[APPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 5, 2026 City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes October 12, 2026 Special City Council Meeting Minutes October 12, 2026 City Council Meeting Minutes ]

COUNCILMAN REAMS IS EXCUSED. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. FIRST WE HAVE THE OCTOBER 5TH, 2026 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES. HAS EVERYONE HAD A CHANCE? AND IF SO, I WILL ENTER.

EVERYONE HAD A CHANCE TO REVIEW. AND IF SO, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MEETING MINUTES. MR. PRESIDENT, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 5TH, 2026 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES. OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ALL OPPOSED? THE OCTOBER 5TH WORK SESSION. MEETING MINUTES ARE APPROVED. OCTOBER 12TH, 2026 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES. I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 12TH SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES. MR. PRESIDENT, I'LL MAKE THE MOTION TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 12TH, 2026 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES. THANK YOU. COUNCILMAN BURGER.

ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ALL OPPOSED? ALL RIGHT. MEETING MINUTES ARE APPROVED. OCTOBER 12TH. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES. MR. PRESIDENT, I'LL MAKE THE MOTION TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 12TH, 2026 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES. COUNCILMAN BURGER MOVED. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ALL OPPOSED? MEETING MINUTES ARE APPROVED. THANK YOU. NEXT ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA, WE

[ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT]

HAVE THE ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT. GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL PRESIDENT HUNTER AND MEMBERS OF COUNCIL.

FALL IS IN THE AIR AND LOTS OF FUN ACTIVITIES GOING ON IN MARYSVILLE. MARYSVILLE MAIN STREET, MARYSVILLE HOSTED MARYSVILLE IN UPTOWN ON OCTOBER 24TH. THIS YEAR'S EVENT FEATURED CLOSE TO 40 ARTS AND CRAFTS VENDORS IN 18 OUTSIDE BUSINESSES. WE WOULD LIKE TO THANK MAIN STREET, MARYSVILLE, THE UPTOWN BUSINESSES AND CITY STAFF FOR ALL THE WORK AND PARTNERSHIP TO MAKE THIS EVENT POSSIBLE. PLEASE NOTE THAT TRICK OR TREATING IN MARYSVILLE IS OFFICIALLY OCTOBER 31ST. IT WILL TAKE PLACE FROM 6 TO 8 P.M. GET READY FOR THOSE TRICK OR TREATERS. THE POLICE DEPARTMENT HOSTED ITS ANNUAL RETIREE LUNCHEON ON SUNDAY, OCTOBER 18TH. WE WOULD LIKE TO CELEBRATE THE NINE RETIREES AND THANK THEM FOR THEIR SERVICE.

ON WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 21ST. EXCUSE ME. OFFICER AIMEE FINDLAY RECEIVED THE UNION COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH AND RECOVERY BOARD'S POWER OF PARTNERSHIP AWARD. THIS WAS IN RECOGNITION OF OFFICER FINDLAY'S EXCEPTIONAL LEADERSHIP, COLLABORATIVE SPIRIT AND COMMITMENT TO STRENGTHENING PARTNERSHIPS ACROSS UNION COUNTY. IN HER ROLE AS THE CRISIS INTERVENTION TEAM COORDINATOR. THIS IS A VERY IMPORTANT ROLE IN OUR COMMUNITY. WE WOULD LIKE TO CONGRATULATE HER ON THIS AWARD. MARYSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT HOSTED A PRESCRIPTION TAKE BACK DAY ON OCTOBER 24TH SATURDAY AND TOOK BACK 36.6 POUNDS OF PRESCRIPTION MEDICATIONS. THIS TAKES THE TOTAL FOR THE YEAR TO OVER 100 POUNDS. WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28TH MARKS NATIONAL FIRST RESPONDERS DAY, A DEDICATED TIME TO RECOGNIZE AND THANK THE EXCEPTIONAL PROFESSIONALS WHO SERVE OUR COMMUNITY AROUND THE CLOCK, OFTEN UNDER THE MOST CHALLENGING AND UNPREDICTABLE CIRCUMSTANCES. OUR POLICE OFFICERS, FIREFIGHTERS, PARAMEDICS AND EMERGENCY DISPATCHERS STEP FORWARD WHEN OUR RESIDENTS ARE AT THEIR MOST VULNERABLE. BEYOND MANAGING CRISIS, THEY DELIVER LIFE SAVING MEDICAL CARE AND IMMEDIATE REASSURANCE AND DECISIVE ACTION THAT KEEPS OUR NEIGHBORHOODS SAFE. BEHIND EVERY EMERGENCY RESPONSE IS A PUBLIC SERVANT WHO BALANCES EXTRAORDINARY PHYSICAL AND MENTAL DEMANDS, OFTEN SPENDING LONG HOURS AWAY FROM THEIR OWN FAMILIES TO PROTECT COMPLETE STRANGERS. PLEASE JOIN ME IN EXTENDING OUR DEEPEST GRATITUDE TO ALL OF OUR PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL FOR THEIR DEDICATION, COURAGE, AND DAILY SERVICE TO OUR COMMUNITY. TONIGHT IS THE FIRST READING OF THE CITY'S PROPOSED 2027 ANNUAL BUDGET. AS CITY MANAGER, I WANT TO NOTE THAT THIS DOES REPRESENT A TRANSPARENT ACCOUNTING OF THE MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES. IT REPRESENTS CITY COUNCIL'S PRIORITIES AND IS ONE TOOL IN PREPARING THE COMMUNITY FOR ITS FUTURE. FROM SOUND INVESTMENTS IN INFRASTRUCTURE, ENSURING OUR EMERGENCY SERVICE TEAMS ARE WHOLE AND PREPARED, AND THAT ROAD REPAIRS, PARKS, EVENTS AND FUTURE PLANNING IS ACCOUNTED FOR. I AM ENCOURAGED BY THIS

[00:05:05]

PROPOSED BUDGET AND LOOK FORWARD TO HEARING FROM COUNCIL REGARDING THAT. IN THE LAST ITEM ON MY ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT, I WOULD LIKE TO INVITE GUEST SPEAKER TONIGHT, KEVIN KENNEDY FROM OHM. HE'S BEEN PREPARING A PUBLIC PROPERTY AND FACILITIES AUDIT, WHICH WE'VE ASKED FOR FOR THIS YEAR. YOU'LL RECEIVE A MORE THOROUGH AUDIT REPORT BEFORE CHRISTMAS. BUT TONIGHT KEVIN'S GOING TO GIVE US AN OVERVIEW OF THE WORK THAT'S GOING INTO THE AUDIT AND WHAT YOU CAN LOOK FORWARD TO BY THE END OF THE YEAR. OUR GOAL IS THAT IN 2027, WE TAKE THIS AUDIT AND WE PRODUCE A PUBLIC FACILITY MASTER PLAN, WHICH WILL HAVE MANY ELEMENTS TO THAT.

AND KEVIN WILL TALK ABOUT THAT. SO I'LL TURN IT OVER TO KEVIN. THANK YOU. YEAH. GOOD EVENING.

THANK YOU. LIKE SHE SAID, THIS IS REALLY MEANT TO BE KIND OF AN INTRODUCTION. IT'S NOT ALL INCLUSIVE OF THE DATA THAT WE'VE PERFORMED SO FAR. BUT THERE WILL BE, YOU KNOW, MORE TO COME. SO THE PURPOSE OF THIS PARTICULAR AUDIT IS TO REVIEW PROPERTIES AND FACILITIES SO THAT THIS AUDIT CAN BE A STRATEGIC TOOL FOR RESPONSIBLE STEWARDSHIP OF YOUR PUBLIC ASSETS, LONG TERM FINANCIAL PLANNING AND PREPARING THE COMMUNITY FOR FUTURE GROWTH. SO THIS GIVES THE CITY A CLEAR PICTURE OF WHAT IT OWNS, THE CONDITION OF THOSE ASSETS, HOW EFFECTIVELY THEY'RE BEING USED, AND WHAT INVESTMENT INVESTMENTS WILL BE NEEDED TO MAINTAIN MUNICIPAL SERVICES OVER TIME. SO THIS IS THE FIRST PART IN A TWO STEP PROCESS TO ENSURE THAT THE CITY'S REAL ESTATE AND FACILITIES SUPPORT MAY SUPPORT MARYSVILLE'S PRIORITIES, WORKFORCE, RESIDENTS AND LONG TERM VISIONS. SO SOME QUICK NUMBERS HERE YOU'LL SEE AS WE'VE GOT CITY OF MARYSVILLE OWNS APPROXIMATELY 300 ACRES WITH 69 BUILDINGS THAT REPRESENT A LITTLE OVER 363,000FT■!S. THESE PROPERTIES ARE GENERALLY CATEGORIZED BY THE TABLE THERE. I'M NOT GOING TO READ THEM BECAUSE WE'LL GET TO IT HERE IN ANOTHER SLIDE.

AND THEN AS MENTIONED, THIS IS MEANT TO GO INTO 2027 AS PART OF A SECOND STEP THAT WILL RESULT IN A PROPERTY ASSESSMENT OR FACILITIES MASTER PLAN THAT WILL IDENTIFY, YOU KNOW, UTILITY FUTURE NEEDS, EMERGENCY SERVICES UP WORK IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN UPTOWN CIVIC CENTER MASTER PLAN, PARKS MASTER PLAN, REAL ESTATE PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT. SO NUMBER OF STEPS THAT WILL GO INTO IT. THIS FIRST MAP HERE IS JUST MEANT TO SHOW THIS. THESE ARE ALL THE PROPERTIES THAT YOU OWN WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS. YOU'LL SEE IN THE THREE DIFFERENT COLORS.

YOU'VE GOT A PRETTY WIDE MIX HERE WITHIN THE CITY. THE THREE CATEGORIES, JUST SO YOU GUYS KNOW, IS THE FIRST ONE IS WE CALLED IT PRIMARY CITY FUNCTION FACILITIES AND SITES FOR POTENTIAL FUTURE USE. MAYBE WE'LL COME UP WITH A CATCHY ACRONYM NEXT TIME, BUT THAT MOSTLY CAPTURES YOUR MAIN USES THAT YOU HAVE RIGHT NOW. THE NET, THE GREEN IS CITY PARK FACILITIES, AND THEN THE YELLOW ARE YOUR CITY UTILITY SITES. THE SECOND MAP HERE IS SHOWING ALL THE ALL THE SITES OUTSIDE OF THE CITY LIMITS. YOU CAN SEE IT'S PRIMARILY 100% UTILITY.

THE ONE GREEN MARKER IS JUST YOUR WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY. AND THE REASON IT'S GREEN IS BECAUSE YOU HAVE A SMALL AMOUNT OF FULL TIME STAFF THAT WORK AT THAT FACILITY. THIS MAP HERE IS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PRIMARY FUNCTION BUILDINGS THAT WE FOCUSED ON FOR THIS AUDIT. SO THERE ARE PIECES OF THE AUDIT WHERE WE GATHERED INFORMATION ABOUT ALL THE SITES. BUT THESE 18 SITES HERE ARE ONES THAT WE'VE GONE AND LOOKED AT IN PERSON. AND AS YOU CAN SEE, IT REPRESENTS A PRETTY WIDE MIX OF USES. SO WE'VE GOT PUBLIC SERVICE BUILDINGS, UTILITIES OPERATIONS, SOME RESIDENTIAL, SOME COMMERCIAL PARKING LOTS, A VACANT BUILDING, AND A VACANT LOT AS WELL. THE THIS NEXT PART HERE IS JUST MEANT TO HIGHLIGHT A FEW OF THOSE SITES. THIS FIRST ONE SHOULD BE WELL AWARE. YOU KNOW, IT'S WHERE WE'RE AT RIGHT NOW. IT'S WEST SIXTH STREET AND THE SOUTH MAIN STREET BLOCK. THIS PARTICULAR SLIDE. RIGHT NOW WE'RE JUST SHOWING THIS IS THE PROPERTY THAT IS FOR CITY HALL THAT WE'RE IN RIGHT NOW. YOU CAN SEE THAT ENCOMPASSES THE BUILDING PLUS THE PARKING LOT WITHIN THAT SAME BLOCK. THERE ARE SIX OTHER PROPERTIES WHICH THREE OF WHICH THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE OWNS. AND SO YOU CAN SEE THOSE THERE WITH SOME SITE INFORMATION ABOUT THOSE THREE. A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THIS BUILDING. IT'S PROBABLY YOUR HIGHEST CONCENTRATION OF PEOPLE AND DEPARTMENTS. SO IT'S REPRESENTED HERE WITH ENGINEERING, FINANCE, PLANNING AND ZONING. FIRE DEPARTMENT 272 FIRE PREVENTION, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, HUMAN RESOURCES, SENIOR ADMINISTRATION AND COMMUNICATIONS. GENERALLY SPEAKING, THE BUILDING WAS BUILT IN 2014 AND IT'S OVERALL IN PRETTY GOOD CONDITION AND WELL MAINTAINED. THIS IS A THIS IS THE BASEMENT AS WELL AS THE FIRST FLOOR. YOU CAN SEE THE WHOLE LEFT SIDE IS THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. AND THEN ALSO ON THE FIRST FLOOR, WE'VE GOT PLANNING AND ZONING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES. SECOND FLOOR, SECOND HALF IS THE LEFT HALF IS STILL PART OF THAT FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE STATION. THE ORANGE IS WHERE WE'RE AT RIGHT NOW, CITY COUNCIL. AND THEN YOU'VE ALSO GOT HUMAN RESOURCES, SENIOR ADMINISTRATION. AND THEN I THINK IT NEXT PROPERTY TO THE WEST OF US HERE ON THE BLOCK IS 117 WEST SIXTH STREET. SO THIS BUILDING IS CURRENTLY MOSTLY UNUSED. IT. THE WHAT WE WITNESSED WAS IT'S BEING USED A LITTLE BIT FOR PLANNING AND ZONING, KIND OF OVERFLOW

[00:10:04]

MEETING SPACE. GENERALLY SPEAKING. OKAY. CONDITION IT WOULD IT WOULD REQUIRE SOME IMPROVEMENTS IF IT WAS TO BE REDEVELOPED. THESE ARE THE FLOOR PLANS OF THAT. SO BASEMENT FIRST FLOOR, SECOND FLOOR. NEXT PROPERTY TO THE WEST OF THAT IS 123 WEST SIXTH STREET. THIS IS CURRENTLY LEASED OUT AS APARTMENTS TO. TWO OUT OF THE FOUR ARE OCCUPIED AND SIMILAR TO THE LAST TIME, IT WOULD REQUIRE IMPROVEMENTS FOR ADA AND OTHER THINGS FOR IT TO BE REDEVELOPED. THESE ARE THE FLOOR PLANS OF THAT BUILDING. THE OTHER. THE LAST BUILDING ON THIS BLOCK THAT'S OWNED BY THE CITY IS 214 SOUTH COURT STREET. THIS BUILDING IS CURRENTLY LEASED OFFICE SPACE TO THE METHODIST CHURCH ACROSS THE STREET. THIS BUILDING HAS HAD SOME REPAIRS DONE OVER THE PAST, BUT LIKE THE OTHERS, IT WOULD REQUIRE SOME ADA ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS IF IT WERE TO BE REDEVELOPED. AND THESE ARE THE FLOOR PLANS OF THAT BUILDING. NEXT ON THE LIST HERE IS 1250 WEST FIFTH STREET, WHICH IS OPERATES AS YOUR POLICE STATION AND COURT FACILITY. THIS IS THIS FIRST SLIDE HERE JUST SHOWS THE ENTIRE SITE. THIS NEXT SLIDE IS ZOOMED IN VERSION. SO THIS IS SHOWING OR HIGHLIGHTING UP AGAINST THE BUILDING. THERE YOU CAN SEE A SMALL BLOCK. WHAT WE UNDERSTAND IS THAT'S A SMALL BUILDING ADDITION THAT'S GOING TO BE GOING IN, WHICH IS MEANT TO SERVE THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. AND THEN THE GRAVEL PARKING LOT IN THE TOP RIGHT THERE, WE UNDERSTAND, IS GOING TO BE REDEVELOPED INTO ADDITIONAL PAVED PUBLIC PARKING. THIS BUILDING IS PRETTY SIMILAR AGE TO THIS ONE AND PRETTY SIMILAR CONDITION, MEANING IT'S BEEN WELL MAINTAINED AND IN GOOD CONDITION. THIS IS THE GENERAL MAKEUP OF THE BUILDING, SO LEFT HALF OF THE BUILDING IN RED. THERE YOU SEE, IS THE COURTS AND THEN THE RIGHT IS THE POLICE IN BLUE. ANY OF THE WHITE SPACE YOU SEE LEFT OVER IS BASICALLY SHARED SPACE OR MECHANICAL. NEXT ONE ON THE LIST HERE IS 16 300 COUNTY HOME ROAD, WHICH OTHERWISE KNOWN AS DECKER FIRE STATION. THIS IS THE WHOLE SITE YOU CAN SEE THERE WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE STATION RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE. THEY HAVE TWO SUPPLEMENTAL BUILDINGS OUT BACK.

THIS BUILDING ALSO PRETTY SIMILAR CONDITION TO THIS ONE AND THE POLICE AND COURTS BUILDING SIMILAR STORY. IT'S BEEN WELL MAINTAINED. IT'S IN RELATIVELY VERY GOOD CONDITION.

AND THAT'S ITS ONLY PURPOSE OUT THERE IS FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. THIS IS THE WHOLE FLOOR PLAN THERE. AND THEN THIS IS A BREAKDOWN. THIS IS A CHUNK OF THE MATERIAL THAT GOES INTO THE OVERALL FACILITIES AUDIT REPORT. SO THIS LIST IN PARTICULAR IS JUST HIGHLIGHTING THE PRIMARY FUNCTIONS THAT WE JUST WENT THROUGH. SOME OF THEM. THIS IS JUST SHOWING WHAT YOU KNOW KIND OF OTHER INFORMATION. WE'RE GATHERING WHAT WE DIDN'T TOUCH ON A WHOLE LOT IN THERE AND WHAT WILL END UP ON THE SHEETS FOR EACH OF THOSE. EACH OF THESE BUILDINGS WILL BE INFORMATION ABOUT CONDITION, AGE, WHETHER OR NOT IT'S HAD OTHER ADDITIONS IN THE PAST.

AND THEN. GENERAL KIND OF MAKE UPS OF LIKE THINGS THAT WE SAW LIKE WINDOWS, DOORS, EXTERIOR WALLS, ROOFING, THAT KIND OF THING. LIKE I MENTIONED, THIS IS ALL MEANT TO FEED INTO THE NEXT STEPS, WHICH IS GOING TO BE A COMPREHENSIVE FACILITIES MASTER PLAN. SO WE SEE THIS AS PRIMARILY A THREE STEP PROCESS. ONCE WE GET TO THAT, STEP, ONE IS GOING TO BE INTERVIEWS THAT WE CONDUCT WITH THE DEPARTMENT LEADERS. THE MAIN PURPOSE OF THIS IS, YOU KNOW, THESE PEOPLE WORK IN THESE BUILDINGS EVERY DAY AND CAN REALLY SEE HOW THEY FUNCTION. SO THEY'RE GOING TO BE THE PEOPLE THAT, YOU KNOW, ARE GOING TO RELAY THE BEST INFORMATION TO US ABOUT THESE PARTICULAR ITEMS, STAFFING AND OPERATIONS, SPACE SHORTAGES AND UNDERUTILIZED AREAS, PUBLIC SERVICE NEEDS, OPERATIONAL AND SECURITY CONCERNS, STORAGE AND EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS, ANTICIPATED STAFFING AND SERVICE CHANGES, AND THEN DESIRED FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS.

STEP TWO IS AN ASSESSMENT ON OUR END, WHERE WE'LL TAKE THAT INFORMATION WE GATHERED FROM THE INTERVIEWS, AS WELL AS THE INFORMATION THAT WE'VE GATHERED DURING THIS AUDIT PHASE AND REALLY START TO EVALUATE, YOU KNOW, OCCUPIED VERSUS UNDERUTILIZED SPACE DEPARTMENT LOCATION. AND IN ADJACENCIES, MEANING ARE THERE DEPARTMENTS THAT ARE IN ONE PARTICULAR BUILDING NOW, AND IT WOULD MAKE SENSE TO MOVE THEM SOMEWHERE ELSE. THOSE ARE OPTIONS. WE'LL EXPLORE MEETING AND COLLABORATION SPACE, PUBLIC FACING SERVICE AREAS, STAFF SUPPORT AREAS, STORAGE AND EQUIPMENT NEEDS, SEPARATION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEE AND AND SECURE FUNCTIONS, AND THEN VEHICLE AND OPERATIONAL CIRCULATION. ULTIMATELY, THOSE FIRST TWO STEPS FEED INTO STEP THREE, WHICH IS REALLY THE COMPILATION OF ALL THAT INFORMATION AS WELL AS RECOMMENDATIONS. YOU KNOW, THESE ARE SOME OF THE QUESTIONS WE'RE PLANNING TO ANSWER OR, OR I SHOULD SAY COMPONENTS, YOU KNOW, WHETHER OR NOT WE MAINTAIN FACILITIES AS CURRENTLY USED, WHETHER WE NEED TO REORGANIZE SPACE WITHIN EXISTING BUILDINGS, WE NEED WHETHER OR NOT WE NEED TO RELOCATE OR CONSOLIDATE DEPARTMENTS, DO WE NEED TO REPURPOSE ANY UNDERUTILIZED SPACE? DO WE NEED TO ADDRESS ANY IMMEDIATE OPERATIONAL DEFICIENCIES, PLAN FOR TARGETED RENOVATIONS, AND THEN EVALUATE OPTIONS FOR BUILDING ADDITIONS OR FOR FULL BUILDING REPLACEMENT? MEANING, IF THERE'S A BUILDING THAT'S IN SUCH A CONDITION, IT'S NOT WORTH SAVING, OR IF IT'S IN, YOU KNOW, THE WAY OF, YOU KNOW,

[00:15:03]

SOME OTHER ACT THAT WE WANT TO TAKE THAT'LL BE AN OPTION. AND THEN LASTLY, IDENTIFYING FACILITIES THAT WARRANT ADDITIONAL TECHNICAL STUDY, MEANING IT'S A BUILDING THAT WE DEEM THAT WE WANT TO KEEP. HOWEVER, WE DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WHAT ALL IS INVOLVED WITH IT, AND WE WANT TO HAVE A BETTER PICTURE OF THE NECESSARY REPAIRS. WE WOULD DO A KIND OF A DEEPER DIVE INTO THE CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF IT. SO WE'D BRING ENGINEERS THAT WE HAVE ON STAFF DO KIND OF A, LIKE I SAID, A DEEP DIVE INTO THE CONDITION AND COMPILE A REPORT THAT WAY. THAT'S ALL I HAVE FOR YOU. SO ■IF I COULD ADD A LITTLE CONTEXT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, KEVIN. APPRECIATE THAT. I THINK IT'S VERY IMPORTANT WE UNDERSTAND WHAT THE CITY OWNS, WHAT THE PUBLIC FACILITIES THAT WE OWN AND LAND. AND WE KNOW THAT IN THE FUTURE, INSTEAD OF TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHERE 1 OR 2 PEOPLE ARE GOING TO SIT OR MOVE, I THINK THERE'S DEFINITELY GROWTH NEEDS WITH POLICE AND FIRE. AS OUR COMMUNITY GROWS, WE REALLY NEED A PLAN, HOW WE'RE GROWING AND HOW THINGS ARE EVOLVING. WE ALSO KNOW THAT THERE'S SOME LAND THAT'S BEEN PURCHASED TO DEAL WITH SOME THINGS UNDERGROUND, BUT AFTER THAT IS FIXED UNDERGROUND, THAT LAND MAY VERY WELL BE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR REDEVELOPMENT. AND I THINK WE NEED TO IDENTIFY THAT, THINK ABOUT IT AND BE READY FOR THAT WHEN THE TIME IS RIGHT. AND THERE'S BEEN A REQUEST TO ALSO HAVE A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF SOME BASIC OVERALL ARCHITECTURAL AND SIGNAGE GUIDELINES, WHICH MAY OR MAY NOT BE A PART OF THIS MASTER PLAN, BUT THAT'S NEEDED NEXT YEAR AS WE GO TO BUILD OR ADD OR CHANGE. I THINK THE GOAL IS TO HAVE A MORE CONSISTENT ARCHITECTURAL LANGUAGE AS WE DO RENOVATIONS OR ADDITIONS, AND THAT GOES ALONG WITH AND THIS IS FOR THE PUBLIC FACILITIES, PARKS AND OTHER PUBLIC BUILDINGS. CAN WE HAVE A CONSISTENT ARCHITECTURAL ETHOS? AND I BELIEVE WE COULD MAKE THAT A PART OF IT. I THINK THOSE ARE THE GENERAL ONES. WE JUST WANT TO BE REALLY THOUGHTFUL ABOUT THIS AND STRATEGIC ON HOW WE GROW AS A COMMUNITY. SO THIS IS THE FIRST PART. HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? COUNCIL MEMBERS. COUNCIL, ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? MR. BERGER? I JUST WANTED TO ASK WHILE WE ARE WHILE WE'RE LOOKING AT THIS, WE ALSO LOOKING AT IF FACILITIES. MAYBE WE'RE FITTING OUR NEEDS NOW, BUT AS THEY GROW, ARE WE LOOKING AT WHERE ELSE THEY COULD BE BUILT? SO LIKE, AND MAYBE I MISSED THAT, BUT LIKE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT WHERE THE DOG PARK IS ALSO TALKING ABOUT CHESTNUT. OBVIOUSLY, THAT'S WHERE ALL OF OUR TRUCKS ARE PARKED NOW. BUT IS THAT FEASIBLE INTO THE FUTURE WHERE THAT CURRENT SITE IS? THAT'S A VERY GOOD QUESTION. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER BERGER. I THINK PART OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WILL BE LOOKING AT FUTURE GROWTH AREAS, AND THAT'S ESPECIALLY GOING TO BE IMPORTANT AS WE LOOK AT EMERGENCY SERVICES AND HOW THEY SERVE NEW AND FUTURE AREAS. AND I THINK THAT CAN BE NOTED IN THE FACILITIES MASTER PLAN GENERALLY, WHAT AREAS WILL NEED TO BE. AND IT WON'T LIKE PICK OUT THE LOT OR DESIGN THE BUILDING OR ANYTHING. IT'LL JUST SAY, GENERALLY, AS THE COMMUNITY GROWS IN THIS AREA, IT MAY WANT TO CONSIDER AN ADDITIONAL FIRE STATION HERE OR HERE, BECAUSE IF THAT DEVELOPMENT HAPPENS, WOULD BE GOOD FOR US TO KNOW SO THAT IN THE TRANSACTIONS WE COULD HAVE THAT PROPERTY KEPT FOR FUTURE CITY SERVICES WITHOUT BURDENING THE TAXPAYER IN THE LONG TERM.

SO YES, GOOD. GOOD JOB. THANK YOU. OTHER OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM MEMBERS OF COUNCIL? I WANTED TO THANK YOU FOR THE EXPLANATION OF THIS KIND OF PRELIMINARY ACTIVITY, AS I'VE BEEN ON COUNCIL NOW GOING ON THREE YEARS. HARD TO BELIEVE. I, I HAVE WE'VE WE HAVE FACED DIFFERENT DECISIONS TO PURCHASE PROPERTIES. FOR EXAMPLE, THE PROPERTY AT 214 SOUTH COURT STREET WHEN THAT WAS FIRST PRESENTED TO US. YOU KNOW, THE QUESTION FROM NEWER COUNCIL COUNCIL MEMBERS WAS, YOU KNOW, WHY WOULD WE DO THIS? BUT IT TOOK, YOU KNOW, EXPERIENCED COUNCIL MEMBERS TO REMIND US THAT THERE HAS BEEN AN OVERALL STRATEGY TO CONSIDER HOW WE WOULD POTENTIALLY, YOU KNOW, OUTGROW THIS BUILDING AND HOW WE WERE TO ACCOMMODATE MORE STAFF AS OUR CITY WERE TO GROW. SO I, I LIKE THE IDEA OF BEING PROACTIVE IN THIS. AND IT'LL BE INTERESTING WHERE IT POINTS TO, YOU KNOW, WE DON'T HAVE THE SAME TYPES OF FACILITIES, MASTER PLANS THAT I THINK A SCHOOL DISTRICT WOULD HAVE. YOU KNOW, YOU SEE OFTENTIMES IT'S NEW SITES, NEW BUILDINGS. WE'LL BE THERE AT SOME POINT. BUT I THINK THE, THE PACE AND THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS IN THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS, THE PACE OF GROWTH, THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS, THEY HAVE TO THINK ABOUT THAT. THEY'RE MANAGING MANY, MANY MORE FOLKS. BUT, YOU KNOW, BEING PROACTIVE IS CERTAINLY A SMART APPROACH. AND I APPRECIATE YOU JUST YOU COMING INTO THE ROLE AND RECOGNIZING, YOU KNOW, THIS AND BEING PROACTIVE IN THE EFFORTS. SO APPRECIATE IT. I DO WANT TO THANK FINANCE DIRECTOR BRAD LUTZ FOR ACTUALLY TAKING THIS ON AND HELPING TO GET US TO THIS POINT. GREAT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WILL THAT DO IT FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT? YES. WE HAVE A COUPLE ITEMS UNDER ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC SERVICE.

[00:20:03]

KEVIN, THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR COMING TONIGHT. ALL RIGHT. ULTRA FIBER CREWS ARE WORKING IN ADINA POINT AND GREENWOOD COLONY, THE 2026 PAVING PROGRAM. THEY ARE COMPLETING STRIPING THIS WEEK AND THEN EAST FIFTH STREET IMPROVEMENTS. MCKENZIE IS GOING TO BE PUTTING SOME PICTURES UP FOR YOUR VIEWING. THE CURB IS POURED AND CREWS ARE BEGINNING TO REMOVE DRIVE APPROACHES ON THE SOUTH SIDE. THEY WILL START POURING THOSE APPROACHES THIS WEEK AND COMPLETE THE ASPHALT PATCHES. ONCE COMPLETE, THE CONTRACTOR WILL MOVE TO THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ROAD. SO WE'RE WE'RE MOVING ALONG. BEAUTIFUL CONCRETE FINISHED VERY NICELY. AND THAT'S ALL I HAVE. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISS FINK? MR. BURGER? ANY QUESTION? THE ONLY STATEMENT I HAVE IS THAT IT'S GOING TO BE NICE TO HAVE STORM DRAINS ON EAST FIFTH STREET.

AND ALSO IT'S. AND I HAVE SAID THIS BEFORE, IT'S GOING TO BE NICE TO HAVE STORM DRAINS ON EAST FIFTH STREET FOR THE FIRST TIME. AND IT'S ALSO GOING TO BE VERY NICE TO NOT HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT YOUR SUMP PUMP LINES FREEZING BECAUSE THEY'RE GOING TO BE UNDERNEATH THE GROUND. SO WITH ALL THAT SAID AND DONE, I NEVER DREAMED THAT THE STREET WOULD BE AS QUIET AS IT IS. SO YOU CAN ACTUALLY HEAR THE BIRDS AND EVERYTHING CHIRPING AND THE CLOCK BELLS CHIMING. SO IT'S NICE. THE OTHER THE OTHER COMMENT I WANTED TO MAKE JUST TO CHANGE GEARS IS THAT I WAS SHOPPING AT KROGER AND I RAN INTO MANY RESIDENTS, AND THAT SHOPPING EXPERIENCE ACTUALLY LASTED 2.5 HOURS, WHICH IS FINE, BUT THEY BROUGHT ALL KINDS OF CONCERNS AND TWO DIFFERENT INDIVIDUALS, TWO DIFFERENT FAMILIES WHO LIVE IN SCOTT FAMILY. SCOTT FARMS SAID THAT WITH THE CONSTRUCTION AND AT THE PARK, AND I JUST WANTED TO BRING THIS TO EVERYBODY'S ATTENTION. THEY SAID THAT THE WITH THE AMOUNT OF TREES THAT ARE NOW MISSING AND SHRUBBERY THAT THE NOISE FROM THE FREEWAY IS A LOT LOUDER. THE ANIMALS THAT USED TO LIVE IN SCOTT FAMILY PARK IS NOW LIVING IN THEIR BACKYARDS. SO THEY WERE TALKING ABOUT RACCOONS, POSSUMS, SQUIRRELS, DEER, RABBITS, SO ON AND SO FORTH. AND THEN ALSO THE OFF OFF THEIR BACK DOORS, WHAT USED TO BE TREES. NOW THEY CAN SEE THE SEMI TRUCKS DRIVING ON 33. AND I JUST THINK THAT AS WE TALK ABOUT THE BUDGET, AND I KNOW THAT COUNCIL'S NOT PROJECT MANAGERS, BUT I THINK THAT IT WOULD BE GOOD TO HAVE A WALK THROUGH MAYBE WITH COUNCIL OR MYSELF TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS HAPPENING, BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, I DON'T WANT TO SEE A SOUND WALL BUILT. AND I THINK THAT WE NEED TO BE VERY CAUTIOUS ON THE AMOUNT OF REMOVAL THAT'S GOING ON IN SCOTT FAMILY PARK, ESPECIALLY BY BUTTING UP TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. I'VE NOT LOOKED AT THAT, BUT I JUST HAD A COUPLE. I JUST HAD TWO DIFFERENT FAMILIES SEE ME IN THE GROCERY STORE AISLE, SO THEY BOTH WERE SPEAKING TO ME ABOUT IT. SO I JUST WANT TO BRING THAT EVERYBODY'S ATTENTION. AND I TOLD HIM THAT I WOULD. SO I JUST WANTED TO BRING IT UP TO EVERYONE'S ATTENTION. SO THANK YOU, COUNCIL MEMBER BURGER. I'LL ENCOURAGE YOU TO GET WITH OUR PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR, CORBIN BONSALL, WHO WILL, I'M SURE, BE HAPPY TO GO TOUR THE PARK AND KIND OF TALK ABOUT THOSE DETAILS WITH YOU. SOUNDS GOOD. I THINK THERE'S A COUPLE OTHER ANNOUNCEMENTS, BUT MOSTLY IT'S OPERATIONAL. AND ZACH, I KNOW YOU HAVE SOME ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS TONIGHT ON THE AGENDA, SO WE'LL PROBABLY LEAVE THAT FOR THAT. WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND MOVE FORWARD. THAT'S ALL WITH OUR ADMINISTRATIVE ANNOUNCEMENTS.

SIR, I WANTED TO SAY THANKS FOR THE UPDATE ON THE STRIPING. BELIEVE IT OR NOT, I HAVE A COWORKER WHO ASKS ME DAILY IF WE'RE GOING TO GET THE STRIPING DONE. LAST YEAR, IF YOU RECALL, THE THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY CAME ALONG AND THAT CAME WITH A REALLY STRONG AND COMPLETELY THEREAFTER COLD TEMPERATURE FRONT. AND WE DIDN'T WE WEREN'T ABLE TO GET ALL THE STRIPING. I THINK THAT WE WANTED TO GET DONE IN THE FALL LAST YEAR. SO GLAD TO HEAR THAT. THAT'S IN PROGRESS. I READ ON SOCIAL MEDIA THAT EAST FIFTH STREET IS NOT THERE'S NO WORK BEING DONE, BUT THEN I SEE CONCRETE. AND THEN I DROVE EAST FIFTH AND I ALMOST FELL ON HOLES IN MY CAR.

SO THERE'S SOME WORK BEING DONE, AND I'M GLAD TO SEE THE PROGRESS ON THAT. AND WELL, LOOKING FORWARD TO, TO, TO WHERE THAT ENDS UP TO. ACTUALLY, THERE'S ONE MORE ANNOUNCEMENT.

I'M SORRY. I THINK IT'S ACTUALLY PRETTY IMPORTANT. CORBIN, IF YOU JUST WANT TO KNOW REALLY BRIEFLY THE WORK GOING ON, THAT YOUR CREW AND FIRE AND POLICE BOTH SPENT QUITE A BIT OF TIME ON 33 AND THE RAMP FROM SCOTTS LAWN ROAD. AND WHAT HAPPENED THERE? YEAH, I MEAN, I CAN LOOK EITHER THE CHIEFS HERE TALK MORE ON THE ACTUAL OPERATION, BUT WE DID ASSIST WITH THE ROAD CLOSURES OUT THERE AND HAD TO DO SOME SOME EMERGENCY ROAD REPAIRS DUE TO THE THE FORKLIFT FALLING OFF THE BACK OF THE TRUCK. SO WE DISPATCHED OUT THERE TO HELP THEM, BUT LET THEM KIND OF TALK MORE ON THE DETAILS. THERE WERE MULTIPLE ACCIDENTS AT 33 AND

[00:25:07]

SCOTTS LAWN THIS WEEK, AND IF THERE'S ANYTHING ELSE YOU GUYS WANT TO MENTION, THE ONLY THING I WOULD SAY IS JUST PUBLICLY HOW BIG OF AN ASSET STREETS IN PUBLIC SERVICES TO US ON THESE TYPE OF INCIDENTS OR ANY TYPES IN ANY TYPES OF INCIDENT. WHENEVER WE NEED HELP WITH ROAD CLOSURES, THEY DROP WHATEVER THEY'RE DOING AND ARE A REAL BIG ASSET TO US. FANTASTIC.

THAT'S ALL. THANK YOU SIR. JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, ME DRIVING INTO A HOLE WAS ME ALSO WEAVING AROUND TO PICK UP SOMEONE WHO LIVED IN THE CONSTRUCTION ZONE. SO IT'S NOT ANY FAULT OF THE STREETS DEPARTMENT. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT'S CLEAR. THAT WAS ON ME. OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT THIS EVENING. NEXT ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA IS THE REPORT OF CLERK OF COUNCIL. THANK YOU. I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING. OKAY. NEXT IS PLANNING COMMISSION

[PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT]

REPORT, MR. ANDREWS. THANK YOU. PLANNING COMMISSION HEARD AN APPLICATION FOR A SKETCH PLAN FOR THE HARVEST RIDGE SUBDIVISION JUST NORTH OF MILL VALLEY. THAT WAS APPROVED BY A VOTE OF SEVEN. YES AND ZERO. NO. THERE WERE SOME ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS THAT WILL ACTUALLY HEAR FIRST READING TONIGHT IN MORE DETAIL TO THE APPENDIX. GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND SECTION 11. 21.13 THE MANUFACTURING AND INNOVATION DISTRICT THAT WAS APPROVED BY SEVEN YES AND ZERO NO. AND ANOTHER TEXT AMENDMENT TO SECTION 1107 REGARDING DESIGN STANDARDS. AND AGAIN, THAT WAS APPROVED. SEVEN YES VERSUS ZERO. NO. OKAY. MEMBERS OF COUNCIL, ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. ANDREWS? OKAY. SEEING NONE. THANK YOU. WE'LL MOVE ON TO DESIGN REVIEW BOARD REPORT. YES.

[DESIGN REVIEW BOARD REPORT]

THANK YOU. THERE WAS A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION RELATED TO THE FACADE IMPROVEMENT GRANT IN THE UPTOWN FOR THE REMOVAL OF A EXISTING COMMUNICATION TOWER AT 118 NORTH MAIN STREET. THAT WAS APPROVED BY A VOTE OF FOUR YES AND ZERO. NO. AND A REVISION TO PLANS. APPLICATION FOR THE RETREAT AT MARYSVILLE FOR THE TOWNHOMES. THAT'S THE SECOND PHASE OF THAT PROJECT ON PROFESSIONAL PARKWAY. AND THAT WAS APPROVED BY A VOTE OF FOUR.

YES. AND ZERO NOW. OKAY. MEMBERS OF COUNCIL QUESTIONS? COMMENTS. OKAY. THANK YOU VERY

[ HEARING OF CITIZENS]

MUCH, MR. ANDREWS. APPRECIATE THE UPDATE. NEXT ON THIS EVENING'S AGENDA IS HEARING OF CITIZENS. THIS IS THE TIME IN OUR MEETING WHERE WE INVITE CITIZENS WISHING TO ADDRESS COUNCIL TO APPROACH THE PODIUM, STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, AND YOU HAVE UP TO FIVE MINUTES.

KEEP IN MIND THAT THIS IS NOT DESIGNED TO BE A BACK AND FORTH Q&A. IT'S NOT MEANT FOR DIALOG.

IT'S MEANT FOR CITIZENS TO ADDRESS COUNCIL AND NOTE THAT IT IS NOT FOR ITEMS NOT RELATED TO PENDING LEGISLATION. AND WE JUST TO NOTE ALSO, WE HAVE ADDED SOME REMINDER NOTES IN THE AGENDA PACKET TO HELP CITIZENS BE AWARE ABOUT THE FIVE MINUTE TIME FRAME. WE HAD A MEMBER WHO. SOMETIMES THIS HAPPENS WHERE MEMBERS WILL TALK AND THEN KIND OF LOSE TRACK OF TIME. BUT TO BE FAIR, WE WILL TIME AND WE WILL ASK YOU TO FINISH. IF THAT FIVE MINUTES IS EXHAUSTED AT THIS TIME, I INVITE ANY MEMBERS WISHING TO ADDRESS COUNCIL TO MAKE YOUR WAY TO THE PODIUM. AND AGAIN, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. AND THEN WE ASK THAT YOU STATE YOUR ADDRESS. BRIAN CUNNINGHAM, 460 SCOTT FARMS BOULEVARD. I GUESS MY BIGGEST ISSUE IS THERE'S REALLY NO WAY TO COMMUNICATE WITH CITY COUNCIL IN A PUBLIC SETTING. I CAN I CAN STAND UP HERE AND ASK QUESTIONS, BUT I CAN'T GET ANSWERS FROM ME. I MEAN, WHERE DO I GO TO DO THAT? IF THAT ALL GOT TO BE OUT OF THE PUBLIC EYE, IT DOESN'T MAKE MUCH SENSE. BUT ANYWAYS, I WANT TO TALK ABOUT INEFFICIENCY AND JUST REALLY POOR PLANNING. I MEAN, AND BOTTOM LINE, SURE, IT'S GOING TO SCATT DIFFERENT DT THE BUCK STOPS WITH YOU GUYS, RIGHT? SO. I WASN'T GOING TO START WITH THIS, BUT I AM BECAUSE YESTERDAY SCOTT FARMS WAS STRIPED, RIGHT. WHICH I DON'T CARE IF IT'S STRIPED. DOESN'T MATTER TO ME. NONE. BUT THEY PUT NO THOUGHT PROCESS INTO IT. SO WHEN SCOTT FARMS WAS BUILT, THERE WAS PARKING ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ROAD. OKAY.

AND THEN WHEN THEY STARTED DOING THE ADDITIONS IN THE BACK, IT WENT TO PARKING ON ONE SIDE OF THE ROAD. SO THAT WAY THE CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES COULD GET THROUGH. MAKES TOTAL SENSE.

WELL, IT NEVER WENT BACK TO PARKING ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ROAD. RIGHT? WELL. NOW YOU STRIPED IT AND THE PARKING LANE IS FOUR FOOT WIDER THAN THE TRAVEL LANES. IT'S HUGE. AND THE OTHER SIDE OF THE ROAD IS RIGHT UP AGAINST THE CURB. OKAY, SO THAT SIDE OF THE ROAD NOW, YOU CAN'T EVEN PUT YOUR TRASH CANS OUT BECAUSE ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES FOR THE CITY,

[00:30:02]

FOR THE TRASH CAN, YOU GOTTA PUT IT IN THE ROAD A FOOT OFF THE CURB, WHICH PUTS IT IN THE LANE. LIKE YOU GUYS GOTTA THINK ABOUT THIS STUFF, RIGHT? SO NOW PEOPLE ARE SOME PEOPLE ARE PUTTING ACROSS THE STREET, RIGHT? GOT A 1415 FOOT LANE OVER THERE, PLENTY OF ROOM.

WELL, THE PROBLEM IS NOW WE HAVE A ROAD THAT HAS PARKING ON ONE SIDE OF THE ROAD AND MAILBOXES ON BOTH SIDES. IS THE CITY GOING TO COME AND PUT ALL THE MAILBOXES ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE ROAD NOW, SO WE CAN ACTUALLY USE THE PARKING? YOU GET WHAT I'M SAYING? LIKE, YOU GUYS GOTTA THINK SOME OF THIS STUFF THROUGH. ANOTHER THING IS FIFTH STREET DOWN TOWARDS LIKE WHERE DONATOS AND STUFF IS, YOU KNOW, THAT THAT PROJECT, I DON'T KNOW, WHAT'S IT BEEN 4 OR 5 YEARS AGO? YOU GUYS REDID IT ALL NEW CURBS, SIDEWALKS. IT LOOKS GREAT. RIGHT? WELL, THEN HERE RECENTLY YOU GUYS WENT THROUGH AND TORE THE CENTER LINE OUT. SO A THIRD OF THE MONEY THAT WE JUST PAID, ARGUABLY ONE OF THE BEST ROADS IN THE IN THE CITY, WE TORE IT OUT. WE PUT ISLANDS IN RIGHT, WHICH REQUIRED MAINTENANCE. AND THERE'S SEVERAL COUNCIL MEMBERS I SPOKE WITH THAT MAINTENANCE IS AN ISSUE TRY TO KEEP UP WITH. SO WE'VE ADDED MORE TO THAT.

RIGHT. WELL, NOT ONLY DID THEY PUT THE ISLANDS IN, THEY PUT THE ISLANDS IN TOO LONG TO WHERE IF YOU TURNING INTO THE BUSINESS, YOU'RE STOPPING IN THE LANE. SO IT'S TRAFFIC STOPPING, NOT TRAFFIC CALMING. SO THEN THE ISLANDS THAT WE JUST PAID TO PUT IN, WE PAID THE CONTRACTOR TO TAKE BACK OUT, YOU KNOW, TEN, 15FT, WHATEVER IT WAS THAT THEY JUST PUT IN A WEEK BEFORE. SAME THING THAT HAPPENED ON FOURTH STREET. THIS TOTAL WASTE OF MONEY. DID WE REALLY NEED ISLANDS WITH GRASS? CAN IT NOT BE SPENT BETTER ELSEWHERE? THAT JUST MAKES NO SENSE. I MEAN, FIFTH STREET FROM ONE END TO THE OTHER. IT'S NOT EVEN THE SAME. YOU GOT ISLANDS WITH NO TREES DOWN THERE. AND THEN THE CENTER SECTION HAS GOT PARKING, YOU KNOW, JUST NICE. JUST PARKING ON ONE SIDE OF THE ROAD. THEN YOU GET DOWN TO THE NEW SECTION THEY'RE WORKING ON. IT'S TOTALLY DIFFERENT. AGAIN, LIKE THERE'S NO CONTINUITY TO ANYTHING. YOU KNOW, YOU THINK THE SAME ROAD WOULD KIND OF LOOK THE SAME FROM BEGINNING TO END. BUT YOU KNOW, THAT'S, THAT'S MY OPINION. AND THEN MAIN STREET BY THE RAILROAD TRACKS THERE. SO AT THE BEGINNING OF THE SUMMER, CITY CREWS WENT THROUGH AND DID A LITTLE MAINTENANCE. THEY CRACK SEALED, RIGHT? GREAT. THERE'S A LOT NEEDS DONE AS FAR AS THAT GOES IN THE CITY. SO THEY CRACK SEALED IT. THEN ABOUT A MONTH LATER, WHEN THE RAILROAD CLOSED IT, THEY MAILED OUT BIG SECTIONS OF IT AND PATCHED IT. OKAY. AND THEN A COUPLE MONTHS LATER, WHICH WAS JUST A COUPLE WEEKS AGO, THEY MAILED IT ALL OUT AND REPAVED IT. WHY DIDN'T WE JUST GIVE THE CONTRACTOR THE MONEY INSTEAD OF HAVING THEM DO WORK? THAT WAS AN INCONVENIENCE ANYWAY. I MEAN, THAT'S ALL I'M GOING TO TALK ABOUT TODAY. BUT I MEAN, I'VE GOT A LOT MORE.

YOU GUYS GOTTA START THINKING ABOUT IT. BUT, YOU KNOW, SOME PEOPLE SAY, YOU KNOW, IT'S THE PAST PEOPLE. IT'S THIS OR THAT. IT TOOK ME FOUR YEARS JUST TO GET THE CROSSWALKS ON SCOTT FARMS BOULEVARD PAINTED ON, BECAUSE THEY WERE NEVER EVEN PAINTED ON FOUR YEARS. SIR.

ANYONE ELSE WILLING WISHING TO ADDRESS COUNCIL THIS EVENING? OKAY. AT THIS TIME WE'LL CLOSE HEARING AS CITIZENS AND WE WE ARE ALWAYS AVAILABLE OUTSIDE OF THIS MEETING. WE DO HAVE TO SET THE MEETING UP TO KEEP AND ENSURE THAT WE'RE GOING THROUGH THIS EVENING'S AGENDA. AND I'M AVAILABLE ALL WEEK LONG. SO GIVE ME A CALL ANYTIME. AND THE SAME, I THINK GOES FOR THE REST OF THE COUNCIL MEMBERS. WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ON TO ORDINANCES AT THIS TIME. SO WE'RE GOING TO START WITH 42-26. THIRD READING VOTE TO AUTHORIZE A SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION FOR THE HIRING OF THREE FULL TIME FIREFIGHTERS IN THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE ADMINISTRATION.

NOTHING FURTHER. COUNCIL. HEARING. NO COMMENTS. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO PASS THE LEGISLATION. COUNCILMAN YOUNG MADE MADE THE MOTION ROLL CALL. MRS. YOUNG. YES. MR. BORDNER YES. MR. WOLFF YES. MR. BURGER YES. MR. HUNTER. YES. MRS. TAKACS YES. SIX. YES.

[43-26 ]

LEGISLATION PASSES 43-26. THIRD READING VOTE TO AMEND. CHAPTER 925 WASTEWATER RATES. CHAPTER 931 WATER RATES AND TO ENACT CHAPTER 933 UTILITY CAPACITY BOARD ADMINISTRATION. NOTHING.

IN ADDITION. OKAY. COUNCIL. ANY MEMBERS OF COUNCIL WISH TO MAKE COMMENTS? COUNCILMAN WOLFF, I

[00:35:04]

WOULD JUST SAY I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT FOR US TO KEEP IN MIND WE RECEIVED COMMENTS FROM A COUPLE INDIVIDUALS IN THE COMMUNITY WITH CONCERNS AND THOUGHTS ON MOVING THIS PROCESS FORWARD AND WHAT WE SHOULD AND SHOULDN'T DO. SO I JUST WANT TO SAY THAT, YOU KNOW, THIS IS A GOOD START. IT'S NOT THE END ALL BE ALL OF THIS CONVERSATION. SO I THINK IT'S SOMETHING TO KEEP IN MIND AS WE'RE MOVING FORWARD IN ESTABLISHING THIS BOARD. ANY OTHER COMMENTS FROM MEMBERS OF COUNCIL? MR. PRESIDENT I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO PASS LEGISLATION. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? I JUST WANTED TO ADD ONE MORE COMMENT. I ALSO WANTED TO EXTEND MY APPRECIATION TO FORMER COUNCILWOMAN JULIE KRAMER.

JULIE KRAMER, I'M GOING TO PUT YOU ON THE SPOT HERE JUST A LITTLE BIT. BUT I KNOW THAT FORMER COUNCILWOMAN JULIE KRAMER WAS ONE OF THE KEY MEMBERS TO BRING THIS TOPIC.

AND IN THE DISCUSSION OF THIS BODY, WE'VE HAD WORK SESSION MEETINGS WHERE WE'VE SPENT HOURS TALKING ABOUT THIS. I KNOW CITY STAFF'S PUT WORK IN TO PREPARING THIS. OUR FORMER PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER JEREMY HOYT, SPENT TIME IN THIS. MR. AS I KNOW YOU SPENT TIME WITH THIS AS WELL, AND I HAD MADE SOME COMMENTS AT THE LAST MEETING. I WAS TRYING TO PARAPHRASE A LOT OF INFORMATION, AND IF I HAD AT ALL MISCHARACTERIZED YOUR COMMENTS, IT WAS NOT MY INTENT TO DO SO, I, I AND OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS.

I THINK THAT THROUGH THE LAST YEAR IN DISCUSSING THIS ISSUE, WE, I BELIEVE, HAVE REACHED CONSENSUS IN THAT IDEALLY WE WOULD HAVE AN OPTIMAL LEVEL OF GOVERNANCE ON DETERMINING UTILITIES USAGE AND APPROVALS FOR THESE VERY LARGE TYPE USERS, AND WE WOULD NOT WANT THAT IN THE HANDS AND THE DECISION MAKING HANDS OF IN ONE PARTICULAR PERSON. AND I WOULD CLASSIFY THAT AS GOVERNANCE BEING LESS THAN OPTIMAL. AND MY GOAL IS TO PROGRESS THE LEVEL OF GOVERNANCE TO THAT WHICH WOULD BE OPTIMAL. AND I THINK AND AGAIN, I DON'T WANT TO MISCHARACTERIZE ANY OTHER VIEWPOINTS, BUT I THINK THERE'S AN IDEA OF HAVING THE. THE CRITERIA ESTABLISHED AND THEN DETERMINING THE COMPOSITION OF A BOARD VERSUS WHAT WE HAVE BEFORE US IS ESTABLISHING THE BOARD. AND THAT BOARD WOULD MOVE TO ADVANCE AND ESTABLISH AN ADVANCED CRITERIA. AND I THINK THAT MOVING THIS FORWARD AT THIS POINT IN TIME WOULD ALLOW US TO PROGRESS TO A MORE, MORE OPTIMAL LEVEL OF GOVERNANCE THAN WHAT WE HAVE TODAY. SO I WOULD WANT TO PROGRESS THAT WAY IN THE SOONER THAN LATER TIME FRAME. SO I'M NOT GOING TO ME PERSONALLY PURSUE A MOTION TO TABLE THE LEGISLATION. I WOULD WANT TO MOVE IT ALONG THIS EVENING. BUT AGAIN, I THANK YOU FOR THE THOUGHTS AND THE VIEWPOINTS THAT ARE SHARED. MR. BERGER, DO YOU HAVE COMMENTS? NO OTHER, NO. OTHER THAN KATE PARTICIPATING BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE LISTENING. YEAH. IF NO FURTHER DISCUSSION, WE HAVE A MOTION. SO AT THIS TIME I'LL WE'LL DO ROLL CALL. MR. BORDNER. YES. MR. WOLF. YES. MR. BURGER YES. MR. HUNTER. YES.

MRS. TAKACS YES. MRS. YOUNG YES. SIX. YES. LEGISLATION PASSES. OKAY. 44-26 THIRD READING VOTE

[44-26 ]

TO ACCEPT THE DEDICATION OF THE CURRY FARMS, SECTIONS ONE AND TWO, PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE ADMINISTRATION. NOTHING FURTHER. OKAY, COUNCIL. MR. PRESIDENT, I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE LEGISLATION. OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION ROLL CALL, MR. WOLF. YES, MR. BURGER YES. MR. HUNTER. YES.

MRS. YES. MRS. YOUNG. YES. MR. BORDNER. YES. SIX. YES. LEGISLATION PASSES 45-26 THIRD

[45-26 ]

READING VOTE TO ACCEPT THE DEDICATION OF THE JEROME VILLAGE EVER SAW RUN NEIGHBORHOOD SECTION EIGHT PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE ADMINISTRATION. NOTHING FURTHER.

COUNCIL. MR. PRESIDENT, IF I MAY, I SHOULD HAVE MADE THE COMMENT ON THE LAST. RESOLUTION OR ORDINANCE, BUT THIS IS KIND OF A HOUSEKEEPING TYPE OF ITEM WHERE, YOU KNOW, WHEN THERE'S SOME NEW DEVELOPMENT. THE INFRASTRUCTURE, EXCUSE ME, IS PUT IN PLACE AND THEN MAINTAINED BY THE THE USER FOR A PERIOD OF 12 MONTHS PRIOR OR SO. AND THEN ONCE WE INSPECT ENGINEERING, CORBIN AND, AND JAMIE ARE BACK THERE SHAKING THEIR HEADS. YES. SO I'M GOING DOWN THE RIGHT PATH, BUT JUST A, IT'S KIND OF A, JUST A REMINDER THAT, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE THE

[00:40:06]

CITY OF MARYSVILLE SERVES THIS AREA WITH UTILITIES, WE NOW HAVE TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY AFTER THAT 12 MONTH PERIOD. SO THAT MEANS IT'S BEEN INSPECTED. WE'RE GOOD WITH THE CONDITION OF THE OF THE UTILITY. INFRASTRUCTURE. AND NOW WE JUST NEED TO FORMALLY BRING IT INTO OUR OUR AREA OF OWNERSHIP. SO JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT'S CLEAR. AND IT IS AMAZING THAT A LOT OF THIS INFRASTRUCTURE IS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY. AND THAT'S BECAUSE WE'RE THE WATER SUPPLIER, WATER SEWER SUPPLIER FOR THE COUNTY. SO A LOT OF THE ADDRESSES THAT WE'LL SEE WILL BE NOT IN THE CITY LIMITS. SO IT'S AN INTERESTING THING THAT WE AS MARYSVILLE, EXPERIENCE. ANY OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS WISHING TO MAKE COMMENTS ON THIS ITEM? IF NO, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO PASS THE LEGISLATION. SO MOVED. OKAY. ROLL CALL, MR. BERGER. YES. MR. HUNTER. YES. MRS. YES. MRS. YOUNG. YES. MR. BORDNER. YES. MR. WOLFF YES.

[46-26 ]

SIX. YES. LEGISLATION PASSES 46-26 THIRD READING VOTE TO AUTHORIZE A SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION FOR ADDITIONAL SCOPE OF SERVICES, WITH PLANNING NEXT FOR THE 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADMINISTRATION. NO NEW INFORMATION. COUNCIL. MR. PRESIDENT, I MAKE THE MOTION TO PASS THE LEGISLATION. ROLL CALL, MR. HUNTER. YES. MRS. YES. MRS. YOUNG YES. MR. BORDNER. YES. MR. WOLFF. YES. MR. BURGER YES. SIX. YES. LEGISLATION PASSES

[38-26 ]

38-26 SECOND READING PUBLIC HEARING TO APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE A ZONING CODE AMENDMENT TO REVISE THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE MARYSVILLE EAST PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION COUNCIL. WE HAVE TWO BRIEF PRESENTATIONS ON THIS ITEM. GO AHEAD. BART, I THOUGHT YOU WERE DOING MINE AFTER THE SECOND. WHO'S DOING FIRST? OKAY, WE HAVE TWO BRIEF PRESENTATIONS TO UPDATE YOU ON THIS ZONING CODE AMENDMENT TO THE MARYSVILLE EAST PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. THANK, MACKENZIE HAS NO WORRIES. NO WORRIES. AS PREVIOUSLY BEEN BEFORE YOU ALL. MY NAME IS ANNIE RICHARDSON AND I'M WITH THE MARYSVILLE LAND COMPANY. THIS PRESENTATION THAT YOU'RE ABOUT TO SEE IS NEARLY IDENTICAL TO WHAT WE SAW PREVIOUSLY, BUT IT'S BEEN A LITTLE WHILE SINCE YOU ALL HAVE HEARD OUR AMENDMENT, SO JUST WANTED TO GIVE A QUICK UPDATE AND REFRESH EVERYONE'S MEMORIES. SO AS YOU MIGHT REMEMBER, THE PUD AMENDMENT THAT'S BEFORE YOU TODAY FOR SECTIONS ONE AND TWO OR EXCUSE ME, AREAS ONE AND TWO MAKE GOOD ON A COUPLE OF AGREEMENTS THAT WE MADE TO COUNCIL LAST FALL, I BELIEVE.

AND THOSE COUPLE OF THINGS THAT ARE LISTED HERE INCLUDE A CONSOLIDATION THAT WILL MAKE ADMINISTRATIVE. CONFLICTS AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY PART OF THE VARIOUS ZONING CODE RESOLUTIONS THAT WERE PASSED A LITTLE BIT EASIER DOWN THE LINE, SO THAT ONCE WE HAVE PROJECTS BEFORE YOU, WE'RE NOT SEARCHING TO FIND THE STANDARDS THAT APPLY.

ADDITIONALLY, WE HAVE TWO ANNEXATION PARCELS THAT WERE APPROVED PREVIOUSLY, BUT NOW JUST NEED TO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE PUD TO CREATE A COHESIVE DEVELOPMENT. AND THEN ALSO A MODIFY AREA TWO FOR THE CONDITIONAL AND PROHIBITED USES THAT ALIGN WITH THOSE COMMITMENTS LAST FALL. IN THIS MAP, YOU'LL SEE AGAIN, MOSTLY JUST UPDATES, BUT THE ADDITIONAL TWO ANNEXATION PARCELS THAT ARE NOW INCLUDED IN AREA TWO AND ALSO SHOWS JUST A LITTLE BIT MORE CLEARLY HOW THE DEVELOPMENT IS ENCOMPASSED AND HOW THE AREAS ARE DISTRIBUTED. GOOD. THIS EXHIBIT, I THINK, ADDRESSES A COUPLE QUESTIONS THAT HAVE COME UP REGARDING SETBACKS. AND ONE OF THE PROVISIONS THAT'S WITHIN THE SETBACK OR WITHIN THE RESOLUTION IS IT ADDRESSES A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT HOW SETBACKS COULD BE ELIMINATED IF PARCELS ARE COMING UNDER COMMON OWNERSHIP. AND SO YOU'LL SEE ON THE LEFT THAT PREVIOUSLY, IF YOU WERE TO TAKE THE PARCEL LINES THAT EXISTED AND APPLY THE SETBACKS TO THEM, IT WOULDN'T NECESSARILY MAKE A WHOLE LOT OF SENSE IF A DEVELOPMENT WERE TO COVER MULTIPLE PARCELS. AND SO THEREFORE THE SETBACKS HAVE TO BE ELIMINATED WITHIN THOSE PARCELS IF THEY HAVE OR BETWEEN THOSE PARCELS, EXCUSE ME, IF THEY HAVE COMMON OWNERSHIP. AND

[00:45:03]

SO ONE WAY THAT YOU'LL SEE OVER ON THE RIGHT IS THAT RIGHT NOW, AS IT EXISTS TODAY, IF ONE PROJECT WERE TO COME IN, IT COULDN'T BE ENCUMBERED BY THOSE SETBACKS BECAUSE THERE'S COMMON OWNERSHIP BETWEEN THE PARCELS. THE ONE THING THAT SHOULD BE NOTED IS THAT WITHIN THE TEXTUAL, YOU'LL SEE VERY DETAILED DRAWINGS, AS WELL AS LANGUAGE THAT SURROUNDS THE BUXTON MEADOWS BUFFER. AND THAT BUFFER IS TO STAY INTACT NO MATTER HOW THE REST OF THE DEVELOPMENT COMES UNDER OWNERSHIP. AND SO THAT THAT SETBACK LANGUAGE THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY CAME INTO QUESTION WOULD NOT APPLY TO THE BUXTON MEADOWS BUFFER AREA. ON HERE, YOU'LL SEE JUST WHAT WE'VE PROPOSED AND TALKED ABOUT PREVIOUSLY. BUT THE DATA CENTER APPROVED USE THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY PART OF THE VARIOUS ZONING RESOLUTIONS THAT WERE PUT FORTH AND APPROVED, NOW BECOMES A CONDITIONAL USE WITHIN THE CONSOLIDATED ZONING PUD. AGAIN, THE DATA CENTER PROHIBITED AREA, WHICH WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED AND PART OF ONE OF THE LATER ZONING TEXTS, IS STAYS THE SAME. IT'S STILL A PROHIBITED USE. NOTHING CHANGES THERE. THE GROUND PASSENGER DISPATCH, PERSONAL STORAGE, AND MANY WAREHOUSING, RECYCLING CENTERS AND EXTENDED STAY HOTELS WERE PREVIOUSLY CONDITIONAL USE. THOSE ARE NOW PROHIBITED USE. THAT ALL COMES FROM FEEDBACK THAT WE'VE RECEIVED FROM THE THE VARIOUS NEIGHBORS AND ALSO FROM FROM THE COUNCIL. AND THEN ADDITIONALLY, THE GROUNDWATER WELLS THAT WERE APPROVED IN ALL AREAS ARE NOW PROHIBITED IN ALL AREAS WITHIN THE PUD. LAST THING, JUST QUICKLY, BECAUSE WE'RE UP HERE, JUST WANT TO GIVE A QUICK INFRASTRUCTURE UPDATE ON WHERE WE'RE AT WITH THE SCOTS LAWN ROADWAY EXTENSION. YOU'LL SEE HERE THIS DRAWING THAT ALIGNS WITH WHAT WE HAVE PREVIOUSLY SHOWN YOU ALL AS FAR AS THE EXTENSION ROADWAY THAT WE ARE BUILDING, THAT CONSTRUCTION HAS DELAYED JUST A LITTLE BIT AND HAS PUSHED TOWARDS THE END OF THIS YEAR. WE ARE PLANNING TO BREAK GROUND NOVEMBER, DECEMBER, DEPENDING ON WHEN OUR FINAL PLANS ARE ABLE TO BE SIGNED AND APPROVED. WE'RE WORKING THROUGH A COUPLE LAST COMMENTS WITH STAFF, AND WE ARE EXPECTING THAT THAT'LL BE ABOUT A 15 MONTH PROCESS TO GET THAT ROAD COMPLETED. AND LAST ITEM, THIS IS A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT, BUT ADJACENT THE MARYSVILLE SOUTH OVERPASS IS GOING TO BE ALONG THE SAME SCHEDULE AS WHAT IS SCOTTS LAWN ROADWAY. SO WE ARE AGAIN EXPECTING THAT THOSE THAT THAT CONSTRUCTION WILL START AT THE END OF THIS YEAR AND BE ABOUT A 15 MONTH PROCESS. BOTH THOSE PROJECTS ACTUALLY WENT OUT TO BID TODAY. SO WE ARE EXCITED TO SEE HOW THAT COMES BACK AND HOPEFULLY GET STARTED AS QUICKLY AS WE CAN. ANY QUESTIONS? ANY QUESTIONS FOR ANNIE? OH, GO AHEAD, YOU GO FIRST. I JUST I JUST WANT TO SAY YOU YOU ALLUDED TO THAT THESE ARE COMMITMENTS THAT WERE MADE LAST FALL. AND SOME MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY MAY NOT REMEMBER THOSE CONVERSATIONS. SO I APPRECIATE YOU REITERATING THAT THESE WERE COMMITMENTS THAT HAD BEEN PREVIOUSLY MADE. YEAH, I SPENT A LOT OF TIME WITH BUXTON MEADOWS RESIDENTS. A COUPLE OF THEM ARE IN THE AUDIENCE TODAY. AND, YOU KNOW, DATA CENTERS WERE A CONCERN. SO AND I KNOW THAT THERE'S A PROHIBITED AREA. COULD YOU JUST REMIND US, WHICH I DON'T REMEMBER, IF IT'S THE NORTH OR THE SOUTH AREA? I THINK IT'S THE NORTH. YEAH. AND THEN IT WAS CONDITIONAL ON THE I GUESS IT WOULD BE SECTION TWO NOW. OR IS THAT ONE I REMEMBER NOW. YES. YOU'RE SO, SO CONDITIONAL WITH SOME CAPACITY UTILITY STUDY WHICH WE TALKED ABOUT THIS EVENING, ESTABLISHING THAT GOVERNING BODY TO, YOU KNOW, LOOK AT THOSE TYPES OF CONDITIONAL USES.

SO AGAIN, AS MR. PRESIDENT HUNTER ALLUDED TO EARLIER, TRYING TO IMPROVE OUR GOVERNANCE AS IT RELATES TO LARGE WATER USERS, YOU, YOU USERS. ADDITIONALLY, I THINK THAT. THE OTHER CONCERNS WERE, AS IT RELATES TO GROUNDWATER AND, AND DRILLING FOR WELLS PROHIBITED USE. SO SHOULD ELIMINATE THAT CONCERN. I GUESS TO MY TO MY KNOWLEDGE. SO I DO WANT TO JUST SINCERELY APPRECIATE OR THANK YOU FOR CONTINUING TO BE ENGAGED WITH THE COMMUNITY. AND, YOU KNOW, MARYSVILLE LAND COMPANY HAS BEEN A TRUE PARTNER. I MEAN, MULTIPLE PROJECTS THAT WE'VE WORKED THROUGH, VERY INVOLVED WITH COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND

[00:50:03]

GETTING FEEDBACK FROM, FROM THOSE THOSE IMPACTED RESIDENTS AND COMING TO SOME SORT OF AMENABLE CONCLUSION IN THE IN THE LONG RUN. SO I APPRECIATE THAT VERY MUCH. THANK YOU.

COUNCILMAN BERGER. THE ONLY COMMENT I HAD WAS I SAW THE ORIGINAL ROAD THAT WAS GOING TO BE BUILT BESIDE BUXTON MEADOWS. AND, YOU KNOW, BACK TO YOUR POINT, WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT COMMUNITY IDENTITY, CONSISTENCY OF WHAT OUR ROADS SHOULD BE, THE WAY THE ROAD WAS GOING TO BE BUILT BEFORE YOU GUYS TOOK IT OVER, I THINK THE NEIGHBORS WOULD HAVE BEEN HORRENDOUS TO SEE HOW THAT WOULD HAVE BUMPED RIGHT UP TO THEIR PROPERTIES. BUT SINCE YOU GUYS HAVE TAKEN IT OVER, MAKING IT A WINDY ROAD, SETTING IT BACK, PUTTING THE PONDS IN, ALMOST MAKING IT FEEL LIKE A PARK IS SOMETHING WE SHOULD ALL STRIVE TO DO IN THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE, WITH ALL OF OUR ROADS, ALL OF OUR GATEWAYS. WHICH IS WHY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS SO IMPORTANT TO GET PAST, AND WHY THE ZONING PART OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HAS TO BE PASSED. BECAUSE RIGHT NOW WE HAVE A LOT OF BUILDERS THAT JUST WANT TO BUILD HERE WITHOUT WITHOUT THINKING OF THE THOUGHTFULNESS OF OUR RESIDENTS AND HOW THEY WANT TO INTERACT IN OUR COMMUNITY, TO HAVE STREETS THAT HAVE THE ABILITY TO HAVE THE SAME IDENTITY, NO MATTER WHERE YOU LIVE OR WHERE YOU GO OR HOW YOU INTERTWINE WITHIN THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE, NOT EVERY DEVELOPER CAN BUILD THAT. BUT THAT IS NOT THE COMMUNITY'S PROBLEM. THE COMMUNITY'S PROBLEM IS TO BUILD A COMMUNITY THAT PEOPLE ACTUALLY WANT TO LIVE IN, AND ACTUALLY FEEL LIKE GOVERNMENT IS WORKING FOR THEM, NOT AGAINST THEM. SO I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU FOR DOING YOUR DUE DILIGENCE ON THAT ROAD AND HIRING THE RIGHT PEOPLE TO MAKE SURE THE ROAD IS BUILT SO THAT THE RESIDENTS IN BUXTON MEADOWS FEEL A LITTLE BIT, A LITTLE BIT MORE, MAYBE ON THE SAFE SIDE, TO KNOW THAT THEIR CONCERNS ARE BEING HEARD. AND IN GOVERNMENT, YOU'RE NOT ALWAYS GOING TO GET 100% OF YOUR WAY, BUT AT LEAST YOU'RE MOVING TOWARDS A MORE PERFECT UNION EVERY DAY. SO THANK YOU, THANK YOU. AND I JUST WANT TO MENTION, TOO, THAT ANY OF THE RESIDENTS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN HEARING MORE ABOUT THE ROADWAY AND THE LANDSCAPE BUFFERS AND THE THINGS THAT WE'RE DOING TO REALLY HOPE TO MAKE IT A PLEASANT EXPERIENCE FOR EVERYONE THAT THAT TRAVERSES THE ROADWAY, EITHER BY BIKE OR BY CAR OR BY TRUCK, MORE THAN HAPPY TO TO SIT DOWN AND TALK ABOUT THAT BECAUSE WE ARE WE ARE VERY PROUD OF IT AND EXCITED FOR THAT TO COME TO FRUITION. AND I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU FOR ADDRESSING.

AND THE POINT ABOUT THE ELIMINATION OF THE SETBACKS AND THE THERE WAS A I'M SURE THE RESIDENTS WHO MAY SPEAK ABOUT THIS THIS EVENING, AND IF SO, I ENCOURAGE YOU TO DO SO, ASK ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE AND AT WHICH POINT WE WOULD LATER ASK YOU TO BE IN RESPONSE DURING COUNCIL DISCUSSION. BUT THERE'S SPECIFIC LANGUAGE, COMMON PROPERTY LINES, SO NO LONGER APPLY WITH RESPECT TO THESE PARCELS. SO I APPRECIATE YOU ARTICULATING WHAT YOUR INTENT WAS AND WHAT THE INTENT FOR THAT BORDER OF THE BUXTON MEADOWS NEIGHBORHOOD IS. SO THANK YOU. APPRECIATE THAT. ABSOLUTELY. ANYTHING ELSE? OKAY. AND IF YOU ARE FINISHED, WE WILL MOVE TO MR. BARRETT. TIM, IS THIS HOW YOU WANT TO PROCESS OR DO YOU WANT TO HAVE PUBLIC COMMENT FOR WHAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED? WELL, WE'RE WE'RE IN A PUBLIC HEARING NOW, SO OKAY. YOU FEEL FREE TO TO SPEAK. AND THEN THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. AND IF YOU'RE GOING TO MAKE AMENDMENTS, OKAY. ROCKFORD DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENTS ARE PASSED, THEN WE WOULD HAVE.

YEAH, JUST SO WE'RE STILL GIVEN THE ADMINISTRATIVE UPDATES, AND THEN WE'LL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY AS COUNCIL TO MAKE TWO AMENDMENTS TO LEGISLATION, THESE AMENDMENTS THAT ARE APPROPRIATE. WELL, ACTUALLY, THESE AMENDMENTS, TECHNICALLY THE WAY IT SHOULD WORK IS YOU HEAR THESE PRESENTATIONS, COUNCIL CAN MAKE COMMENTS, AND THEN COUNCIL CAN INVITE COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC AND THEN MOTIONS TO AMEND. MOTIONS TO AMEND WOULD THEN BE MADE, PRESUMABLY BY MEMBERS OF COUNCIL, AND THEN IF, IF ANY, OF THE MOTIONS TO AMEND ARE ARE APPROVED, THEN YOU WOULD HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE LEGISLATION, AS AMENDED. SO, AND THEN WHAT WE'RE HEARING, WHAT WE'LL BE HEARING ARE DIFFERENT ITEMS THAT WE WOULD NEED TO CONSIDER TO MAKE AMENDMENTS FOR AS PART OF YOUR PRESENTATION. CORRECT. I GUESS THE THE ONE POINT I WOULD MAKE IS IT WOULD BE GOOD TO GET CITIZEN COMMENTS PRIOR TO THE AMENDMENTS BEING VOTED ON, SO THAT WE'RE HAVING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE LEGISLATION THAT'S ON THE TABLE NOW. OKAY. SO YOU'RE SAYING GATHER CITIZEN COMMENTS ON THE LEGISLATION THAT IS NOW AND THEN MR. BARRETT WOULD PRESENT THESE ITEMS. I THINK HE CAN MAKE THE MOTIONS TO AMEND, AND THEN THE PUBLIC CAN COMMENT ON THE LEGISLATION ON THE TABLE AS WELL AS THE THE THE MOTIONS OR THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS. SO TO PRESENT FIRST. YEAH, BART CAN

[00:55:01]

PRESENT YES. AND THEN YES. BART PRESENTS AND THEN YOU YOU HAVE COUNCIL COMMENTS, CIS AND COMMENTS, AND THEN THE MOTIONS TO AMEND CAN BE MADE. IF ANY OF THE MOTIONS TO AMEND PASS, THEN YOU WOULD HAVE A SECOND PUBLIC HEARING ON THE LEGISLATION AS AMENDED. OKAY. UNDERSTAND, MR. BARRETT, BARBARIC ROCKFORD DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENTS, 5979 DUBLIN ROAD. I APPRECIATE YOU GUYS HEARING THIS. THAT MIGHT SOUND A LOT OF CONFUSION, BUT ORIGINALLY WHEN THIS CAME THROUGH, THE EMPHASIS ON THE CONSOLIDATION OF ANNEXATION ONE, TWO, ONE A, ONE B AND THREE NACO BROUGHT THAT FORWARD BECAUSE THERE WERE SOME GOOD THINGS THAT WE HAD THAN THE LAST ANNEXATION. FROM THE INDUSTRIAL STANDPOINT, THE ELIMINATION OF THE WELLS CONDITIONAL USES, THOSE SORT OF THINGS. SO THEY TOOK ON THE OBJECTIVE OF CONSOLIDATING WHAT ESSENTIALLY WAS THE INDUSTRIAL ABOUT A MONTH AGO. SCOTT, I BELIEVE IT WAS YOURSELF ASKED IF WE WOULD CONSIDER CHANGES TO ANNEXATION THREE AND ANNEXATION ONE, WHICH IS THE RESIDENTIAL, THE. AND THOSE COMPONENTS. SO WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH STAFF FOR THE LAST MONTH, AND WE DO HAVE A FEW ITEMS HERE THAT WE WANT TO PRESENT FOR CONSIDERATION. THESE HAVE NOT WENT THROUGH THE PLANNING COMMISSION, SO IT'S NOT PART OF THEIR RECOMMENDATION. AS TIM JUST ALLUDED TO, IF YOU WANT TO INCORPORATE ANY OF THESE, IT WOULD TAKE A SUPERMAJORITY VOTE TO INCORPORATE THEM IN TO CATCH UP WITH WHAT NACO HAS PRESENTED SO FAR. SO WITH THAT, I PROMISE TO BE BRIEF. I USED ANNIE'S FORMAT HERE. SO ESSENTIALLY ANNEXATION THREE. HERE ARE OUR GOALS THAT THAT WE FOUND. SO THE SUB AREAS. I'M GOING TO JUMP BACK TO THIS PAGE. IF YOU REMEMBER THIS PAGE. THE SUB AREAS HERE ARE VERY RIGID. THEY'RE DEFINED ACREAGE.

THEY'RE DEFINED BOUNDARIES WITHIN THOSE BOUNDARIES. WE DO HAVE DIFFERENT PRODUCTS IN EACH OF THESE. WE'VE GOT THE RETAIL THE MULTIFAMILY, THE THE EMPTY NESTER PATIO HOME, DUPLEXES, PATIO HOMES FOR SALE, SINGLE FAMILY AND TOWNHOMES WITHIN THESE BOUNDARIES AS WE START TO GO THROUGH DESIGN, REVIEW, ETC. STAFF POINTED OUT THAT THEY'RE VERY RIGID. THERE ARE SOME AREAS THAT THEY WANT WANT TO ENCOURAGE US TO MIX THE PRODUCTS. SO THEREFORE, BECAUSE OF THE RIGIDITY OF THAT, THIS FIRST AREA IS THE ABILITY TO EXPAND THE SUB AREA, PERMITTED USES TO ALLOW MIXED TYPES OF HOUSING IN CERTAIN SUB AREAS. SO I'M GOING TO GO THROUGH THE EXPANSION OF THE SUB AREAS. OKAY. WHEN I SAY EXPANSION OF THE SUB AREAS, THIS IS ALLOWING SOME PRODUCTS TO GO INTO A SINGLE FAMILY SUB AREA THAT MAY HAVE BEEN A TOWNHOME PRODUCT OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. AND I'VE GOT SOME EXAMPLES OF WHERE WE'RE ACTUALLY PROPOSING THAT.

THE OTHER STUFF IS WE REALIZE THAT IN OUR TEXT WE WERE MENTIONING DUPLEXES TRIPLEXES SINGLE FAMILY. WE WERE MAKING DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN SINGLE FAMILY AND PATIO HOMES. THERE IS NO DISTINCTION BETWEEN THOSE. SO WORKING WITH STAFF, WE'RE CLEANING UP SOME OF THOSE RESIDENTIAL OR SOME OF THOSE TERMS. SINGLE FAMILY IS BOTH FOR SALE SINGLE FAMILY AND PATIO HOME. THAT IS A SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED PRODUCT. SO WE'RE CHANGING WHERE WE'RE SAYING SINGLE FAMILY DUPLEX THAT TO SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL. SAME THING IN THE TOWNHOMES AND THE DUPLEXES AND TRIPLEXES. ALL OF THOSE ARE SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED PRODUCTS.

SO WE'RE CHANGING THOSE WORDS TO MAKE IT MORE CONSISTENT THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE DOCUMENT.

AND THAT'S THE FIRST EXPANDED SUB AREA PERMITTED USES. AND AGAIN, I'VE GOT EXAMPLES OF THOSE HERE IN JUST A MINUTE. WE ALSO FOUND IN MULTIFAMILY SUB AREA THAT WE WERE REFERRING TO A BONUS DENSITY WHICH IS NO LONGER APPLICABLE. THE BONUS DENSITY PROGRAM ON MULTIFAMILY IS SOMETHING THAT USED TO BE CONSIDERED. BUT IF YOU REMEMBER, THIS WAS ACTUALLY APPROVED ON OCTOBER 28TH OF 2024. THAT'S HOW LONG THESE DEVELOPMENTS TAKE. ON THAT FINAL NOTE, WE MADE 13 CHANGES TO THE CODE. ONE OF THEM WAS TO FIX THE MULTIFAMILY TO 240 UNITS PERIOD.

SO THIS BONUS DENSITY DOES NOT APPLY TO THAT AREA. WE'VE GOT ANOTHER PIECE THAT I'LL MENTION HERE IN A MINUTE, BUT WE'RE ALSO CLEANING UP THE LANGUAGE IN THE COMMERCIAL AREA. THERE IS A DENSITY SECTION IN THE COMMERCIAL. IF YOU REMEMBER, THERE WAS A LITTLE BUMP OUT.

I'M GOING TO SHOW IT HERE. SO ON THE COMMERCIAL DOWN HERE SUB AREA G, WE HAD FIVE ACRES TO THE TOP THAT WE WERE TARGETING FOR VERY SPECIFIC RETAILERS. AT THE POINT IN TIME I HAD ORIGINALLY HAD GOING INTO THAT VOTE ON OCTOBER 28TH, THE ABILITY TO CONVERT THAT BACK, IF THAT RETAIL, THE BIGGER BOXES WEREN'T AVAILABLE TO CONVERT THAT BACK TO APARTMENT.

BUT ON THAT NIGHT OF THE VOTE, WE REMOVED THAT ABILITY. WELL, THE THE TEXT THAT WAS IN THIS SUB AREA, G DEFINED DENSITY AS 16 UNITS AN ACRE. AND IT ALSO PICKED UP A VINYL SIDING FROM THE REST OF IT. SO HERE WE'RE ADDRESSING BOTH OF THOSE ISSUES. THE OTHER PIECE IS PROBABLY MORE IMPORTANT IS THIS CHANGE, EVEN THOUGH THIS CHANGE WOULD BE EFFECTIVE WHENEVER IT'S APPROVED, IF IT IS APPROVED, THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE CODE AND ORDINANCE AND SECTIONS

[01:00:01]

REFERENCED THROUGHOUT THE DOCUMENT ARE STILL MARCH 25TH AND 2024. THAT WAS HARD CODED IN THE DOCUMENT. SO THESE ARE SUMMARY OF THE OBJECTIONS OR THE OBJECT OR THE PURPOSE OF THESE CHANGES. THIS IS THE SAME THING. ANNEXATION THREE. IT'S THE ONE IN THE UPPER LEFT HAND CORNER, IN CASE YOU'RE AWARE WRAPS AROUND TRACTOR SUPPLY. THIS IS JUST FOR PURPOSES. THIS WAS THE ORIGINAL APPROVED PLAN THAT WAS THERE. AGAIN, WE'VE GOT SEVEN DIFFERENT PRODUCTS IN HERE. THIS IS JUST FROM THE EXISTING TABLE. AND USING THE SAME FORMAT THAT NACO DID. SUB AREA A PATIO HOMES, THAT PATIO HOME DEFINITION, WHICH IS NOW SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED. IT ALREADY HAD IN ITS EXISTING. I COULD DO SINGLE FAMILY PATIO HOMES OR SINGLE FAMILY. SO ACTUALLY ON SUDBURY A. THERE ARE NO PROPOSED ADDITIONS TO THE USES ON THAT SUB AREA. B THIS WAS THE CORE SINGLE FAMILY AREA. IT HAS SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED. IN THIS CASE, WE HAVE A SCENARIO WHERE ON TWO SIDES OF IT STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT WE INTERMIX A LITTLE BIT OF BOTH THE TOWNHOMES AND THE DUPLEX TRIPLEX. IT'S VERY IMPORTANT AS I INCREASE USES IN THESE AREAS, THE DENSITY IS NOT INCREASING AT ALL. OUR MAXIMUM DENSITIES ARE LOCKED FROM THAT STANDPOINT. SO IF THESE GO INTO THE AREA, IT DOESN'T AFFORD US THE OPPORTUNITY TO EXCEED THE DENSITIES THAT WAS APPROVED ORIGINALLY. AND THE ORIGINAL DENSITIES WAS CLOSER TO 1000 UNITS. WE'RE NOT GOING TO BE ANYWHERE CLOSE TO 1000 UNITS JUST BASED ON DESIGN SUB AREA C, THIS IS THE THE SUB AREA DEFINED AS DUPLEXES. TRIPLEXES. IT'S ESSENTIALLY IT HAS THE ABILITY TO PUT IN SINGLE FAMILY, DETACHED, SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED. AND THEN THE OTHER USES THAT ARE SURROUNDING A SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. THOSE WERE ALREADY IN THE THE CODE. SO THERE ARE NO CHANGES THERE. THE TOWNHOMES, WHICH IS SUB AREA D THAT IS BEING REDEFINED AS SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED. THAT IS THE ONLY CHANGE SUB AREA F, WHICH IS THE MULTIFAMILY. WE ARE ADDING THE USE OVER TO THE RIGHT OF SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED. THAT WOULD MEAN THAT IN THE MULTIFAMILY THREE STORY, THE DUPLEXES ARE DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH. WE COULD HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY WHERE THOSE WOULD COME SOUTH. SO THAT'S THE PURPOSE OF EACH OF THESE IN THIS TABLE. OTHER TEXT CHANGES THAT DON'T DEAL WITH THE SUB AREAS, LIKE I SAID, SUB AREA. F THAT'S THE MULTIFAMILY WE HAVE IN THERE, A DENSITY SECTION THAT INCLUDED THE BONUS DENSITY DISCUSSION THAT IS BEING COMPLETELY REMOVED, SUB AREA G, WHICH IS THE COMMERCIAL. WE ARE ELIMINATING THE OVERALL DENSITY OF 16 UNITS PER ACRE. AGAIN, WE TOOK AWAY THE ABILITY TO CONVERT THAT 5 OR 6 ACRES TO APARTMENTS IN OUR LAST THING. SO THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT SHOULD HAVE COME OUT. VINYL IS A PERMITTED MATERIAL IN THE COMMERCIAL. IT'S NOT APPLICABLE TO COMMERCIAL. NOBODY BUILDS VINYL THERE. SO WE'RE RECOMMENDING THE REMOVAL OF BOTH OF THOSE ITEMS. SUB AREA H. I ONLY ADDED THIS. THERE'S ACTUALLY NO CHANGE HERE. BUT I ADDED THIS FOR SANCTITY OF MINDSET. WHEN YOU START TALKING ABOUT EXPANDING SUB AREAS WE ARE NOT TOUCHING SUB AREA H OKAY. WE WILL NOT BUILD IN THAT AREA AND WE'RE NOT REDUCING THAT BY TAKING ONE OF THE OTHER SUB AREAS INTO IT. SO I JUST FELT THIS WOULD PUT IN HERE.

AND THEN THE GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND THE CODE REFERENCES FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. AGAIN, IT'S CURRENTLY MARCH 25TH, 2024 AND IT STAYS MARCH 25TH OF 2024. SO THERE'S ACTUALLY NO CHANGE. IT'S JUST BEING STATED THIS PIECES OF THIS DEVELOPMENT HAS WENT THROUGH THE COMMERCIAL AND THE EMPTY NESTER HAS WENT THROUGH A DRB. THE SINGLE FAMILY PATIO HOME IN THE TOWNHOME PRODUCTS ARE IN DRB RIGHT NOW. AND THE THREE STORY AND THE DUPLEXES WILL BE COMING THROUGH DRB HERE SHORTLY. THIS IS THE ILLUSTRATIVE THAT WE FEEL RIGHT NOW IS CLOSE TO. I DON'T WANT TO SAY IT'S FINAL BECAUSE WE'RE NOT THROUGH DRB, BUT THIS IS WHAT IS BEING PRESENTED COMING THROUGH DRB FOR THE INDIVIDUAL SECTIONS.

THIS IS AN EXAMPLE. SO LET ME GO BACK TO THE. IF YOU LOOK AT SUB AREA A AT THE TOP, WHICH IS THE TURQUOISE AND THE BLUE, WHICH IS SINGLE FAMILY, YOU HAVE PATIO HOMES AND SINGLE FAMILY THAT HAVE A RIGIDITY OR OF THE LINE THAT THAT BOUNDS THEM. SO ON. THIS IS MY EXAMPLE.

THE BUBBLE TO THE NORTH IS AN EXAMPLE OF HOW THE THE ROADS ARE LAYING OUT, AND IT WOULD BE DIFFICULT TO FOLLOW THAT LINE. YOU WOULD HAVE THE LINE THAT WE DEFINED WITH THE 15 IF IT WAS RIGID, GOING THROUGH SOME OF THE LOTS, SO WOULD IT BE PATIO HOME? WOULD IT BE SINGLE FAMILY? THE ZONING ACTUALLY ALLOWED BOTH. SO THAT IS ONE OF THE AREAS THAT WE COULD MIX SOME OF THE PATIO HOME AND THE SINGLE FAMILY ON THE SAME STREETS. THE DEVELOPER IS VERY INTERESTED IN THE NORTHERN PIECE BEING NOT AGE RESTRICTED BUT AGE TARGETED. THEY WANT AN EMPTY NESTER COMMUNITY TO THE NORTH AND A LITTLE BIT SEPARATE. BUT THERE ARE AREAS IN HERE THAT THE SINGLE FAMILY AND THE PATIO HOMES WILL MERGE. PROBABLY THE MOST SIGNIFICANT AREA THAT, AND

[01:05:03]

THIS WAS REALLY PUSHED A LOT BY STAFF IS THE TOWNHOMES DOWN HERE IN THE SOUTHERN BUBBLE.

WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A STREET WHERE WE HAVE REAR LOADED TOWNHOMES THAT FACE THE ROAD.

WE'RE GOING TO BOULEVARD THE ROAD, AND THEN WE'LL HAVE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ROAD. SO THAT WOULD BE AN EXAMPLE OF THAT. COULDN'T HAPPEN UNLESS YOU EXPANDED THE USES TO DO THAT. NOW, THIS IS ONLY A COUPLE ACRES HERE, BUT IT GIVES AN ORIENTATION THAT KIND OF INTERMIXES THE TOWNHOMES AND THE SINGLE FAMILY AND MAKES IT ONE COMMUNITY VERSUS INDIVIDUAL PODS. AND THEN THE OTHER PIECE HERE IS JUST KIND OF AN AREA WHERE THE DUPLEXES, THE QUADS AND THE TRIPLEXES ARE INTERMIXED WITH SOME OF THE SINGLE FAMILY AND THE ORIENTATION TO THE ROAD STAFF HAS HAS TALKED TO US ABOUT THE ORIENTATION OF THE ROAD AS WE AS WE GO THROUGH THIS DEVELOPMENT. SO THESE ARE THE EXAMPLES OF THE CHANGES. ONE OTHER THING I WANT TO POINT OUT IS REALLY ANNEXATION. NUMBER ONE, THE FIRST ONE THAT THIS INTERMIXING STORY, THIS INTERMIXING STORY, THIS DEVELOPMENT IS NOT JUST A THREE STORY WALKUP. THREE STORY WALK UPS ARE IN THE CENTER. WE DID THAT WITH A TOWNHOME PRODUCT AROUND THE OUTSIDE. SO THIS IS YOUR THREE STORY THAT WILL BE PART OF FOUNDRY 33. AND THEN WE ARE MIXING IT ON BOTH SIDES WITH TOWNHOMES TO ACTUALLY BUFFER THAT. AND THAT WAS SOME OF THE DISCUSSION THAT WE HAD WITH THE EXISTING CONDO OWNERS, WHICH ARE JUST TO THE NORTH IN WATKINS GLEN. AND THAT WAS ALSO A REASON THAT NOT A SINGLE PERSON SPOKE PUBLICLY AGAINST ANNEXATION. THREE THE NIGHT WE DID IT. AND, MR. HUNTER, YOU WERE THE ONE THAT MENTIONED THAT THAT WAS KIND OF A SPECIAL NIGHT BECAUSE THERE WASN'T ANY CITIZEN COMPARED TO WHAT SOME OF THE OTHER MEETINGS WERE. SO THIS IS SOME ILLUSTRATIVE THAT WE PUT ON THE ENTRANCE COMING IN. THIS IS OFF THE RETAIL ON THE TOP, AND THIS IS IN THE INTERNAL ROUNDABOUT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PROJECT, THE FENCE, THE TREES AND THE PARKWAY TYPE OF THING. SO WITH THAT, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR. BURKE. I JUST WANT TO ALSO REITERATE A COUPLE THINGS IN REGARDS TO OUR PROCEDURE THIS EVENING. SO IT MAY BE A LITTLE CONFUSING BECAUSE WHAT WE ARE HEARING, WHAT THE LEGISLATION BEFORE US IS AND ISN'T AN AMENDMENT TO THE MARYSVILLE LAND COMPANY, THE COMMERCIAL PIECE AND WHAT WE WOULD DO AFTER. THANK YOU FOR THE UPDATES, BUT WE WOULD ENTERTAIN AND HEAR CITIZEN COMMENTS AT THAT TIME. WHAT MR. BURKE HAS JUST PRESENTED ARE ADDITIONAL AMENDMENTS THAT WE WOULD THEN CONSIDER POST PUBLIC COMMENT, AND I WOULD SAY IF WE AS COUNCIL, WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO DISCUSS THESE AMENDMENTS EITHER NOW OR WE COULD WAIT, ALLOW US CITIZENS TO SPEAK HERE, MAKE COMMENTS, AND THEN WE COULD DELIBERATE FURTHER ON POTENTIAL AMENDMENTS AT THAT TIME. MR. BORDEN, DO YOU HAVE QUESTIONS? MR. PRESIDENT, IF I MAY MAKE A RECOMMENDATION JUST FOR CLARITY AND EASE? I THINK WE JUST STARTED WITH COMMERCIAL AND THEN GO TO THE RESIDENTIAL, WHICH IS THE LEGISLATION AS PRESENTED ALREADY. CORRECT. OKAY. THANK YOU, MR. BORDNER. I AGREE AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU, MR. BURKE. AT THIS TIME, I INVITE CITIZENS WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM TO APPROACH THE PODIUM. ARE THERE ANY CITIZENS WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ABOUT THIS ITEM? AND THEN WE ASK THAT YOU STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. HI, MY NAME IS MICHELLE NICODEMUS. I LIVE AT 14183 OXFORD DRIVE IN MARYSVILLE, WHERE I AM PART OF THE BUXTON MEADOWS COMMUNITY. I HAD A WHOLE LITTLE PAGE PRINTED OUT THAT I WAS GOING TO READ FOR MY NEIGHBOR, DOUG JENKINS, BUT ANNIE ADDRESSED PART OF THAT FOR US. WE ARE STILL ASKING TO REQUEST THAT ANY. WE WOULD JUST LIKE IT IN WRITING. BASICALLY. I KNOW YOU MENTIONED THAT NONE OF THE BORDERS THAT YOU'VE DEALT WITH US IN JOLLY ROAD WERE GOING TO CHANGE, BUT WE LOOKED THROUGH THE 440 PAGE AMENDMENT STUFF AND WE DIDN'T SEE ANYTHING SPECIFICALLY RELATING TO JOLLY ROAD OR MARY OR BUXTON. MEADOWS SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED THAT THE ELIMINATION OF SETBACKS CLAUSE WOULD NOT APPLY TO US. SO I GUESS WE WOULD JUST LIKE OUR NAMES UP IN LIGHTS IN WRITING, SAYING THAT WE WILL NOT BE AFFECTED IF THE PROPERTIES CHANGE HANDS. OKAY. ALSO, THIS IS COMING IN FROM THE FLY FROM MY NEIGHBOR. WE WOULD ALSO LIKE TO ASK IF THE LANGUAGE PROTECTING OUR PROPERTY COULD BE APPROVED DURING THE NEXT SECOND READING, OR AS SOON AS POSSIBLE IF THERE IS A NEXT SECOND READING, BECAUSE OF SOME OF THE CHANGES MET, I GUESS. THANK YOU. AND JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, THE WRITING THAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT IS THE ONE THAT YOU JUST

[01:10:04]

MENTIONED, CORRECT? OH, I'M SORRY. NO, I WAS NOW I'M CONFUSED. I WAS I HAD A WHOLE SOMETHING I WAS GOING TO READ FOR MY NEIGHBORS REGARDING THE ELIMINATION OF SETBACKS, BUT IT WAS ADDRESSED BY ANNIE. BUT WE WOULD STILL JUST LIKE IT PLACED IN WRITING THAT OUR NEIGHBORHOOD SPECIFICALLY ARE MENTIONED THAT THE ELIMINATION OF SETBACKS WOULD NOT APPLY.

OUR AGREED SETBACKS WOULD NOT APPLY. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR COMMENTS.

ANY OTHER CITIZENS WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? GOOD EVENING. I'M AMBER DARST, 16,000 JOLLEY ROAD, MARYSVILLE. I JUST WANT TO KIND OF PIGGYBACK ON WHAT MICHELLE JUST BROUGHT UP. BUT WHEN ANNIE WAS SPEAKING THIS EVENING, I DIDN'T HEAR ANYTHING REGARDING JOLLY ROAD, SO I DON'T KNOW IF THAT WAS JUST KIND OF AN OVERSIGHT, BUT I JUST DIDN'T. I DID HEAR THAT THAT I DID NOT HEAR THAT ANYTHING WAS MENTIONED REGARDING KEEPING THOSE SETBACKS AS AGREED UPON FOR JOLLY ROAD IN THE FUTURE. SO I'M JUST GOING TO KIND OF SECOND THAT AND SAY WE WOULD REALLY APPRECIATE THOSE BEING ADDED IN, IN WRITING INTO THAT DOCUMENT. THANK YOU. OKAY. ANY OTHER CITIZENS WISHING TO COMMENT ON THIS ITEM? HI, LYNN MILLER, JOLLY ROAD, I GUESS I WOULD LIKE TO REINFORCE WITH BOTH. MY NEIGHBOR SAID TO JUST REINFORCE THE FACT THAT AMBER AND OUR NEIGHBORS SPENT 6 OR 7 MONTHS LAST YEAR CARVING THESE OUT AND WORKING WITH BART ACTUALLY QUITE A BIT, AND WE'D LIKE TO SEE IT IN WRITING THAT OUR SETBACKS WILL REMAIN WHERE THEY ARE. OKAY. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER CITIZENS WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM TONIGHT? OKAY. HEARING NONE, WE'LL CLOSE. CITIZEN COMMENTS FOR THIS TIME AT THIS TIME WOULD BE COUNCIL COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS? COMMENTS FROM MEMBERS OF COUNCIL. MR. BORDNER I THINK SO, PROCEDURALLY I'M NOT. DID YOU HAVE DID YOU HAVE SOMETHING SPECIFIC? PROCEDURALLY, I DON'T KNOW SPECIFICALLY WHAT I THINK IS GOING TO PUT A SLIDE. OKAY. PROPOSED AMENDMENT AND THIS IS FOR THE THE. MR. BARACK'S PIECE OF IT. I DID WANT TO GIVE THE MARYSVILLE LAND COMPANY AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS PRESENTED BY THE CITIZENS. MR. ROAD CAMP, IF YOU WOULD. AND I'LL JUST REITERATE THE REQUEST AND APOLOGIZE IF I DON'T GET THIS VERBATIM. BUT THERE WAS A REQUEST BY CITIZENS TO HAVE IN WRITING THAT THE. THE BUFFERS THAT ARE ESTABLISHED ALONGSIDE BUXTON MEADOWS AND THE BUFFERS AND THE SETBACKS THAT ARE ESTABLISHED ALONG JOLLY ROAD ARE IN WRITING.

AND NOW THAT MAY BE THE CASE. I'M NOT. I HAVE TO REREAD IT ALL. BUT IF YOU COULD COMMENT ON THAT ITEM. FIRST OF ALL, DICK CAMP, MARYSVILLE LAND COMPANY, 8000 WALTON PARKWAY, NEW ALBANY, I YOU SUMMARIZED IT FINE, MR. PRESIDENT. I THINK THERE'S A FUNDAMENTAL MISUNDERSTANDING. THE SETBACK ELIMINATION PROVISION IS IS TO THERE TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE WHERE AN INTERNAL PARCEL LINE OR DIVISION BETWEEN TWO PARCELS THAT WOULD OTHERWISE HAVE A SETBACK IF THEY COME UNDER COMMON OWNERSHIP, THAT SETBACK WOULD GO AWAY SO THAT A BUILDING, FOR EXAMPLE, COULD GO ACROSS A PARCEL LINE. THE BUXTON MEADOWS MOUNDS AND BUFFERING AND THE JOLLY AND SETBACKS AND THE JOLLY ROAD SETBACKS AND BUFFERING ARE ON THE PERIMETER OF THE SITE. AND SO THEY THEY THEY COULD NEVER BE. I CAN'T THEY COULD NEVER BE PART OF, OF, OF THAT ELIMINATION BECAUSE THEY'RE ALWAYS ON THE OUTER BORDER. SO, SO I THINK THE, THE, THE LANGUAGE AS IT'S CURRENTLY WRITTEN GIVES THOSE RESIDENTS THE GUARANTEE THEY NEED. I, I THINK IT'S NOT SO MUCH. I MEAN, THE GUARANTEE IS IN THERE. AND WE SPENT A LOT OF TIME GETTING SOME VERY SPECIFIC LANGUAGE FOR, FOR BOTH OF THOSE SECTIONS. SO I, I DON'T KNOW THAT ANY FURTHER WRITTEN COMMITMENT IS NECESSARY BECAUSE AGAIN, THOSE WOULD NEVER BE INTERNAL SETBACKS. THEY'RE ALWAYS ON THERE ON THE PERIMETER. WE HAVE

[01:15:09]

NO INTENTION OF BUYING HALF OF BUXTON MEADOWS AND, YOU KNOW, SO AND I THINK THE ONLY WAY IT WOULD BE POSSIBLE IS IF FOR SOME REASON, YEAH, THE YOUR PROPERTY WOULD ENCOMPASS THOSE PROPERTIES, RIGHT? YEAH. AND IN WHICH CASE YOU WOULD HAVE A SHARED OR AN ADJACENT PROPERTY WITHIN WHAT YOU HAD OWNED. YES. AND, AND AGAIN, THEY'RE, THEY'RE ON THE PERIMETER. WE'VE PRETTY WELL, WE, WE IN THOSE AREAS HAVE SET OUR LIMITS. AND, AND SO I DON'T KNOW THAT ANY FURTHER CLARIFICATION IS NECESSARY. IF I MAY SUGGEST. MR. ROGGENKAMP, IT MAY BE HELPFUL FOR THE PROPERTY OWNERS IF WE COULD. AND THIS COULD BE LATER IN A MEMO OR WHATEVER.

JUST TO STATE CLEARLY IN THE PUD LANGUAGE, THESE ARE THE SETBACKS THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT IT SAYS THAT'S IN THE PUD TEXT. THEREFORE, THAT IS THE LEGAL LANGUAGE. AND THAT WILL REMAIN FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT IN THAT PROPERTY. I THINK YOU JUST WANT TO SEE EXACTLY WHERE THOSE SETBACKS ARE THAT ARE ALONG YOUR ROAD. AND THAT IS IN THE I THINK THAT'D BE EASY JUST TO POINT IT OUT. THE EXHIBIT IS IS PART OF THE TEXT AND IT'S DESCRIBED IN THE TEXT. I REALLY AMBER, I KNOW WE SPENT A LOT OF TIME ON THIS AND IT'S, IT'S IN THERE FOR, FOR, FOR YOU AND, AND FOR BUXTON. I REALLY, AGAIN, I HAVE A HARD. WE'VE CREATED SOME CONFUSION AND, AND THAT'S REGRETTABLE. BUT AS I LOOK AT THE TEXT. YOU'RE THOSE, THOSE BUFFERS AND THOSE LANDSCAPING COMMITMENTS AND SETBACKS ARE ARE SACROSANCT. THEY, THEY WOULDN'T FALL VICTIM TO THAT ELIMINATION OF SETBACK PROVISIONS. SORRY, CAN WE JUST CAN WE JUST GO TO THAT SLIDE? I THINK MAYBE THIS WILL BE HELPFUL JUST TO GET ON PUBLIC COMMENT. THE ONE THAT HAD THE TWO ZONING EXHIBITS SIDE BY SIDE. YEAH. BECAUSE I THINK THAT THAT'S WHAT THE AMENDMENT IS ADDRESSING. BUT TO MR. ROGAN CAMP'S POINT, THE PERIMETER IS AND I CAN'T REMEMBER WHAT THE SETBACK WAS, IF IT WAS 450 OR 250FT, BUT IT WAS 30FT OF TREES AND MOUNDING. IT'S SOME, SOME OPACITY. I, I, I REMEMBER, I MEAN, IT'S BEEN TWO YEARS, BUT, BUT I REMEMBER IT BEING LIKE 6 OR 12 FOOT OF MOUNDING PLUS 18 FOOT OF TREES, 80% OPACITY WITHIN FIVE YEARS. AND THEN THE SETBACK FROM THE PERIMETER WAS, I DON'T REMEMBER IF IT WAS LIKE 250 OR 450FT. AND IT CHANGED SOME WITH DEPENDING ON WHAT THE ROAD WAS. YEAH. I MIGHT ADD TO THAT, THE ROADWAY WAS DESIGNED INTENTIONALLY SO THAT YOU WE ARE GOING TO BE MORE THAN THAT WITH BUILDINGS AWAY FROM THAT, THAT PERIMETER BOUNDARY AND, AND THOSE DETENTION BASINS ACTUALLY SIT BETWEEN THE ROADWAY AND BUXTON MEADOWS VERY SPECIFICALLY TO INCREASE THAT BUFFER AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. COULD YOU GO UP ONE MACKENZIE, WHERE YOU'VE GOT THE THE BEFORE AND AFTER MAPS? YEAH. THERE YOU GO. YEAH. SO I IT WE'LL KEEP IN MIND THAT THE THE BUXTON MEADOW BUFFERS WERE DONE FIRST. THAT WAS PART OF THAT I THINK MIGHT HAVE BEEN THE SECOND ANNEXATION OR THE FIRST I LOSE TRACK. AND SO THOSE WERE LAID OUT SPECIFICALLY THE JOLLY ROAD SETBACKS WERE A LITTLE BIT OF A DIFFERENT SITUATION BECAUSE IT. BUXTON YOU HAD HOUSES DIRECTLY BACKING UP TO THE DEVELOPMENT WHERE IN. ALONG JOLLY ROAD THEY WERE ACROSS THE STREET YOU HAD DIFFERENT UPWARD ELEVATION ON THE WEST SIDE. AND SO THERE'S NOT NECESSARILY AS MUCH IN THE WAY OF MOUNDING AS THERE IS BUFFERING AND TREES. BUT BOTH OF THOSE, AS I LOOK AT THIS EXHIBIT, EACH BOTH OF THESE EXHIBITS, FRANKLY, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, THOSE AREAS ARE ON THE PERIMETER. AND, AND I JUST, I, THEY'RE NOT LIKE I SAID, THEY'RE NOT GOING TO FALL VICTIM TO THAT ELIMINATION OF SETBACKS BETWEEN PARCELS THAT COME UNDER COMMON OWNERSHIP.

BECAUSE EVEN IF EVEN IF EVERYTHING WAS, WAS UNDER COMMON OWNERSHIP, THAT'S ACTUALLY AS IT IS NOW ALMOST YOU'D STILL HAVE THAT THOSE PERIMETER BUFFERS. I'M OPEN TO ANY SUGGESTIONS, BUT I, I DON'T QUITE KNOW WHAT ELSE TO DO WITH IT. TO MAKE IT MORE SPECIFIC, I THINK. YEAH, I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. I THINK IT'S LIKE, I THINK THERE WAS THE REQUEST. LET'S HAVE THIS IN WRITING. I THINK IN YOUR VIEWPOINT. WELL, HERE IT IS.

AND IT'S IT'S IN WRITING. IT'S JUST IN THE FORM OF AN IMAGE AND A LOT OF TEXT THAT DESCRIBES SPECIFICALLY WHAT THOSE BUFFERS ARE. AND WE WILL HAVE ALSO A RECORD OF THE

[01:20:02]

MEETING MINUTES OF THIS VERY MEETING, WHERE YOUR COMMENTS WILL BE STATED. SO THAT CAN THAT WILL BE PRESERVED AS RECORD. SO MY THOUGHT IS PERHAPS THAT WOULD SUFFICE. BUT I UNDERSTAND YOUR INTENT. AND IF IF IT HELPS, MR. PRESIDENT, TO TO REINFORCE THAT, WE'LL SAY RIGHT NOW WE ARE COMMITTED THAT THE BUFFERS AND THE LANDSCAPING AND THE MOUNDING, AS OUTLINED IN THE TEXT AROUND BUXTON MEADOWS AND ALONG THE JOLLY ROAD NORTHERN SECTION, WILL NOT CHANGE. OKAY. AND WE'LL GET THAT IN THE MEETING MINUTES VERBATIM. OKAY. THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS FROM MEMBERS OF COUNCIL FOR THE MARYSVILLE LAND COMPANY PORTION OF THIS. OKAY, SO HEARING NONE, WE'LL ALSO WE HEARD INFORMATION PRESENTED FROM MR. BARRICK REGARDING DIFFERENT UPDATES, SOME PERHAPS CLASSIFIED AS COMMERCIAL, BUT A LOT RESIDENTIAL AS WELL. AND ARE THERE ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS YOU. COUNCIL THE COUNCIL MEMBERS HAVE REGARDING THOSE ITEMS? MR. BORDNER MR. BURKE, JUST FOR. MY MEMORY, THERE WAS A MEETING. I SAT IN THIS VERY SEAT. WE LOOKED AT 7 OR 8 DIFFERENT ITEMS THAT WE WERE CHECKING, RIGHT. THERE WERE A LOT OF CONCERNS RELATIVE TO TIFS, AND I THINK AFFORDABILITY WAS ONE WAS WAS ONE ONE OF THE WAS ONE OF THE CONCERNS. AND WE WERE ADDRESSING. A LOT OF SORRY ABOUT 50 WITH MY BAG. EXCUSE ME. CAN DO YOU HAVE THAT LIST HANDY? BUT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THE 13 ITEMS WE CHANGED ON THE LAST EVENING? NO, THAT WAS SO THE 13 WERE MAYBE 13, 11 OR WHATEVER THE NUMBER ENDED UP BEING. THAT WAS AFTER. BUT I THINK WHEN WE ORIGINALLY APPROVED THIS, WE TALKED ABOUT THE SENIOR SNOWBIRD HOMES. IT WAS SOMETHING THAT I WASN'T, YOU KNOW, INTO, IN TUNE WITH. I HAD A HANDFUL OF RESIDENTS ASK ABOUT THE, THE, THE, THE, I CALL THEM SNOWBIRD HOMES BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT WE REFERRED TO IT TWO YEARS AGO. IT WAS LIKE A 55 AND OLDER, I THINK COMMUNITY AND I WANT TO SAY IT WAS IN THE BLUE. SO WHAT WOULD BE THE BLUE SECTION? IS THAT STILL REMAIN THE SAME? YES. AND THEN WE HAD SOME LEVEL OF ENTRY, ENTRY LEVEL HOME. MAYBE THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE REFERRING TO. IS THE PATIO HOME. NO, NO. SO THE PATIO HOME IS THE EMPTY NESTER. SO WE HAVE I WENT BACK AND WATCHED THE, THE THE LAST APPROVAL NIGHT VIDEO. AND YOU DID EXPRESS INTEREST IN EMPTY NESTER PRODUCT FOR THAT TARGET MARKET, BECAUSE YOU DID HAVE A NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT, THAT SPOKE FOR THAT. SO THE TURQUOISE AT THE TOP ON ON THIS IMAGE HERE IT WELL, I'M SORRY, I'M NOT ON THERE, BUT BUT THE THE PIECE AT THE TOP THERE IS TARGETED FOR PATIO HOMES, SINGLE STORY, MAYBE ONE AND A HALF STORY PRODUCTS. AND LIKE I SAID, THE DEVELOPER STILL WANTS TO HAVE THE MAJORITY OF THOSE TARGETED TO THE 55 AND OVER. AND THAT WOULD BE A FOR SALE PRODUCT. NOW, THE WILCOX COMMUNITY PIECE, WHICH IS CLOSER TO TRACTOR SUPPLY AND WRAPS AROUND IT, THAT IS A 55 AND OVER FOR LEASE OR FOR RENT PRODUCT. SO THERE ARE TWO PRODUCTS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT. OUT OF THE 7 OR 8 PRODUCTS, IT'S ACTUALLY TARGETING THAT EMPTY NESTER MARKET. SO THE BLENDING IS NOT GOING TO TAKE ALL THE EMPTY NESTER PIECES THAT ARE FOR SALE AND BLEND IT WITH ALL THE TWO STORY FAMILY. IT'S GOING TO KEEP THEM SEGMENTED AT THE NORTH, BUT THERE ARE AREAS BECAUSE OF THE RIGIDITY OF THE, THE LINE WHERE THOSE ARE PROBABLY GOING TO MIX BACK AND FORTH, OKAY, A LITTLE BIT, BUT IT'S NOT GOING TO BE YOU HAVE ONE SINGLE FAMILY, THEN A PATIO HOME, ONE SINGLE FAMILY, THAT THAT MIX IS NOT BEING DONE. SO IT'S ONLY ON THAT BOUNDARY BETWEEN THE BLUE AND THE TURQUOISE THAT, THAT THIS MIXING ACTUALLY WILL OCCUR BECAUSE THE ROADS HAVE CHANGED. OKAY. BUT OTHER THAN THAT, LIKE THE OTHER COMMITMENTS THAT WE REVIEWED, THAT IS CORRECT TWO YEARS AGO REMAIN. THERE IS AN AFFORDABLE ELEMENT TO BOTH THE PATIO HOMES AND THE SINGLE FAMILY ON THIS. NOW IT IS NOT STARTER HOMES. SO I MEAN, BUT BUT IT IS IT IS A A MIDDLE MARKET THAT IS TARGETED TO BE MORE AFFORDABLE THAN SOME OTHER PRODUCTS IN MARYSVILLE. OKAY, OKAY. THANKS. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS REGARDING THE POTENTIAL AMENDMENTS HERE? SO WE'VE HEARD YOU PROPOSE OR YOU'VE CONSIDERED PRESENTED A NUMBER OF AMENDMENTS. AND THEN MY UNDERSTANDING, MR. ALLEN,

[01:25:04]

DID YOU HAVE A COMMENT TO MAKE? NO, I JUST WANTED. YEAH. REGARDING THE AMENDMENTS, IT APPEARS THAT MR. BURKE IS PROPOSING SIX AMENDMENTS, SIX SEPARATE AMENDMENTS, THREE PERTAIN TO USE AND THREE PERTAIN TO CHANGES IN THE TEXT. IS THAT CORRECT? THAT IS CORRECT. JEFF SUMMARIZED THIS. CORRECT. SO I AND HE'S YEAH, HE'S ALREADY SUMMARIZED, I THINK, ALL THESE AMENDMENTS IN HIS PRESENTATION. SO I THINK AT THIS POINT, COUNCIL, IF COUNCIL FEELS THAT THEY WANT TO ADDRESS THESE AMENDMENTS, THEN MOTIONS TO AMEND SHOULD BE MADE PIECEMEAL. YOU CAN START WITH THE USE AMENDMENTS WITH THE VERY FIRST ONE AND THEN WORK YOUR WAY DOWN THE LIST. SO WOULD THERE BE A MEMBER OF COUNCIL WISHING TO MAKE A MOTION TO AMEND SUB AREA B AND ADD SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED AS A PERMITTED USE? AND IF SO, MAKE THAT MOTION. MR. PRESIDENT, IF I UNDERSTOOD YOU CORRECTLY, I WILL MAKE SUB SUB B ADD SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED TO THE REPEAT AS A PERMITTED USE AS A PERMITTED USE. SO YOU'RE MAKING A MOTION. CORRECT. MAKING A MOTION. THAT'S AMENDMENT. IT DOES REQUIRE IT'LL REQUIRE FIVE VOTES TO PASS. OKAY. SO WE HAVE A MOTION. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION. ROLL CALL PLEASE MRS. TACTIC. YES. MRS. YOUNG YES. MR. BORDNER. YES. MR. WOLFF. YES. MR. BURGER YES. MR. HUNTER. YES. SIX. YES. MOTION PASSES. ANY COUNCIL MEMBER WISHING TO MAKE A MOTION TO AMEND SUB AREA D AND ADD SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED AS A PERMITTED USE. MR. PRESIDENT, I WILL. I SUB AREA D ADD SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED AS A PERMITTED USE. YOU'RE MAKING THE MOTION.

MAKING THE MOTION? YES, WE HAVE A MOTION. ALL IN. ROLL CALL PLEASE. MRS. YOUNG YES. MR. BORDNER YES. MR. WOLFF YES. MR. BURGER YES. MR. HUNTER. YES. MRS. TECH YES. SIX. YES. MOTION PASSES. MR. PRESIDENT, I MAKE THE MOTION TO ADD SUB SUB AREA F A SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED AS A PERMITTED USE. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION FOR SUB AREA F TO ADD SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED AS A PERMITTED USE ROLL CALL. MRS. YOUNG YES. MR. BORDNER YES. MR. WOLFF YES. MR. BURGER YES. MR. HUNTER YES. MRS. TECH YES. SIX. YES. MOTION PASSES. NEXT IS TEXT AMENDMENTS. SO THE FIRST WOULD BE A MOTION FOR SUB AREA F TO REMOVE DENSITY BONUSES. THE DENSITY BONUS REFERENCE.

MR. PRESIDENT I MAKE THE MOTION TO SUB AREA F TO REMOVE THE DENSITY BONUS REFERENCE. AND IT SHOULD SAY BONUS. CORRECT. NOT BONES. YES. OKAY. THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION.

ROLL CALL PLEASE. MR. BORDNER YES. MR. WOLF. YES. MR. BURGER YES. MR. HUNTER. YES. MRS. TACTIC. YES. MRS. YOUNG YES. SIX. YES. MOTION PASSES. MR. PRESIDENT, I MAKE THE MOTION TO SUB AREA G TO REMOVE THE DENSITY SECTION AND G IS RETAIL. OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION ROLL CALL, PLEASE, MR. WOLF. YES, MR. BURGER YES. MR. HUNTER. YES. MRS. TACTIC. YES. MRS. YOUNG YES. MR. BORDNER YES. SIX. YES. MOTION PASSES AND MR. PRESIDENT, I WILL SUB AREA G REMOVE VINYL AS PERMITTED MATERIAL. SO YOU'RE MAKING A MOTION MAKING THE MOTION. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. ROLL CALL PLEASE, MR. BURGER. YES. MR. HUNTER. YES. MRS. YES. MRS. YOUNG YES. MR. BORDNER. YES. MR. WOLF. YES. SIX. YES. MOTION PASSES. OKAY. THIS LEGISLATION IS AT SECOND READING PUBLIC HEARING, AND I WILL AT THIS TIME ASK IF THERE ARE ANY CITIZEN COMMENTS.

THIS WOULD BE IN REGARD TO THE LEGISLATION, AS AMENDED THIS EVENING. OKAY. SEEING NONE, THIS WILL BE BACK FOR THIRD READING VOTE ON NOVEMBER 9TH. 47-26 SECOND READING PUBLIC

[47-26]

HEARING TO APPROVE THE 10TH AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT OF THE MARYSVILLE JEROME TOWNSHIP JOINT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AUTHORIZING THE INCLUSION OF CERTAIN ADDITIONAL PROPERTY WITHIN SAID DISTRICT KNOWN AS THE HUNTINGTON BANK JEROME VILLAGE AMENDMENT ADMINISTRATION. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. CITIZENS, ANY CITIZENS WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? OKAY. SEEING NONE. COUNCIL. ANY QUESTIONS? COMMENTS FROM MEMBERS OF

[01:30:04]

COUNCIL. OKAY. SEEING NONE. THIS WILL BE BACK FOR THIRD READING VOTE ON NOVEMBER 9TH,

[48-26]

2026. 48-26 SECOND READING PUBLIC HEARING TO AMEND THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. CITY OF MARYSVILLE, OHIO TO PROVIDE AMENDMENTS TO TRAFFIC. MARYSVILLE CITY CODE, SECTIONS 301.02 THROUGH 371.12 TO PROVIDE FOR PENALTIES. TO PROVIDE FOR CODIFICATION, TO PROVIDE FOR SEVERABILITY. CONFLICTING ORDINANCES TO PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. ADMINISTRATION. THERE IS NO FURTHER COMMENT. CITIZENS ANY CITIZENS WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. COUNCIL. ANY QUESTIONS? COMMENTS FROM MEMBERS OF COUNCIL. THIS WILL BE BACK FOR THIRD READING VOTE ON NOVEMBER 9TH, 2026. 49-26

[49-26]

SECOND READING PUBLIC HEARING TO AMEND THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. CITY OF MARYSVILLE, OHIO TO PROVIDE AMENDMENTS TO GENERAL OFFENSES. MARYSVILLE CITY CODE, SECTIONS 513.01 THROUGH 545.18 TO PROVIDE FOR PENALTIES. TO PROVIDE FOR CODIFICATION. TO PROVIDE FOR SEVERABILITY. TO REPEAL CONFLICTING ORDINANCES, TO PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

ADMINISTRATION. NOTHING FURTHER. CITIZENS. ANY CITIZENS WISHING TO SPEAK ON 49-26 COUNCIL. THIS WILL BE BACK FOR THIRD READING VOTE ON NOVEMBER 9TH, 2026. 50-26 FIRST READING

[50-26]

INTRODUCTION TO ADOPT A CAPITAL BUDGET FOR 2027. AND I HAVE A PRESENTATION TO PULL UP. OKAY.

SO WHILE THAT'S BEING PULLED OUT, I. NOTICED IF WE'RE GOING THROUGH THIS EVENING THAT THIS PORTION OF THE BUDGET, THE CAPITAL BUDGET ITEMS IN IT. SO. CAN PUT THIS WHEREVER YOU LIKE.

I WILL NOT DICTATE THAT. I WOULD SUGGEST, HOWEVER, THAT PUTTING IT IN THE CAPITAL ORDINANCES BECAUSE. THANK YOU SIR. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS NOT PART OF. I, I WONDER, I WONDER, I THOUGHT YOU DIDN'T EMAIL ME OR I THOUGHT, WELL, THERE HAS TO BE SOME KIND OF EXPLANATION FOR IT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. SO WHAT WE HAVE UP HERE IS ACTUALLY SOME SLIDES THAT ARE ABOUT THE OVERALL BUDGET. YOU KNOW, I, I DON'T HONESTLY KNOW WHICH WAY BEST TO HANDLE THIS. MY THOUGHT IS JUST KIND OF GO OVER THE BUDGET AS A WHOLE. AND THEN WE CAN, YOU KNOW, APPROVE THE ORDINANCES. I MEAN, I'LL, YOU KNOW, THE PERSONNEL ORDINANCE IS KIND OF ITS OWN THING. SO WE'LL PAUSE THERE FOR A MOMENT. BUT AT LEAST THE FIRST THREE, THE CAPITAL BUDGET, THE APPROPRIATIONS ORDINANCE AND THE WHAT'S THE OTHER ONE CALLED? WE HAVE TWO ORDINANCES THAT ARE BASICALLY THE SAME AS OUR CHARTER SAYS, WE HAVE TO HAVE THE APPROPRIATIONS ORDINANCE AND THE BUDGET ORDINANCE ANYWAY. SO THESE SLIDES ARE ACTUALLY FROM YOUR BOOK WANTED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THAT. SO WE'RE GOING TO START WITH THE GENERAL FUND. OBVIOUSLY THE FUND THAT MOST OF OUR ACTIVITY MOVES THROUGH OUTSIDE OF OUR ENTERPRISE FUNDS, OUR OUR WASTEWATER, WATER, SANITATION AND STORMWATER ENTERPRISE FUNDS GENERAL FUND. WE'LL TALK ABOUT REVENUE. DON'T NEED TO SPEND A LOT OF TIME ON THIS. I THINK ZACH DID AN ABSOLUTELY FANTASTIC JOB WITH HIS PRESENTATION EARLIER TODAY REGARDING THE POTENTIAL FOR COMMUTER TAX CREDIT AND DISCUSSING INCOME TAXES. YOU CAN SEE THERE IT IS A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF OUR BUDGET. NOT SURPRISINGLY, IF WE WERE TO LOOK AT A COUNTY, IT WOULD BE SALES TAX. IF WE LOOK AT THE SCHOOL WOULD BE PROPERTY TAXES. IN OUR CASES, IT'S INCOME TAX DOESN'T MEAN THOSE OTHER FORMS OF REVENUE AREN'T MEANINGFUL TO THE BUDGET. IT'S JUST IN COMPARISON TO INCOME TAX IT'S PRETTY SMALL. SO IF WE LOOK AT THE REVENUE, INCOME TAXES FOLLOWED BY PROPERTY TAXES, THEN FOLLOWED BY CHARTER SERVICES, AND YOU MAY RECALL CHARGES FOR SERVICES, ARE THOSE MONIES THAT WE CHARGE THE ENTERPRISE FUNDS FOR THE SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE GENERAL FUND. FROM THERE, IT BELIEVE IT LOOKS LIKE IT GOES TO PURPLE, WHICH I'M GOING TO SAY IS OTHER. AND THEN IT JUST GETS REALLY SMALL FROM THERE. THOSE OF YOU THAT REVIEW THE MONTH END REPORTS ON A REGULAR BASIS, VERY FAMILIAR WITH THESE RECEIPTS AND SEE HOW THEY BREAK DOWN. WE DON'T EXPECT A SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE REVENUES ACCEPTED OR RECEIVED IN 2026 COMPARED TO 2026 BUDGET. YOU CAN SEE THAT REFLECTED IN THOSE LAST TWO COLUMNS. THERE'S NOT A SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO. THE BIGGEST DIFFERENCE, QUITE FRANKLY, IS RELATIVELY MODEST INCREASE IN PREDICTED INCOME TAXES AT AROUND 3% AND PROPERTY TAXES COMING IN HIGHER

[01:35:06]

THAN WE INITIALLY BUDGETED IN 26, BECAUSE, FRANKLY, WE DIDN'T KNOW WHAT THE REAPPRAISAL WAS GOING TO DO, BUT IMPACT THAT WAS GOING TO HAVE. BUT IT WAS LARGER THAN BUDGETED. SO BETWEEN THOSE TWO NUMBERS, THAT IS THE BULK OF THE REVENUE INCREASE IN THE GENERAL FUND.

I'LL PAUSE HERE FOR ANY REVENUE RELATED QUESTIONS. ALL RIGHT. GOOD. SO NOW WE'LL TALK ABOUT EXPENSES. THESE ARE THE EXPENSES BY THE TYPE NOT BY DEPARTMENT. SO THIS IS AT THE HIGH LEVEL. YOU CAN SEE HERE THE BIGGEST CHUNK OF THAT ARE TRANSFERS AND ADVANCES. BECAUSE AGAIN IF WE RECALL ZACH'S PRESENTATION EARLIER TODAY DISCUSSED THAT OVER 50% OF OUR EXPENDITURES ARE RELATED TO POLICE AND FIRE IN OUR CITY. THOSE MONIES COME FROM THE GENERAL FUND AND ARE TRANSFERRED INTO THE SECURITY PERSONS AND PROPERTY FUND. SO THAT IS WHY TRANSFERS MAKES UP THE BIGGEST EXPENSE IN THE GENERAL FUND AFTER THAT. NOT SURPRISINGLY, AS IT IS WITH MOST FUNDS IN THE GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL SERVICES, FOLLOWED BY THEN CONTRACT SERVICES, WHICH WOULD BE THINGS LIKE TECHNICAL SERVICES AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND THOSE TYPES OF THINGS THAT WE PAY FOR THIRD PARTY RELATED SERVICES, AND THEN FOLLOWED BY THE SMALLER ITEMS GOING ON UP MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES AND SO FORTH. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ISN'T REALLY APPLICABLE IN THE GENERAL FUND ITSELF. THAT IS PART OF THE TRANSFERS. SO THAT WILL BE IN THE 439 FUND. GO GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE. AND THIS IS BY DEPARTMENT. SO AGAIN NOW YOU'VE GOT THE NUMBERS ATTACHED TO THOSE THOSE BIGGER EXPENDITURES.

BUT AGAIN BROKEN DOWN BY DEPARTMENT. SO TRANSFERS OUT AGAIN THAT IS THE BIGGEST BY FAR. AND THEN YOU CAN SEE THE DEPARTMENT'S LEAST. I DON'T WANT TO SAY THE MOST IMPORTANT TO THE LEAST, BECAUSE I DON'T THINK THAT'S FAIR TO, YOU KNOW, SOME OF THESE. BUT YOU KNOW, THEY ARE THE ONES THAT SPEND THE MOST MONEY. SO NOT SURPRISINGLY, ENGINEERING IS UP AT THE TOP GIVEN THE AMOUNT OF WORK THAT GOES THROUGH THAT DEPARTMENT. AND THAT INCLUDES THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AS WELL. FINANCE IS UP THERE PRIMARILY BECAUSE WE HAVE THOSE SHARED GOVERNMENT SERVICES THAT WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THAT GO THROUGH THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT. SO THE PAYMENTS TO THE PORT, TO THE COG, THOSE VARIOUS ITEMS, AND THEN IT KIND OF GOES DOWN FROM THERE. BUT MOST OF THESE I THINK WE SHOULD BE PRETTY SELF-EXPLANATORY IN TERMS OF WHERE THEY FALL IN TOTAL EXPENDITURES. JUST TO ADD SOME CLARITY FOR THE REST OF THE COUNCIL, BECAUSE I DID THIS AT ABOUT 10:00 LAST NIGHT OF THE TRANSFERS OUT, ABOUT 20 MILLION IS POLICE FIRE NINE AND SOME CHANGE AND TEN AND SOME CHANGE.

AND THEN IT ALSO INCLUDES ABOUT 2 MILLION IN MUNICIPAL COURT, JUST TO PUT IT IN PERSPECTIVE.

SO IF ANYBODY GOES IN AND THEY'RE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT THE NUMBER, YOU HAVE TRANSFERS, BUT THEN YOU ALSO HAVE THE OTHER LINE ITEM ITEMS. AND I HONESTLY CAN'T REMEMBER WHAT THEY ARE, BUT LIKE CHARGES FOR SERVICE OR WHATEVER THAT ARE SPREAD OUT IN OTHER AREAS. BUT FOR THE MOST PART, POLICE, FIRE, MUNICIPAL COURT, YOU'LL FIND THE POOL, YOU'LL FIND A LOT OF OTHER THINGS IN THAT TRANSFERS OUT BUCKET, BUT THE MAJORITY OF IT, 78% OF IT IS POLICE. FIRE COURT. SPEAKING OF WHICH, NEXT SLIDE. SO HERE'S THE SECURITY PERSONS AND PROPERTY FUND AGAIN.

NOT SURPRISINGLY, PERSONNEL SERVICES AND BENEFITS BY FAR THE LARGEST EXPENSE IN THESE AREAS. KEEP IN MIND THAT THIS IS THE TOTAL EXPENDITURES FOR THE DEPARTMENT. SO THIS INCLUDES EVERYTHING ALL ROLLED INTO ONE. WE'VE GOT DEPARTMENTS I BELIEVE IN THE NEXT SLIDE. SO MOVING ON TO THE NEXT ONE. NOPE. WE DIDN'T DO THAT. MAN. I LIED TO YOU. I'M SORRY. WE'LL TRY TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT THAT LATER. BUT IF WE GO BACK TO THIS, THESE INCREASES ARE, NOT SURPRISINGLY RELATED TO POLICE AND FIRE PERSONNEL COSTS GOING UP. AND YOU GUYS JUST APPROVED EARLIER TONIGHT, THREE FIREFIGHTERS THAT IS CARRYING OVER INTO 2027. THAT, OF COURSE, WAS NOT ORIGINALLY BUDGETED IN FY 26. I DID NOT ADD THAT INTO THIS FY 26 NUMBER. I'M COMPARING BUDGETED TO BUDGETED. SO THAT'S A BIG REASON FOR THE INCREASE AT LEAST IN THE GREEN BAR AND THEN IN POLICE SOME OTHER PERSONNEL ADDITIONS AND CHANGES AS WELL. COURTS REMAINED RELATIVELY FLAT. WANT TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE THE TWO MAJOR ENTERPRISE FUNDS, WATER AND WASTEWATER, SANITATION AND STORM, WHILE OF COURSE IMPORTANT, ARE MUCH SMALLER IN COMPARISON, HAVE MUCH LESS PROJECTS GOING THROUGH ANY GIVEN YEAR. SO REVENUES HERE OF COURSE, CHARGES FOR SERVICES FOLLOWED BY EARNINGS ON INVESTMENT ARE

[01:40:01]

THE BIGGEST CONTRIBUTOR INTO THE WATER FUND. WE DO NEED TO KEEP IN MIND THAT THE WATER FUND AND THE STORM SEWER FUND HAVE THEIR OWN CAPITAL FUNDS, WHICH A LARGE PORTION OF THE CAPACITY FEES, TAP FEES GO INTO. BUT AGAIN, YOU CAN SEE HERE WE DO HAVE, AGAIN, A MODEST INCREASE IN WATER AND WASTEWATER, BASICALLY ACCOUNTING FOR JUST THE EXPANSION OF THE SYSTEM. OF COURSE, NO WASTEWATER OR WATER INCREASES ARE BUDGETED. MOVE ON TO THE NEXT ONE I BELIEVE IS EXPENDITURES. SO THIS ONE AGAIN, SIMILAR TO THE GENERAL FUND, THE WASTEWATER AND WATER FUND OPERATE BY TRANSFERRING A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF MONEY TO DO CAPITAL EXPENDITURES. SO THAT'S WHY YOU SEE TRANSFERS AND ADVANCES IS THE BIGGEST EXPENDITURE FOLLOWED THEN BY OTHER EXPENSES. YOU CAN SEE HERE PERSONAL SERVICES AND BENEFITS ARE ACTUALLY A SMALLER PORTION OF THESE FUNDS, BECAUSE THESE FUNDS HAVE SUCH A LARGE AMOUNT, NOT ONLY OF CAPITAL EXPENDITURES, WHICH AGAIN ARE REPRESENTED BY TRANSFERS ADVANCES, BUT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES AND MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES TO RUN THOSE PLANTS.

WASTEWATER. YOU SEE A SIMILAR. TREND AS THE WATER FUND. SO AGAIN, THERE IS A MODEST INCREASE IN CHARGE FOR SERVICES. THE LARGER INCREASE HERE IS FOR PROPERTY TAXES. WE TALKED A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THAT EARLIER. DIDN'T REALLY KNOW EXACTLY WHERE THOSE PROPERTY TAXES WOULD FALL. NOW WE DO. WE DID RECEIVE THOSE RECEIPTS IN OCTOBER. SO I DID MODIFY THE BUDGET TO PROPERLY REFLECT WHAT WE COLLECTED THIS YEAR. SO IT CARRIES FORWARD NEXT YEAR. KEEP IT. REMEMBER THAT THE PROPERTY TAXES THAT GO INTO THE WASTEWATER FUND ARE FOR THE RESIDENTIAL TIFS WE MAKE A PAYMENT TO THE SCHOOLS FROM THIS FUND, AND THE REMAINDER IS LEFT BEHIND IN THE FUND TO BE USED TOWARDS THE DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT FOR THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLAN AS AGREED TO WITH THOSE TIFS. SO THAT'S THE REASON THE PROPERTY TAXES INCREASE SO SIGNIFICANTLY. BUT JUST AGAIN, NOTICE THE BLUE BAR DID NOT INCREASE THAT MUCH FROM 26 TO 27. AGAIN, BECAUSE IT'S ONLY ACCOUNTING FOR INCREASES OF CHARGES AND SERVICES RELATED TO EXPANSION OF THE SYSTEM, NOT RATE INCREASES. I BELIEVE THIS IS THE LAST ONE. AND REALLY AGAIN, TELLING THE SAME STORY. TRANSFERS AND ADVANCES ARE A BIG PART OF WHAT'S BEING GOING INTO THE CAPITAL FUNDS FOR THE WASTEWATER FUND. AND THEN EVERYTHING ELSE KIND OF FALLS FROM THERE. AGAIN, SIMILAR TO THE WATER FUND. I MEAN, I CAN TALK ABOUT ANY TOPIC I. ALRIGHT, WELL, THAT'S IT THERE. YEP. SO THAT'S A HIGH LEVEL BUDGET PRESENTATION. OBVIOUSLY THIS YEAR, THANKS TO KIM, WE DID DO A BUDGET RETREAT AND WENT OVER A LOT OF THE BUDGET IN DETAIL.

SO I'LL PAUSE HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS RELATED TO THE BUDGET. YOU OBVIOUSLY ALL HAVE YOUR BOOKS GAVE YOU THE CAPITAL DETAIL. YOU'VE GOT TWO MORE READINGS, OF COURSE, TO GO THROUGH. SO WE GOT SEVERAL WEEKS TO GO THROUGH. ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS OR CONCERNS.

OBVIOUSLY AT THE NEXT WORK SESSION WE'LL SOME OUTSTANDING QUESTIONS WILL BE ANSWERED.

SOME QUESTIONS HAVE ALREADY BEEN ANSWERED THROUGH KIM'S FRIDAY NIGHT UPDATE OR FRIDAY AFTERNOON UPDATE, DEPENDING ON WHEN YOU READ IT. AND SO PAUSING QUESTIONS, ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM MEMBERS OF COUNCIL? I GOT A COMMENT, COUNCILMAN YOUNG, THAT YOU'RE GOING TO BE HERE NEXT YEAR, BUT CAN WE LIKE PUT PAGE NUMBERS ON THE SCREEN SO I KNOW WHERE I'M SUPPOSED TO BE? PUT THEM IN THE BOOK. OH, PAGE NUMBERS FOR WHERE THOSE SLIDE THOSE. YEAH, WE CAN DO THAT. APRIL WILL BE HERE NEXT APRIL WILL BE HERE NEXT YEAR. YOU KNOW, IF SHE'S NOT, I'LL, I'D BE HAPPY TO HUNT HER DOWN FOR YOU. OKAY. BUT NO, THAT'S A GREAT THAT'S A GREAT POINT. REFERENCE REFERENCE PAGES IN THERE. ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM MEMBERS OF COUNCIL? YEAH. BRAD, THANK YOU FOR PUTTING THE INFORMATION TOGETHER. AND I THINK THIS IS OUR THIS BE A COMBINED FIVE HOURS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT OF BUDGET REVIEWS. WE'RE IN OUR FIFTH HOUR PERHAPS. SO YEAH, LET'S, LET'S KEEP GOING. OH, HEY. WELL, MARK, THANKS FOR SHOWING UP. WE WILL START AT THE BEGINNING. PLEASE STAND. SO JUST A REAL QUICK THEN I'LL STAY UP HERE WHILE YOU GO THROUGH EACH ONE OF THESE. THE CAPITAL BUDGET ORDINANCE AS EXPLAINED, IF YOU FLIP TO THAT TAB, IS A LIST BY FUND THE FUND AND OBJECT THE CAPITAL PROJECTS. SO OF COURSE THOSE ARE FUND TOTALS OR PROJECT TOTALS. AGAIN, YOU NOW HAVE THE DETAIL THAT ATTACHES TO THOSE TOTALS. BUT FOR THE SAKE OF THE ORDINANCE, IT IS JUST AT THE LEGAL LEVEL OF CONTROL OF WHICH YOU BUDGET. SO. OKAY, SO ACCORDING TO OUR

[01:45:11]

AGENDA THAT WE ARE ON THE TO ADOPT A CAPITAL BUDGET. SO WE HAD HEARD THE ADMINISTRATION, ALTHOUGH YOU SPOKE TO SOME THINGS. COUNCIL. ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE CAPITAL BUDGET PIECE OF THIS? I THINK FOR ME, I JUST WANT ONE MORE. MAYBE ANOTHER WEEK TO GO THROUGH THE FINER DETAILS OF THE CAPITAL BUDGET. AND THEN I'LL PROBABLY HAVE A QUESTION OR TWO COME OUT OF IT. BUT I APPRECIATE THE THE CONTENT TONIGHT. AND TO MISTER PRESIDENT HUNTER'S POINT, THIS IS PROBABLY OUR FIFTH OR SIXTH HOUR, AND I'VE PROBABLY SEEN THIS MORE THAN MOST GIVEN MY SERVING ON FINANCE COMMITTEE. SO PRETTY FAMILIAR OVERALL WITH IT. BUT STILL, I WANT TO JUST MAKE SURE I'M CLEAR ON THE CAPITAL PIECE AND SURE, COME BACK, MR. BURGER. JUST STAY TUNED. IT COULD GET RIVETING. YOU NEVER KNOW. ANY OTHER MEMBERS WISHING TO SPEAK ON THE 50-26 THE CAPITAL BUDGET. ANY COMMENTS? I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO JUST FURTHER DISCUSSION ON SOME OF THE FOLLOW UP WE HAD HAD FROM THE PREVIOUS SPECIAL MEETINGS. SO THIS WILL BE BACK FOR SECOND READING PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 9TH, 2026.

[51-26]

51-26 FIRST READING INTRODUCTION TO ADOPT AN ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET FOR 2027 ADMINISTRATION. ANYTHING FURTHER TO ADD? SO THESE NEXT TWO ORDINANCES ARE EXTREMELY SIMILAR. ONE IS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW, ONE IS REQUIRED BY THE CHARTER. SO THEY BASICALLY BOTH STATE THE APPROPRIATIONS OF THE LINE ITEMS. AGAIN AT THE LEGAL LEVEL OF CONTROL THAT YOU APPROVE THE BUDGET AT. SO FUNDAMENTALLY, THERE'S NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO.

THEY JUST ARE REQUIRED FOR DIFFERENT PURPOSES. COUNCIL MEMBERS OF COUNCIL. ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? OKAY. THIS WILL BE BACK FOR SECOND READING PUBLIC HEARING ON

[52-26]

NOVEMBER 9TH, 202652-26 FIRST READING INTRODUCTION TO ADOPT ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR 2027.

ANYTHING FURTHER? ALL RIGHT. COUNCIL MEMBERS OF COUNCIL. QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? OKAY.

THIS WILL BE BACK FOR SECOND READING PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 9TH, 2026. AND YOU

[53-26]

DON'T GET TO GO AWAY YET. NOPE. BECAUSE WE HAVE 53-26 FIRST READING INTRODUCTION TO SET ANNUAL THE ANNUAL COMPENSATION FOR ALL CITY EMPLOYEES IN 2027. ADMINISTRATION. MR. MR. YES. SO THIS IS AN ORDINANCE, ESPECIALLY FOR THOSE THAT MAYBE HAVEN'T SEEN IT AS OFTEN AS BEFORE, WHERE WE SET THE COMPENSATION FOR OUR SALARY AND HOURLY EMPLOYEES, INCLUDING VARIOUS OTHER TYPES OF EMPLOYEES THAT MAY FALL UNDER PAYROLL. THOSE COULD BE PART TIME. THOSE COULD BE SPECIAL TYPES OF PAY RELATED TO THE UNION CONTRACTS AND SO FORTH.

THE FIRST PART OF THAT SHOWS THE SALARY POSITIONS AND THEIR RATE OF PAY SPECIFIC TO THE POSITIONS, FOLLOWED BY THE. I ALWAYS FORGET WHICH ONES IT IS, BUT THE THE SPREADSHEET WILL JUST CALL IT FOR THE RATES OF PAY FOR OUR HOURLY WORKERS, WHICH OF COURSE ARE AT VARIOUS LEVELS AND STEPS. AND THEN FINALLY AGAIN AFTER THAT IS THE, SHALL WE CALL THEM, SPECIAL TYPES OF EMPLOYEES OR AGAIN, PART TIMERS. WAGE WAGES FOR THE UNION WERE UNION POLICE AND FIRE BASED ON YEARS OF SERVICE, THOSE TYPES OF THINGS. AND THEN FINALLY, AS PART OF THAT IS THE STRATEGIC WORKFORCE PLAN. SO THAT'S BROKEN DOWN BY DEPARTMENT. AND IT HAS THE PAST YEARS OF HOW MANY STAFF HAVE BEEN IN EACH DEPARTMENT, FOLLOWED BY WHAT IS THE LEAST REQUESTED OR EXPECTED STRATEGIC WORKFORCE PLAN MOVING FORWARD. SO WHEN WE WOULD EXPECT TO ADD POSITIONS, KEEP IN MIND THAT AS PART OF THE BUDGET PRESENTATION OR BUDGET RETREAT WE DID DO OR TARA DID PRESENTED A LIST OF POSITIONS AND HOW THOSE POSITIONS START AT X AND WENT TO Y. THE STRATEGIC WORKFORCE PLAN IS IS WHERE THAT PROCESS GENERALLY STARTS. SO FOR EXAMPLE, IF YOU LOOK AT THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT, IT MIGHT HAVE IN FISCAL YEAR 28 OR 29, I WAS ADDING, SAY UTILITY CLERK OR INCOME TAX CLERK WHEN THAT YEAR COMES, ASSUMING THAT THE FINANCE DIRECTOR AT THAT TIME BELIEVES THAT THAT'S A POSITION THAT IS NECESSARY FOLLOWING THE PLAN, THEY WOULD MAKE THAT REQUEST. AND AGAIN, AS IT GOES THROUGH THE BUDGET PROCESS,

[01:50:01]

IT'S POSSIBLE IT MAY BE DEEMED A LESSER OR HIGHER PRIORITY DEPENDING ON THE CIRCUMSTANCES.

BUT AGAIN, THAT STRATEGIC WORKFORCE PLAN AT LEAST GIVES YOU AN IDEA OF WHERE WE WOULD EXPECT STAFFING NEEDS TO OCCUR BASED ON THE FUTURE FISCAL YEARS, BUT IT IS IN NO WAY GUARANTEED. YOUR APPROVAL OF THE STRATEGIC WORKFORCE PLAN IS PART OF THE PERSON. THAT IS IN NO WAY, NECESSARILY EVEN AN ENDORSEMENT OF THAT. IT'S AN ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF THAT. THIS IS WHERE THE ADMINISTRATION BELIEVES THAT STAFF WILL BE NEEDED IN THE FUTURE. BUT OF COURSE, WE'LL BE EVALUATING EACH BUDGET CYCLE. OKAY. THANK YOU. MEMBERS OF COUNCIL, QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS REGARDING THE 53-26 ITEM. HEARING NONE. THIS WILL BE BACK FOR SECOND READING PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 9TH, 2026. THANK YOU, MR. LUTZ. WE APPRECIATE YOUR PRESENTATION THIS EVENING. AN EXPLANATION. THANK YOU. 54-26 FIRST READING INTRODUCTION TO

[54-26]

APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS TO PART 11 ZONING CODE. APPENDIX. GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND TO SECTION 11. 21.13 MANUFACTURING AND INNOVATION DISTRICT. AND I HAVE A PRESENTATION TO PULL UP. OKAY. THANK YOU, MEMBERS OF COUNCIL. SO WE ARE GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE PLANNING PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS THAT WERE REFERENCED AT THE BEGINNING OF THE MEETING. SO WE'LL GO THROUGH THESE AND SORRY. SO THE REASON FOR THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS, YOU KNOW, WE REVIEWED THE EXISTING USES WITHIN THE MANUFACTURING INNOVATION DISTRICT AND IDENTIFIED AN AREA WHERE WE CAN ADD A USE TO THAT AREA OR TO THOSE DISTRICTS WITHIN THE OR.

YEAH. USED TO THOSE DISTRICTS. THIS WAS HEARD AT PLANNING COMMISSION IN OCTOBER, AS I SAID EARLIER, BY A VOTE, AND WAS APPROVED BY A VOTE OF 7 TO 0. NO. I SKIPPED AHEAD. THAT'S RIGHT. SO THERE ARE TWO NEW DEFINITIONS THAT WE'LL BE ADDING TO THE GLOSSARY. BOTH ARE FORM OF BATCH PLANT. ONE IS TEMPORARY ONES PERMANENT, BUT THAT IS FOR CONCRETE PRODUCTION OR ASPHALT PRODUCTION. THE IDEA IS ONE LIKE A TEMPORARY ONE MIGHT MAKE SENSE IN ONE AREA TO BE USED ON A LIMITED BASIS, AND A PERMANENT ONE TO SERVE THE AREA. AS WE CONTINUE TO GROW AND DEVELOP ON THIS SOUTH AREA OF TOWN WHERE THE MANUFACTURING INNOVATION DISTRICT IS, IT WOULD SUPPORT THAT GROWTH. THE DISTRICT BOUNDARIES ARE THERE IN PURPLE ON THE SOUTHEAST SIDE OF TOWN, YOU KNOW, INDUSTRIAL IN 33. AND WE'LL BE ADDING, AS I SAID, TEMPORARY BATCH PLANT AND PERMANENT BATCH PLANT. BOTH IS CONDITIONAL USES. SO THOSE WILL HAVE TO GO TO PLANNING COMMISSION FOR APPROVAL. AND PLANNING COMMISSION CAN SET CERTAIN CONDITIONS ON THAT, WHETHER IT'S RELATED TO THE DURATION OF USE FOR THE TEMPORARY BATCH PLANT, THEY CAN SET A STRICT CUT OFF DATE FOR HOW LONG THAT'S IN PLACE, WHETHER THAT'S A TEMPORARY USE TO SERVE FOR INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS, ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THAT DISTRICT. THE SECOND, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS BEFORE WE GO ON TO THE NEXT ZONING CODE? AND THAT'S. RELATED TO THE BATCH PLANT. ANY QUESTION FOR MR. ANDREWS? MR. BURGER, TURN YOUR. I WAS JUST GOING TO I WAS JUST GOING TO WAIT UNTIL HE'S DONE.

OKAY? OKAY. THIS OTHER UPDATE IS MORE JUST CLEANUP OF THE THE ZONING TEXT IN THE 1107.19 SECTION THAT WAS ADDED, I THINK EARLIER THIS YEAR. IT SET. IT WAS SET UP SO THAT PLANNING COMMISSION WOULD REVIEW THE ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES OF A CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT. AND THAT REALLY DOESN'T MAKE SENSE THE WAY OUR BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS OPERATE. SO WE'RE JUST CLEANING THAT UP. SO WITH RESPECT TO THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS DESIGN REVIEW BOARD WILL REVIEW THOSE.

AND JUST PUTTING THAT IN CODE IN THE 1107 CHAPTER. AND JUST A LITTLE HISTORY PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWED THIS IN OCTOBER AS WELL. AND IT WAS APPROVED SEVEN ZERO NOW. AND THAT'S JUST KIND OF IDENTIFIES WHERE THAT CHANGE IS HAPPENING IN THE CODE. WE'RE JUST SWAPS OUT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FOR PLANNING OR PLANNING COMMISSION FOR DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. AND I THINK THAT IS IT. OKAY. THE FIRST PORTION OF WHAT WAS PRESENTED BY MR. ANDREWS WAS

[01:55:06]

ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS? COMMENTS BY MEMBERS OF COUNCIL, MR. BURGER I ONLY QUESTIONS, AS YOU PROBABLY KNOW ALREADY IS, YOU KNOW, MAKING SURE THESE STRUCTURES ARE NOT BUILT WITHIN, YOU KNOW, WHERE IT CAN'T BE SEEN BY THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. IT'D BE NICE IF THEY WERE SHIELDED BY TREES, NOT ON THE MAIN, NOT ON THE MAIN DRAGS OF TOWN, BUT FARTHER OFF THE ROADS.

AND THEN IF THEY ARE ONLY GOING TO BE CONSTRUCTED FOR A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME, MAKING SURE THAT THE LAND GOES BACK TO, YOU KNOW, TO SPECIFIC PROVISIONS IN THERE, THAT IF IT'S A TEMPORARY ONE, IT HAS TO GO BACK TO THE PRE-DEVELOPMENT CONDITION. OKAY? AND THEN THEY WILL STILL HAVE TO GO TO DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. SO WHETHER IT'S SCREENING, WHETHER IT'S ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES, OR THEY PAINTED A MURAL ON THE SIDE OF THE SILO OR SOMETHING, JUST TO INCREASE THAT VISUAL INTEREST, THOSE ARE ALL PROVISIONS THAT WOULD BE REVIEWED UNDER THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. YEAH. AFTER A PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL. YEAH. JUST, YOU KNOW, LIGHTING THE SIZE, YOU KNOW, JUST EVERYTHING THAT CONSUMES WITH THAT. I KNOW THAT WHEN WE WERE DRIVING AROUND TO OTHER SITES, THEY HAD THEM AND THEY WERE TASTEFULLY DONE. SO IF WE CAN JUST, YOU KNOW, LOOKING, I MEAN, I'M SURE WE HAVE, BUT LOOKING AT OTHER CODES OTHER COMMUNITIES HAVE DONE TO DO THIS, YOU KNOW, JUST MAKING SURE THAT, YOU KNOW, WHAT I DON'T WANT TO SEE DONE IS JUST A GRAB FOR DEVELOPERS TO SAY, I WANT TO BUILD SOMETHING HERE BECAUSE I WANT TO SAVE MONEY ON MY COST. AND THEN WE AS A COMMUNITY HAVE THIS BATCH PLANT, NOT, YOU KNOW, AND I MEAN, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S DONE IN A WAY THAT IS NOT JUST IF THEY'RE GOING TO BUILD ONE, IT SHOULD BE BUILT NOT JUST LIKE YOU WOULD DRIVE PAST.

IF YOU GO UP TOWARDS RUSSELLS POINT WHERE THERE'S JUST, YOU KNOW, IT'S NOT GOING TO BE SOMETHING THAT LARGE, OBVIOUSLY, BUT JUST I DON'T WANT IT TO JUST BE BUILT JUST TO GIVE DEVELOPER A FREEBIE TO SAY, YOU KNOW, I NEED THIS BECAUSE I WANT TO SAVE ON MY COST, RIGHT? AND THAT'S THE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION PROCESS. YOU KNOW, THAT'S THE REASON THERE'S A CONDITIONAL USE IS BECAUSE IT MIGHT MAKE SENSE IN ONE AREA OF THE MI DISTRICT, BUT NOT ON ANOTHER. SO. RIGHT. THAT'S KIND OF THE BACKSTOP ON THAT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION AND THEN THAT STRICT CUT OFF DATE. IF THEY SAY IT'S GOING TO BE A TEN YEAR TEMPORARY PLANT, TEN YEARS, THEY GOT TO BRING IT BACK TO THE FULL RESTORATION OF THAT SITE. AND THEN EVERYTHING ELSE THAT WE USE IN OUR REVIEW FOR COMMERCIAL PROJECTS THROUGH DESIGN REVIEW, FROM LIGHTING TO LANDSCAPING AND SETBACKS, THAT'LL ALL BE IN PLACE. JUST LIKE A TYPICAL COMMERCIAL PROJECT. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I WOULD LIKE TO GET RID OF ON COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES IS CAP LIGHTING ON BUILDINGS. SO TO MAKE SURE I CALL IT CAP LIGHTING. IT'S THE LIGHT SPOTLIGHTS I PUT ON THE SIDE OF BUILDINGS BECAUSE THEY DON'T WANT TO. THAT'S THEIR PARKING LOT LIGHT. AND IT'S JUST EVERY COMMERCIAL BUILDING HAS LIKE TEN OF THEM. AND JUST MAKING SURE THAT WHEREVER IT'S BUILT, IT'S RESPECTFUL OF THE SURROUNDING AREAS BECAUSE A LOT OF OUR COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS, IN MY OPINION, ARE NOT RESPECTFUL OF THE RESIDENTIAL AREAS THAT THEY'RE THAT THEY'RE LOCATED BY. WE CAN THAT'S SOMETHING WE CAN LOOK INTO. BUT THERE ARE SOME LIKE IF THAT'S A BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENT FOR LIKE EMERGENCY EXITS, THAT THAT'S NOT REALLY SOMETHING WE CAN TELL THEM THEY CAN'T DO. BUT THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE CAN CERTAINLY LOOK AT.

OKAY. THANK YOU. ZACH. MR. ANDREWS. MR. ANDREWS. I HAD A COUPLE QUESTIONS. SO THIS IS A DEFINITION. SO IT'S JUST GOING. GLOSSARY TERMS. BUT IT'S IT'S ALSO BEING ADDED AS A. IT SHOULD ALSO BE. YES. IT'S BEING ADDED INTO. 1121. 13 OR 19 OR. SORRY. I GOT MY PAGES MIXED UP.

[02:00:10]

JUST GO BACK ON THE. I THINK WE MIGHT BE MISSING A SLIDE AND WE CAN GET THAT TO YOU, BUT IT IS BEING ADDED AS A CONDITIONAL USE TO THE DISTRICT FOR MI. SO I JUST HAD A COUPLE QUESTIONS.

SO THE. IN REGARDS TO THE TEMPORARY BATCH PLAN, IT SAYS THAT THERE NEEDS TO BE A STATEMENT PROVIDED ON HOW TO REMEDIATE THE PROPERTY TO ITS ORIGINAL STATE. WHAT TOOLS WOULD WE HAVE TO ENFORCE THAT? THIS WOULD BE MY QUESTION. IF SOMEONE CONSTRUCTS THIS AND THEN THEY THEY LEAVE TOWN AND IT'S THERE. WHAT DO WE HAVE, PERHAPS AS A LEGAL MEANS TO ENFORCE REMEDIATION TO ITS ORIGINAL STATE? IN THE CASE OF A TEMPORARY BATCH PLAN. WELL, I MEAN, WE COULD ALWAYS FILE A MOTION FOR AN INJUNCTION OR A MOTION TO ENJOIN THEM FROM BUILDING ANY FURTHER. IF THEY'RE VIOLATING THE, THE, THE, THE PROVISIONS IN THE IN THE CODE AND THE DEFINITION. I MEAN, THAT'S OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD. THAT'S WHAT WE COULD DO.

OBVIOUSLY, WE WOULDN'T WANT TO GO THERE UNLESS THAT WAS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY. BUT THAT THAT WOULD BE THAT WOULD BE THE WAY TO ENFORCE IT. I THINK WE ALSO TALKED ABOUT A DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT. MAYBE. WELL, THERE IS A I MEAN, A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. BUT SO YOUR QUESTION, I THINK, MR. HUNTER, IS IF THEY VIOLATE THE TERMS OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, IF THEY CONSTRUCT IT AND THEY'RE GONE. AND NOW WE HAVE A PROPERTY WITH A STRUCTURE ON IT, AND THERE'S POTENTIALLY SOME COSTS FOR DOING THAT WORK TO REMEDIATE IT, IS THAT GOING TO BE ON US TO THEN SEEK SOME GRANT TO REMEDIATE A PROPERTY? THERE ARE SOME COMMUNITIES THAT REQUIRE FOR LARGE INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS LIKE A DEMOLITION BOND. SO THAT'S SOMETHING WE COULD RESEARCH. OKAY. I WOULD BE INTERESTED IN THAT SO THAT WE'RE EQUIPPING OURSELVES TO ACCOMMODATE THIS TYPE OF USE. AND THEN I DID NOT WATCH THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING.

WAS THERE DISCUSSION ABOUT A PERMANENT BATCH PLAN AS A CONDITIONAL USE? I GUESS DID THAT DISCUSSION PARALLEL THE TEMPORARY, OR WAS THERE PERHAPS WHAT WAS THE THE DISCUSSION. I THINK THE IDEA IS JUST PROVIDING ANOTHER OPTION. SO IT MIGHT MAKE SENSE TO DIVERSIFY THE BUSINESSES IN TOWN. AND THERE MIGHT BE A SITE IN MI WHERE THAT MAKES SENSE, WHERE IT IS FARTHER BACK FROM THE ROAD, NOT VISIBLE. I AN OPTION I RECOGNIZE FROM THE MAP THE WHAT THE DISTRICT THAT THIS WOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR. IT'S THIS DISTRICT AND ONLY THIS DISTRICT. HOWEVER, I THINK COUNCILMAN BERGER MENTIONED IT ABOUT OUR WHAT DO YOU CALL IT? THE THE PATHWAYS OR THE ROADWAYS? THE THRUWAYS THROUGH TOWN. I DON'T I WOULD NOT WANT TO HAVE IT SUCH THAT THERE'S A NEW PERMANENT AGGREGATE, YOU KNOW, COMBINING SITE, THIS TYPE OF STRUCTURE RIGHT ALONG THE ROAD. AND WHAT IN OUR WHAT IN THE APPLICATION OF THIS IS GOING TO PREVENT THAT? IF IT'S A CONDITIONAL USE, I WOULD SAY PLANNING COMMISSION WOULD BE ABLE TO HEAR THAT IF THEY WERE TO HAVE TO VOTE NO, THEY HAVE TO STATE THEIR REASONING WHY.

BUT WHAT COULD PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS CITE AS A REASON? WHY DO WE. DO WE SAY IT SHOULD NOT BE ON THE ALONG THE ROAD SOMEWHERE ELSE? I THINK IF IT'S NOT AN IF IT DOESN'T ALIGN WITH OUR FUTURE LAND USE PLAN AND OUR. THE INTENT OF OUR ZONING CODE THAT WE CAN LEAN ON THAT. BUT ALTERNATIVELY, WE COULD LOOK AT AN AMENDMENT TO THIS LEGISLATION THAT ADDS STRICT PROVISIONS, STRICTER PROVISIONS FOR THE PERMANENT ONE THAT SAY, YOU KNOW, THERE'S A CERTAIN SETBACK THAT IT HAS TO BE FROM THE ROAD, SO IT WOULDN'T ALLOW IT TO BE ALONG ONE OF THE THOROUGHFARES THAT HAVE TO BE FARTHER BACK. BUT THAT'S SOMETHING WE COULD EXPLORE. I WOULD BE INTERESTED, ESPECIALLY FOR THE PERMANENT. YES. OKAY. IF WE COULD PUT MORE STRENGTH BEHIND HOW TO AVOID A CIRCUMSTANCE WHERE PLANNING COMMISSION IS FACED WITH AN APPLICATION AND THEY DON'T THEY'RE NOT THEY'RE NOT EQUIPPED TO SAY NO. SO THAT'S WHAT I WOULD ASK FOR THIS. YEAH. I THINK IT'S OR WE'RE EARLY ENOUGH THAT WE CAN MAKE SOME ADJUSTMENTS TO ADDRESS THOSE CONCERNS. OKAY. THANK YOU FOR HEARING THOSE QUESTIONS, MR. PRESIDENT. CAN I JUST GO BACK TO THE LAST THE LAST THE FIRST QUESTION YOU HAD? I, I GUESS I MISUNDERSTOOD YOUR QUESTION. I THOUGHT YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT LIKE WHILE IT WAS BEING BUILT, IF THEY VIOLATED THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT. BUT IF YOU'RE MORE CONCERNED ABOUT HOW IT WILL BE, YOU KNOW, TORN DOWN AND REMEDIATED, YOU MADE A REALLY GOOD POINT, ZACK. AND

[02:05:06]

BUT THE QUESTION THOUGH, IS, IS IF THERE WERE A DEMOLITION BOND WITH THAT, WE WOULD HAVE TO MAKE THAT PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. AND THEN WE COULD. I DON'T I GUESS MY FEELING IS I DON'T THINK WE NEED ADDITIONAL TEXT IN THE DEFINITION THAT, YOU KNOW, THAT STATES A DEMOLITION BOND IS REQUIRED. I THINK, YOU KNOW, IT WOULD JUST BE PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. WE COULD WE COULD PUT IN THE TEXT THAT, YOU KNOW, IF YOU HAVE DIFFERENT THOUGHTS, LET ME KNOW THAT THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT HAS TO BE APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION, SAY, OR I MEAN, OR THE CITY MANAGER. BUT WE YOU KNOW, I THINK THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT WOULD MAKE SURE THAT THIS IS A VERY UNIQUE TYPE OF USE AND WOULD MAKE SURE THAT THERE WERE A DEMOLITION BOND THAT WOULD ASSURE THAT THE THE PROPERTY WAS PROPERLY DEMOLISHED AND RESTORED TO ITS PRIOR APPEARANCE. SO, I MEAN, IF WE ADD LANGUAGE TO IT, WE COULD, YOU KNOW, I DON'T THINK WE NEED TO REQUIRE A DEMOLITION BOND IN THIS TEXT, BUT THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT COULD, IN ITS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, INSIST THAT A DEMOLITION BOND BE PROVIDED, THAT, YOU KNOW, THAT PROVIDES ASSURANCE THAT THAT THAT IT'LL BE DEMOLISHED THE WAY WE WANT IT DEMOLISHED AND AND THE AREA WILL BE RESTORED. SO. AND WE COULD TALK FURTHER ABOUT WHO APPROVES DEMOLITION BOND, BUT IT COULD, YOU KNOW, WE COULD WE COULD MAKE IT SO THAT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION DURING THE PROCESS. YOU KNOW, I THINK THAT THAT'S A REALLY IF I MAY, MR. PRESIDENT. GOOD POINT. YOU KNOW, IN THE COMMERCIAL SPACE OR INDUSTRIAL SPACE, YOU KNOW, IF YOU'RE LEASING A BUILDING, YOU TYPICALLY PAY DILAPIDATION COSTS TO RETURN THE BUILDING TO ITS ORIGINAL STATE. SIMILAR CONCEPT EXCEPT JUST LAND. SO MAYBE THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE COULD CONTEMPLATE IN OUR DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS FOR MAYBE ANY TYPE OF USER MOVING FORWARD. I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S COMMON PRACTICE, YOU KNOW, AND COMMUNITY OVER COMMUNITY, BUT IT'S 910 AT NIGHT. SO IDEA POPPED IN MY HEAD AND I JUST GOT IT OUT. SO. OKAY. BUT I MEAN, IT'S EVEN, YOU KNOW, IT, IT'S MORE OBVIOUS IN THIS PARTICULAR INSTANCE BECAUSE THIS IS A TEMPORARY BADGE PLANT, RIGHT? SO YEAH, I COULD TALK TO, I COULD TALK MORE ABOUT IT.

OKAY. YEAH. I APPRECIATE THE FURTHER CONSIDERATION ON THAT. THANK YOU. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THE 54-26. THIS IS THE GLOSSARY TERMS AND THE USE THESE. SO THAT'LL BE THIS

[55-26]

WILL BE BACK FOR SECOND READING PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 9TH 2026. AND THEN 55-26 WILL STATE THIS FOR THE RECORD. FIRST READING INTRODUCTION TO APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS TO PART 11 ZONING CODE TO SECTION 1107 DESIGN STANDARDS. AND THEN, PER MR. ANDREWS PRESENTATION, THIS IS TO ADD CLARITY TO OUR CODE AND DEFINE WHO IS REVIEWING WHAT TYPE OF ITEM. SO ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS FROM MEMBERS OF COUNCIL? COMMENTS FROM MEMBERS OF COUNCIL ON THIS ITEM. OKAY. SEEING NONE, THIS WILL BE BACK FOR SECOND READING PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 9TH, 2026. THANK YOU, MR. ANDREWS.

APPRECIATE THE. SORRY. I GUESS, TIM, I WANT TO CLEAR UP THE GLOSSARY. TEXT IS ONE AMENDMENT AND THEN THE DISTRICT USES ONE AMENDMENT. DO WE NEED TO ADD A THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE AGENDA? I DON'T THINK I THINK IT'S ONLY ON AS TWO. DID I LOOK AT THAT INCORRECTLY? OR AM I WRONG? I DON'T HAVE TWO SEPARATE ORDINANCES FOR THE ITEMS THAT YOU JUST SPOKE TO, AND IF THE DISTRICT BEING PLACED. DID I STATE THAT WRONG? NO, I THINK I, I THINK WE MAY HAVE GOT THE INFORMATION, NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION FOR THE AGENDA. SO I GUESS I CAN JUST CLEAR IT UP WITH AN ACTION. OKAY. BUT IF WE NEED TO REVIEW IT AGAIN, PLEASE LET US KNOW. OKAY. WE'RE GOOD.

[COMMENTS OF THE CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL PERSONS AND GENERAL DISCUSSION: ]

OKAY. COMMENTS OF CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL PERSONS IN GENERAL DISCUSSION. THE SHARP. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THIS EVENING. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, COUNCILWOMAN YOUNG COUNCILMAN REAMS. I JUST WANTED TO REMIND EVERYBODY WITH THE THE CHANGE IN THE THE DAYLIGHT SAVINGS

[02:10:04]

TIME, OUR STREET LIGHTS ARE PROBABLY GOING TO BE MORE IMPORTANT FOR PEOPLE WALKING ON THE SIDEWALKS. AND I JUST WANT TO REMIND PEOPLE THAT IF YOU NOTICE ONE THAT'S OUT, TRY TO GET THE NUMBER THAT'S ON THE POLE AND REPORT IT TO THE CITY. WE TRY TO GET THOSE FIXED AS QUICKLY AS WE CAN. AND IF IF YOU DON'T FEEL COMFORTABLE STOPPING TO GET THE NUMBER, JUST REPORT THE ADDRESS AND WE CAN LOOK THAT UP. BUT YOU KNOW, IT'S THAT TIME OF YEAR. STREET LIGHTS ARE GOING TO BE A LITTLE MORE IMPORTANT. THANK YOU. COUNCILMAN, I WANT TO THANK MR. CUNNINGHAM. IS THAT YOUR LAST NAME? IT'S BEEN A WHILE SINCE YOU WERE UP THERE, SO THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING TONIGHT AND SPEAKING. YOU KNOW, WE I'M JUST A MOM AND A SMALL BUSINESS OWNER, AND I TRY TO DO MY BEST HERE ON COUNCIL TO MAKE IT AROUND TO ALL PARTS OF THE CITY.

BUT THIS IS, YOU KNOW, WE'D LIKE TO THINK IT'S A SMALL TOWN, BUT IT DOES COVER QUITE A BIT OF LAND. SO I HAVE NOT BEEN OUT THERE SINCE THEY STRIPED THE ROAD. SO STUFF LIKE THAT THAT HAPPENS. I APPRECIATE THAT YOU CAME TO THE MEETING AND ADDRESSED THAT AND THAT CONCERN.

I YOU KNOW, THIS IS TEN MONTHS NOW THAT WE'RE WRAPPING UP, 11 MONTHS SINCE I'VE BEEN ON COUNCIL. AND I AM HONESTLY SURPRISED AT THE LACK OF CITIZENS THAT COME AND SPEAK AND BRING CONCERNS LIKE THAT TO THE PUBLIC. BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, UNFORTUNATELY, THERE ARE ONLY SEVEN OF US AND WE TRY OUR BEST TO GET AROUND TO THE CITY. AND I DON'T WANT TO PUT WORDS IN ANYONE'S MOUTH, BUT STUFF LIKE THAT, YOU KNOW, SOMEONE MIGHT NOT HAVE DRIVEN ON YOUR STREET SINCE THEN AND SEEN THAT. SO YEAH, SO, SO BRING THAT STUFF FORWARD AND TO THE REST OF THE CITIZENS. YOU KNOW, IT'S WE, OUR EMAILS ARE ONLINE. YOU CAN CALL MCKENZIE'S OFFICE AND SHE WILL GET YOU IN TOUCH WITH US. SO THINGS LIKE THAT, WE DON'T, WE DON'T SEE EVERY STREET OR EVERY CONCERN ALL THE TIME. SO KEEP COMING, KEEP BRINGING THEM FORWARD. YOU KNOW, WE WE TALKED ABOUT THE BUDGET TONIGHT AND THERE'S VERY FEW PEOPLE IN THE AUDIENCE. SO I KNOW THERE WILL BE PEOPLE WHO HAVE COMMENTS ABOUT WHAT WE ARE SPENDING YOUR TAX DOLLARS ON. SO PLEASE EMAIL US. PLEASE CALL US. WE WANT TO HEAR WE WANT YOUR INPUT, YOU KNOW, REACH OUT. AND JUST TO SAY THAT TRICK OR TREAT IS THIS SATURDAY. SO WHICH MISS SHARP MENTIONED. SO PLEASE BE CAUTIOUS WHEN YOU ARE OUT. IF YOU DON'T HAVE KIDS, IT'S FROM 6 TO 8. IT WILL BE DARK. IT WILL BE GETTING DARK THIS WEEKEND EARLIER. SO JUST WATCH OUT FOR THE LITTLES WHO WILL BE VERY EXCITED TO TRICK OR TREAT AND HAVE SOME FUN. SO THAT IS ALL. THANK YOU, COUNCILMAN BORDNER. I HAVE MAYBE TWO THINGS FOR ENGINEERING. ONE IS, AND I DON'T HAVE THE POLL NUMBER, BUT 400 PROFESSIONAL PARKWAY. I HAD A RESIDENT EARLIER THIS WEEK OR MAYBE IT WAS, I GUESS IT'S ONLY MONDAY, SO IT MUST HAVE BEEN LATE LAST WEEK THAT I HAD A PHONE CALL ABOUT A LIGHT POLE BEING OUT, MAYBE BECAUSE OF THE ALL THE FIBER CONSTRUCTION WORK, BUT 400 PROFESSIONAL PARKWAY AND I MIGHT JUST DRIVE BY ON THE WAY HOME AND LET YOU KNOW IF IT'S STILL OUT. AND THEN I WAS COMING HOME ON CHESTNUT AND MAYBE BY THE BAPTIST CHURCH THERE. THERE WAS AN ORANGE BARREL ON TOP OF THE SEWER GRATE. PRETTY INTENSE, I GUESS, DIP FROM WHEN THEY REPAVED CHESTNUT. I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S A WAY THAT WE COULD SOFTEN THAT. I DON'T KNOW, I THINK MORE MOTORCYCLES HITTING IT, HOPEFULLY NOT THAT FAR OVER, BUT YOU NEVER KNOW. BUT BUT I, I HIT IT BECAUSE THE ORANGE BARREL WASN'T THERE. AND, AND HENCE WHY I'M BRINGING IT UP TODAY. SO MAYBE IF WE COULD JUST CHECK THAT, CHECK THAT OUT.

I'D APPRECIATE IT. COUNCILMAN WOLFF YEAH, I JUST WANT TO GIVE A SHOUT OUT TO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT'S HONOR GUARD. I WAS PLEASANTLY SURPRISED LAST WEDNESDAY NIGHT AT THE CREW'S OPEN CUP FINAL MATCH TO SEE THEM THERE. AND IT'S ACTUALLY THE SECOND TIME THAT'S HAPPENED DOWN IN CINCINNATI REDS GAME LAST YEAR. THEY WERE THERE AND I ATTENDED, AND THE ONLY NEGATIVE THING I'M NOTICING IS BOTH TIMES THE TEAM I'M THERE ROOTING FOR ENDED UP LOSING. SO HOPEFULLY THAT CHANGES IN THE FUTURE AND THAT WE DON'T MAKE IT TO ANY BENGALS GAMES WHILE THAT'S GOING ON. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, COUNCILMAN BURGER. YEAH I THINK IT WAS TO MR. CUNNINGHAM'S POINT. I THINK THEY WERE STRIPED ON SUNDAY. I THINK THE ROAD WAS STRIPED ON SUNDAY, WHICH WAS SURPRISING TO ME BECAUSE I YOU KNOW, I'M CRAZY. SO I DO DRIVE AROUND EVERYWHERE. I'M SURE SOMEONE'S GOING TO CLIP THAT PART OUT THOUGH. BUT ANYWAY, I WAS SURPRISED IT WAS STRIPED ON A SUNDAY, TO BE HONEST, BUT I THOUGHT THE SAME CONCERNS AS YOU KIND OF BROUGHT OUT. AND THEN, YOU KNOW, TO YOUR COMMENTS THAT YOU STATED

[02:15:05]

EARLIER, YOU KNOW, AS A PLANNER, THESE ARE ALL THE THINGS THAT I HAVE GRIPED ABOUT FOR A LONG TIME. AS YOU PROBABLY KNOW, THIS IS THE REASON WHY REALM WAS SO IMPORTANT TO HIRE. THIS IS THE REASON WHY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WAS SO IMPORTANT. AND THIS IS THE REASON WHY THE ZONING PART OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE REALM HAS TO BE PUT IN THE ZONING CODE. AND THIS IS THE REASON WHY MISS SHARP IS SITTING WHERE SHE IS, EAST FIFTH STREET IN FRONT OF MY HOUSE IS GOING TO LOOK TOTALLY DIFFERENT THAN ANY OTHER SECTION OF EAST FIFTH STREET, INCLUDING THE STREET LIGHTS. IT'S THE MAIN GATEWAY THROUGH OUR CITY, AND EVERY SECTION OF IT IS BUILT DIFFERENTLY. TO YOUR POINT, THE MAIN DRAG OF TOWN SHOULD HAVE OLD TREES, BURIED POWER LINES, BRICK SIDEWALKS, BEAUTIFUL VICTORIAN HOMES, AND IT SHOULD LINE THE STREETS. SO WHEN YOU DRIVE DOWN THE MAIN DRAG OF TOWN AND YOU GO TO THE UPTOWN, IT SHOULD BE BEAUTIFUL AWNINGS, BEAUTIFUL STOREFRONTS, PEOPLE WALKING AROUND. EVERYONE'S VISION OF A SMALL TOWN IS DIFFERENT, BUT THAT'S MY VISION. THERE IS NO REASON. IN 2026, WE HAVE NOT HAD A ZONING CODE THAT ENFORCED THAT LEVEL OF STANDARD INTEGRITY AND IDENTITY IN OUR HISTORICAL DISTRICT AND IN OUR COMMUNITY. BUT CHANGE IS HARD, AND WE DIDN'T HAVE THAT LEVEL OF THINKING SOMETIMES IN THE PAST. I'M NOT SAYING THAT. YEAH, THE BUCK LIES WITH US, BUT TO YOUR POINT, I SEE THE FRUSTRATIONS OUT THERE ON THE STREETS LIKE I WAS AT KROGER AND PEOPLE WERE JUST TALKING TO ME LIKE, YOU KNOW, BUT I'M THE.

YEAH. AND I'M THE MOST NOTICEABLE ONE, SO I GET IT. BUT, YOU KNOW, I JUST WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT THE COMMENTS THAT ARE MADE ARE NOT BEING HEARD. THEY'RE NOT THEY'RE BEING HEARD, THEY'RE BEING UNDERSTOOD. IT'S JUST GETTING EVERYBODY TO AGREE THAT WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO IS FOR THE BEST INTEREST OF ALL OF OUR COMMUNITY AND ALL OF OUR CITY. THERE'S ALWAYS GOING TO BE PEOPLE OUT THERE WHO ARE TRYING TO SABOTAGE WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO. BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY, ANYBODY WHO DRIVES AROUND OUR CITY STREETS HAS TO REALIZE WE CAN AND SHALL AND WILL DO BETTER THAN WHAT WE'RE CURRENTLY DOING BECAUSE WE HAVE TO. SO THOSE ARE JUST MY COMMENTS. SO THANK YOU FOR SHOWING UP. OKAY. THANK YOU, COUNCILMAN BURGER. JUST A FEW THINGS THAT I WANTED TO NOTE. FIRST, AGAIN, THANK YOU FOR STAYING THROUGH THE DURATION OF THIS MEETING. IT'S BEEN A FEW HOURS NOW SINCE WE'VE BEEN HERE. AND AS YOU AS CITIZENS COME TO ADDRESS US, YOU KNOW, WHEN DO YOU GET TO TALK TO US? I JUST WANT TO LET YOU KNOW I'M AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES. WE ALL HAVE OUR PHONE NUMBERS POSTED ONLINE. WE HAVE EMAILS AND I WILL NOT PRETEND TO BE PERFECT. BUT I DO MAKE GOOD. I LIKE TO BELIEVE THAT I MAKE EFFORT TO BE RESPONSIVE WHERE I CAN. AND THAT'S WHAT THE THE PROMISE THAT I MADE TO THE RESIDENTS OF MY WARD, BUT ALSO THE CITY AND HAVING GIVING ME THE HONOR TO SERVE UP HERE. SO PLEASE, LET'S TALK AND COMMITTED TO THAT. A COUPLE THINGS. LAST WEEK I HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO ATTEND THE DUBLIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY MEETING THEY HAD HAD LAST TUESDAY, AND IT WAS A VERY INTERESTING TO SEE THE WHAT IS GOING ON. AND IN ONE OF OUR NEIGHBORING MUNICIPALITIES AND SOME OF THE PLANS THAT THEY HAVE, IT'S VERY EXCITING FOR CENTRAL OHIO. SO I VERY MUCH ENJOYED THAT, AND I APPRECIATE THE INVITATION FROM THEIR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR.

A LOT OF MEMBERS, GOOD REPRESENTATION FROM UNION COUNTY. WE HAD. AND, CHIEF BROOKS, I'M GOING TO LEAN ON YOU FROM TO LEAN ON YOU FOR A MOMENT, BUT AT THE MENTAL HEALTH AND RECOVERY BOARD, YOU HAD ACCEPTED AN AWARD ON BEHALF OF. IF YOU COULD FILL IN THE BLANK FOR ME, I'D APPRECIATE IT. OFFICER AIMEE FINDLAY, OFFICER AIMEE FINDLAY AND THAT AWARD WAS FOR THE. I'M PUTTING YOU ON THE SPOT HERE. YOU HAVE THAT WRITTEN DOWN AND. WAS THAT PART OF YOUR ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT? I JUST WANT TO REPEAT THAT IF YOU COULD. OFFICER AIMEE FINDLAY RECEIVED THE UNION COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH AND RECOVERY BOARD'S POWER OF PARTNERSHIP AWARD IN RECOGNITION OF HER LEADERSHIP, COLLABORATIVE SPIRIT AND COMMITMENT TO STRENGTHENING PARTNERSHIPS ACROSS UNION COUNTY IN HER ROLE AS THE CRISIS INTERVENTION TEAM COORDINATOR. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR REPEATING THAT.

APPRECIATE. SO I HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO ATTEND, AS DID CHIEF BROOKS. BUT ASIDE FROM THAT AWARD AND CONGRATULATIONS TO THAT OFFICER. BUT ASIDE FROM THAT AWARD, THERE WERE A LOT OF GOOD SPEAKERS AT THAT EVENT. ONE IN PARTICULAR, HIS FIRST NAME WAS LUKE. I COULDN'T REMEMBER HIS LAST NAME, BUT HE JUST SHARED THE THE CHALLENGES THAT WE AS A SOCIETY FACE. FOR THOSE HAVING TO DEAL WITH MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES, MENTAL HEALTH CRISES, AND HOW WE AS A COMMUNITY CAN HELP IN IN THOSE MOMENTS AND IN IN CRISES AND INTERVENE WHERE IT YOU KNOW,

[02:20:05]

WHERE IT IS NEEDED. VERY ENJOYABLE EVENT LAST WEEK AND THEN I WAS ALSO ABLE LASTLY TO ATTEND THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY DINNER. THEY HAVE A BI ANNUAL DINNER. LAST WEEK I LEARNED ABOUT SOME OF THE RICH HISTORY OF UNION COUNTY. THEY HAD CLOSED THAT EVENING WITH A NUMBER OF FROM THE 1800S, ACCOUNTS OF VARIOUS. IT WAS. IT WAS A HALLOWEEN OR SPOOKY TYPE THEME, BUT VARIOUS MURDERS THAT HAD TAKEN PLACE IN THE 1800S. SO IT WAS VERY INTERESTING TO HEAR THAT AND VERY MUCH INTERESTED TO LEARN JUST MORE ABOUT OUR HISTORY. AND IT IT WAS A LEARNING OPPORTUNITY FOR ME. SO VERY APPRECIATIVE OF OF THAT. AND ALL THE BEST TO THE

[Additional Item]

UNION COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY. WITH THAT, WE NOW HAVE POTENTIAL TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO CONSIDER CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION RELATED TO SPECIFIC BUSINESS STRATEGY OF AN APPLICANT FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE THAT INVOLVES PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, AND THAT WOULD REQUIRE A MOTION AND A SECOND. SO MOVED. I'LL SECOND. ROLL CALL, MR. HUNTER. YES. MRS. PACKAGE. YES. MR. REAMS. YES. MRS. YOUNG. YES. MR. BORDNER. YES. BORDNER. YES.

MR. WOLF. YES. MR. BURGER YES. SEVEN YES.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.

Oct 26, 2026 City Council

Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download Selected Item