALL DOWN TO THERE. SAME WAY WITH THE COMMERCIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT RENTALS. SAME THING. 
          WE DIDN'T WANT IT THERE. IT WAS IN A CONDITIONAL USE AS PLANNING. SO WE'VE NOW MOVED IT DOWN. WAREHOUSING AND STORAGE UNITS ARE THE SAME WAY THAT WE ENDED UP DOING THAT. NOW THE EXTENDED STAY HOTEL, IT WAS ACTUALLY PERMITTED USE. SO WE NOW SAID, HEY, IF THAT'S GOING TO COME IN, IT'S GOING TO BE SOMETHING RARE. SO LET'S PUT IT OVER TO THE CONDITIONAL USE FROM YOUR STANDARD CODE. AND THEN IF YOU ON THE PERMITTED SIDE, THEN WE ENDED UP TAKING DATA CENTERS, MADE IT A PROHIBITED USE. RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITIES. WE TOOK BOTH OF THEM, MADE THEM A PROHIBITED USE, AND THEN VEHICLE BODY SHOP SERVICE AND REPAIR FACILITY, AND WIRELESS COMMUNIOMMUNICATION TOWERS THAT WERE PERMITTED OVER THERE. AND SO WE PUT THOSE ALL OVER INTO THERE. SO WE ALSO ADDED IN FUEL SERVICES OR FUEL SALES. AND THAT ON THAT SIDE, THAT'S THE SAME AT THE SAME. ANY QUESTIONS ON ANY. MR. BORDNER. YES, I GUESS I JUST. 
          SO YOU'VE GOT CHANGES FOR STAFF AND COUNCIL REQUEST AND THEN ON THE RIGHT YOU HAVE PERMITTED USE BY CODE AND AND THERE'S SOME AMENDMENTS IN IN RED HIGHLIGHTED WHAT STOOD OUT TO ME ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE WAS YOU'VE YOU'VE ELIMINATED IN THE SCD AND RMU PERMITTED USE THE VEHICLE BODY SHOP AND THE SERVICE AND REPAIR FACILITY. BUT YOU KEPT VEHICLE SALES AND I DON'T KNOW, AND MAYBE SOMEBODY COULD EDUCATE ME. I DON'T KNOW THAT I'VE SEEN ANY VEHICLE SALES FACILITY WITHOUT A REPAIR OR BODY SHOP. SO I DON'T KNOW IF THAT MAKES SENSE TO HAVE VEHICLE SALES AS PERMITTED USE OR IF YOU WOULD ALSO TAKE THOSE OFF. BECAUSE I DON'T I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'RE DOING ANY GOOD BY JUST HAVING VEHICLE SALES. YOU'RE KIND OF HANDCUFFING YOURSELF. YEAH. GO AHEAD. YEAH. SORRY. JUST GENERALLY WHEN THERE'S A LIKE A REPAIR SHOP WITH A DEALERSHIP THAT'S CONSIDERED AN ACCESSORY USE. SO IT'S INCIDENTAL TO THE PRINCIPAL USE AS A CAR DEALERSHIP. SO IT WOULDN'T BE A SEPARATE USE AS DEFINED BY THIS AS A VEHICLE REPAIR SHOP. SO THAT'S A, THAT'S LIKE UNDER MY HOW I UNDERSTAND IT IS WHY IT WOULD BE SEPARATED. BUT IF A DEALERSHIP WENT IN UNDER THIS TEXT, THEY COULD HAVE REP REPAIR FACILITY AS PART OF THAT USE AS A DEALERSHIP. SO IT'S BASED ON THE PRIMARY USE. OKAY. THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING THAT. THAT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING. OKAY. AND THAT'S WHY IT WOULD BE THE SAME WAY IF THE CAR WASH. SO IF THEY HAVE A CAR WASH IN THERE THAT THEY'RE, THEY'RE DOING AT THAT SAME TYPE LIKE HONDA DOES AND ALL THAT KIND OF STUFF. YEAH, IT'D BE THE SAME WAY. OKAY. 
          BECAUSE IT'S THE PRIMARY USE IS CAR. OKAY. THANKS FOR CLARIFYING THAT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON? I HAVE A CALL FROM ONE OF OUR EARLIER MEETINGS WHERE WE TALKED ABOUT THIS. THIS IS A TIF DISTRICT, AND WE HAVE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE SCHOOLS NOT TO DO RESIDENTIAL TIFS. AND I SEE THAT, YOU KNOW, WE'RE PROPOSING ADDING SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING TO C1C2, B ONE SUB AREA A, I MEAN, BASICALLY ABOUT THREE FOURTHS OF THE AREA. AND, YOU KNOW, I ASKED IF WE HAD TALKED TO SCHOOLS ABOUT THAT AND I'M JUST HAVE WE HAD A CHANCE TO HAVE THAT DISCUSSION. WELL I, I BELIEVE THERE WAS A DISCUSSION AND WOULD YOU GUYS WANT TO SPEAK TO THAT THAT YOU HAD DISCUSSION. I FOLLOWED UP AND HAD DISCUSSION WITH THE SUPERINTENDENT TODAY AS WELL. SO DO YOU MIND DO YOU WANT TO SPEAK ON IT OR DO YOU WANT ME TO SPEAK? OKAY, SO BASED ON THIRD PERSON HERE JUST IS THAT THEY BASED ON THE CONVERSATION THAT FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND, THEY DID NOT HAVE A, A PROBLEM WITH THE RESIDENTIAL USE THERE. 
          KEEP IN MIND THAT OUR TIF, IF I'M CORRECT, AND, AND EVERYTHING ALONG THAT LINE IS FOR COMMERCIAL. SO EVEN IF WE WENT RESIDENTIAL IN THERE, THEY COULD NOT. THAT PART OF. THEY COULDN'T TAKE CARE, COULDN'T PARTICIPATE IN THE TIF BECAUSE IT WOULD END UP BEING RESIDENTIAL. SO THAT'S WHAT I THAT'S WHAT I BELIEVE. UNDERSTAND. I DON'T KNOW IF BRAD CAN CLARIFY THAT OR NOT, BUT WE ALSO HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH WHAT WE ALSO DIDN'T KNOW, 
          [00:40:03]
AND I UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT AND KNEW THAT MR. RAMSEY WAS COMING UP. BUT AT THE SAME POINT, WE'VE ASKED STAFF, THE LANDOWNER AND EVERYBODY, NOBODY HAS PROVIDED A DOCUMENTATION THAT SAYS, HEY, THIS IS SO WE DON'T KNOW IF IT'S A HANDSHAKE DEAL OR WHAT IT IS OR HOW THAT CAME ABOUT. THERE'S NO EVIDENCE OR THERE'S NO DOCUMENTATION OF IT. IF IT'S DOCUMENTATION OF IT, THEN, HEY, THAT'S GREAT, AND WE'LL HAVE TO ABIDE BY IT AND EVERYTHING ALONG THAT LINE. BUT IF NOT, WE NEED TO GET DOCUMENTATION IN HAND OR PROOF OR SOMETHING TO HELP PROTECT US ALL ON THAT. ON THAT CASE, IF I COULD SUGGEST, BECAUSE I, I TALKED TO THE SUPERINTENDENT TODAY, HE SEEMED TO BE COMFORTABLE AS LONG AS IT WAS SENIOR LIVING TYPE FACILITIES, 55 AND OVER AND THINGS LIKE THAT. HOWEVER, IT WAS A QUICK CONVERSATION. I THINK, TODAY. 
          HERE'S WHAT I WOULD SUGGEST IS, IS THAT MAYBE WE SPEND A LITTLE MORE TIME WITH THE SCHOOLS, AND I THINK I CAN DO THAT IN THE NEXT SEVERAL DAYS. MAYBE BRING THIS TOPIC BACK TO THE WORK SESSION ON MONDAY, BECAUSE OUR WORK SESSION AGENDA IS VERY LIGHT. IT'S VERY LIGHT. WE HAVE ONE OTHER ITEM THAT'LL TAKE ABOUT 20 MINUTES. AND THEN WE COULD WE COULD REALLY DIVE INTO THIS. I MAY EVEN BE ABLE TO HAVE A STOOL SCHOOL REP THERE TO GET MORE UNDERSTANDING WHERE THEY'RE AT, AND THEN WE CAN BRING IT BACK ON THE 11TH IF WE'RE COMFORTABLE AND MAKE THE DECISION. I JUST, I DON'T WANT TO FORCE FEED THIS ON ANYBODY, BUT IT SEEMS LIKE WE'VE GOT AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEND A LITTLE TIME ON IT AND MAYBE ENSURE THAT MAYBE THERE IS A POTENTIALLY A LEVEL OF COMFORT, A STRONG LEVEL OF COMFORT. BECAUSE WHEN I TALKED TO THE SUPERINTENDENT TODAY, I THINK HE FELT LIKE HE WANTED TO, YOU KNOW, HIS BOARD MEMBERS, HE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THEY WERE ALL IN PLAY ON THIS. SO I APPRECIATE THE SUGGESTION. I THINK THAT'S A PROBABLY A GOOD POINT. YOU MENTIONED AT THE BEGINNING KIND OF RUNNING OUT OF TIME. WHERE ARE WE AT IN TERMS OF TIME ON THIS? I THINK IT HAS TO BE DECIDED UPON AT THE MAY 11TH REGULAR MEETING. OKAY. SO THAT, YOU KNOW, OF COURSE, THE WORK SESSIONS NEXT NEXT WEEK ON THE FOURTH. SO WE COULD REALLY SPEND A LITTLE TIME ON IT. MAKE SURE C AND MAKE SURE THE SCHOOLS ARE COMFORTABLE BECAUSE I, I RESPECT THAT WE'VE HAD, YOU KNOW, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY HAVE A LEVEL OF COMFORT AND THEN SEE IF WE CAN ALL COME BACK ON THE 11TH AND MOVE SOME OF THIS FORWARD. SO ONE QUESTION. SO GIVEN THAT WHAT MR. EMERY JUST STATED MAY 11TH, IN THE EVENT THAT WE DO NEED TO ADD AMENDMENTS, THERE NEEDS TO BE A MAJORITY, A TWO THIRDS MAJORITY OF COUNCIL. IS THAT CORRECT? IT'S FIVE OUT OF SEVEN TO MAKE AMENDMENTS TO MAKE AMENDMENTS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. ARE THERE ANY IMMEDIATE CONCERNS OF YOUR ABILITY TO BE IN ATTENDANCE AT THAT MAY 11TH MEETING THAT ARE UNDERSTOOD BY COUNCIL MEMBERS? NO. OKAY. I JUST WANTED TO CONFIRM. I WANT TO BE HERE. YOU WILL NOT BE HERE.  ONE OTHER QUESTION. YOU HAD MENTIONED THE THAT THE TIFF ONLY APPLIES TO COMMERCIAL. IS THAT. YES. IS THAT VALID? BECAUSE I UNDERSTOOD THAT THE COTTAGE HOMES WOULD BE CONSIDERED RESIDENTIAL. IS THAT CORRECT? UNDERSTANDING. WHEREAS LIKE AN APARTMENT BUILDING OR A MULTIFAMILY WOULD BE CONSIDERED COMMERCIAL? I BELIEVE THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. BUT IS THAT A CORRECT STATEMENT THAT THE TIFF IS IN FACT RELATED TO COMMERCIAL ONLY COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL OUT OF THAT SAME. YES. OKAY. IF YOU IF RESIDENCES WERE BUILT INSIDE AN AREA DESIGNATED AS A COMMERCIAL TIFF, THEY WOULD JUST BE TAXED NORMALLY. OKAY. BECAUSE IT IS A COMMERCIAL TIFF, BUT A COMMERCIAL, OF COURSE, AS WE KNOW, APPLIES TO MULTIFAMILY. OKAY. MR. WOLFF YEAH, JUST ONE QUESTION LOOKING AT THIS. AND, YOU KNOW, WE'VE HAD PLENTY OF COTIONS AS I'M READING THIS RIGHT NOW. IS SINGLE FAMILY HOME ATTACHED CURRENTLY ALLOWED WITHIN THIS, THE WHOLE COOKS POINT DISTRICT JUST GOING THROUGH THE DIFFERENT A THROUGH WHAT IS IT D TWO IT HAS THAT IS CURRENTLY ALLOWED. CORRECT. 
          BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT I'M READING HERE IS PERMITTED USES BY CODE SCD SINGLE FAMILY HOME ATTACHED IS CURRENTLY ON THAT LIST. LIKE UP HERE ON A PERMITTED USE BY CODE S, C, D AND RMU. YOU GO DOWN SINGLE FAMILY HOME ATTACHED I. I'M MAKING SURE IF THIS IS CURRENTLY ALLOWED BY CODE OR THIS IS BEING ADDED IN WITH THE CHANGES THROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION, I CAN'T EITHER IT'S ADDED IN. I MEAN, IT'S NOT PART OF THE ORIGINAL. OKAY. CORRECT. NOT PART OF THE ORIGINAL PUD, BUT PART OF BUT A PERMITTED USE IN THE CITY DISTRICT. SO THE, THE ITEMS 
          [00:45:07]
LISTED ON THE RIGHT HERE, THESE ITEMS ARE JUST JUST SIMPLY THISA REFERENCE TO OUR CODE, CORRECT? CORRECT. THE MIDDLE COLUMN OF WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT IS WHAT IT WOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR AN AMENDMENT. SO YOUR QUESTION YOU'RE POINTING TO THE COLUMN ON THE RIGHT, WHICH IS SIMPLY A REFERENCE TO OUR CODE. CORRECT. IN WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN BASED ON THE PUD REVISIONS THAT WE DID WITH PLANNING COMMISSION WOULD HAVE BEEN APPROVED AT THAT POINT WITH PLANNING COMMISSION BECAUSE THEY BECAUSE NOT ONLY DID THEY THE EXTRA LIST HERE, THEY ALSO. THOSE WOULD HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THERE AT THAT TIME BECAUSE WE. BECAUSE IT'S WRITTEN OUT TO THAT, WE WOULD FOLLOW THE C D YOU KNOW, THE MARYSVILLE CODE FOR USES. AND THEN WE MADE THE, YOU KNOW, HAD THE MODIFICATION LIST, WHICH IS APPROVED. SO TECHNICALLY, TECHNICALLY THE RIGHT. AND THE AND THE LEFT WERE ACTUALLY APPROVED AT THAT MEETING. SO THE MODIFICATION IS ON THE RIGHT. IS THAT, HEY THESE ARE THE ADDITIONAL USES AT THAT POINT THAT SAID, HEY, WE DON'T WANT THOSE IN THERE. SO LET'S STRIKE THEM OUT. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? OKAY. BUT I GUESS TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, THE SINGLE FAMILY HOME ATTACHED AS I INTERPRET THIS IS INCLUDED THEN, RIGHT? IT'S THIS IS A PUD. YEAH. THIS A PUD AND THE EXISTING PUD DEFINES THE USES, WHICH DOES NOT INCLUDE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES. OKAY, OKAY, A LITTLE CONFUSING. THERE IT IS. IT IS. YOU KNOW, IT'S IT IS WHEN YOU WHEN YOU END UP CONSIDERING THAT WAY. AND THAT'S WHY I'M TRYING TO PRESENT IT OF, HEY, I WANT YOU GUYS TO SEE THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT'S GETTING PERMITTED HERE. SO THAT'S REALLY WHAT YOU'RE YOU KNOW, I KNOW WE'RE TALKING PAST AND PRESENT, BUT NOW WE'RE TALKING, HEY, THIS IS WHAT YOU GUYS ARE DOING BECAUSE WE'RE ADJUSTING FOR MIDDLE COLUMN. IS IT OKAY? YEAH. MIDDLE COLUMN WITH THE ADDITION OF THE RIGHT. 
          BECAUSE THOSE ARE THE ONES IN YOUR CODE. OKAY. YEAH. ANYTHING IN BLACK. ANYTHING IN BLACK IN THE CENTER AND THE RIGHT HAND COLUMN IS WHAT YOU'RE SAYING, HEY, IS GOING TO BE PERMITTED. 
          THAT'S AN EASY WAY TO UNDERSTAND IT. YEAH, EXACTLY. EXCEPT FOR THE PROHIBITED USES. 
          SO, SO I GUESS MY THING THAT I WANT TO BE CLEAR ABOUT IS, IS THAT WE HAVE UNTIL TECHNICALLY, I BELIEVE WE HAVE UNTIL THE 24TH, MAYBE MAY 24TH FOR OUR 90 DAYS. SO IF WE DO SAY, HEY, GO TO THE WORK SESSION AND DO THAT AND YOU SAY, HEY, ON THE 11TH MEETING. SO THAT'S WHY WE PICKED THE 11TH MEETING BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY BACKTRACKING. SO WE'RE HITTING OUR 90 DAYS, THEN THAT WOULD MEAN IF YOU DON'T TAKE US BACK AND SAY, HEY, YOU'RE GOING TO ADOPT THESE TODAY. YEAH. THEN THAT WOULD MEAN ON THE 11TH, IF I'M CORRECT, WE NEED TO HAVE OUR SECOND READING. AND THEN WE HAVE TO HAVE OUR THIRD READING AT THE SAME TIME, BECAUSE WE WON'T HAVE ENOUGH TIME TO COME BACK TWO WEEKS LATER AFTERWARDS IN ORDER TO DO THAT. SO THAT'S WHY WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE GOT TO YOU THIS DATE FOR THE MODIFICATION, SO THAT THE THIRD READING IS GOING TO DO THAT. SO YOU MIGHT HAVE TO CONSIDER, AND I KNOW THAT THE RULES AND EVERYTHING ON THAT HAVE, YOU KNOW, ABIDING BY THE THIRD, YOU KNOW, YEAH, WHATEVER YOU WANT. 
          NOW, I CAN'T THINK OF WHAT I WANT TO SAY. BUT YEAH, THE THIRD MEETING IS SAYING, YOU KNOW, GOTTA AVOID THE THIRD MEETING OR, YOU KNOW, BRING UP THIRD MEETING. SO JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE ANY ISSUES AS WE GO. I'M, I DON'T WANT TO SPEAK FOR THIS COUNCIL, BUT I THINK THIS COUNCIL FEELS VERY STRONGLY ABOUT MAKING SURE THE SCHOOLS ARE COMFORTABLE WITH WITH WHAT WE'RE THINKING ABOUT MOVING FORWARD WITH. AND I THINK WE CAN USE MONDAY NIGHT, NEXT MONDAY AS AN OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE SURE NOT ONLY THIS HAS GONE THROUGH AND THE DETAIL IT MAY NEED, BUT THE SCHOOLS ARE MAYBE PRESENT AND AND PARTICIPATING AND PROVIDING INPUT. THEN WE CAN ALL COME BACK ON THE 11TH, VERY COMFORTABLE, MAYBE WITH WHAT WE HAVE IN PLACE. OR IS EVERYBODY OKAY WITH THAT APPROACH? IT WOULD ALSO ALLOW COUNCIL TO DIGEST EVERYTHING THAT YOU'RE PRESENTING TONIGHT. SO IF THEY HAVE QUESTIONS, IT GIVES THEM AN EXTRA OPPORTUNITY TO TO ASK QUESTIONS BEFORE THE MAY 11TH CUT OFF. RIGHT. SO I AGREE WITH TERRY. I THINK IT'S IT'S PRETTY IMPORTANT THAT WE PUT THIS ON THE AGENDA FOR NEXT WEEK SO THAT WE CAN ALL HAVE THE SCHOOLS INPUT. AND ALSO, YOU GUYS, YOU GET AN EXTRA CHANCE TO LOOK AT THIS AND ASK QUESTIONS AND MAYBE MAKE SOME MORE CHANGES. CAN WE DO AMENDMENTS, A WORK SESSION? I THINK WE WOULD MAKE THE AMENDMENTS AT THE NEXT AT THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING AND THEN MAKE KNOW IT'S GOING TO GO. 
          [00:50:01]
IT'S GOING TO COME ON FOR THIRD READING. IT'LL GET TABLED. YOU CAN MAKE THEM. YOU CAN YOU CAN MAKE MOTIONS TO AMEND AT THE WORKS. IT'LL COME ON FOR THIRD READING. SO WHAT WOULD HAVE TO HAPPEN TONIGHT WOULD BE, YOU KNOW, AT THE END OF THE PRESENTATION, A COUNCIL MEMBER WOULD MOVE TO TABLE IT TO A DATE CERTAIN MAY 4TH AT THE WORK SESSION FOR THIRD READING. 
          MAY 4TH FOR THIRD READING, AND THEN THE THIRD AT THE WORK SESSION. THEN YOU'RE SAYING WE WOULD BE ABLE TO AMEND LEGISLATION TO AMEND IT? YEAH. YOU YOU COULD YOU IF YOU YOU COULD ALSO, IF YOU HAD TO TABLE IT FOR THIRD READING AGAIN TO MAY 11TH. OKAY. YEAH. IDEALLY, YOU'D WANT TO MAKE THERE ARE DIFFERENT SCENARIOS. YOU COULD MAKE AMENDMENTS ON MAY 4TH, AND THEN YOU WOULDN'T HAVE TO WAIVE THE THIRD READING. YOU COULD JUST CONTINUE IT TO MAY 11TH, THE THIRD READING, AND THEN VOTE ON IT, THEN VOTE ON THE LEGISLATION AS AMENDED. SO YOU'D MAKE YOU'D MAKE AMENDMENTS ON MAY 4TH AT THE AT AT THE WORK SESSION, AND THEN AMENDMENTS PASSED. IT WOULD COME BACK FOR SECOND READING. THEN AFTER THE ON THE LEGISLATION, AS AMENDED AT THE MAY 4TH WORK SESSION, AND THEN YOU WOULD CONTINUE IT THEN TO TO THIRD READING AT THE WORK SESSION. GIVEN IF WE WERE TO MAKE AMENDMENTS AND THEN VOTE ON THEM THERE, THEN IT WOULD GO BACK TO SECOND READING, AT WHICH POINT PUBLIC COMMENT WOULD BE WELCOMED. AT YES. WORK SESSION. OKAY. AND REQUIRED. YES. YEAH. OR THE OPPORTUNITY WOULD BE REQUIRED. YEAH. OKAY. THANK YOU FOR THE EXPLANATION. I THINK, MR. EMMER, YOUR COMMENTS ARE ACCURATE IN THAT THERE IS A DESIRE FOR VARIOUS MY SENSE ACROSS COUNCIL TO ENSURE PROPER COLLABORATION AND KIND OF REVIEW WITH THE SCHOOLS IN IN REGARD THEN TO GOING THROUGH THE PRESENTATION TONIGHT WOULD DO DOES COUNCIL FEEL WOULD BE BENEFICIAL TO DO A LIKE A MAYBE A MORE RAPID RUN THROUGH OF THE CHANGES OPPORTUNITY FOR QUICK QUESTIONS? THAT'S TOTALLY YOUR CALL. SOLL . OKAY. OKAY. AND THEN SO ONCE WE GO THROUGH THE DIFFERENT CHANGES, PERHAPS MAYBE A SLIGHTLY MORE RAPID PACE, AND THEN FEEL FREE, OF COURSE, TO ENGAGE IN QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE WITH AN UNDERSTANDING THAT YOU KNOW, LIKELY TO TABLE THIS UNTIL MAY 4TH. EVERYBODY HAPPY WITH ANY QUESTIONS? A NO. THE OTHER ONE SHOULD BE A LITTLE BIT EASIER BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, THE BEES, THE BEES, THE SEAS AND THE BEES ARE ALL PRETTY CLOSE TO BEING THE EXACT SAME. YOU KNOW, THE BEES ARE DEFINITELY THE EXACT SAME. SO ALL RIGHT, SO WE WENT TO B ONE. AND SO IF YOU LOOK AT YOUR AREA AND B ONE. SO B ONE IS THE AREA PRETTY MUCH NEXT TO A NEXT TO THE THE RESIDENTIAL AND THE AREA BETWEEN THE POND AND THE SUBDIVISION THERE. SO AGAIN SAME KIND OF THEME, TRYING TO KEEP IT LIGHTER PACED THERE AND EVERYTHING ALONG LINE. SO AGAIN, THE EVERYTHING IN RED THERE IS WHAT THE CHANGES WERE FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION. AS YOU CAN SEE WITH THE PERMITTED ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE, WE JUST HAVE THE SED ON THIS ONE. SO WE DON'T HAVE THE THE RMU. SO THE ONLY ONE THAT CHANGES THERE IS WE'RE REMOVED THE RESIDENTIAL CARE PUT IT IN THE PROHIBITED USES. SO AGAIN LABORATORIES LIKE FROM WHAT WE HAVE FOR NOTES ON THE PERMITTED USES THAT WERE APPROVED LABORATORIES AND RESEARCH WAS HAY AND NURSERY GARDEN WERE MOVED THOSE TO IN SMALL BOX WERE MOVE ALL THOSE TO CONDITIONAL USES IN CASE THEY HAPPEN TO FIT IN THERE. AGAIN, WE PUT THE SINGLE FAMILY COTTAGE IN THERE JUST IN CASE, SO THAT IF IT WAS. MOST OF IT IS TO THE LOW AREA THERE. THAT'S NEXT TO A BY THE RESIDENTIAL AND THE SOUTH SIDE OF YOUR MAP. AND THE MAP THERE IS TO LET THAT. SO THAT THAT WHOLE WILL CALL IT A BOWL LOOKING EFFECT DOWN THERE AT THE BOTTOM COULD STAY ALL THE SAME. AND YOU COULD DO ALL THE COTTAGES DOWN THERE AND EVERYTHING. SO ALLOW THAT TO HAPPEN IPPEN IF THEY SPILL UP FR OR NOT. BUT YOU KNOW, ALONG THAT LINE, THE VEHICLE SALES AND EVERYTHING KEPT THAT IN THE, YOU KNOW, AS AN OPTION IF IT ENDS UP BEING BUT A CONDITIONAL USE AND FUEL SALES, FUEL SALES AND ACCESSORY PERMIT FOR THOSE CAR WASH, ALL THAT KIND OF STUFF, WAREHOUSING, PUT IT ALL IN PROHIBITED. B TWO, SAME KIND OF FEEL ON IT, BUT AT THE SAME TIME THE B TWO SMALL AREAS THAT WE HAVE ARE, YOU KNOW, REALISTICALLY THE ONLY B TWO ONES ARE THE ONES ON THE NORTH AND EAST SIDE OF THE POND. SO KEPT THE SAME THING RESIDENTIAL AGAIN, BACK DOWN LABORATORIES AND LABORATORIES AND THE NURSERY, ALL IN THE NURSERIES AND SMALL BOX ACTUALLY SMALL BOX WENT TO PROHIBITED THE LABORATORIES AND NURSERY ALL WENT DOWN TO WENT DOWN TO 
          [00:55:07]
CONDITIONAL USE. THE OTHER CHANGE HERE WAS MULTIFAMILY FOR THESE TWO. HERE WE GAVE MULTIFAMILY, BUT WE PUT THE RESTRICTION OF SECOND STORY. WE KNOW HOW YOU GUYS ARE LIKE TO, YOU KNOW, WANT THE COMMERCIAL WITH THE SECOND STORY ON IT. SO WE GAVE THAT OPTION THAT, HEY, WE CAN HAVE, WE CAN HAVE MULTIFAMILY IN THERE, BUT IT HAS TO BE A SECOND STORY. SO THOSE TWO AREAS THEY COULD END UP DOING, YOU KNOW, THOSE DO A PLAZA STYLE BUILDING AND HAVE THAT, YOU KNOW, COMMERCIAL ON THE BOTTOM, RESIDENTIAL ON TOP. SO WE GAVE THAT AS AN OPTION OPTION THERE FOR IT. SO NORMAL MULTIFAMILY WOULD NOT BE PERMITTED ONLY B SECOND STORY. 
          SO. THAT ONE AND RESTRICTED FUEL SALES, WAREHOUSING EVERYTHING ELSE ALONG THAT LINE. 
          SO QUESTIONS ON THAT ONE. I THINK WE'RE OKAY TO MOVE TO THE NEXT ONE. C ONE AND C TWO ARE THE BIG BLOCKS. THESE ONES ARE PRETTY MUCH THE THE SAME. AGAIN. WE DID THE SAME THING HERE WITH THE RESIDENTIAL CARE. MOVED IT DOWN TO BEING PROHIBITED. SCROLL UP A LITTLE BIT. SO AND THEN WE HAVE SMALL BLOCKS GOT SMALL BOX VEHICLE, BODY SHOP FUEL SALES AS AN ACCESSORY USE ALL GOT MOVED DOWN TO ALL GOT MOVED DOWN TO CONDITIONAL USE. AND THEN FOR PROHIBITED THE RESIDENTIAL DATA WAREHOUSING AND WIRE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS. C TWO PRETTY MUCH THE EXACT SAME THING. WE ACTUALLY LET'S SEE SAME THING NURSERY, SMALL BOX VEHICLE, BODY SHOP, FUEL SALES, ACCESSORY USE, REPAIR FACILITIES, WAREHOUSE OR EXCESSIVE SALES AND REPAIR ALL GOT MOVED DOWN TO CONDITIONAL USES, WE ADDED. WEE ADDED THE SINGLE FAMILY BACK IN JUST BECAUSE WE ADDED IT FOR THE REASON THAT ONE OF THE DIET. 
          THE GEOGRAPHICAL WAY THIS LINES UP IS THAT BECAUSE B ONE WE GAVE THAT AS AN OPTION AND B ONE. SO WHAT WE DID IS OUR VISION WAS THAT IF SOMEBODY WANTED TO DO THOSE, WE COULD DO THOSE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE WATERWAY THAT'S THERE THAT'S CONNECTED TO B ONE. SO WE ACTUALLY PUT THAT RESTRICTION ON THERE. YOU COULD ACTUALLY COME IN WITH THAT OPTION IF YOU'RE ATTACHING IT WITH B ONE. SO B ONE SAME KIND OF THING THAT WE TALKED ABOUT FOR THE BOTTOM PART. IF IT SPILLS OVER YOU NEED THAT LITTLE BIT OF ROOM. THERE'S ABOUT EIGHT ACRES THERE THAT THEY COULD SAY, HEY ON THAT SOUTH SIDE OF THE STREAM OR THE WATERWAY THERE, THEY COULD PUT IT ON THAT SOUTH, THAT SOUTH SIDE, BECAUSE IT ENDS UP BRINGING IT ALL IN TOGETHER THERE IN THAT SAME AREA. SO THAT'S WHY WE DID THAT ONE. AND WE DID THE SAME THING FOR C TWO, WE C TWO. WE SAID HEY IF IT'S B TWO IF THEY END UP YOU KNOW MAYBE PUTTING A BRIDGE ACROSS THE AND CONNECTING IT TO SOME THINGS AROUND B TWO ON THAT SOUTH SIDE, THEY COULD EXTEN EXTEND IT OVER, YOU KNOW, GO OVER THAT WATERWAY AND MAKE IT A FEATURE OR SOMETHING ALONG THAT LINE, YOU KNOW, AND, AND MAKE IT MORE CONTIGUOUS THAT WAY. SO BUT IT HAS TO BE PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT HAS TO BE PART OF B TWO. SO THEY GOT TO BE SAYING, HEY, WE'RE BUYING B TWO AND WE'RE GOING TO TAKE THE SOUTH HALF, LET'S SAY OF C TWO. 
          THEY'VE GOT TO DO THAT AND HAVE IT AS ONE PROJECT. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE THAT OUR LIST HERE DOESN'T SHOW THE SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED AND B TWO. BUT C TWO SAYS IT'S ALLOWED IF IT'S CONNECTED TO B TWO. SO. I'M NOT SURE WHAT THE DISCONNECT IS. ARE WE JUST MISSING A LINE FROM B TWO OR IS THAT A A TYPO IN C2? IN C TWO IT SAYS SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED IS ALLOWED IF CONNECTED TO B TWO, CORRECT TO B2ND B2 DOES NOT SAY ANYTHING ABOUT SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED IN OUR LIST THAT WE'RE PROVIDING. OH, I SEE WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. OKAY. SO IS IT JUST MISSING FROM OUR LIST? WELL, I GUESS YOU'RE RIGHT. I THINK THE INTENT WAS NOT TO HAVE IT BE ON B TWO BY ITS OWN, ONLY TO BE IN B TWO AS LONG AS IT WAS CONNECTED TO, AS LONG AS IT WAS CONNECTED TO C TWO TO MAKE IT AS A A GROUP INCORPORATE THE WATERWAY, YOU KNOW, AND DO EVERYTHING LIKE THAT BUT NOT HAVE IT ON ITS OWN THING. SO IT'S JUST NOT LISTED IN B2 HERE. 
          OKAY. WELL WHAT WHAT HE WHAT HE'S I MEAN, AND YOU PROBABLY, I THINK YOU UNDERSTAND THIS, 
          [01:00:02]
BUT WHAT HE'S SAYING IS THEY DIDN'T WANT IT LISTED IN B2, BECAUSE THAT'S BECAUSE THEY DON'T WANT IT PERMITTED JUST IN B2. IT HAS TO BE. THEY WANT TO ONLY HAVET INN C WITH B ONLY IF THERE'S ONLY IF IT'S BUILT TOGETHER. BUT THEY DON'T WANT TO DO IT IN ONE AND THEN HAVE ONE DEVELOPER BUILD IT AND THEN NOT IN C, IS THAT CORRECT? I AGREE, BUT TO YOUR POINT THOUGH, IS THAT FORCIBLE. WELL, WHAT I'M SAYING IS OUR QUESTION FOR THAT'S WHAT IT SAYS ABOUT C TWO. 
          YEAH. BUT THEN WE DON'T SAY THE SAME THING IN B2. WE SAY C TWO IS ALLOWED. IF IT'S CONNECTED TO B2 WE DON'T SAY IT'S EVEN ALLOWED IN B2. SO I. SO I GUESS TO CLEAR IT UP. YEAH. ALLOWED IF IT'S CONNECTED TO C2. YES. YEAH. SO I JUST WRITE THAT IN THERE TO CLEAR IT UP. YEAH, THAT MAKES SENSE. BECAUSE HONESTLY B TWO THAT SECTION THERE IS NOT BIG ENOUGH FOR REALLY WHAT YOU WANT TO DO. IT'S ONLY I DON'T FOUR ACRES. SO THEY'RE NOT GOING TO GET MUCH OUT OF IT. OKAY. YOU HAVE THAT NOTED THEN. CORRECT. ALL RIGHT. IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE FOR C TWO. I THINK IT'S OKAY TO MOVE. OKAY. WE'LL MOVE ON. D1 AND D2 ARE THE SAME. D1 IS THE ROUTE FOR SIDE OVER THERE IS IS WHAT IT IS ON YOUR ON YOUR THING THERE. SO IT'S GOING FROM COOK'S DOWN TO SCOTT'S FARM. SO AGAIN RESIDENTIAL CARE. WE ACTUALLY PUT THAT AS A CONDITIONAL USE ONE THERE THAT WE COULD END UP DOING IT AS GARDEN CENTER AND SMALL BOX WAS ON. YOUR GUYS'S SUGGESTION IS NOT WANTING IN THOSE IN THOSE AREAS. SO WE PUT THOSE AS PROHIBITED USES SO THAT THEY WERE NOT THERE. AGAIN, MULTIFAMILY, WE ONLY ARE ALLOWING IT IN THE SECOND FLOOR OR HIGHER SO THAT WE ENDED UP ACCOMPLISHING THAT FOR WHAT YOU GUYS WERE DOING. AND THEN VEHICLE SERVICE AND REPAIR, WE PUT THAT AS A CONDITIONAL USE DOWN AT THE AS A CONDITIONAL USE. KEEPING IN MIND D1 IS NOT DEVELOPED AT THIS POINT. D2 PRETTY MUCH MATCHES T TWO MATCHES D1. BUT KEEPING IN MIND D2 HAS LIKE AN ACRE LEFT OF IT ON THE NORTH SIDE. THAT'S IT. IT'S FULLY DEVELOPED. QUESTIONS THERE. ANY QUESTIONS? I THINK YOU'RE OKAY TO MOVE FORWARD. THAT SHOULD COVER ALL OF US. DID WE GO THROUGH E? E IS THE SAME. A IS FULLY E E DID NOT CHANGE. OKAY, THAT'S PRETTY MUCH IT IS BUILT. IT IS ONLY FOR THE RESIDENTIAL FOR UP THERE, THE APARTMENTS THAT ARE THERE ALREADY. SO THAT WAS ALREADY SECTION. THE ONLY QUESTIONS, STATEMENTS THAT I WILL ADD IS, FIRST OF ALL, I WANT TO TRULY THANK THE DEVELOPER AND THE FAMILY TO WORKING WITH US TO CREATE THESE CHANGES. I BELIEVE THESE CHANGES ARE POSITIVE AND THEY WERE ENHANCED. THE DEVELOPMENT. 
          I WILL SAY THAT WHEN YOU DRIVE DOWN 31 AND MOST OF OUR GATEWAYS ARE LIKE THIS, WHEN YOU DRIVE DOWN, YOU'RE YOU'RE BOMBARDED WITH PARKING LOT, PARKING LOT LIGHTS, HUGE SIGNAGE, GAS PUMPS. AND I WOULD ASK IF WHEN WE ARE DOING THIS DEVELOPMENT, WE MAKE AN EXAMPLE AND SAY THAT WE'RE NOT GOING TO CONTINUE WHAT OUR WHAT THE CITY ZONING HAS ALLOWED IN THE SENSE OF ADDING THAT GAS PUMPS NOT FACE THE MAIN ARTERIES AS YOU'RE COMING INTO TOWN WITH THE BUILDING, WITH THE BUILDING BY THE ROAD AND THE GAS PUMPS NOT FACING THE ROAD, ALSO ADDING. AND THEN AND I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS SOMETHING THAT YOU GUYS CAN WORK WITH CITY STAFF ABOUT, BUT ALSO HAVING THE SETBACKS A LOT DEEPER. LIKE WHEN YOU DRIVE DOWN 31, THE BUILDING AND THE PARKING IS SO CLOSE TO 31 THAT IT'S JUST PRETTY MUCH A DITCH. AND IF YOU GO PAST SOME OF THOSE BUSINESSES, SOME OF THEM AREN'T EVEN BEING MOWED. BUT ALLOWING A LARGER, A LARGER RIGHT OF WAY TO BE BUILT SO YOU CAN HAVE NICER TREES BEING PLANTED AND SCREENING. AND THEN ALSO THE OTHER THING IS IF YOU GUYS WOULD PUT IN YOUR DEVELOPMENT TAX, THAT WHATEVER IS BUILT IN THIS AREA, ALL OF THE STREET LIGHTS FROM THE PARKING LOT, LIGHTS AND ALL THOSE JUST BE A BLACK COLOR BECAUSE JUST CREATE A STANDARD, YOU KNOW, COLOR FOR YOUR INFRASTRUCTURE. YOU KNOW, I'LL JUST, I'LL JUST BE OKAY. I'LL JUST REMEMBER THE COLOR. 
          IF IT'S BLACK OR BRONZE, THAT'S FINE. YEAH, THAT'S GREAT. BECAUSE LIKE, YOU KNOW, I DON'T, 
          [01:05:01]
I'M JUST GOING TO SAY LIKE FRIENDSHIP KITCHEN, ALL OF THEIR POLES WERE WHITE AND THEY'RE ALL RUSTED COMPLETELY OUT AND IT LOOKS TERRIBLE. SO, BUT YEAH, THERE'S WAYS WE CAN ENHANCE LANDSCAPING THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, THE COLOR OF ALL THE INFRASTRUCTURE, AND THEN ALSO KEEPING ALL THE GAS PUMPS AND PARKING LOTS FROM FACING FOUR, ESPECIALLY FOUR AND 31, I THINK WOULD MAKE A DRASTIC IMPROVEMENT TO WHAT THE REST OF THE GATEWAYS LOOK LIKE IN THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE. AND HOPEFULLY, THIS CAN BE SOMETHING WE CAN DO THROUGHOUT OUR COMMUNITY. MR. BERGER AND PERHAPS, MR. ANDREWS, JUST A POINT TO CLARIFY CERTAIN TOPICS THAT WERE JUST MENTIONED IN THE COMMENTS THERE. ARE THOSE ACTUALLY RELATED TO ZONING? ARE THOSE B D, R B TYPE ITEMS? IT DEPENDS ON THE DEVELOPMENT TEXT. IF THIS TEXT SAYS TO USE THE CITY'S DESIGN REVIEW CHAPTERS FOR THE REVIEW, THEN YOU WOULD USE THE CITY'S DESIGN REVIEW CHAPTERS. AND IF IT SPEAKS TO THE LIGHT POLE COLORS OR SETBACKS OR SPECIFIC DESIGN DETAILS, YOU WOULD FOLLOW THE CITY CODE. IF THE DEVELOPMENT TEXT HAS ITS OWN STANDARDS, YOU WOULD USE THE DEVELOPMENT TEXT STANDARDS. SO IT JUST DEPENDS ON WHAT THE TEXT SAYS ABOUT THAT REVIEW PROCESS. WHEN A DEVELOPMENT COMES IN, THAT'S THE THE APPROVED PUD THAT WAS APPROVED, I DON'T KNOW, NOT QUITE 20 YEARS AGO. CURRENT PUD. REFERENCES. OUR ZONING CODE TWO ITERATIONS AGO. SO WITH CONSULTING WITH THE LAW DIRECTOR, YOU KIND OF HAVE TO SEE WHAT THE OLD CODE SAYS AND FIND THE NEW SECTION THAT ADDRESSES THAT SPECIFIC. 
          PORTION OF THE REVIEW. SO I GUESS IT'S JUST, I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND THAT THERE'S A LOT OF INTRICACIES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PARTICULAR CHANGE. AND THEN LIKE WHAT THE APPROVED PUD LANGUAGE ALREADY STATES AND WHAT IT POINTED TO AT THAT TIME. SO JUST PERHAPS THOSE SOME OF THE SPECIFIC QUESTIONS THAT YOU BROUGHT UP, IT WOULD BE GOOD WITHIN BETWEEN NOW AND NEXT WEEK TO TRY AND IDENTIFY, LIKE YOU TOUCHED ON, LIKE STREET LAMP LIGHT COLORING AND THINGS LIKE THAT, PERHAPS IDENTIFY WHAT THOSE, YOU KNOW, SAY, IF THOSE ARE CONCERNS BECAUSE YEAH. OR IF, IF THE NEW TEXT REFERENCES THE CURRENT, LIKE IF IT JUST SAYS A BLANKET STATEMENT THAT SAYS THE REVIEW PROCESS WILL FOLLOW THE CURRENT PROVISIONS OF THE CITY'S ZONING CODE AS IT RELATES TO DESIGN REVIEW, THEN IT WOULD CARRY FORWARD IN PERPETUITY. SO IF WE WERE TO UPDATE THOSE STANDARDS THROUGH THE VISIONING PROCESS OR WHATEVER, THE NEXT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMES, LIKE THIS DOCUMENT WOULD JUST FOLLOW WHATEVER ISN'T CURRENTLY IN PLACE WITH THE CITY MOVING FORWARD. ALSO UNDERSTANDING THAT YOU AS A DEVELOPER OR AN APPLICANT, OR YOU'RE NOT PROPOSING TO CHANGE CERTAIN THINGS, YOU'RE PROPOSING TO CHANGE THE USES. SO, YOU KNOW, PROCEDURALLY, WE JUST MAKE SURE WE'RE DOING, YOU KNOW, WHAT YOU KNOW, WE'RE SUPPOSED TO BE DOING AND WE CAN TALK ABOUT WHAT WE SHOULD TALK ABOUT. AND THEN MAYBE THINGS THAT ARE BEYOND THE SCOPE THAT MAYBE THERE'S A SEPARATE CONVERSATION. 
          MAYBE MAYBE MY STATEMENT WAS A LITTLE CONFUSING. I FULLY UNDERSTAND WHAT OUR ROLE IS AND WHAT I CAN ADVOCATE FOR AND NOT ADVOCATE FOR WHAT I'M JUST ASKING IF THE DEVELOPER COULD WORK WITH CITY STAFF TO DO A LITTLE BIT MORE IN THE DEVELOPMENT, IN THE DEVELOPMENT TEXT, AND IF IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE'RE ABLE TO CHANGE IN THE DEVELOPMENT TEXT, SO WE'RE NOT DUPLICATING OUR CITY CODE BECAUSE IF WE WERE GOING TO DUPLICATE OUR CITY CODE, WE WOULDN'T BE IN THIS PROCESS WHERE WE ARE NOW. SO ALL I'M SO WHAT I'M STATING IS, IS THAT IF THERE'S A WAY THAT THE DEVELOPER COULD MEET WITH CITY STAFF TO TALK ABOUT THESE ISSUES, THE COMMENTS OF THE, THE, THE GAS STATIONS NOT FACING THE STREET AND THE LANDSCAPING AND THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. AND THE LIGHTING WAS ALL TOPICS THAT WERE BROUGHT UP WITH CITY STAFF IN THE PAST. IN THE PAST, WHEN IT WAS FIRST BEING BEING BROUGHT UP, WHEN I WAS READING THROUGH THEKET,T, I DIDN'T SEE ANYTHING MENTIONED IN THERE. I JUST DON'T KNOW IF IT WAS DISCUSSED OR NOT DISCUSSED. I JUST WANTED TO JUST CREATE A FRIENDLY REMINDER THAT, HEY, IF THIS ISN'T A POSSIBILITY, LET'S MAKE IT A POSSIBLE. LET'S, LET'S MAKE IT HAPPEN. THAT'S, THAT'S WHAT I'M SAYING. SO HOPEFULLY THAT CLEARS UP THE CONCERN THAT YOU HAVE. YEAH, I UNDERSTAND AND JUST, YOU KNOW, AND YOU KNOW, IT'S BEEN SINCE WE HAD OUR FIRST ONE AND EVERYTHING ALONG THAT AS PART OF WE'VE ONLY PICKED ON THE USES BECAUSE THOSE ARE THE CHANGES ARE PART OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF THE ACTUAL PUD WAS CHANGING THINGS LIKE, YOU KNOW, I THINK THE MULTI USE PATH WAS EIGHT FEET THERE. THEN WE CHANGED TO TEN TO YOUR GUYS'S, YOU KNOW, STANDARD. SO WE'VE GONE THROUGH AND DONE THAT. THE LIGHT POLES IS A PERFECT ANOTHER PERFECT EXAMPLE. OURS WERE 33. YOUR CODE WAS 30. SO WE CHANGED THAT TO 30. SO WE'VE MADE THOSE CHANGES AS TRYING TO DO THAT 
          [01:10:01]
SAME WAY WITH THE SIGNAGE AND EVERYTHING ALONG THAT LINE TO MORE FIT INTO THAT. SO I APPRECIATE THAT. OKAY. THEN THIS WOULD CONCLUDEHE REVIEW OF INFORMATION YOU HAVE TO SHARE TONIGHT, COUNCIL MEMBERS, IF YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS COMMENTS, NOW WOULD BE THE TIME TO ASK. OTHERWISE I WOULD, AS MR. EMERY HAD SUGGESTED, ENTERTAIN A MOTION. 
          IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO PROCEED IN TABLING. IT DOES SOUND LIKE YOU'RE WELCOME TO THAT IDEA OF TABLING TO TO MAY 4TH TIMING, BUT I WOULD WELCOME A MOTION FOR THAT OR ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR THAT. MR. PRESIDENT, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO TABLE THIS TILL THE MAY 4TH WORK SESSION. 
          OKAY. ANY DISCUSSION? WE HAVE A MOTION TO TABLE TO MAY 4TH. ROLL CALL PLEASE, MR. WOLF. YES. 
          MR. BURGER YES. MR. HUNTER. YES. MRS. TUCKER. YES. MR. YES. MISS. YOUNG. YES. MR. BORDNER. YES. 
          YES. MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU GUYS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. APPRECIATE THAT. ORDINANCE 
          [06-26]
06-26 THIRD READING VOTE TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT TO CREATE THE MARYSVILLE JEROME TOWNSHIP JOINT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AUTHORIZING THE INCLUSION OF CERTAIN ADDITIONAL PROPERTY WITHIN SAID DISTRICT KNOWN AS THE BAY MITCHELL OWNER, LLC AMENDMENT ADMINISTRATION. YEAH, I GUESS I'VE GOT THIS ONE. SO AS AN UPDATE, THE WATER SEWER AGREEMENT FOR THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN AGREED, AGREED TO BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE DEVELOPER, WHICH IS ACTIVE INFRASTRUCTURE. WITH THAT, THE ALLOCATED VOLUME THAT WAS NEGOTIATED IS 4000 GALLONS PER DAY, AS PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED. THAT WOULD BE DURING MAY TO SEPTEMBER. AND THEN DUE TO OUR SYSTEMS CAPABILITIES, WE ARE ABLE TO ALLOW MORE WATER DURING OFF. I GUESS WE'RE CALLING IT OFF PEAK OR NON COOLING SEASON. AND SIMILAR TO TO THE COSMOS PROJECT, THAT NUMBER IS FOUR TIMES THAT AMOUNT IN THE OFF OFF SEASON. THERE ARE PENALTIES IN THERE. IF FOR SOME REASON ONE OF THOSE VOLUMES IS EXCEEDED. SO WITH THOSE THEY WOULD BE PAYING QUITE A BIT MORE ON A PER GALLON BASIS. IF THEY'RE 0 TO 10% OVER, IT'D BE FIVE TIMES OUR CURRENT RATE. 10 TO 50 WOULD BE 10% MORE THAN OUR CURRENT RATE. IF THEY ARE 50% ABOVE THAT NUMBER TO 100%, THAT'S 50 TIMES OUR RATE AND THEN 100 TO 200 TIMES, OR 100 TO 200% MORE WOULD BE 100 TIMES OUR CURRENT RATE FOR THAT. ANYTHING ABOVE 200% IS 500 TIMES OUR RATE. AND WORKING WITH TIM IN THE DEVELOPER, WE HAVE SOME REMEDIES IN CASE THEY GO OVER MORE THAN THREE TIMES IN A YEAR AS WELL. SO IT COULD BE ANYTHING FROM REVISING THESE TO MAKE THE PENALTY MORE TO ALL, YOU KNOW, TO JUST DISCONNECTING THEM FROM OUR SYSTEM, WHICH MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT'D BE MUCH MORE DETRIMENTAL THAN ANY MONEY THAN THAT WE COULD FIND THEM FOR. SO WITH THAT, MR. ZIEGLER. ZIEGLER, JEFF IS HERE, AND WE CAN BOTH ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, IF THERE ARE ANY. BUT I FEEL VERY COMFORTABLE WITH THIS, WITH THIS AGREEMENT, AND FEEL THAT THIS SHOULD BE OUR TEMPLATE MOVING FORWARD WITH THE HELP OF NOT ONLY TIM, BUT BRICKER, OUR OUTSIDE COUNSEL. THANK YOU, MR. HOYT. I ALSO WANT TO JUST REMIND COUNCIL THE LEGISLATION HERE IS AUTHORIZING THE INCLUSION OF CERTAIN ADDITIONAL TERRITORY WITHIN SAID DISTRICT. SO I KNOW WE HAD A LOT OF DISCUSSION ABOUT THE UTILITIES AND THE AGREEMENT ON UTILITIES, BUT I JUST WANT TO JUST REITERATE THE POINT THAT WHAT WE ARE DOING IS WE'RE TALKING ABOUT MAP BOUNDARIES. SO THANK YOU AGAIN, MR. REAMES. I THINK JUST A LITTLE MORE CLARIFICATION, ADDING THIS PROPERTY TO THE JED MAP ASSURES THAT THE TAXES ARE BEING PAID FROM THIS PROPERTY, NOT ADDING IT TO THE JED AGREEMENT IS EQUIVALENT TO GIVING THEM A PERMANENT TAX EXEMPTION. THAT'S HOW I'M LOOKING AT IT. OKAY. MR. BORDNER, I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU, JEREMY AND STAFF, FOR YOUR DUE DILIGENCE ON THIS. AND I UNDERSTAND. THANK YOU. 
          OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS. I JUST WANT TO STATE FOR PUBLIC RECORD SO THAT THE PUBLIC HEARS WE CANNOT CONTROL WHAT JEROME TOWNSHIP DOES IN THEIR ZONING. SO I WOULD IMAGINE JEROME TOWNSHIP OFFICIALS ARE PROBABLY PLEASED TO HEAR YOU SAY THAT, BECAUSE JUST ACKNOWLEDGING THEIR AUTHORITY. BUT THANK YOU. OTHER MEMBERS OF COUNCIL. WITH THAT, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION 
          [01:15:02]
TO PASS THE LEGISLATION. SO MOVED. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION ROLL CALL, MR. BARKER. NO. MR. HUNTER. YES. MRS. TACKETT YES. MR. REAMES. YES. MRS. YOUNG YES. MR. BORDNER YES. MR. WOLFF. NO. 
          [20-26]
FIVE. YES. MOTION PASSES. OKAY. ORDINANCE 20-26. THIRD READING VOTE TO AMEND CHAPTER 1100 DEVELOPMENT AND ZONING FEES OF THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE. CODIFIED ORDINANCES REGARDING STREET, TREE AND PARKLAND FEES, AND I HAVE SOME OPTIONS THAT WILL BE PULLED UP ON THE SCREEN ADMINISTRATION. YOU WILL BE. YEAH. MACKENZIE IS GOING TO PULL OPEN THE THE DIFFERENT OPTIONS AND WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE IN THE CODE, BUT IT DIDN'T SEEM LIKE WE RECEIVED ANY QUESTIONS OVER THE PAST TWO WEEKS. SO THE, THE TWO OPTIONS THAT REMAIN ARE A PER ACRE OPTION. AND ALSO THE ADJUSTMENT OF THE CURRENT WAY THAT WE DO IT, WHICH IS A FLAT FEE PLUS AN ESCALATING QUANT OR ESCALATING FEE PER SQUARE FOOT FOR ANY BUILDING. SO THAT IS THE PER ACRE OPTION THAT YOU SEE THERE. ON THE NONRESIDENTIAL. AND AGAIN, THIS IS ALL ASSUMING AGAIN, WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY QUESTIONS AS IT RELATES TO RESIDENTIAL OR THE STREET TREE. 
          SO IT SEEMED LIKE THE THE PRIMARY FOCUS WAS ON THAT NONRESIDENTIAL AMOUNT. YEAH, YEAH. IF YOU WANT TO OPEN THE OTHER ONE. AND AGAIN, THAT THIS, THIS OPTION JUST FOLLOWS THE CURRENT WAY WE CALCULATE IT. IF YOU SCROLL DOWN JUST A HAIR. THERE YOU GO. BUT WE CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE REGARDING EITHER OPTION. SO COUNCIL AND I JUST WANTED TO REITERATE THE POINT THAT HAD COME UP DURING THE INITIAL INITIAL REVIEW OF THIS AND WHY WE'RE TALKING ABOUT OPTIONS. SO AT THAT MEETING, I BELIEVE IT WAS MR. REAMES HAD BROUGHT UP THE POINT ABOUT PERHAPS. NO, AND I DON'T WANT TO PUT WORDS IN YOUR MOUTH, BUT PERHAPS NOT A STRONG CONCERN ON THE RESIDENTIAL SIDE OF THINGS, BUT MORE SO ON THE COMMERCIAL AND THE LEGITIMACY OF WHAT WAS BEING PUT FORTH AS BEING APPROPRIATE AND, AND JUSTIFIABLE. AND AGAIN, I DON'T WANT TO PUT WORDS IN YOUR MOUTH, BUT THAT LED TO FURTHER DISCUSSION AND REVIEW OF DIFFERENT OPTIONS. AND JUST AS MR. HOYT HAD EXPLAINED, WE HAVE SOME PRECEDENT IN TERMS OF HOW WE'VE CALCULATED THIS FEE, BUT THEN ALSO MORE OF A SIMPLIFICATION, WHICH IS ANOTHER OPTION THAT WE HAD TO THAT WAS LOOKED AT IN OUR LAST MEETING. AND THAT IS OPTION ONE. CORRECT. THE MORE THE 30% AS OPPOSED TO THE 50% FOR THE COMMERCIAL SIDE OR, OR WE USED A DIFFERENT TERM. IT WAS THE NON RESIDENTIAL SIDE. YEAH. SO WITH THAT, MR. BORDNER, DO YOU HAVE ANT QUESTION? NO, I JUST THINK THAT MAYBE ONE THING THAT WE HAVEN'T MAYBE CONSIDERED OR CONTEMPLATED IS JUST THE FEE. PROGRESSION. I KNOW WE HAVE IT CURRENTLY OVER THREE YEARS. I DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY WOULD BE. I MEAN, JUST RIP THE BAND-AID OFF AND DO IT OVER MAYBE TWO YEARS AS OPPOSED TO TRYING TO, TO EXTEND IT OUT OVER THREE. I'D REALLY MAYBE BE MY ONLY ADJUSTMENT TO THE RECOMMENDATION. OKAY. WE DID HAVE COMMENTS IN REGARD TO THAT AT OUR LAST MEETING, BUT YES, I UNDERSTAND. MR. REAMES, A COUPLE OTHER THINGS I THINK WE TALKED ABOUT, AND MAYBE WE NEED TO COME UP WITH SOME LANGUAGE OF HOW WE WANT TO HANDLE THIS IS MIXED USE BUILDING THAT'SMMED RESIDENTIAL ON THE SECOND FLOOR OR THIRD FLOOR. RIGHT NOW, WE DON'T SAY HOW WE CALCULATE THAT. SO MAYBE WE CAN WORK ON THAT A LITTLE BIT. AND ALSO HOW DO WE HANDLE AN ADU. MR. HOYT. YEAH, AT LEAST WITH THE THE ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT, IT'D BE SIMILAR TO HOW WE DO OUR CAPACITY FEES. SO WITH THAT, I BELIEVE THOSE ARE CHARGED AT THE THE MULTIFAMILY RATE. BUT IN THIS CASE, IT WOULD JUST BE ANOTHER UNIT SINCE MULTIFAMILY GETS CHARGED AT A REGULAR RESIDENTIAL RATE. IF I'M NOT SURE IF WE CAN DO A POLICY AS IT RELATES TO MIXED USE FROM THAT PERSPECTIVE, OR IF YOU WANT THAT CODIFIED. BUT I'M SURE THAT'S SOMETHING I CAN WORK WITH MACKENZIE AND TIM TO 
          [01:20:04]
MAKE SURE THAT THAT'S IN THERE CORRECTLY. BUT THE WAY I WOULD HANDLE IT NOW, AND I DON'T THINK WE'D GET MUCH PUSHBACK, WOULD BE, HEY, WE'RE CHARGING YOU PER ACRE FOR, YOU KNOW, FOR THE PROPERTY. AND NOW YOU'RE ADDING HOWEVER MANY RESIDENTIAL UNITS YOU, YOU GET ON TOP AT AS WELL. IF THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT WANTED TO BE, WE'LL SAY CONTESTED, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT, YOU KNOW, WE COULD PRESENT TO THE PARKS AND REC COMMISSION ON, ON HOW THAT WORKS. AND, YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY CITY STAFF WOULD PROVIDE A RECOMMENDATION BEFORE THEY MAKE THAT CALL. BUT DIDN'T YOU SAY, EXCUSE ME, BUT DIDN'T YOU SAY THAT IT'S WHEN IT WAS PLATTED, WHEN THE FEES TAKE PLACE, AT WHICH TIME SAY LIKE MY ADU WAS PLATTED IN THE 50S. I WOULD SAY THAT'S A NEW STRUCTURE. SO LET'S SAY WE DEMOED YOUR HOUSE AND YOU GO, YOU PUT A NEW HOUSE IN. YOU DON'T OWE CAPACITY FEES, YOU DON'T OWE PARKLAND FEES. BUT IF YOU ADDED ANOTHER STRUCTURE TO IT, THEN THAT WOULD POSSIBLY BE THE CASE. WHEN I WAS TALKING PLATTING, THAT'D BE IN A NEW SECTION OF MILL VALLEY OR AMERON MEADOWS. IT WOULD BE THE THE FEE AT THE TIME OF PLATTING. BUT WHEN I MENTIONED LIKE THE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, YOU WERE LIKE, WELL, THAT PROPERTY'S ALREADY PLATTED. WE'VE ALREADY. YEAH. I GUESS YOU'RE ADDING A UNIT THOUGH AS WELL, I GUESS IN OUR BOOK. SO I WOULD SAY AT THE, THE SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE WAS PLATTED FOR A SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE. IF YOU'RE ADDING SOMETHING TO IT THAT THAT WOULD RESULT IN THE ADDITIONAL FEE. BUT AGAIN, THAT THAT COULD BE UP FOR DEBATE AS WELL. BUT I'M JUST TELLING YOU FROM, FROM MY EXPERIENCE HOW I WOULD HANDLE IT. YEAH. I MEAN, TYPICALLY IF A HOUSE WAS BUILT AND IT WAS ALREADY USING THOSE SERVICES AND THEN IT'S DEMOLISHED AND SOMEBODY BUILDS A NEW ONE TWO YEARS LATER, WELL, THEY'VE ALREADY BEEN ACCOUNTED FOR IN THAT CAPACITY AND THE PARKLAND. SO IT'S NOT A NEW CHARGE. OR IF YOU HAVE A REALLY BIG HOUSE AND YOU WANT TO CREATE A DUPLEX IN IT, IT WAS ALREADY PLATTED BEFORE, BUT YOU DO A DUPLEX THAT IS AN ADDITIONAL UNIT, TWO UNITS AND TWO FAMILIES USING PERK PLAN INSTEAD OF ONE. YEAH. SO I WOULD SAY THAT'S MORE OF A COMMERCIAL OR MORE OF A MATERIAL CHANGE THAN, YOU KNOW, IF, IF YOU DEMO A HOUSE OR IT BURNS DOWN. YEP, THEY'RE ALREADY GRANDFATHERED IN. 
          THEY'VE GOT BIGGER PROBLEMS THAN THE PARKLAND FEE AT THAT TIME, BUT THEY'VE ALREADY PAID THEIR CAPACITY FEES IN THEIR PARKLAND. SO LOOKING AT A MIXED USE BUILDING, LET'S SAY IT'S A, YOU KNOW, 200 ZERO SQUARE FEET COMMERCIAL SPACE ON THE FIRST FLOOR. AND IT'S GOT A FLOOR ABOVE THAT OF APARTMENTS, MAYBE 8 OR 12 APARTMENTS UP THERE, WHICH WOULD BE THE EASIER CALCULATION. YOU KNOW, IF WE SAID IT'S THE THE 200 ZERO SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL PLUS 8 OR 12 UNITS OR THE ACREAGE PLUS 10 OR 12 UNITS, OR IS IT A WASH? EITHER WAY? I WOULD SAY IT'S I WOULD SAY IT'S A WASH WASH EITHER WAY. I GUESS IN MY OPINION, YOU KNOW, REALLY THE MATH ISN'T, YOU KNOW, SUPER HARD AS IT RELATES TO HOW BIG IS YOUR BUILDING? COOL. WE ARE GOING TO CHARGE YOU $0.07 OR $0.15 PER SQUARE FOOT. YOU KNOW THE ONE THING WITH THE PER SQUARE FOOT, YOU KNOW, IF SOMEBODY EVER EXPANDED ON THAT, THEN THAT'S USUALLY TOUGH FOR US TO CATCH. BUT I WOULD SAY IT'S 6 IN 1 HAND, HALF A DOZEN IN THE OTHER. I HAD ONE QUESTION IN REGARD TO WHAT MR. REAMS HAD BROUGHT UP. SO FOR FOR THE ADUS IN THE APPLICATION PROCESS, AT WHAT POINT IN THE APPLICATION PROCESS DO WE HAVE A MECHANISM TO CAPTURE THE PARKLAND FEE? AND I MIGHT BE GETTING INTO THE WEEDS A BIT. I'LL DEFER TO ZACH. I DON'T THINK WE HAVE MANY ADUS. YEAH, TO MY KNOWLEDGE, I KNOW IT'S A NEW AND A COUPLE YEARS, BUT IT'D BE SIMILAR TO HOW WE ASSESSED THE CAPACITY FEES AT A REDUCED RATE IF IT'S AN ADU. SO WHEN THAT'S GETTING CALCULATED FOR THE INVOICE, WE CAN PROBABLY ADD WHATEVER CALCULATION FOR THE PARKLAND FEE. OKAY. SIMILAR TO HOW WE DO FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER. YEAH. 
          DID WE DO THAT ON THE ADUS THAT HAVE BEEN BUILT SINCE WE'VE ADDED THAT TO OUR. YEAH. BEFORE WE BEFORE THAT WAS ADOPTED, THERE WAS DISCUSSION ON HOW TO ADDRESS WATER AND SEWER CONNECTIONS. THEY HAVE TO HAVE INDEPENDENT CONNECTIONS. THE PARKLAND FEE THOUGH SIDE OF IT. 
          I DON'T BELIEVE SO. OKAY. SO I THINK. LET'S WORK OUT SOME OF THESE DETAILS OF THESE COUPLE OF WEEKS AND BRING IT BACK. I DO THINK WE SHOULD AGREE ON WHETHER OR NOT WHETHER OR NOT WE AGREE WITH DOING IT ALL AT ONCE. DO IT IN THREE YEARS, OR KIND OF SPLITTING THE SPLITTING 
          [01:25:01]
IT DOWN THE MIDDLE. AND I'VE HEARD SEVERAL PEOPLE KIND OF LIKE THAT TWO YEAR APPROACH INSTEAD OF THREE YEAR. IS THAT KIND OF THE CONSENSUS? WELL, WE COULD WE COULD MAKE A, WE COULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION, MAKE A MAKE, TAKE A VOTE ON THAT. I ACTUALLY, I SO, SO I ACTUALLY WROTE UP A MOTION BECAUSE IT WAS SOMETHING THAT I THOUGHT, YOU KNOW, BUT SO I'LL, I'LL READ WHAT I PUT TOGETHER, BUT I SAID, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION. WE REVISE THE SCHEDULE TO REDUCE FROM A THREE YEAR PHASE INTO A TWO YEAR PHASE FOR RESIDENTIAL. I WAS HOPING THAT YOU WERE LISTENING INSTEAD OF STARTING AT YEAR ONE AT 500 AND INCREMENTING 500 A YEAR TWO, AND THEN AGAIN IN YEAR THREE. LET'S START AT 750, THEN MOVE TO 1500 A YEAR. TOO LONG WITH THIS COMMERCIAL FEE. AND THE COMMERCIAL FEE WOULD BE SCHEDULED. THE COMMERCIAL FEE WOULD BE SCHEDULED AND ADJUSTED WITH THE RESIDENTIAL FEE. SO IT'D BE A TWO TWO YEAR INSTEAD OF A THREE YEAR. SO. MR. SO COUNCILMAN BURGER HAD MADE A MOTION TO ADJUST. HOWEVER, I DO WANT TO POINT OUT IN THAT. SO SO THAT IS THAT IS USING I THINK THAT'S UTILIZING ONE OF THE OPTIONS AS A BASIS. SO I THINK THE MOTION WOULD NEED TO BE ADJUSTED. AND ACTUALLY MAYBE THE ORDER OF WHAT IS BEING DISCUSSED AND PROPOSED AS AN AMENDMENT. WE NEED TO CONSIDER THAT. I BELIEVE WHAT YOU'RE REFERRING TO IS. SORRY, WHERE IS THE RESIDENTIAL SIDE OF IT'S 1500 GOING UP TO? SO YOU'RE TALKING 1500 TO 2000 TO 2000 TO 2500. HOW IT'S IF I'M UNDERSTANDING WHAT YOU'RE SAYING, RIGHT, HOW IT'S INCREMENTING AND. FROM PRESENT TO THE 1500 TO 2000, IT'S 500 PER YEAR OVER A COURSE OF THREE YEARS. AND YOU'RE SAYING INCREASING IT OVER TWO YEARS AT 750. IS THAT YOUR INTENT THERE? YEAH. I THINK THE MOTION WOULD NEED TO BE REVISED. SO 2026 WOULD BE 1750 PER UNIT AND 2027 WOULD BE 2500 PER UNIT. YEAH. 
          YEAH. I THINK THAT'S WHAT YOUR YOUR INTENTION WAS TO BE. I CAN'T DO THAT MATH IN MY HEAD, BUT 2026 AND 2027 WOULD BE FOLLOW THE SAME LINES. YEAH. OKAY. MR. REIMS, YOU HAD A COMMENT. I THINK IT IT MIGHT BE CLEANER IF WE JUST LIKE COME TO A CONCEPTUAL AGREEMENT THAT WE WANT TO DO IT IN TWO YEARS OR THREE YEARS AND THEN COME BACK WITH THE CLEAN NUMBERS NEXT TIME. YEAH. OKAY. YEAH. SO DO YOU DO YOU WISH TO RETRACT THE MOTION? WELL, I WAS BASED ON MR. REAMS. COMMENT OR REVISE THE COMMENT. REVISE THE MOTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH MR. REAMS COMMENT. I MEAN, IF WE AGREE THAT IT'S TWO YEARS, DO WE JUST CAN WE JUST VOTE ON THAT NOW. 
          WELL, I THINK WE CAN JUST DO LIKE A VOICE VOTE. WHO WANTS TO DO A TWO YEAR ADJUSTMENT INSTEAD OF THREE. AND THEN THAT GIVES DIRECTION. I THINK THAT'S WE CAN DO THAT TONIGHT. OKAY. 
          YOU WANT TO DO THAT TONIGHT. YOU HAVE TO ULTIMATELY VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT ANYWAY. YEAH. SO THAT WOULD BE PART OF THE AMENDMENT. SO IF WHO HERE. I GUESS THE BETTER WAY TO DO IT MAYBE MARK WOULD BE DOES ANYONE HERE OBJECT TO THE TWO YEAR PHASING AS OPPOSED TO THE THREE YEAR. I OBJECT TO ALL OF IT. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. BUT IS EVERYONE OKAY? SO IT LOOKS LIKE THE CONSENSUS IS FOR A TWO YEAR PHASE AND A THREE YEAR PHASING. SO WHEN WE DO THE AMENDMENT, WE'LL INCORPORATE THAT INTO THE INTO THE TABLE. OKAY. THANK YOU. MR. ASLANI ARE KEEPING US PROCEDURALLY SOUND. APPRECIATE THAT. OKAY. AND THEN IN REGARD TO THE THE OTHER POINT OF WHAT WE'VE DISCUSSED, THEN WE'RE TALKING BETWEEN SQUARE FOOTAGE. IN ADDITION, SIMILAR CALCULATION TO WHAT OUR KIND OF OUR PARKLAND FEE HAS AS A PRECEDENT VERSUS A PER ACREAGE CALCULATION, WHICH I AM IN FAVOR OF. BUT THAT ALSO WOULD NEED TO BE THERE NEED TO BE SOME MOTION BROUGHT FORWARD. I THINK WE COULD KIND OF DO A STRAW OR WE COULD DO A STRAW POLL ON, ON THAT AS WELL, WHICH OPTION WE PREFER JUST TO MAKE THIS EASIER FOR WOULD MAKE IT EASIER. YEAH. I MEAN, LET'S, IT APPEARED TO ME THAT I'M SPECULATING A LITTLE BIT HERE, BUT THE MOST. THE MOST PREFERRED THE ACREAGE OPTION FOR THE NON RESIDENTIAL. IS THAT THE CASE. DOES ANYONE HERE PREFER THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OPTION FOR THE NON RESIDENTIAL. 
          [01:30:03]
I PREFER IT. YEAH. BUT I, I, I CAN LIVE WITH THE OTHER THAT AS BEEN AS IT'S BEEN ADJUS OKAY. SO IT APPEARS THEN THAT THAT IT'S THE ACREAGE OPTION THAT JEREMY WILL WORK WITH. 
          YEAH. AND THEN WE'VE GOT THE 30% AND THE 50%. WHERE ARE WE ON THAT? IS THE, THE, IN, IN DETERMINING WHAT THE, THE BREAKDOWN OR THE REDUCTION? YEAH, THE ADJUSTMENT, THE ADJUSTMENT. I LIKE THE RESIDENTIAL. YEAH. I LIKE THE PROPOSED ADJUSTMENT DOWN TO 30%. 
          I THINK IT'S MORE IN LINE WITH WHAT WE'RE DOING IN TERMS OF WHAT THE INCREASE WE WOULD SEE ON THE RESIDENTIAL SIDE. IT'S MORE EQUIVALENT TO WHAT WE'RE SEEING THERE. SO I, I PREFER THAT ALSO DO. OKAY. SO LOOKS LIKE JEREMY, WE'VE GOT OUR MARCHING ORDERS THEN. AND THEN IF WE CAN CLARIFY THE LANGUAGE ON HOW WE'RE GOING TO HANDLE MIXED USE AND ADUS BOTH JUST SO IT'S ALL CLEAR. I THINK THAT'LL BE EASY NOW. AND GIVEN, GIVEN WHAT WE HAD JUST DISCUSSED THEN AND WITH THE MOTION THAT WAS MADE, WE NEED TO WITHDRAW THAT MOTION. IT APPEARED THAT IT WAS A MOTION. OKAY. I THOUGHT IT WAS I HAD WRITTEN THIS UP AND I WAS GOING TO MAKE. SO I GUESS IF MR. BURGER JUST CLARIFY WHAT IT WAS A MOTION. IF IT WAS A MOTION, THEN YOU CAN WITHDRAW. 
          IF IT WASN'T, THE STATE COULD. IT WASN'T TO IT WASN'T A MOTION, BUT TO, TO CALM THE NERVES OF EVERYBODY. I'LL PULL IT BACK. OKAY. I THINK THE INTENT WAS CAPTURED. SO APPRECIATE YOUR WILLINGNESS TO ENTERTAIN THIS. SO AS FAR AS TONIGHT GOES. SORRY. MOTION TO TABLE IT. YEAH. 
          WE WOULD NEED A MOTION TO TABLE IT. UNLESS THERE IS A DESIRE TO MAKE AMENDMENTS TONIGHT, WHICH WOULD PUT IT BACK AT SECOND READING. CAN I MAKE A COMMENT? YES, MA'AM. SO IF MY MEMORY SERVES ME CORRECTLY, I WAS GOING THROUGH THESE POWERPOINTS AND YOU MAY HAVE THIS ONE, THE LIST OF THE $50 MILLION. BACK IN OUR WORK SESSION BACK IN 23, I BELIEVE IT WAS. AND AT THE TIME IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT MAYBE THE INCOME TAX SHOULD INCREASE FROM ONE AND A HALF TO 2% TO COVER THIS $50 MILLION WORTH OF PARKLAND. STUFF. GIVEN THE PUBLIC'S CONCERN WITH PROPERTY TAXES, I HIGHLY DOUBT THAT THE CITIZENS ARE GOING TO GO FROM A ONE AND A HALF TO A 2%, ESPECIALLY IF THEY'RE NOT GETTING A COMMUTER TAX CREDIT. MANY RESIDENTS ARE ALREADY EXPRESSING CONCERNS ABOUT AFFORDABILITY HERE IN MARYSVILLE. WELL, THERE ARE SENTIMENTS THAT DEVELOPMENT SHOULD PAY FOR ITSELF. SEVERAL ITEMS ON THIS CURRENT LIST DO NOT APPEAR TO BE CLEAR. CONNECTIONS WITH NEW DEVELOPMENT TRAIL CONNECTIONS. 
          ADINA POINT TO ELDER PARK, JIM SIMMONS TRAIL, MILFORD AVENUE TO BUNSEN, SCOTT'S FAMILY TO MCCARTHY. HOW DO THESE RELATE TO NEW DEVELOPMENT IN MARYSVILLE, SAY, MARYSVILLE EAST OR MARYSVILLE NORTH? IT IS UNCLEAR WHY NEW DEVELOPMENT IS BEING TASKED WITH THIS. WITH THIS FEE, LIKE THE AQUATIC CENTER OR TO REHAB THE POOL. MANY NEW DEVELOPMENTS LIKE COPPER RUN, MARYSVILLE FLATS AND OTHERS THAT COME BEFORE US WILL PROBABLY HAVE POOLS TOO. 
          WHY ARE WE ASKING THEM TO FOOT THE BILL? GREENWOOD PARK, THE UPTOWN ALLEY THESE APPEAR TO BE EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS OR DEFERRED MAINTENANCE, RATHER THAN REQUIREMENT OF NEW GROWTH, INCREASE IN THE FINANCIAL BURDENS ON DEVELOPERS TO ULTIMATELY INCREASE HOUSING COSTS, POTENTIALLY PRICING LOWER INCOME DEMOGRAPHICS OUT OF THE STARTER HOME MARKET, SEGREGATING LOWER INCOME FAMILIES FROM OUR COMMUNITY THAT WILL BE SEEKING HOUSING IN COMMUNITIES LIKE RICHWOOD AND BELLEFONTAINE AND THE BURBS ALL AROUND MARYSVILLE. I AM CONCERNED WITH THIS APPROACH REPRESENTS GOVERNMENT OVERREACH THAT COULD POTENTIALLY CAUSE LEGAL ACTIONS FOR MARYSVILLE. I'M DONE. JUST JUST TO PICK UP A POINT OF THAT STATEMENT THERE. 
          SO A $50 MILLION FEE, WHAT ARE YOU REFERRING TO? RIGHT. A IT WAS IN THEIR POWERPOINT. A, A THERE WAS A LIST AT A WORK SESSION A COUPLE YEARS AGO OF POTENTIAL PARK IMPROVEMENTS THAT COULD BE MADE IN THE FUTURE AND, AND ESTIMATE, BALLPARK ESTIMATE ON THE COST. 
          AND IT WAS I JUST ALSO WANT TO CLARIFY, IT WAS NOT SAID THAT WE WOULD INCREASE THE INCOME TAX TO 2%. THE COMMENT WAS THAT ONE WAY TO PAY FOR IT WOULD BE AN INCREASE IN INCOME TAXES. 
          [01:35:01]
AND THE EQUIVALENT AMOUNT OF THAT WOULD BE ABOUT A HALF PERCENT. BUT THERE IS NO PLAN PROPOSED THAT NIGHT OR EVER SINCE TO RAISE THE TAX. SO JUST TO CLARIFY, MARK'S CORRECT. IT WAS THE SUGGESTION. YEAH. I MEAN, THERE'S DIFFERENT WAYS TO PAY FOR THE PROJECTS, USER FEES, YOU KNOW, TAXES, DEVELOPER FEES. AND I DON'T THINK ANYONE HAS SAID ALL OF THOSE PROJECTS ARE GOING TO BE FUNDED BY NEW DEVELOPMENT. AND NO ONE SAID THAT, YOU KNOW, IT'S ONLY GOING TO FALL ON THE EXISTING RESIDENTS. IT'S IT'S SOMETHING THAT IF WE'RE GOING TO COMPLETE THESE PROJECTS, WE START TO FIND THAT ANSWER AND HOW WE'RE GOING TO FUND THOSE THINGS. I, I PERSONALLY BELIEVE THAT THE THE POINTS BROUGHT UP THERE. AND IN THAT EXAMPLE, I DO THINK IT'S WORTH CLARIFYING THAT WHAT, WHAT PARKLAND FEES ARE. AND, AND I, I THINK I WENT OVER THIS IN THE LAST MEETING, BUT NEW DEVELOPMENT BRINGS NEW PEOPLE, WHICH BRINGS NEW DEMAND FOR NEW PARK SERVICES. SO IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE TAXING NEW DEVELOPMENT TO PAY FOR EVERYTHING THAT THAT LIKE, YOU KNOW, WE WANT HERE BECAUSE WE'RE BEHIND IT'S NEW DEVELOPMENT IS BRINGING DEMAND. 
          SO THERE'S THIS, THIS IDEA OF DEVELOPMENT PAYING FOR ITSELF. WELL, ALSO, THERE'S THE DEMAND ON THE ACTUAL REGION ITSELF. AND HOW CAN NEW DEVELOPMENT HELP OFFSET THE DEMAND THAT THEY CREATE. AND I BELIEVE PARKLAND FEES HAVE CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS OF WHAT WE CAN AND CANNOT USE THEM FOR. AM I MISTAKEN ON THAT? OR COULD YOU? MAYBE NOT OFFICIALLY, BUT UNOFFICIALLY. YEAH. ANYTHING NEW THAT'S A NEW AMENITY THAT CAN NOT ONLY BE USED BY EXISTING RESIDENTS, BUT BY NEW RESIDENTS AS WELL, SEEMS TO BE ELIGIBLE. AND THAT'S HOW THE PARKS AND REC COMMISSION LOOKS. LOOKS AT IT. OKAY. ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR DISCUSSION? I MOVE TO TABLE THIS TO MAY 11TH. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION TO TABLE UNTIL MAY 11TH. THIRD READING. RIGHT? YES. ROLL CALL. MR. HUNTER. YES. MRS. YES. MR. REEMS. YES. MRS. YOUNG YES. MR. BORDNER. YES. 
          MR. WOLFF. YES. MR. BURGER YES. SEVEN. YES. MOTION PASSES. OKAY. 26-26. SECOND READING PUBLIC 
          [26-26]
HEARING TO APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION TO AMEND PART 11 ZONING CODE. 
          SECTION 112107 SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SECTION 1121.08. SUBURBAN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. SECTION 11. 21.09 AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. SECTION 11. 21.10 VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. SECTION 11. 21.11 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. SECTION 11. 
          21.12 HOSPITAL MISUSE DISTRICT. SECTION 11. 21.14 LIGHT MANUFACTURING DISTRICT. SECTION 11. 21.15NALIONAL MIXED USE DISTRICT. SECTION 11. 21.18 UPTOWN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. 
          SECTION 11. 21.20 UPTOWN SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT. SECTION 11. 21.21 UPTOWN TRANSITIONAL DISTRICT AND SECTION 11. 21.22 MANUFACTURING AND INNOVATION OVERLAY DISTRICT. AND I DO HAVE A PRESENTATION TO PULL UP THAT'S THE SAME AS WHAT WAS PROVIDED AT THE LAST MEETING FOR POTENTIAL AMENDMENTS. OKAY. 
          SHOULD BE SHOULD BE COMING HERE. IT ALWAYS WORKS PRIOR TO THE MEETING, RIGHT. AND EVERYTHING'S DUPLICATED. I'M DOUBLE CHECKING IT ONLY FAILS WHEN WE'RE ACTUALLY IN THE MEETING. I'LL JUST CHANGE A DIFFERENT INPUT HERE AND SEE. OKAY, THERE WE GO. THERE WE GO. 
          THAT WAS ME. OKAY. THANK YOU. MACKENZIE. SORRY FOR THE LENGTH OF THAT TITLE. AND IT'S PAINFUL EVERY TIME YOU HAVE TO READ THROUGH ALL THAT. SO WE DON'T HAVE ANY CHANGES FROM THE LAST MEETING. IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS, HAPPY TO ANSWER THOSE. I WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE THAT. WE TALKED ABOUT SOME AMENDMENTS FROM WHAT PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED. WE WOULD ASK FOR THOSE TO BE VOTED ON TONIGHT SO THAT AT THIRD READING, NEXT TIME, WE DON'T HAVE TO GO BACK TO PUBLIC COMMENT. THAT'S REALLY THE ONLY THING I HAVE. AND IF THERE'S 
          [01:40:04]
ANY QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED ON ANY OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS, I'M HAPPY TO PROVIDE. JUST AS A REFRESHER, THIS DEFINITION, WE'RE REMOVING DATA PROCESSING. SO IT'LL JUST BE CALL CENTER MOVING FORWARD. AND THAT NEW DEFINITION IS BELOW. THESE ARE THE DISTRICTS THAT IT WOULD BE PERMITTED IN. AND AGAIN THIS IS A COMBINED PRESENTATION. SO THERE'S TWO DIFFERENT AGENDA ITEMS IN THE PRESENTATION IN THE PRESENTATION. ONCE WE GET THROUGH THAT IF YOU WANT TO VOTE ON THE AMENDMENTS WE CAN DO THAT THEN. MR. BORDEN. MR. PRESIDENT, I JUST HAVE A ONE COMMENT AS IT RELATES TO THE DATA CALL CENTER, DATA PROCESSING CENTER. SO WE MET ABOUT THIS A MONTH OR SO AGO. SO I'M I'M GOOD WITH THE. THE LANGUAGE. I JUST, I GUESS MR. IS NOT HERE RIGHT NOW. SO PROCEDURALLY, IF, IF, IF A DATA CENTER WERE TO COME FORWARD, LIKE OUR GUARDRAILS THAT WE'RE PUTTING ON THE, ON THE, ON THE LAYING DOWN RIGHT THROUGH THIS AMENDMENT WOULD BE THAT THE, THE PROPOSAL WOULD HAVE TO COME THROUGH LIKE A PUD TYPE OF. YEAH. MOVING FORWARD, ANY NEW DATA CENTER WOULD ONLY BE IN A PUD WHERE IT'S PERMITTED OR CONDITIONAL USE, RIGHT? IT WOULDN'T BE ANY STRAIGHT ZONING DISTRICTS WHERE IT WOULD BE PERMITTED. OKAY. I GUESS MY, MY QUESTION, AS I REFLECT ON A PREVIOUS, THE PED TEXT THAT WE DID ON MAYBE THE EAST SIDE, WHERE WE PUT SOME, SOME LANGUAGE WITHIN THE, WITHIN THE TEXT PERTAINING TO LIKE CONDITIONAL USE BASED OFF THE OUTCOME OF LIKE A UTILITY CAPACITY STUDY BEING COMPLETED. I DON'T KNOW IF, IF THAT'S SOMETHING THAT. AND IT MIGHT NOT. IT MAY IT MA IT MAY NOT BE PERTINENT TO, TO THIS AMENDMENT, BUT I JUST WONDER OUTSIDE OF, OF, OF, OF THIS COUNCIL AND, YOU KNOW, APPROVING SOME PUD, IF IT IS A, IF IT IS A CONDITIONAL USE THAT GIVES THE, THE APPROVAL, OBVIOUSLY A PLANNING COMMISSION, I WOULD I WOULD LIKE TO UNDERSTAND LIKE WHAT GUARDRAILS WE CAN SET WITH PLANNING CONDITION TO ENSURE THAT, YOU KNOW, WE'RE, WE'RE DOING OUR DUE DILIGENCE ON FROM A, FROM A UTILITIES CAPACITY PERSPECTIVE TO MAKE SURE IT'S JUST NOT, OH, IT'S CONDITIONAL. 
          WE CAN, WE CAN RUBBER STAMP IT. THERE HAS TO BE SOME TEETH OR SOME DUE DILIGENCE BEHIND IT. 
          SO I DON'T, I THINK I FOLLOW AND I'M NOT SURE IT'S GERMANE TO THIS. IT ISN'T. BUT YEAH, AS I UNDERSTAND IT, THOSE, THE UTILITY PARAMETERS THAT ARE BEING SET WOULD APPLY UNIVERSALLY. IT'S NOT REALLY DOESN'T HAVE AS MUCH TO DO WITH ZONING AS IT DOES THE UTILITY CONNECTIONS. THAT MAKES SENSE. SO I DON'T THINK IT WOULD IMPACT THIS LEGISLATION, BUT I THINK THE SAFEGUARDS WOULD BE IN PLACE FOR ANY PUD WHERE THAT USE IS PERMITTED OR CONDITIONAL. 
          THEY STILL HAVE TO MEET THE ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE BEING SET BY THE UTILITY REQUIREMENTS. YEAH, RIGHT. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT THOSE REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE SOME LEVEL OF CAPACITY VERIFICATION. UPFRONT. AND. MR. AS LINEAR IS, IS YEAH, I THINK WITH ANY DEVELOPMENT THAT COMES IN AND HAS TO GO THROUGH EITHER PLANNING COMMISSION OR DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ENGINEERING, DOES A STAFF REPORT OR ADDS TO THE STAFF REPORT FOR THOSE PROJECTS. 
          AND THOSE WOULD BE ADDRESSED DURING THE ENGINEERING REVIEW AS FAR AS I KNOW. SO IF THEY'RE NOT PART OF THE APPROVAL FLOW, A CAPACITY STUDY, UTILITY CAPACITY STUDY. YEAH. OKAY. 
          FROM THAT WITH JEREMY AND TIM. BUT OKAY, AS LONG AS, AS LONG AS THAT'S IN PLACE, THEN I'M COMFORTABLE. THANK YOU. AND THEN JUST A REFRESHER ON THESE TWO OR THIS NEW DEFINITION. 
          IT'S JUST ADDING ADULT DAYCARE TO CHILD DAYCARE, KIND OF COMBINING THOSE INTO ONE DEFINITION SIMILAR TO OTHER COMMUNITIES. AND THAT'S TO FILL A VOID WHERE WE DIDN'T HAVE THAT AS A PERMITTED USE WITH OUR ZONING CODE. UPDATE 2020. THESE ARE THE DISTRICTS THAT THOSE WILL BE PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL IN. AND THE HOME OCCUPATION. THIS IS THE ONE THAT WE HAD SOME CHANGES FROM PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION, BUT IT SEPARATES THAT OUT INTO MINOR MAJOR HOME OCCUPATIONS. SO THERE'S A THRESHOLD FOR, YOU KNOW, HOME BUSINESS THAT WOULD BE JUST AN ADMINISTRATIVE ZONING PERMIT REVIEW VERSUS THE 
          [01:45:04]
CONDITIONAL USE THROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION. AND THIS IS JUST HIGHLIGHTS OF WHAT WOULD BE A MINOR HOME OCCUPATION. YOU KNOW, SOMEBODY SELLING SOURDOUGH BREAD, YOU KNOW, CRAFTS, WHAT HAVE YOU. AND THEN THE MAJOR HOME OCCUPATIONS WITH ARE A LITTLE MORE INTENSE, BUT STILL MAINTAINING THE RESIDENTIAL FEEL OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SO THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE ANY CHANGES TO THE STRUCTURE. DO YOU HAVE A QUESTION OR COMMENT, MR. BORDNER? DO YOU HAVE A QUESTION? CORRECT. NO. GO AHEAD. AND AGAIN, THESE ARE THE DISTRICTS WHERE THEY'LL BE PERMITTED OR CONDITIONAL. AND THEN HEALTH AND FITNESS STUDIO. 
          THIS IS A DEFINED USE THAT WE HAD, BUT WE DIDN'T HAVE IT DESIGNATED IN ANY DISTRICT. SO WE'RE JUST ADDING IT TO THE RMU AS PERMITTED. AND THEN THOSE THREE DISTRICTS CD AND CD AND UPTOWN AS A CONDITIONAL USE. ONE ONE COUPLE COMMENTS I WANTED TO MAKE IS THAT I'M GLAD THAT GOVERNMENT WORKS SLOW IN SOME SENSE, BECAUSE WE GET TIME TO TO LOOK AT THESE. BUT A CON OF GOING SLOW IS SOMETIMES WE FORGET WHERE WE'RE AT WITH THE PROCESS. SO I JUST WANT TO KIND OF GO BACK TO THE BEGINNING OF THIS, IS THAT PLANNING COMMISSION HAD MADE A REVIEW OF OUR OUR ZONING TEXT TO ENSURE AND GIVE CLARIFICATION TO THINGS LIKE A DATA CENTER, WHICH HISTORICALLY YEARS AGO, DECADES AGO, DATA CENTER MORE THAN LIKELY WAS A DATA PROCESSING CENTER. IT WAS APPROVED THROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION POST REVIEW OF PLANNING COMMISSION AND POST INTRODUCTION AT COUNCIL. THERE WERE SOME ADDITIONAL ADJUSTMENTS TO THAT. SO NOW YOU'RE YOU'RE YOU'RE YOU'RE SHOWING THAT ALONG WITH THE ADJUSTMENTS THAT THE ORIGINAL LEGISLATION PLUS THE ADJUSTMENTS THAT YOU'RE RECOMMENDING BASED REVIEW. SO WHAT YOU HAD MENTIONED AT THE BEGINNING OF TONIGHT'S PRESENTATION WAS A REQUEST TO PROCEED WITH THE AMENDMENTS AS YOU HAD PRESENTED, AND THEN IT WOULD MOVE TO THIRD READING, IN WHICH CASE WE WOULD YOU HAD MENTIONED TO TO OKAY. WITH THAT SCHEDULE OF VOTING ON IT, WE'D PREFER IF WE DID THE VOTE TONIGHT. SO WE DON'T HAVE TO COME BACK TO PUBLIC COMMENT. IF IT WERE TO BE AMENDED AT THIRD READING, WE'D HAVE TO SEND IT BACK FOR PUBLIC COMMENT FOR THOSE AMENDMENTS. SO I JUST THINK PROCEDURALLY, I THINK IT MAKES MORE SENSE TO MAKE THAT VOTE. NOW IF AND A VOTE ON THE AMENDMENTS. YES. NOT A VOTE TO ACTUALLY PASS. YES. CORRECT. OKAY. YEAH. THANK YOU. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION COMMENTS, QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS? THE ONLY QUESTION I HAVE FOR YOU IS ON THE HEALTH, HEALTH, STUDIO HEALTH AND FITNESS, HEALTH, THE HEALTH AND FITNESS STUDIO. SO IS WOULD THAT BE IN? SO I'M JUST THINKING ABOUT LIKE THE UPTOWN. SO IT'D BE LIKE A FIRST FLOOR. YOU KNOW, THERE'S NO. THAT COULD BE IT COULD BE SECOND FLOOR. YEAH. THERE THEREO SET REQUIREMENT ON THAT. BUT IT'S CONDITIONAL. SO YOU KNOW, IF WE HAD AN APPLICATION FOR THAT, THEY'D HAVE TO MEET WHATEVER PLANNING COMMISSION'S CONDITIONS ARE FOR. OKAY. I WAS JUST I'M JUST THINKING ABOUT LIKE, YOU KNOW, SOMETHING ON THOSE LINES. WOULD THAT BE SOMETHING THAT THERE'D BE MULTIPLE MULTIPLE CLASSES? LIKE FOR ONE DAY, YOU'D HAVE WHOEVER SETS SOMETHING. IT COULD BE WE HAVE USE THOSE USES IN THE UPTOWN NOW THAT HAVE BEEN THERE. YOU KNOW, THEY PREDATE THE MOST RECENT ADOPTION OF THE ZONING CODE. SO I BELIEVE SOME OF THESE USES HAVE MULTIPLE CLASSES PER DAY. OKAY. YOU'RE OKAY WITH THAT? YOU'RE OKAY WITH. YEAH. I MEAN, I THINK LIKE PULSE. YEAH. ALL UNDER THIS, RIGHT? YEAH. YEAH. I WAS GOING TO SAY I WAS GOING TO SAY PULSE, BUT I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU'RE OKAY WITH ANOTHER, YOU KNOW? YEAH. MORE USES. OKAY. ANYTHING THAT BRINGS MORE PEOPLE TO OUR UPTOWN TO MAKE IT VIBRANT. AND I JUST SPEAKING AS THE FATHER OF SOMEONE WHO USES ONE OF THE HEALTH AND FITNESS STUDIOS IN UPTOWN, THE OTHER BUSINESSES BENEFIT FROM HAVING THOSE CLASSES IN THE UPTOWN. OKAY. 
          THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? COMMENTS? I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO AMEND THE LEGISLATION WITH THE CONTENTS AS PRESENTED THIS EVENING. MR. PRESIDENT, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO AMEND THE LEGISLATION AS IS PRESENTED. I'M SORRY. I THINK THERE'S GOING TO BE. OH, IS THERE A COUPLE MORE SLIDES? NO, THERE'S TWO VOTES. SO THERE'S THERE'S TWO AGENDA ITEMS. YEAH, THERE'S TWO AMENDMENTS. OKAY. SORRY, I JUMPED AHEAD HERE. WELL, NO, I TAKE THAT BACK. SO THERE'S NO AMENDMENTS TO THE GLOSSARY OF TERMS OR TO THE THE NEXT ONE. 
          THERE'S NO AMENDMENTS TO THE THE DISTRICTS WHERE THEY'RE BEING ASSIGNED. IT'S JUST AMENDMENTS TO THE GLOSSARY OF TERMS. SO OKAY, TAKE THAT BACK. SORRY. MY NOTES HERE. YEAH. 
          [01:50:05]
YEAH. SO THIS ONE WE WILL NOT AMEND OR ACTUALLY THIS. SO IF WE'RE AMENDING, WE'RE GOING TO WE'RE GOING TO AMEND 27-26. OKAY. 2626 IS JUST COMING BACK CORRECT. YEAH YEAH YEAH. SORRY. 
          OKAY. CITIZEN COMMENTS. NO CITIZEN COMMENTS. SORRY FOR THE CONFUSION HERE. ANY FURTHER COUNCIL COMMENTS. OKAY. THIS WILL BE BACK FOR THIRD READING VOTE ON MAY 11TH. 27-26. THE. 
          THIS IS THE GLOSSARY OF TERMS. SO THIS ONE WOULD. YEAH, THIS THIS I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO AMEND THE LEGISLATION WITH THE CHANGES PRESENTED IN THIS EVENING. AND I BELIEVE WE HAD A MOTION TO. MR. PRESIDENT, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO AMEND THE LEGISLATION AS PRESENTED THIS EVENING. OKAY. WE HAVE AN AMENDMENT TO A MOTION TO AMEND THE LEGISLATION. ROLL CALL. 
          [27-26]
SORRY, HAVE I READ 27 YET? OH, I WE ARE WE ARE ALL OUT OF SORTS TONIGHT, AREN'T WE? SO LET ME FIRST. YEAH. STATE 27-26. SECOND READING PUBLIC HEARING TO APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION TO AMEND PART 11 ZONING CODE. APPENDIX. GLOSSARY OF TERMS. OKAY, AND NO FURTHER COMMENTS, MR. ANDREWS. OKAY. SORRY FOR GETTING THE TRAIN OFF THE RAILS. 
          YEAH, THANKS FOR KEEPING ME IN ORDER HERE. A LOT OF CHANGES. WE'RE TALKING THROUGH CITIZENS. 
          ANY CITIZENS WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? COUNCIL. OKAY, THIRD TIME'S A CHARM. MR. MR. PRESIDENT, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO AMEND THE LEGISLATION AS PRESENTED THIS EVENING. OKAY. 
          ROLL CALL. MRS. PACKAGE. YES. MR. RAMSEY. YES. MRS. YOUNG. YES. MR. BODNAR. YES. MR. WOLF. 
          YES. MR. BURGER YES. MR. HUNTER. YES. MOTION PASSES. LEGISLATION IS AMENDED. OKAY. CITIZEN COMMENTS. DO WE HAVE TO READ IT FIRST? WE AMENDED THE LEGISLATION WHICH KEEPS IT AT SECOND READING, BUT ALSO ALLOWS FOR CITIZEN COMMENTS. WE'RE TRYING TO GET OUT OF HERE. ANY CITIZEN WISHING TO SPEAK, IT DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE THE CASE. THIS WILL BE BACK FOR THIRD 
          [28-26]
READING VOTE ON MAY 11TH. OKAY, 28-26 FIRST READING INTRODUCTION TO APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE A ZONING CODE. AMENDMENTS TO PART 11 ZONING CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 1139 ALTERNATIVE ENERGY AND AMENDING THE APPENDIX GLOSSARY OF TERMS. I HAVE ANOTHER PRESENTATION. AND WHILE MACKENZIE'S PULLING THAT UP, I THINK THAT'S GOING TO KIND OF SPEAK TO THIS BECAUSE IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE WORK WITH. 
          THE DIVISION OF FIRE ON ADDING REQUIREMENTS TO OUR ZONING CODE FOR THE LOCATION, FOR EMERGENCY, EMERGENCY DISCONNECTS FOR ELECTRONIC VEHICLES, CHARGING STATIONS. THIS WAS AT PLANNING COMMISSION WAS APPROVED SEVEN. YES, ZERO NO. WITH A FEW CONDITIONS. THOSE CONDITIONS WERE TO CONTINUE TO WORK WITH DIVISION OF FIRE AND THE ACTUALLY THE THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT ON FINALIZING THE LANGUAGE FOR SIGNAGE TO LOCATE WHERE THE EMERGENCY DISCONNECT IS. SOME LOCKING MECHANISMS AND STANDARD DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE EMERGENCY DISCONNECT. 
          YEAH. SO WHAT WE WANT TO DO IS ADD THIS LANGUAGE TO THE ZONING CODE. THE FIRE CODE CURRENTLY DOES NOT HAVE ANY REGULATIONS ON EMERGENCY DISCONNECTS FOR EV CHARGING STATIONS. SO IT'S SOMETHING NEW IN THE STATE THAT SOME OTHER JURISDICTIONS ARE STARTING TO ADD. YOU CAN SEE LIBERTY TOWNSHIP, WHICH IS DOWN AROUND THE DAYTON AREA. THEY'RE THEY'RE THE ONES THAT ARE ADDING IT AS WELL AS CITY OF COLUMBUS. SO WE WANT TO TRY TO BE ON TOP OF THAT, YOU KNOW, LEADING AT LEAST IN OUR AREA AND THINKING ABOUT THE SAFETY OF THE FIRST RESPONDERS. SO IF WE HAVE A FIRE AT AN EV VEHICLE, WE CAN DISCONNECT THAT POWER TO IT. THE DISCONNECT SWITCH IS IN A SAFE LOCATION. THEY CAN IDENTIFY IT WHEN WE ARRIVE ON SCENE. AND ALL THAT. SO JUST HELPS WITH THE SAFETY OF THAT. BECAUSE ONCE WE CAN DISCONNECT THAT POWER, IT'LL HELP. IT'LL DE-ENERGIZE THAT VEHICLE, WHICH THEN ALLOWS US TO BE ABLE TO GET THAT FIRE PUT OUT. SO SOME OF THE ITEMS THAT WILL BE WOULD BE ADDING IS PROHIBITED. AND THE BELOW GRADE PRIVATE SPACES UNDERNEATH MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, IF THOSE ARE TYPE THREE OR TYPE FIVE CONSTRUCTION, THERE WOULD BE GUARDS AROUND EACH ONE OF THOSE CHARGING STATIONS TO PREVENT, 
          [01:55:03]
YOU KNOW, SOMEONE FROM HITTING IT. THERE'D BE CERTAIN DISTANCES FROM IF THESE CHARGING STATIONS ARE AT A FUELING STATION. SO THEY'RE SO FAR AWAY FROM THE THE FUELING STATIONS WHERE THE DISPENSERS ARE, AND AS WELL AS WHERE FUEL IS DELIVERED AND WHERE THE VENT PIPES ARE FOR THOSE UNDERGROUND TANKS. COULD YOU BACK UP ONE SLIDE, PLEASE? SORRY. JUST. AND THEN SO WITH THE SIGNAGE, WE WANTED TO WORK WITH THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE BECAUSE NFPA ALSO WORKS WITH THEM TO ENSURE IT'S A SIMILAR LANGUAGE. AND IT'S COMMON THAT YOU'D SEE MAYBE IN SOME OF THE OTHER COMMUNITIES. SO THAT'S WHERE WE WE ADDED THE LANGUAGE FOR THE TWO TYPES OF SIGNAGE THAT CAN BE DISPLAYED AT THESE CHARGING STATIONS. ANY QUESTIONS? MR. PORTER? CHIEF, THANK YOU FOR THIS. I DID A RIDE ALONG WHEN I FIRST GOT ON ELECTED, AND THAT WAS ONE OF THE BIGGEST CONCERNS THAT WAS EXPRESSED FROM A FIRE SAFETY IS EV VEHICLES AND THE INABILITY TO, YOU KNOW, REALLY PUT THEM OUT. MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT AND MAYBE THINGS HAVE CHANGED IN A YEAR AND A HALF, BUT MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THEY HAVE THESE FIRE BLANKETS THAT ESSENTIALLY YOU JUST TOSS OVER THE VEHICLE AND LET IT SMOLDER OUT OR BURN OUT. WATER ISN'T GOING TO DO ANYTHING, IS THE WAY THAT I UNDERSTAND IT, CORRECT? WE DO HAVE A EV BLANKET ON AT OUR STATION, SO WE CAN USE THAT IN THE EVENT THAT WE HAD A EV FIRE. BUT THE BIG THING TOO, IS IF WE CAN GET THE POWER DISCONNECTED TO IT, THEN IT DOES. IT TAKES A LOT OF WATER. SO IT'S A THAT'S EXACTLY WHY THIS IS SO IMPORTANT. LOCATION TO BUILDINGS, OTHER VEHICLES, GAS SOURCES, ETC. PREVENT, YOU KNOW, AN EXPANSION OF, YOU KNOW, A, AN ALREADY ISSUE, MAKING IT A, OBVIOUSLY A, A, A MUCH LARGER ISSUE. SO I APPRECIATE YOU AND THE, THE TEAM COMING UP WITH, WITH THESE, THESE SAFETY MEASURES TO, TO KEEP OR HELP TO, TO KEEP THE, THE, THE GENERAL PUBLIC SAFE. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. CAN YOU BACK IT UP THE SCREEN? THANKS. PLEASE. SORRY. OH, NO. I JUST DIDN'T SAY PLEASE. OH, I THINK 20FT IS PRETTY CLOSE. I MEAN, THAT'S HERE TO ZACH. SO I'M THINKING, LIKE, IF THERE'S A FIRE, I DON'T WANT TO BE THAT CLOSE. YEAH. A LOT OF IT, YOU KNOW, DEPENDS ON WHERE THE LOCATION OF THE OF THE CHARGERS. SO WANT TO GIVE A RANGE TO WHERE, YOU KNOW, IF THERE'S NOT MUCH DISTANCE AND THAT'S THE BEST LOCATION FOR THE DISCONNECT, WE CAN STILL GET TO THAT. AGAIN. 
          WE'LL BE IN, YOU KNOW, FULL GEAR THAT WE CAN ACCESS THAT TO BE ABLE TO GET IT SHUT OFF. SO WANTED TO GIVE SOME A RANGE OF DISTANCE THAT'S ACCEPTABLE. I GUESS YOU WOULD BE MORE COMFORTABLE AT 20FT THAN I WOULD BE. YEAH. I'LL JUST MAKE A FEW COMMENTS. SO I WAS AT AN AUTOMOTIVE CONFERENCE IN 2021, AND AT THAT TIME I WAS LISTENING TO A COUPLE AUTO EXECUTIVES TALK ABOUT, I THINK IT WAS THE BUILD BACK BETTER PLAN UNDER THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION. AND IT WAS ANNOUNCED ON, I THINK IT WAS APRIL 1ST OF 2021. AND IT WAS ONE OF THE EXECUTIVES WAS JOKING THAT HE THOUGHT THAT THE. IT WAS NOW REFERRED TO AS SOMETIMES THE EV MANDATE. BUT THE THE EV MANDATE, HE THOUGHT, WAS AN APRIL FOOL'S JOKE, BUT IT WAS NOT. AND THEN IT PROCEEDED FORWARD. SO WHAT IT ESSENTIALLY DID WOULD. IT WOULD HAVE DRIVEN A RAPID ADVANCEMENT OF EVS THAT ARE GOING TO NEED TO BE SOLD INSTEAD OF INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE VEHICLES AND AT A RAPID PACE IN SOME STATES WERE OUTLAWING GASOLINE VEHICLES, EVEN BY, I DON'T KNOW, MID 2025, MID 2020S, OTHER STATES, MAYBE THE 2030S AND MAYBE MID 20, MID 2030S WITH THE, THE, I THINK IT WAS THE BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL PERHAPS THAT HAD ROLLED BACK WHAT'S CALLED THE EV MANDATE, THE TIMELINE FOR ADOPTION OF EVS IS SLOWED. 
          BUT BUT WHEN THIS ALL WAS GOING ON, I WAS LISTENING TO THESE INDIVIDUALS TALK ABOUT THE 
          [02:00:03]
INDUSTRY AND ITS DIRECTION. I LOOKED AT OUR CODE AND THE ONLY REFERENCE TO ELECTRIC VEHICLES IN OUR ZONING CODE, I BELIEVE, WAS A REFERENCE TO LIKE A SEGWAY TYPE, LIKE, YOU KNOW, A SEGWAY, THE TWO WHEELED AND YOU STAND ON THEM AND YOU MOVE. THERE MAY HAVE BEEN SOMETHING IN REGARD TO GOLF CARTS, BUT IT WAS IT WAS THAT MOMENT. WE ALSO AT THAT SAME TIME, WE DID A STUDY FOR. WE I WASN'T PART OF THE CITY COUNCIL AT THAT TIME, BUT THE CITY DID A STUDY ON HOW ARE WE GOING TO PLAN FOR THIS EV INFRASTRUCTURE IN OUR CITY, YOU KNOW, AND IT IT WAS JUST, YOU KNOW, EYE OPENING TO ME TO THINK WE'VE WE'VE GOT TO CATCH UP WITH THIS BECAUSE THIS IS GOING TO BECOME A REALITY WITH THE ROLLBACK OF THE EV MANDATE. IT DOESN'T MEAN THAT EVS ARE GONE. IT JUST MEANS THAT THE ADOPTION IS GOING TO TAKE LONGER, ASSUMING THAT'S THE TECHNOLOGY THAT PREVAILS. I'M HOPEFUL THAT WITH NEWER TECHNOLOGY, THAT THE RISK FOR WHAT THEY CALL THERMAL RUNAWAY IS, IS NO LONGER A CONCERN, BUT IT IS CERTAINLY A CONCERN WITH THE TECHNOLOGY THAT'S AVAILABLE TODAY. SO I AM GLAD TO SEE US. I'M NOT GOING TO SAY LIKE WE'RE OVERLY PROACTIVE, BUT I'M GLAD TO SEE US TAKE BECAUSE BECAUSE THERE ARE SOME CITIES THAT, YOU KNOW, OUT WEST, THEIR STATE GOVERNMENTS HAVE MADE IT SUCH THAT THEY HAVE TO CONSIDER THIS NOW RATHER THAN LATER. BUT I'M GLAD THAT WE'RE PUTTING PRECAUTIONS IN PLACE, AND WE'RE DOING SO TO BE RESPONSIBLE. SO AND I JUST LOOK AT THIS AS A FIRST STEP. BUT NOW I APPRECIATE THE WORK THAT'S GONE INTO THIS. YEAH. THANKS TO OUR COMMUNITY RISK REDUCTION BUREAU, THEY'VE TRIED TO RESEARCH AND GET BE PROACTIVE IN THIS AREA, EVEN IDENTIFYING WHERE THOSE CHARGING STATIONS ARE WITH WITH STICKERS. WE DID CAMPAIGN ON THOSE LAST YEAR IN THE COMMUNITY. SO CONTINUE TO PUSH FOR, YOU KNOW, THE SAFETY OF OUR STAFF AS WELL AS THE RESIDENTS. SO AND IT'S ALMOST LIKE CHANGING A OR SORRY, IT'S LIKE CHASING A MOVING GOALPOST BECAUSE AS SOON AS YOU THINK YOU HAVE SOMETHING COVERED, THEN ALL OF A SUDDEN THE EV INFRASTRUCTURE CHANGES AND THEN YOU HAVE A MUCH HIGHER VOLTAGE. THEY HAVE DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICS AND SO ON AND SO FORTH. IT'S, YOU KNOW, THAT'S HOW IT IS IN THE AUTO INDUSTRY. BUT YEAH, I APPRECIATE THE WORK THAT THEY'RE DOING. ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS BY MEMBERS OF COUNCIL? OKAY. I BELIEVE THIS CONCLUDES THIS ITEM. THIS WILL BE BACK FOR SECOND READING PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 11TH. 29-26 FIRST 
          [29-26]
READING INTRODUCTION TO AMEND CHAPTER 1320 VACANT BUILDING REGISTRATION, SPECIFICALLY SECTION 13. 20.03 REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE CODIFIED ORDINANCES. 
          ADMINISTRATION. THANK YOU. MACKENZIE. YEAH. SO SOME OF YOU MAY REMEMBER WE WERE HERE LAST WINTER FALL TO UPDATE THE FEE SCHEDULE TO ADDRESS THE MULTI TENANT OCCUPANCY AND UPDATE THE EXEMPTION CLAUSE OF OUR VACANT BUILDING REGISTRATION. SINCE THEN, WE'VE MET WITH COUNCILWOMAN TACKETT, AND SHE HAD SOME CONCERNS ABOUT SOME BUILDINGS IN THE UPTOWN, BUT ALSO, YOU KNOW, VACANT BUILDINGS IN GENERAL. SO IT TOOK SOME TIME TO REEVALUATE WHAT SOME OF THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS ARE AND HOW WE CAN. INCREASE THE SAFETY FOR SOME OF THOSE BUILDINGS, SPECIFICALLY COMMERCIAL MIXED USE AND INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS. AND WE TOOK THIS TO PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICE ON APRIL 13TH. WE'RE HERE TONIGHT. SO CURRENTLY, WHEN A BUILDING GETS REGISTERED WITH OUR OFFICE, WE DO A LIKE AN EXTERIOR INSPECTION, JUST LIKE A WALK AROUND CHECK TO MAKE SURE THE DOORS WINDOWS ARE SECURE. THERE'S NO MAJOR PROPERTY MAINTENANCE VIOLATIONS. WE HAVE A WAY TO KIND OF KEEP TABS ON GRASS, TRASH, OR OTHER BLIGHTING FACTORS AND JUST MAKE SURE THE BUILDING IS OVERALL, YOU KNOW, SECURE IN A SAFE MANNER. BUT WHAT THAT DOESN'T DO IS GIVE US AN IDEA OF HOW THE, YOU KNOW, WHAT KIND OF CONDITION THE FOUNDATION SYSTEM MIGHT BE IN, OR THE ROOF OR THE STRUCTURE OF THE WALLS. SO THE WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING TONIGHT IS TO HAVE A WAY TO GET BUILDINGS THAT ARE REGISTERED WITH US, HAVE THOSE INSPECTED TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S BEING MAINTAINED IN A SAFE MANNER, NOT PRESENTING A HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC. SO WHEN A BUILDING GETS REGISTERED WITH US, WITH THESE NEW, YOU KNOW, IF THESE NEW PROVISIONS ARE PASSED, THE PROPERTY OWNER WILL HAVE TO HIRE EITHER A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OR A REGISTERED ARCHITECT, YOU KNOW, SOME SORT OF PROFESSIONAL TO DO AN INSPECTION OF THE BUILDING. AND IT'LL BE FOCUSED ON THESE BULLETS HERE. SO ALL THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS, ROOF SYSTEMS, FOUNDATIONS, ANY 
          [02:05:03]
OBSERVABLE STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS. SO LIKE, YOU KNOW, SOME MAJOR SUPPORT COLUMN OR FLOOR JOISTS AND THEN FIRE, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS IF APPLICABLE. AND WHERE THIS IS IMPORTANT IS, YOU KNOW, IF WE HAVE A VACANT WAREHOUSE SOMEWHERE AND THERE'S A FIRE OR SOME OTHER EMERGENCY, WE WANT TO KNOW THAT THE BUILDING IS REASONABLY SAFE FOR FIRST RESPONDERS TO ENTER THAT BUILDING, TO ADDRESS WHATEVER THAT EMERGENCY IS. AND THEN IF THE OWNER FAILS TO FULFILL THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS, WE WOULD HAVE A MECHANISM TO, FOR THE CITY TO HIRE THAT PROFESSIONAL TO COMPLETE THAT INSPECTION SO WE CAN GET AN IDEA OF WHAT WHAT THE CONDITION OF THAT BUILDING IS. IF THERE'S ANY SERIOUS ISSUES, THEY WOULD HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED. AFTER EVALUATING THAT REPORT. AND THIS IS KIND OF A I'M NOT AWARE OF ANY OTHER COMMUNITY THAT HAS THIS IN THEIR BUILDING REGISTRATION, BUT THERE ARE COMMUNITIES LIKE COLUMBUS THAT HAVE A SIMILAR INSPECTION REQUIREMENT FOR BUILDINGS IN THEIR DOWNTOWN. THEY HAVE TO SUBMIT A CRITICAL OBSERVATION REPORT. AND IT'S ESSENTIALLY EVERYTHING THAT THIS DOES. BUT FOR EVERY BUILDING IN THEIR DOWNTOWN THOUGHT IT WAS APPROPRIATE TO HAVE THIS FOR OUR VACANT BUILDINGS CITYWIDE. SO IT WOULD INCLUDE ANY VACANT BUILDING IN THE UPTOWN. IT COULD BE A VACANT WAREHOUSE ON THE OUTSIDE, YOU KNOW, ON THE OUTSKIRTS OF TOWN OR ANY OTHER VACANT COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL OR MIXED USE BUILDING. THAT'S PRETTY MUCH IT. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. MR. PRESIDENT? GO AHEAD. FIRST, I JUST WANT TO THANK ZACH AND ASHLEY FOR THEIR WORK ON CHATTING WITH ME, ON THE IMPORTANCE OF OUR UPTOWN HISTORIC BUILDINGS. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE HEAR OVER AND OVER AGAIN FROM RESIDENTS IS HOW MUCH THEY VALUE MARYSVILLE'S SMALL TOWN FEEL, AND THE CHARACTER THAT MAKES OUR CITY SPECIAL. A BIG PART OF THAT IDENTITY COMES FROM OUR HISTORIC BUILDINGS, ESPECIALLY IN UPTOWN, BUT REALLY ALL ACROSS OUR COMMUNITY. AND THESE STRUCTURES AREN'T JUST BUILDINGS. THEY REPRESENT OUR HISTORY, OUR GROWTH, AND THE AND THE STORIES OF THE PEOPLE WHO BUILT THIS CITY BEFORE US. SO IF WE WANT TO PRESERVE THAT CHARACTER FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS, WE HAVE TO BE INTENTIONAL ABOUT TAKING CARE OF WHAT WE ALREADY HAVE. THAT INCLUDES MAKING SURE THESE PROPERTIES ARE NOT ONLY MAINTAINED, BUT SAFE FOR THE PUBLIC AND FOR THE SURROUNDING BUSINESSES AND NEIGHBORHOODS. THIS UPDATE IS ONE SMALL BUT MEANINGFUL STEP IN THAT DIRECTION, AND I THINK IT REINFORCES THAT PRESERVATION AND SAFETY CAN AND SHOULD GO HAND IN HAND. SO. THANK YOU, MISS MISS YOUNG. SO BACK IN JANUARY, THE SUPREME COURT SORRY. SO BACK IN JANUARY, I WENT DOWN TO THE SUPREME COURT ABOUT INSPECTIONS REQUIRING A WARRANT TO HAVE TO HAVE TO HAVE AN INSPECTION. THE CASE WAS. 
          NORTH CANTON, AND THEY WERE THE ONES THAT FILED AGAINST THIS PARTICULAR BUSINESS. SO BEFORE WE DO ANYTHING, I THINK WE PROBABLY SHOULD SEE HOW THAT CASE PANS OUT. AND IT COULD TAKE MONTHS. TIM, HOW LONG DOES THE SUPREME COURT CASES CASE? I MEAN, I CAN'T IMAGINE THAT. I MEAN, IT'S THE CASE, BUT I'LL LOOK IT UP AND SEE WHAT THE STATUS IS. YEAH. BUT IT WAS NORTH CANTON. THEY WERE DIGGING THEMSELVES A HOLE. OKAY. OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS QUESTIONS. 
          COMMENTS. I JUST HAD A QUESTION. SO WE HAD THE BUILDING SOUTH OF SEVENTH. IS IT? IT'S NOT SEVENTH STREET. IS IT THAT GOOD? THE WITH THE FORMER GOODWILL BUILDING. FORMER GOODWILL BUILDING. HOW WOULD THIS HAVE APPLIED TO THAT? WHAT MY UNDERSTANDING THAT BUILDING HAD SOME ISSUES. THINGS WERE FALLING AND PERHAPS CAUSING. I'M NOT AWARE OF ANYTHING FALLING. THERE'S DEFINITELY SOME PROPERTY MAINTENANCE ISSUES THAT WE HAD. IT WAS FENCED. GET THE PROPERTY. THE FORMER PROPERTY OWNER TO RESOLVE IT WAS FENCED OFF. 
          RIGHT. THAT'S THAT'S WHY I'M THINKING IT WAS FENCED OFF BECAUSE OF THE CONDITION OF THE EXTERIOR WALLS. OKAY. SO THAT AND THEY DID HAVE A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER PROVIDE A DOCUMENT THAT SAID IT WASN'T AN IMMEDIATE THREAT TO COLLAPSE, BUT OUT OF AN ABUNDANCE OF CAUTION, THEY PUT THE FENCE AROUND IT JUST TO KEEP PEOPLE FROM GOING IN AND OUT OF IT. 
          BUT I MEAN, IF THIS HAD BEEN IN PLACE, IT HAD A MECHANISM TO IDENTIFY ISSUES THAT WE CAN'T SEE FROM THE STREET. I WOULD BE CURIOUS TO UNDERSTAND WHAT THE INVENTORY IS OF VACANT INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS IN THE CITY. WE TRY WE DO OUR BEST TO KEEP AN ACCURATE COUNT OF THAT, BUT IT'S HARD TO GET ALL OF THEM. YEAH, THERE'S MORE THAN YOU WOULD PROBABLY THINK. 
          OKAY. OTHER COMMENTS? QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL HERE. OKAY, THIS WILL BE BACK FOR SECOND READING 
          [02:10:10]
PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 11TH. THANK YOU, MR. ANDREWS. APPRECIATE IT. COMMENTS OF THE CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL PERSONS IN GENERAL DISCUSSION. MR. EMERY MR. PRESIDENT, I'M GOING TO PASS THIS EVENING, SO I'M GOING TO PUT IT RIGHT BACK TO YOU. SO THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. 
          MR. BORDNER MR. PRESIDENT, THANK YOU. I TOO SHALL PASS. MR. WOLF. THE ONLY THING I'LL SAY IS PRIMARY ELECTIONS COMING UP MAY 5TH. SO EARLY VOTING IS ONGOING, EXTENDED HOURS THIS WEEK AND THIS WEEKEND. SO GET OUT AND VOTE. MR. BERGER. I'LL JUST I I'LL JUST SAY QUICKLY, THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE HAD OUR ARBOR DAY TREE ANNUAL TREE PLANTING, AND WE HAD IT AT OAKDALE CEMETERY. AND IT WAS A GOOD TURNOUT. THERE WAS A LOT OF TREES. OBVIOUSLY, RESIDENTS ARE SEEN STREET TREES BEING PLANTED. A LOT OF THAT IS FOR AMERICA'S. 250. BUT THEN ALSO WE WERE ABLE TO PLANT, I BELIEVE, 13 TREES AT OAKDALE CEMETERY FOR THE 13 COLONIES. 
          ALSO, I THINK THE MAJORITY OF THE TREES WERE ELMS, WHICH WERE ALL RELATED BACK TO THOMAS JEFFERSON. YOU KNOW, THEY'RE FOR PEOPLE WHO DON'T KNOW THERE ARE TREES THAT YOU CAN THAT ARE SEEDS OR GRAFTED FROM TREES THAT WERE PLANTED BY OUR FOUNDING FATHERS SO MANY YEARS AGO. SO THEY ALL COME FROM THAT HERITAGE OF THOSE HERITAGE TREES IS WHAT THEY CALL THEM. 
          SO I DID NOT BRING THE PROCLAMATION, BUT I WAS GOING TO READ IT. SO I WILL READ IT EVENTUALLY. BUT I JUST WANT TO THANK EVERYBODY WHO CAME OUT AND WAS ABLE TO PICK PICK OUT A TREE. AND HOPEFULLY, AS WE CONTINUE TO GROW AS A COMMUNITY, YOU KNOW, IT'S AMAZING WHEN YOU DRIVE AROUND TOWN AND SEE HOW MANY STREET TREES HAVE BEEN PLANTED AND KNOWING THAT WHAT MARYSVILLE STREED USED TO LOOK LIKE. AND JUST IN TEN YEARS, HOW SHADED OUR STREETS WILL ONE DAY BE AGAIN, JUST IN A LITTLE BIT OF TEN YEARS IS GOING TO BE PRETTY REMARKABLE. SO HOPEFULLY THAT'S AN INITIATIVE THAT NEXT YEAR WE CAN ALSO PLANT ANOTHER 250 TO NOT ONLY BEAUTIFY OUR CITY STREETS AND TO EDUCATE OUR RESIDENTS ON THE IMPORTANCE OF WHAT OUR SMALL TOWN IDENTITY IS, BUT ALSO BECAUSE WE PASSED OUR STRATEGIC PLAN FOR OUR CANOPY STUDY, WHICH PROVES THAT WE NEED TO PLANT MORE TREES. SO JUST THANK YOU FOR EVERYBODY FOR COMING OUT TO THAT EVENT. 
          THANK YOU, COUNCILWOMAN YOUNG, I HAVE. NOTHING. ALL RIGHT. COUNCILMAN REEVES, YOU KNOW, I JUST WANT TO MENTION, FOR THOSE THAT WEREN'T ABLE TO ATTEND THE. THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE HAS AN ANNUAL DINNER EVERY YEAR. THIS YEAR'S EVENT WAS LAST WEEK. GREAT EVENT. AND TERRY EMERY WAS RECOGNIZED FOR HIS OUTSTANDING LEADERSHIP OVER A LONG PERIOD OF TIME. AND I THINK, YOU KNOW, EVERYONE HERE IS, YOU KNOW, VERY PROUD OF EVERYTHING THAT TERRY'S DONE FOR US. SO I JUST WANTED TO THANK TERRY HERE IN THE MEETING. WELL DESERVED. THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. APPRECIATE THAT. COUNCILWOMAN. NOT MUCH. JUST TO SAY THAT I AM VERY PLEASED THAT WE DID A PROCLAMATION ON THE MILITARY APPRECIATION MONTH, AND I'M GLAD THAT THOSE GENTLEMEN DIDN'T HAVE TO SIT THROUGH SOME OF THE DISCUSSIONS TONIGHT. SO THEY'RE NO LONGER HERE, BUT TO THANK THEM FOR ATTENDING AND BEING A PART OF THAT. AND A SPECIAL THANK YOU TO ALL OF OUR MILITARY MEMBERS WHO ARE MARYSVILLE RESIDENTS. WE APPRECIATE EVERYTHING YOU DO AND IT DOES NOT GO UNNOTICED. OKAY. THANK YOU. JUST A COUPLE COMMENTS FOR MYSELF. AGAIN, LATCHING ON TO WHAT MR. REAMES HAD STATED, IT WAS A GREAT TIME TO SEE YOU RECEIVED THAT AWARD LAST WEEK AND. TO SEE YOU AND YOUR FAMILY AND THE GRANDKIDS. IT WAS A SPECIAL, SPECIAL TIME. 
          THERE WERE ALSO A FEW BUSINESS OWNERS IN THE MARYSVILLE AREA. WE HAD, I THINK IT WAS THE OWNER OPERATOR OF COFFEE HALL, COFFEE HALL AND SOME OTHER BUSINESSES AS WELL HAD RECEIVED AN AWARD. THERE WAS AN INDIVIDUAL FROM RICHWOOD BANK, WHICH WE HAVE A BRANCH HERE IN MARYSVILLE. WHAT WAS THE NAME? JONATHAN. JONATHAN. GUMMO. AND THEN. AND THEN RYAN WITH UCO, UCO, AND THEN ALSO SO IT WAS DAVE AND RYAN, AND THEN FROM THE AVALON THEATER WE HAD. OH, YES. I DON'T KNOW HIS LAST NAME. RYAN BO, RYAN BOWIE. YEAH. SO MARYSVILLE WAS REPRESENTING 
          [02:15:05]
STRONG AT THE UNION COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE EVENT. AND IT WAS IT WAS AN EVENT HELD IN RICHWOOD, BUT I THINK IT HAD A STRONG SENSE OF MARYSVILLE THERE. THANK YOU. I WAS PLEASED TO SEE THAT. AND CONGRATULATIONS AGAIN, MR. EMERY. I WANT TO JUST ALSO EXPRESS A GRATITUDE AND APPRECIATION AND THANK YOUS TO CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER RICHARD KERWOOD AND THEN CAPTAIN ALEX ROZANSKI FOR THEIR ATTENDANCE TONIGHT. AND WITH THAT, I WILL 
          [Executive Session]
SAY WE HAVE A POTENTIAL TO ADJOURN TO AN EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS THE PURCHASE OF PROPERTY AND TO DISCUSS THE EMPLOYMENT OF A PUBLIC EMPLOYEE, AND THAT REQUIRES A MOTION AND A SECOND. SO MOVED. WE HAVE A MOTION. I'LL MAKE A SECOND MOTION AND A SECOND ROLL CALL. 
          MR. REAMES YES. MRS. YOUNG YES. MR. BORDNER YES. MR. WOLFE YES. MR. BURGER YES. MR. HUNTER
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.